Valuation of fermentation residues from biogas stations

References

• Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T., and Zechmeister–Boltenstern, S. 2006. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 112:153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson, V. 2009. Closing the global energy and nutrient cycles through application of biogas residue to agricultural land–potential benefits and drawback. Energies 2:226–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., Mayr, H., Hopfner-Sixt, K., and Amon, T. 2009. Detailed monitoring of two biogas plants and mechanical solid–liquid separation of fermentation residues. J. Biotechnol. 142:56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, H., Qu, G. F., Ning, P., Xiong, X. F., Jia, L. J., Shi, Y. K., and Zhang, J. 2011. The resource utilization of anaerobic fermentation residue. Proc. Environ. Sci. 11:1092–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, W., and Drosg, B. 2013. Assessment of the state of the art of technologies for the processing of digestate residue from anaerobic digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 67:1984–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hašková, S. 2016. Holistic Assessment and Ethical Disputation on a New Trend in Solid Biofuels. Sci. Eng. Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9790-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J., and Harrison, M. D. 2004. U.S. Patent No. 6,797,050. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Igliński, B., Buczkowski, R., and Cichosz, M. 2015. Biogas production in Poland—Current state, potential and perspectives. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 50:686–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insam, H., Gómez-Brandón, M., Ascher, J. 2015. Manure–based biogas fermentation residues–Friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol. Biochem. 84:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolář, L., Borová-Batt, J., Peterka, J., Kužel, S. 2011. Utilisation of Waste from Digesters for Biogas Production. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo, P., and Gyuricza, C. S. 2004. Effect of the ridge tillage system on some selected soil physical properties in a maize monoculture. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 52:211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Losak, T., Zatloukalova, A., Szostkova, M., Hlusek, J., Fryc, J., and Vitez, T. 2011. Comparison of the effectiveness of digestate and mineral fertilizers on yields and quality of kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis (Czech Republic).
   Google Scholar
• Lošák, T., Hlušek, J., Válka, T., Elbl, J., Vítěz, T., Bělíková, H., and Von Bennewitz, E. 2016. The effect of fertilisation with digestate on kohlrabi yields and quality. Plant, Soil Environ. 62:274–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makádi, M., Tomócsik, A., and Orosz, V. 2012. Digestate: a new nutrient source–review. Energy 4:8–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mardoyan, A., and Braun, P. 2015. Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. Int. J. Green Energy 12:405–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J. 2012. Finding the optimal parameters for the steam explosion process of hay. Revista Técnica de la Facultad de Ingeniería. Universidad del Zulia 35:170–178.
   Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J. 2013. Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production. Ind. Crops Prod. 44:253–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J., Itoh, S., Higa, O., Kondo, Y., Ueno, M., Suwa, R., Tominaga, J., and Kawamitsu, Y. 2013. Enzymatic hydrolysis enhanced by pressure shockwaves opening new possibilities in Jatropha Curcas L. processing. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 88:1650–1653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J. 2014. Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 16:1821–1825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., and Vaníčková, R. 2014. Nutrient management in processing of steam exploded lignocellulose phytomass. Chem. Eng. Technol. 37:1945–1948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J. 2015. Economic analysis of the pressure shockwave disintegration process. Int. J. Green Energy 12:1232–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., and Vaníčková, R. 2015a. Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 17:549–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., and Vaníčková, R. 2015b. Processing of residues from biogas plants for energy purposes. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 17:797–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J., Maroušková, A., Myšková, K., Váchal, J., Vochozka, M., and Žák, J. 2015c. Techno–economic assessment of collagen casings waste management. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12:3385–3390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Žák, J., Vaníčková, R., Maroušková, A., Váchal, J., and Myšková, K. 2016. Polemics on ethical aspects in the compost business. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22:581–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., and Swift, M. J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, K., and Müller, T. 2012. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng. Life Sci. 12:242–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkoa, R. 2014. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 34:473–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pötsch, E. M., Pfundtner, E., and Much, P. 2004. Nutrient Content and hygienic properties of fermentation residues from agricultural biogas plants. Land use systems in grassland dominated regions. Proceedings of the 20th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Luzern, Switzerland, 21–24 June 2004. 9:1055–1057.
   Google Scholar
• Rehl, T., and Müller, J. 2011. Life cycle assessment of biogas digestate processing technologies. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 56:92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W., Ma, H., Wang, Q., Li, J., and Ma, J. 2013. Thermal behavior and gaseous emission analysis during co–combustion of ethanol fermentation residue from food waste and coal using TG–FTIR. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 99:79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vochozka, M., Maroušková, A., Váchal, J., and Straková, J. 2016. Reengineering the paper mill waste management. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 18:323–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, E., Deumlich, D., and Kaupenjohann, M. 2016. Bioenergy maize and soil erosion—Risk assessment and erosion control concepts. Geoderma 261:80–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, P. J., Koegel, R. G., Lorenz, L. F., Frihart, C. R., and Kenealy, W. R. 2005. Wood adhesives prepared from lucerne fiber fermentation residues of Ruminococcus albus and Clostridium thermocellum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66:635–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkler, D., Peters, A., Kaupenjohann, M. 2014. Elemental composition of biogas residues: variability and alteration during anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy 67:89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar