Effect of seed sludge on the startup of biohydrogen producing reactor with mixed strains of cellulose biomass

References

• APHA. 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th ed. Washington D C: American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ausiello, A., L. Micoli, M. Turco, G. Toscano, C. Florio, and D. Pirozzi. 2017. Biohydrogen production by dark fermentation of Arundo donax using a new methodology for selection of H2-producing bacteria. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (52):30599–612. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakonyi, P., G. Buitrón, I. Valdez-Vazquez, N. Nemestóthy, and K. Bélafi-Bakó. 2017. A novel gas separation integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of self-generated biogas recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation. Applied Energy 190:813–23. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., V. G. Jm, R. Zoetemeyer, and A. Breure. 1984. Main characteristics and stoichiometric aspects of acidogenesis of soluble carbohydrate containing wastewater. Process Biochemistry 19:228–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessì, P., E. Porca, N. R. Waters, A. M. Lakaniemi, G. Collins, and P. N. L. Lens. 2018. Thermophilic versus mesophilic dark fermentation in xylose-fed fluidised bed reactors: Biohydrogen production and active microbial community. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (11):5473–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W. Q., J. Ding, C. Chen, G. L. Cao, X. J. Zhou, and N. Q. Ren. 2013a. Accelerated startup of hydrogen production expanded granular sludge bed with L-cysteine supplementation. Energy 60:94–98. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W. Q., S. Yang, J. W. Pang, J. Ding, X. J. Zhou, X. Feng, H. Zheng, and N. Q. Ren. 2013b. Application of low frequency ultrasound to stimulate the bio-activity of activated sludge for enhanced hydrogen production as inoculums. RSC Advances 3:21848–55. doi:10.1039/c3ra41723a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. C., Y. Dai, Y. X. Bai, Y. H. Li, Y. T. Fan, and H. W. Hou. 2014. Co–Producing hydrogen and methane from higher concentration of corn stalk by combining hydrogen fermentation and anaerobic digestion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39:14204–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, W., Y. Hu, S. Li, Q. Nie, H. Zhao, and J. Tang. 2016. Effect of organic loading rate on dark fermentative hydrogen production in the continuous stirred tank reactor and continuous mixed immobilized sludge reactor from waste pastry hydrolysate. Waste Management (New York, NY) 58:335–40. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, P., E. B. G. Kana, and S. Schmidt. 2017. Can artificial neural network and response surface methodology reliably predict hydrogen production and cod removal in an uasb bioreactor? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (30):18875–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., H. H. Ngo, W. Guo, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Guo, S. W. Chang, D. D. Nguyen, and J. Wang. 2018. Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy. Renewable Energy 129:754–68. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirli, B., and I. K. Kapdan. 2016. Selection of microorganism immobilization particle for dark fermentative biohydrogen production by repeated batch operation. Renewable Energy 87:697–702. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisaalita, W. S., and K. L. Pinder. 1987. Acidogenic fermentation of lactose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 30:88–95. doi:10.1002/bit.260300113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, R., J. Cheng, and J. D. Murphy. 2018. Inhibition of thermochemical treatment on biological hydrogen and methane co-production from algae-derived glucose/glycine. Energy Conversion & Management 158:201–09. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., C. Zhang, L. Wang, J. He, B. Li, Y. Zhang, and X.-H. Xing. 2015. Effects of furan derivatives on biohydrogen fermentation from wet steam-exploded cornstalk and its microbial community. Bioresource Technology 175:152–59. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maaroff, R. M., J. M. Jahim, A. M. Azahar, P. M. Abdul, M. S. Masdar, D. Nordin, and M. A. A. Nasir. 2019. Biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by two stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactor(ASBR) system for better utilization of carbon sources in POME. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (6):3395–406. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.013 44 3395-3406
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Atiqueuzzaman, K., H. H. Ngo, W. Guo, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Guo, S. W. Chang, D. D. Nguyen, and J. Wang. 2018. Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy. Renewable Energy 129:754-768. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.029
   Google Scholar
• Nkemka, V. N., B. Gilroyed, J. Yanke, R. Gruninger, D. Vedres, T. Mcallister, and X. Hao. 2015. Bioaugmentation with an anaerobic fungus in a two-stage process for biohydrogen and biogas production using corn silage and cattail. Bioresource Technology 185:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. C. D. M., M. S. D. Santos, L. M. S. Brandão, I. T. F. D. Resende, I. M. Leo, E. S. Morillo, R. M. N. Yerga, J. L. G. Fierro, S. Egues, and R. T. Figueiredo. 2017. The effect of cellulose loading on the photoactivity of cellulose-TiO 2 hybrids for hydrogen production under simulated sunlight. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42:28747–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachiega, R., I. K. Sakamoto, M. B. Varesche, R. R. Hatanaka, J. E. D. Oliveira, and S. I. Maintinguer. 2018. Obtaining and characterization of mesophilic bacterial consortia from tropical sludges applied on biohydrogen production. Waste & Biomass Valorization 5:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Palomobriones, R., E. Trably, N. E. LópezLozano, L. B. Celis, H. O. MéndezAcosta, N. Bernet, and E. Razo-Flores. 2018. Hydrogen metabolic patterns driven by clostridium-streptococcus community shifts in a continuous stirred tank reactor. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology 102 (5):2465–75. doi:10.1007/s00253-018-8737-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A. K., A. Debroy, S. Sharma, R. Saini, A. Mathur, R. Gupta, and D. K. Tuli. 2015. Biohydrogen production from a novel alkalophilic isolate clostridium sp iodb-o3. Bioresource Technology 175 (175):291–97. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phanduang, O., S. Lunprom, A. Salakkam, and A. Reungsang. 2017. Anaerobic solid-state fermentation of bio-hydrogen from microalgal Chlorella sp biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42:9650–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, N., D. Zhao, X. Chen, and Z. Li. 2002. Mechanism and controlling strategy of the production and accumulation of propionic acid for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Science in China(Series B) 45:319–27. doi:10.1360/02yb9041.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, N., T. Xie, and D. Xing. 2009. Composition of extracellular polymeric substances influences the autoaggregation capability of hydrogen-producing bacterium Ethanoligenens harbinense. Bioresou Technol 100:5109–13. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salma, A. A. R., D. Kubendran, M. Yuvarani, D. Thiruselvi, T. Amudha, P. Karthik, and S. Sivanesan. 2018. Enhanced biohydrogen production from leather fleshing waste co-digested with tannery treatment plant sludge using anaerobic hydrogenic batch reactor. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization & Environmental Effects 40 (5):586–93. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1435754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaterzadeh, M., and S. A. Ataei. 2017. The effects of temperature, initial pH, and glucose concentration on biohydrogen production from Clostridium acetobutylicum. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 39 (11):1118–23. doi:10.1080/15567036.2017.1297875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivagurunathan, P., G. Kumar, T. Kobayashi, X. Kaiqin, S.-H. Kim, D. D. Nguyen, and S. W. Chang. 2018. Co-digestion of untreated macro and microalgal biomass for biohydrogen production: Impact of inoculum augmentation and microbial insights. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43:11484–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, N., P. K. Mishra, D. Kushwaha, M. Srivastava, P. K. Mishra, P. W. Ramteke, and P. K. Mishra. 2017. Efficient dark fermentative hydrogen production from enzyme hydrolyzed rice straw by clostridium pasteurianum (mtcc116). Bioresource Technology 238:552–58. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, S., Z. Lei, G. Lingfang, L. Wenzong, W. Guofeng, W. Jieting, and A. Wang. 2018. Enhanced biohydrogen production from nutrient-free anaerobic fermentation medium with edible fungal pretreated rice straw. RSC Advances 8 (41):22924–30. doi:10.1039/C8RA03361G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. Y., Y. Tao, D. W. Gao, G. Liu, C. H. Chen, N. Q. Ren, J. B. van Lier, and M. de Kreuk. 2015. Microbial population dynamics in response to increasing loadings of pre-hydrolyzed pig manure in an expanded granular sludge bed. Water Research 87:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, S., X. Qingli, L. Lifang, and Y. Yongjie. 2017. Hydrogen production by glycerol reforming in a fixed-bed reactor. Energy Sources. Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 39 (24):2195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, D., N. Ren, A. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Feng, and F. Ma. 2008. Continuous hydrogen production of auto-aggregative Ethanoligenens harbinense yuan-3 under non-sterile condition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33:1489–95. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.09.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanan, Y., and W. Jianlong. 2018. Pretreatment of macroalgal, laminaria japonica, by combined microwave-acid method for biohydrogen production. Bioresource Technology 268:52–59. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Y. Bai, Y. Fan, and H. Hou. 2016. Improved bio-hydrogen production from glucose by adding a specific methane inhibitor to microbial electrolysis cells with a double anode arrangement. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 122 (4):488–93. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.03.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziganshin, A. M., T. Schmidt, Z. Lv, J. Liebetrau, H. H. Richnow, S. Kleinsteuber, and M. Nikolausz. 2016. Reduction of the hydraulic retention time at constant high organic loading rate to reach the microbial limits of anaerobic digestion in various reactor systems. Bioresource Technology 217:62–71. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoetemeyer, R. J., J. C. van Den Heuvel, and A. Cohen. 1982. pH influence on acidogenic dissimilation of glucose in an anaerobic digestor. Water Research 16:303–11. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(82)90190-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar