4-E analysis of heavy oil-based IGCC

References

• Aljundi, I. H. 2009. Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan. Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (2–3):324–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allevi, C., and G. Collodi. 2000. The sarlus IGCC project construction overview and commissioning experience. Paper read at 16th World Petroleum Congress, Calgary, Canada, June 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ameri, M., P. O. U. R. I. A. Ahmadi, and S. H. O. A. I. B. Khanmohammadi. 2008. Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant. International Journal of Energy Research 32 (2):175–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabkhalaj, A., H. Ghassemi, and R. S. Markadeh. 2016. Thermodynamic evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle: Comparison between high‐ash and low‐ash coals. International Journal of Energy Research 40 (12):1638–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, A., M. Hartwich, A. Richter, and B. Meyer. 2018. Numerical and experimental study of heavy oil gasification in an entrained-flow reactor and the impact of the burner concept. Fuel Processing Technology 169:58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejan, A., and G. Tsatsaronis. 1996. Thermal design and optimization. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Birol, F. 2017. Key world energy statistics. Paris, France: IEA Publications, International Energy Agency, rue de la Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. B. 2011. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants, Volume 3a: Low rank coal to electricity. IGCC Cases. DOE/NETL-2010-1399, Final Report, DOE.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrenkämper, G., D. Reiermann, G. Höhne, and U. Lingner. 2004. Technology evolution of the proven gas turbine models V94. 2 and V84. 2 for new UNITS and service retrofits. Siemens Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., H. Boshu, G. Ding, S. Liangbin, and Z. Duan. 2017. Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes. Energy 140:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, J., S. Zhang, Y. Yang, B. Wang, and Y. Xiao. 2015. Performance prediction of a transport gasifier–based IGCC system with CO 2 capture under uncertainties. Journal of Energy Engineering 142 (3):04015035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collodi, G. 2000. Operation of ISAB energy and sarlux IGCC projects. Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cormos, A.-M., C. Dinca, and C.-C. Cormos. 2015. Multi-fuel multi-product operation of IGCC power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Applied Thermal Engineering 74:20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domenichini, R., M. Gallio, and A. Lazzaretto. 2010. Combined production of hydrogen and power from heavy oil gasification: Pinch analysis, thermodynamic and economic evaluations. Energy 35:2184–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draucker, L., R. Bhander, B. Bennet, T. Davis, R. Eckard, W. Ellis, J. Kauffman, J. Littlefield, A. Malone, and R. Munson. 2012. Life cycle analysis: Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant, DOE/NETL-2012/1551. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Eia, U. S. 2010. US energy information administration.“Assumptions to the annual energy outlook 2011. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• 2017. “establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under directive 2010/75/EU of the European parliament and of the council, for large combustion plants“. COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/1442.
   Google Scholar
• S&P Global Platt. 2016. EUROPEAN MARKETSCAN. 48(211). Available from https://www.platts.com/im.platts.content/productsservices/products/euromktscan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• 2018. Eurostat [cited march 2018]. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Electricity_price_statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassemi, H., S. M. Mostafavi, and R. Shahsavan-Markadeh. 2016. Modeling of high-ash coal gasification in an entrained-flow gasifier and an IGCC plant. Journal of Energy Engineering 142 (4):04015052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffrida, A., S. Moioli, M. C. Romano, and G. Lozza. 2016. Lignite‐fired air‐blown IGCC systems with pre‐combustion CO2 capture. International Journal of Energy Research 40 (6):831–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, M. D., L. Beck, P. Barfield, R. D. Willis, M. S. Landis, R. K. Stevens, W. Preston, and Y. Dong. 2009. Physical and chemical characterization of residual oil-fired power plant emissions. Energy & Fuels 23 (5):2544–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S. 2016. Economic indicators. New York, NY: CEPCI.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, M. M., and S. Lee. 1996. Integrated gasification combined cycle—A review of IGCC technology. Energy Sources 18 (5):537–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jradi, M., and S. Riffat. 2014. Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 32:396–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampa, M., and E. Castanas. 2008. Human health effects of air pollution. Environmental Pollution 151 (2):362–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko, S. 2015. Integrated coal gasification combined cycle: A reality, not a dream. Journal of Energy Engineering 142 (2):E4015018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karg, J., G.Haupt, and G. Zimmermann. 2000. Optimized IGCC cycles for future applications. Paper read at Proceedings of the gasification technologies conference, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. A., and F. L. Alvarado. 1992. EES: Engineering equation solver for the Microsoft Windows operating system. Middleton, WI: F-Chart Software.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk, B., C. Kowalczyk, R. M. Rolf, and K. Badyda. 2014. Model of an ANSALDO V94. 2 gas turbine from lublin wrotków combined heat and power plant using gatecycle (TM) software. Journal of Power Technologies 94 (3):190.
   Google Scholar
• Kunze, C., and H. Spliethoff. 2010. Modelling of an IGCC plant with carbon capture for 2020. Fuel Processing Technology 91 (8):934–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C., H. H. Lee, Y. J. Joo, C. H. Lee, and O. Min. 2014. Process simulation and thermodynamic analysis of an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) plant with an entrained coal gasifier. Energy 64:58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., C. Song, and V. Subramani. 2010. Hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Manzanares-Papayanopoulos, E., M. Fernández-Montiel, J. A. Altamirano-Bedolla, A. Mani-González, and A. Arriola-Medellín. 2008. A comparative study of the gasification technology versus traditional combustion technologies for power generation in Mexico. Paper read at Conference Proceedings AIChE Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Meratizaman, M., S. Monadizadeh, M. Sardasht, and M. Amidpour. 2015a. Techno economic and environmental assessment of using gasification process in order to mitigate the emission in the available steam power cycle. Energy 83:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meratizaman, M., S. Monadizadeh, A. Ebrahimi, H. Akbarpour, and M. Amidpour. 2015b. Scenario analysis of gasification process application in electrical energy-freshwater generation from heavy fuel oil, thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40 (6):2578–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meratizaman, M., S. Monadizadeh, O. Pourali, and M. Amidpour. 2015c. High efficient-low emission power production from low BTU gas extracted from heavy fuel oil gasification, introduction of IGCC-SOFC process. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 23:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2017. National Iranian oil refining and distribution company, statistics 2014 [cited February 2017]. Available from http://www.niordc.ir.
   Google Scholar
• Oskunejad, M. M. 2006. Engineering economic. Tehran, Iran: Amirkabir University.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, M., and A. Caouette. 2007. Heavy fuel oil consumption in Canada, Ottawa. Canada: Analytical Paper Statistics no. 11-621-MIE — No. 062.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. S., K. D. Timmerhaus, R. E. West, K. Timmerhaus, and R. West. 1968. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. Vol. 4. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Promes, E. J. O., T. Woudstra, L. Schoenmakers, V. Oldenbroek, A. Thallam Thattai, and P. V. Aravind. 2015. Thermodynamic evaluation and experimental validation of 253MW integrated coal gasification combined cycle power plant in Buggenum, Netherlands. Applied Energy 155:181–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, W. G., D. C. Alpern, and M. R. Walker. 2004. Deploying IGCC in this decade with 3 party covenant financing. Citeseer, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Taillon, J., and R. E. Blanchard. 2015. Exergy efficiency graphs for thermal power plants. Energy 88:57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2018. Trading economics [cited march 2018]. Available from https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/interest-rate. Aspen Plus. Aspen Technology Inc
   Google Scholar
• van der Ham, L. V., and S. Kjelstrup. 2010. Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes. Energy 35:4731–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., and G. J. Stiegel. 2016. Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC technologies). Sawston, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar