Transient simulation and modeling of photovoltaic-PEM water electrolysis

References

• Abdin, Z., C. J. Webb, and E. MacA Gray. 2015. Modelling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40 (39):13243–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubras, F., J. Deseure, -J.-J. A. Kadjo, I. Dedigama, J. Majasan, B. Grondin-Perez, J.-P. Chabriat, and D. J. L. Brett. 2017. Two-dimensional model of low-pressure PEM electrolyser: Two-phase flow regime, electrochemical modelling and experimental validation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (42):26203–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbir, F. 2005. PEM electrolysis for production of hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Solar Energy 78 (5):661–69. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2004.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, M. S. 2014. Hybrid clean energy technologies for power generation from sub-bituminous coals: A case of 250 MW unit. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 33 (1):35–48. doi:10.1080/14786451.2011.631011.
   Google Scholar
• Carmo, M., D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel, and D. Stolten. 2013. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38 (12):4901–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbertaldo, P., S. L. G. Aláez, and S. Campanari. 2017. Zero-dimensional dynamic modeling of PEM electrolyzers. Energy Procedia 142:1468–73. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.594.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, N. V., M. D. Mann, and H. Salehfar. 2008. Semiempirical model based on thermodynamic principles for determining 6kW proton exchange membrane electrolyzer stack characteristics. Journal of Power Sources 185 (2):1348–53. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Soto, W., S. A. Klein, and W. A. Beckman. 2006. Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance. Solar Energy 80 (1):78–88. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2005.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, J. H. 1990. Detailed modelling of photovoltaic system components. Master thesis, University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa-López, M., C. Darras, P. Poggi, R. Glises, P. Baucour, A. Rakotondrainibe, … P. Serre-Combe. 2018. Modelling and experimental validation of a 46 kW PEM high pressure water electrolyzer. Renewable Energy 119:160–73. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriev, S. A., V. I. Porembsky, and V. N. Fateev. 2006. Pure hydrogen production by PEM electrolysis for hydrogen energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2):171–75. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. W., E. Hernández-Pacheco, M. Mann, and H. Salehfar. 2005. Semiempirical Model for Determining PEM Electrolyzer Stack Characteristics. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology 3 (2):220–23. doi:10.1115/1.2174072.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. A., W. A. Beckman, J. W. Mitchell, J. A. Duffie, and T. L. Freeman. 2006. TRNSYS 17 a transient system simulation program. University of Wisconsin, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoy, R. L., C. T. Bowen, and D. J. LeRoy. 1980. The thermodynamics of aqueous water electrolysis. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 127 (9):1954–62. doi:10.1149/1.2130044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, B., B. Alli, and B. Ahmed. 2016. Using the hydrogen for sustainable energy storage: Designs, modeling, identification and simulation membrane behavior in PEM system electrolyser. Journal of Energy Storage 7:270–85. doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, U., S. Walker, M. Fowler, and A. Elkamel. 2016. Power-to-gas in a demand-response market. International Journal of Environmental Studies 73 (3):390–401. doi:10.1080/00207233.2016.1165479.
   Google Scholar
• Ruuskanen, V., J. Koponen, K. Huoman, A. Kosonen, M. Niemelä, and J. Ahola. 2017. PEM water electrolyzer model for a power-hardware-in-loop simulator. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (16):10775–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartory, M., E. Wallnöfer-Ogris, P. Salman, T. Fellinger, M. Justl, A. Trattner, and M. Klell. 2017. Theoretical and experimental analysis of an asymmetric high pressure PEM water electrolyser up to 155 bar. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (52):30493–508. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifian, S., and M. Harasek. 2015. Dynamic simulation of hydrogen generation from renewable energy sources. Chemical Engineering Transactions 45:409–14. doi:10.3303/CET1545069.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva Kumar, S., S. U. B. Ramakrishna, B. Rama Devi, and V. Himabindu. 2018. Phosphorus-doped graphene supported palladium (Pd/PG) electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in PEM water electrolysis. International Journal of Green Energy 15 (10):558–67. doi:10.1080/15435075.2018.1508468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Spanish electrlcity system: preliminary report. Accessed Jun 2018. http://www.ree.es/en/statistical-data-of-spanish-electrical-system/annual-report/spanish-electricity-system-preliminary-report-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tijani, A. S., and A. A. Rahim. 2016. Numerical modeling the effect of operating variables on Faraday efficiency in PEM electrolyzer. Procedia Technology 26:419–27. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.054.
   Google Scholar