Gender-Responsive Probation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning from Justice-Involved Women and Their Supervising Officers

References

• Ahlin, E. G., Hagen, C. A., Harmon, M. A., & Crosse, S. (2016). Kiosk reporting among probations in the United States. The Prison Journal, 96(5), 688–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516662628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, G. C., Ahlman, L., Gill, C., Sherman, L. W., Kurtz, E., & Malvestuto, R. (2010). Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(2), 159–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9094-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, G. C., Hyatt, J. M., Ahlman, L. C., & Kent, D. T. L. (2012). The effects of low-intensity supervision for lower-risk probationers: Updated results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.679874
   Google Scholar
• Belisle, L., & Salisbury, E. J. (2021). Starting with girls and their resilience in mind: Reconsidering risk/needs assessments for system-involved girls. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(5), 596–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820983859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belisle, L., & Salisbury, E. J. (2022). Community corrections officers as change agents. In E. J. Salisbury & P. Van Voorhis (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (10th ed., pp. 44–55). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., & Covington, S. (2000). Gendered-justice: Programming for women in correctional settings [Paper presentation]. The American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.nicic.gov/Library/018017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–1014. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, T., & Jackson, E. (2022). Women’s pathways: Replication and generalizability across state prison systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(9), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221096667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflective thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
   Google Scholar
• CDC. (2022a). CDC museum COVID-19 timeline. https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html#Mid-2020
   Google Scholar
• CDC. (2022b). Interim guidance on management of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in correctional and detention facilities. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/correction-detention/guidance-correctional-detention.html
   Google Scholar
• Cobbina, J. E. (2010). Reintegration success and failure: Factors impacting reintegration among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(3), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509671003666602
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. http://www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. H., & Starr, V. L. (2021). Survey of U.S. probation and pretrial services agencies’ adaptations to COVID-19. Federal Probation, 85(1), 14–23. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/85_1_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cornacchione, J., & Smith, S. W. (2017). Female offenders’ multiple goals for engaging in desired communication with their probation/parole officers. Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.117694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacchione, J., Smith, S. W., Morash, M., Northcutt Bohmert, M., Cobbina, J. E., & Kashy, D. A. (2016). An exploration of female offenders’ memorable messages from probation and parole officers on the self-assessment of behavior from a control theory perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44(1), 60–77. http://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2015.1116705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosse, S., Harmon, M. A., Claus, R. E., Bauer, E. L., Hagen, C. A., & Ahlin, E. M. (2016). Final summary overview multi-jurisdiction research on automated reporting systems: Kiosk supervision. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/250173.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daly, R., Deary, M., Lawson, V., & Nagarajan, P. (2021). Pathways to success on probation: Lessons learning from the first phase of the reducing revocations challenge. CUNY Institute for State & Local Governance. https://islg.cuny.edu/resources/pathways-to-success-on-probation
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. T., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2009). Discounting women: Context matters in risk and need assessment. Critical Criminology, 17(4), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9084-x
   Google Scholar
• Debus-Sherrill, S., Breno, A., Garcia, A., Clubb, A. C., Chavez, L. A., & Still, W. (2022). Probation under quarantine: The impact of COVID-19 on probation in Alameda county. Corrections, 7(5), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2022.2090029
   Google Scholar
• DeHart, D., & Lynch, S. (2021). Women’s and girls’ pathways through the criminal legal system: Addressing trauma, mental health, and marginalization. In C. Renzetti (Ed.), Cognella series on family and gender-based violence. Cognella Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Epperson, M. W., & Pettus-Davis, C. (Eds.). (2017). Smart decarceration: Achieving criminal justice transformation in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FCC. (2021). E-rate: Universal service program for schools and libraries. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/universal-service-program-schools-and-libraries-e-rate#:~:text=With%20funding%20from%20the%20Universal,to%20eligible%20schools%20and%20libraries
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, M., Applegarth, D. M., Martin, E., Adams, B., & Durose, M. (2021). Using data and science to understand the impact of COVID-19 on corrections. National Institute of Justice. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/using-data-and-science-understand-impact-covid-19-corrections
   Google Scholar
• Garwood, H. (2020). The evidence-informed case for OffenderLinkTM automated telephone reporting. Fieldware, LLC. https://fieldware.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Evidence-Informed-ATR-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gobeil, R., Blanchette, K., & Stewart, L. (2016). A meta-analytic review of correctional interventions for women offenders: Gender-neutral versus gender-informed approaches. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 43(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815621100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2019). The sexist algorithm. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering “gender” and risk assessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00549.x
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2016). A conceptual kaleidoscope: Contemplating ‘dynamic structural risk’ and an uncoupling of risk from need. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.111411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawks, L., Woolhandler, S., & McCormick, D. (2020). COVID-19 in prisons and jails in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(8), 1041–1042. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, N., Ezekwesili, A., Nunes, K., Gumbs, E., Haynes, M., & Swain, J. (2021). “Can you see my screen?” Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in telehealth. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 15(23). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-021-00685-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry, B. F. (2020). Social distancing and incarceration: Policy and management strategies to reduce COVID-19 transmission and promote health equity through decarceration. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 536–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120927318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilty, D. M., Gentry, M. T., McKean, A. J., Cowan, K. E., Lim, R. F., & Lu, F. G. (2020). Telehealth for rural diverse populations: Telebehavioral and cultural competencies, clinical outcomes and administrative approaches. MHealth, 6(20), 20–20. https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/2Fmhealth.2019.10.04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J., Adams, E. A., Morash, M., Smith, S. W., & Cobbina, J. E. (2017). Supportive messages female offenders receive from probation and parole officers about substance avoidance: Message perceptions and effects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(11), 1496–1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817723395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J., & Utada, C. (2018). Community supervision marked by racial and gender disparities. Pew Trusts. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/12/06/community-supervision-marked-by-racial-and-gender-disparities
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, B. A., Vermeer, M., Woods, D., Banks, D., Goodison, S. E., Russo, J., Barnum, J. D., Gourdet, C., Langton, L., Planty, M. G., Shelton, S. R., Sitar, S. I., & Witwer, A. R. (2021). Promising practices from community corrections organizations’ COVID-19 response: Ensuring safety in the community. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA108-4.html
   Google Scholar
• Jenner, B. M., & Myers, K. C. (2019). Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: A comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1512694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeble, D. (2021). Probation and parole in the United States, 2020. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahle, L. L., & Rosenbaum, J. (2021). What staff need to know: Using elements of gender-responsive programming to create safer environments for system-involved LGBTQ girls and women. Criminal Justice Studies, 34(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2020.1786281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinger, M. E., & Varpio, K. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide No. 131. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMasters, K., Delamater, P., Brinkley-Rubinstein, L., Edwards, J. K., Robinson, W. R., & Pence, B. (2023). Mass probation: Temporal and geographic correlation of county-level probation rates & mental health in North Carolina. SSM-Mental Health, 3, 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lovins, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Latessa, E. J., & Jonson, C. L. (2018). Probation officer as a coach: Building a new professional identity. Federal Probation, 82, 13–19. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/82_1_2_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders. Topics in Community Corrections, 3–8. http://caparc.org/uploads/3/5/2/7/35276822/high_low_risk_article.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, M., Edwards, E., Dright, A., Gilliam, L., Brown, A., Levy, M., Sikka, N., Siegel, M., Criss, V., Chauncey Watson, C., Machtinger, E., & Kuo, I. (2020). Development of a telehealth intervention to promote care-seeking among transgender women of color in Washington, DC. Public Health Nursing, 37(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K. D., & Zettler, H. R. (2022). COVID-19ʹs impact on probation professionals’ views about their roles and the future of probation. Criminal Justice Review, 47(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168211052876
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity on semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, e1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2019). Resisting mass supervision: Reform and abolition. In P. Carlen & L. Ayres Fanca (Eds.), Justice alternatives (pp. 88–102). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Messina, N. P., & Calhoun, S. (2021). An experimental study of a peer-facilitated violence prevention program for women in prison. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16130–NP16156. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211022063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina, N. P., & Esparza, P. (2022). Poking the bear: The inapplicability of the RNR principles for justice-involved women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 140, 108798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, S. (2005). The promise of appreciative inquiry as an interview tool for field research. Development in Practice, 15(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500042094
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? (Working Paper Series, Work in Progress No. 33). Stone Center.
   Google Scholar
• Morash, M. (2010). Women on probation and parole. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morash, M., Kashy, D. A., Smith, S. W., & Cobbina, J. E. (2015). The effects of probation or parole agent relationship style and women offenders’ criminogenic needs on offenders’ responses to supervision interactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814551602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morash, M., Kashy, D. A., Smith, S. W., & Cobbina, J. E. (2016). The connection of probation/parole officer actions to women offenders’ recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815626490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttitt, S., Vigneault, R., & Loewen, L. (2004). Integrating telehealth into Aboriginal healthcare: The Canadian experience. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 63(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v63i4.17757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2021). Limiting incarceration for technical violations of probation and parole. https://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/limiting-incarceration-for-technical-violations-of-probation-and-parole.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Northcutt Bohmert, M., & DeMaris, A. (2018). Cumulative disadvantage and the role of transportation in community supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 64(8), 1033–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716686344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRCJIW. (2016). Fact sheet on justice involved women in 2016. https://cjinvolvedwomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Fact-Sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ogeden, T. G., & Horrocks, C. (2001). Pagers, digital audio, and kiosk: Officer assistants. Federal Probation, 65(2), 35–37. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/65_2_7_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliffe, J. L., Kelly, M. T., Gonzalez Montaner, G., & Yu Ko, W. F. (2021). Zoom interviews: Benefits and concessions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudekerk, B., & Kaeble, D. (2021). Probation and parole in the United States, 2019. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/ppus19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pamela, H. A. (2006). Culturally responsive cognitive-behavioral therapy: Assessment, practice, and supervision. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S. (2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law & Policy, 35(1–2), 52–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S. (2016). Possibilities and contestation in twenty-first-century us criminal justice downsizing. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085046
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S. (2017). Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society, 19(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745166491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, M. S. (2020). Mass probation from micro to macro: Tracing the expansion and consequences of community supervision. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J., Westaby, C., Ainslie, S., & Fowler, A. (2021). ‘I don’t like this job in my front room’: Practicing probation in the COVID-19 pandemic. Probation Journal, 68(4), 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505211050867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, K., Hyatt, J. M., & Link, N. W. (2022). Implementing reforms in community corrections: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. Crime & Delinquency, 68(8), 1223–1246. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211061722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prison Police Initiative. (2022). The most significant criminal justice policy changes from the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/virus/virusresponse.html
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, C. R., & Grumbach, G. (2015). Critical race theory and the limits of relational theory in social work with women. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 24(3), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2015.1062673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J. (2019, November). Actuarial malpractice and responsible risk assessment [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., Belisle, L. A., & Cowell Mercier, M. (2023). Arandomized controlled trial of gender-responsive community supervision using amixed-methods approach. Manuscript in progress.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., Boppre, B., & Kelly, B. (2016). Gender-responsive risk and need assessment: Implications for justice-involved women. In F. S. Taxman (Ed.), Handbook on risk and need assessment: Theory and practice (Volume 1: Handbook Series sponsored by the Division on Corrections and Sentencing, American Society of Criminology) (pp. 220–243). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationer’s paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAMSHA. (2021). NNEDLearn implementation analysis: Evidence-based and culturally relevant behavioral health interventions in practice: Strategies and lessons learned from NNEDLearn. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/pep21-05-02-001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. J., & Koetzle, D. (2021). What the COVID-19 pandemic teaches about the essential practices of community corrections and supervision. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 48(9), 1300–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211019073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzapfel, B. (2020). Probation and parole officers are rethinking their rules as Coronavirus spreads. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/04/03/probation-and-parole-officers-are-rethinking-their-rules-as-coronavirus-spreads
   Google Scholar
• Servon, L., Esquier, A., & Tiley, G. (2021). Gender and financialization of the criminal justice system. Social Sciences, 10(11), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10110446
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2009). Doing qualitative research (Third ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Skeem, J., Monahan, J., & Lowenkamp, C. (2016). Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: The cost of treating women like men. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens-Martin, K., Oyewole, O., & Hipolito, C. (2014). Technical revocations of probation in one jurisdiction: Uncovering the hidden realities. Federal Probation, 78(3), 16–20. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/78_3_3_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stickels, J. W. (2007). A study of probation revocations for technical violations in Hays County, Texas, USA. Probation Journal, 54(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507073328
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2017). A guide to GPRA data collection using Trauma-informed interviewing skills.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2012). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tumperi, E. (2020). Tele-supervision and tele-work – Where do we go from here? CorrectTech. http://www.correcttech.com/blog/tele-work-tele-supervision-0
   Google Scholar
• UCJC. (2022). Women’s risk needs assessment. https://socialwork.utah.edu/research/ucjc/wrna/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P. (2012). On behalf of women offenders: Women’s place in the science of evidence-based practices (Vollmer Award Address). Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender-responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wormer, K. (2001). Counseling female offenders and victims: A strengths-based approach. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, J., Alward, L. M., Lockwood, A., & Bryson, S. (2020). Adaptations to COVID-19 in community corrections agencies across the United States. Victims & Offenders, 15(7–8), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1818153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, J., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Changes in the use of telehealth services and use of technology for communication in U.S. community supervision agencies since COVID-19. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 49(2), 1727–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221092976
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, J., & Taxman, F. S. (2018). Low risk offenders under probation supervision: Risk management and the risk-needs-responsivity framework. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 45(12), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818790299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolford, R. (2022). The stories of eight women managed by a community rehabilitation company during the Covid-19 pandemic. Probation Journal, 69(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505211041576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellowlees, P., Marks, S., Hilty, D., & Shore, J. H. (2008). Using e-Health to enable culturally appropriate mental healthcare in rural areas. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 14(5), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2007.0070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar