A weight coefficient distribution method based on quantile impact value for modeling low calorific value in coal-fired power plants

References

• Akay, M. F. 2009. Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2):3240–47. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkaya, A. V. 2009. Proximate analysis based multiple regression models for higher heating value estimation of low rank coals. Fuel Processing Technology 90 (2):165–70. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amjady, N., and F. Keynia. 2009. Day-ahead price forecasting of electricity markets by a new feature selection algorithm and cascaded neural network technique. Energy Conversion and Management 50 (12):2976–82. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrés, J. M., and M. T. Bona. 2006. ASTM clustering for improving coal analysis by near-infrared spectroscopy. Talanta 70 (4):711–19. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2006.05.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, C., W.-C. Yeh, Y. Y. Chung, and S.-L. Liu. 2010. Feature selection with intelligent dynamic swarm and rough set. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (10):7026–32. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bona, M. T., and J. M. Andrés. 2007. Coal analysis by diffuse reflectance near-infrared spectroscopy: Hierarchical cluster and linear discriminant analysis. Talanta 72 (4):1423–31. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2007.01.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelgani, S. C., J. C. Hower, E. Jorjani, S. Mesroghli, and A. H. Bagherieh. 2008. Prediction of coal grindability based on petrography, proximate and ultimate analysis using multiple regression and artificial neural network models. Fuel Processing Technology 89 (1):13–20. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. T., L. J. Xu, X. L. Li, and Z. S. Guo. 2012. Online coal calorific value prediction from mutiband coal/air combustion radiation characteristics. In 8th IEEE International Symposium on Instrumentation and Control Technology (ISICT), 309–13. London, UK: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dombi, G. W., P. Nandi, J. M. Saxe, A. M. Ledgerwood, and C. E. Lucas. 1995. Prediction of rib fracture injury outcome by an artificial neural network. The Journal of Trauma 39 (5):915–21. doi:10.1097/00005373-199511000-00016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng, Q., J. Zhang, X. Zhang, and S. Wen. 2015. Proximate analysis based prediction of gross calorific value of coals: A comparison of support vector machine, alternating conditional expectation and artificial neural network. Fuel Processing Technology 129:120–29. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haryono, D., A. Desiani, M. Huda, W. P. Taruno, M. R. Baidillah, and I. Maulana. 2015. Characterization of various types coal using capacitance measurement technique. Advanced Materials Research 1112:506–09. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1112.506.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, R., W. Qian, and Z. Zhou. 2012. Variable selection and coefficient estimation via composite quantile regression with randomly censored data. Statistics & Probability Letters 82 (2):308–17. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2011.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, Y., H. Oda, and C. Yokokawa. 1986. Temperature-dependence of propagation velocity of ultrasonic wave in coals. Fuel 65 (2):177–81. doi:10.1016/0016-2361(86)90004-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R. 2005. Quantile regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and G. Bassett. 1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46 (1):33–50. doi:10.2307/1913643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, E., and Y. Xia. 2014. An adaptive composite quantile approach to dimension reduction. Annals of Statistics 42 (4):1657–88. doi:10.1214/14-AOS1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. Z., W. Tao, T. Gao, H. Li, Y. H. Lu, and Z. M. Su. 2012. Improving the accuracy of DFT calculation for homolysis bond dissociation energies of Y-NO bond via back propagation neural network based on mean impact value. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities 33 (2):346–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., Y. Xiong, D. Yu, and X. Sun. 2005. Prediction of grindability with multivariable regression and neural network in Chinese coal. Fuel 84 (18):2384–88. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C. S., and D. A. Abernethy. 2005. On-line coal analysis using fast neutron-induced gamma-rays. Applied Radiation and Isotopes : Including Data, Instrumentation and Methods for Use in Agriculture, Industry and Medicine 63 (5):697–704. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Y. Zhou, H. Zhao, and Z. Shen 2008. On-line measurement method of water in coal based on microwave heating. Control Conference. Kunming, China : IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lv, Y., R. Zhang, W. Zhao, and J. Liu. 2014. Quantile regression and variable selection for the single-index model. Journal of Applied Statistics 41 (7):1565–77. doi:10.1080/02664763.2014.881786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder, A., R. Jain, P. Banerjee, and J. Barnwal. 2008. Development of a new proximate analysis based correlation to predict calorific value of coal. Fuel 87 (13):3077–81. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, S. S., and S. C. Chelgani. 2016. Estimation of coal gross calorific value based on various analyses by random forest method. Fuel 177:274–78. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesroghli, S., E. Jorjani, and S. Chehreh Chelgani. 2009. Estimation of gross calorific value based on coal analysis using regression and artificial neural networks. International Journal of Coal Geology 79 (1–2):49–54. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2009.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S. U., B. Jeevan Kumar, Y. P. Badhe, B. K. Sharma, S. Saha, S. Biswas, A. Chaudhury, S. S. Tambe, and B. D. Kulkarni. 2007. Estimation of gross calorific value of coals using artificial neural networks. Fuel 86 (3):334–44. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, M., Z. Fu, and F. Chen. 2016. Research on a feature selection method based on median impact value for modeling in thermal power plants. Applied Thermal Engineering 94:472–77. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, H., Y. Lu, J. Du, W. Du, X. Ye, X. Yu, J. Ma, J. Cheng, Y. Gao, Y. Cao, et al. 2012. Application of back propagation artificial neural network on genetic variants in adiponectin ADIPOQ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, and retinoid X receptor-α genes and type 2 diabetes risk in a chinese han population. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 14 (3):293–300. doi:10.1089/dia.2011.0071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, K. L., R. R. Gu, and H. P. Zhou. 2013. Prediction of coal calorific value based on a hybrid linear regression and support vector machine model. In Proceedings of The Eighth International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications (BIC-TA), edited by Z. Yin, L. Pan, and X. Fang, Vol. 212, 883–90. Germany: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. W., B. Y. Li, and J. L. Hu. 2009. Feature selection for human resource selection based on affinity propagation and SVM sensitivity analysis. In World congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC), 31–36. Coimbatore, India: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, M. H., Q. L. Zhou, Z. J. Yang, and J. G. Zheng. 2012. Prediction model of agricultural product’s price based on the improved BP neural network. In 2012 7th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 613–17. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., S. Jian, and J. Wang. 2017. Prediction models of calorific value of coal based on wavelet neural networks. Fuel 199:512–22. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and J. Yuan. 2015. Online identification of the lower heating value of the coal entering the furnace based on the boiler-side whole process models. Fuel 161:68–77. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerel, S., and T. Ersen. 2013. Prediction of the calorific value of coal deposit using linear regression analysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 35 (10):976–80. doi:10.1080/15567036.2010.514595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Y. Gong, Y. Li, X. Wang, J. Fan, L. Dong, W. Ma, W. Yin, and S. Jia. 2015. Development of a coal quality analyzer for application to power plants based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 113:167–73. doi:10.1016/j.sab.2015.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhongguang, F., Q. Minfang, and J. Yuan 2012. Regression forecast of main steam flow based on mean impact value and support vector regression. 2012 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Piscataway, NJ, IEEE, March 27–29, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., J. Meng, and B. Liu. 2017. Investigation into the pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic model of Zingiberis Rhizoma/Zingiberis Rhizoma Carbonisata and contribution to their therapeutic material basis using artificial neural networks. RSC Advances 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, H., and M. Yuan. 2008. Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. Annals of Statistics 36 (3):1108–26. doi:10.1214/07-AOS507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar