Detailed comparison of the methods used in the heat transfer coefficient and pressure loss calculation of shell side of shell and tube heat exchangers with the experimental results

References

• Ambekar, A. S., R. Sivakumar, N. Anantharaman, and M. Vivekenandan. 2016. CFD simulation study of shell and tube heat exchangers with different baffle segment configurations. Applied Thermal Engineering 108:999–1007. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and J. M. Pearce. 2011. Environmental and economic assessment of a greenhouse waste heat exchange. Journal of Cleaner Production 19 (13):1446–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam Bhutta, M. M., N. Hayat, M. H. Bashir, A. R. Khan, K. N. Ahmad, and S. Khan. 2012. CFD applications in various heat exchangers design: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering 32 (1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Benarji, N., C. Balaji, and S. P. Venkateshan. 2008. Optimum design of cross-flow shell and tube heat exchangers with low fin tubes. Heat Transfer Engineering 29 (10):864–72. doi:10.1080/01457630802125724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichkar, P., O. Dandgaval, P. Dalvi, R. Godase, and T. Dey. 2018. Study of shell and tube heat exchanger with the effect of types of baffles. Procedia Manufacturing 20:195–200. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.028.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, A. K. 2015. Process integration and heat exchanger networks. In Ludwig’s Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petrochemical Plants, 491–622. Texas: Gulf Professional Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, J. M., and J. F. Richardson. 2002. Coulson & Richardson’s Chemıcal Engineering. 4th edited by R. P. ChhabraBasavaraj Gurappa, Vol. 6. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dezfoli, A. R. A., and M. A. Mehrabian. 2009. The overall heat transfer characteristics of a double-pipe heat exchanger. Heat Transfer Research 40 (6):555–70. doi:10.1615/HeatTransRes.v40.i6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou, Y., S. Ohnishi, M. Fujii, T. Togawa, T. Fujita, H. Tanikawa, and L. Dong. 2018. Feasibility of developing heat exchange network between incineration facilities and industries in cities: Case of Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Journal of Cleaner Production 170:548–58. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, B. C., Y. L. He, K. Wang, and H. H. Zhu. 2017. Convective heat transfer of molten salt in the shell-and-tube heat exchanger with segmental baffles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 113:456–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Z., F. Shen, X. Cao, and J. Zhang. 2016. Comprehensive effects of baffle configuration on the performance of heat exchanger with helical baffles. Nuclear Engineering and Design 300:349–57. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiamsa-ard, S., K. Kiatkittipong, and W. Jedsadaratanachai. 2015. Heat transfer enhancement of TiO2/water nanofluid in a heat exchanger tube equipped with overlapped dual twisted-tapes. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 18 (3):336–50. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2015.01.008.
   Google Scholar
• El Maakoul, A., A. Laknizi, S. Saadeddine, M. El Metoui, A. Zaite, M. Meziane, and A. Ben Abdellah. 2016. Numerical comparison of shell-side performance for shell and tube heat exchangers with trefoil-hole, helical and segmental baffles. Applied Thermal Engineering 109:175–85. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fesanghary, M., E. Damangir, and I. Soleimani. 2009. Design optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers using global sensitivity analysis and harmony search algorithm. Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (5–6):1026–31. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, E. S., and V. Gnielinski. 1997. Pressure drop on the shell side of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with segmental baffles. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 36 (2):149–59. doi:10.1016/S0255-2701(96)04194-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami, M., D. D. Ganji, and M. Gorji-Bandpy. 2014. A review of different heat exchangers designs for increasing the diesel exhaust waste heat recovery. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 37:168–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidi, N., and N. Sadafi. 2019. An evaluation for spiral coil type earth-air heat exchanger at different climate conditions. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects 1–18. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1623942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapale, U. C., and S. Chand. 2006. Modeling for shell-side pressure drop for liquid flow in shell-and-tube heat exchanger. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (3–4):601–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, Y. A., and Ö. Güraras. 2004. A computer program for designing of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering 24 (13):1797–805. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayabaşı, E., M. Kolukısa, and H. Kurt. 2015. Static simulation of heat exchanger circuit of cumene production. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science 3 (2):26–32. doi:10.5505/apjes.2015.24865.
   Google Scholar
• Kayabasi, E., and H. Kurt. 2018. Simulation of heat exchangers and heat exchanger networks with an economic aspect. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 21 (1):70–76. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2018.02.006.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and P. Dinesha. 2018. Numerical study of the influence of design parameters on heat transfer in a helically coiled heat exchanger. Heat Transfer Research 49 (15):1431–43. doi:10.1615/HeatTransRes.v49.i15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppan, T. 2000. Heat exchanger design handbook. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis Group. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Y., Y. Li, S. Jing, C. Song, Y. Lyu, and F. Wang. 2017. Design and performance analysis of the novel shell-and-tube heat exchangers with louver baffles. Applied Thermal Engineering 125:870–79. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milcheva, I., F. Heberle, and D. Brüggemann. 2017. Modeling and simulation of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger for organic rankine cycle systems with double-segmental baffles by adapting the Bell-Delaware method. Applied Thermal Engineering 126:507–17. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei, M., H. Hajabdollahi, and H. Fadakar. 2017. Multi-objective optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchanger by constructal theory. Applied Thermal Engineering 125:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, D. K. 2016a. Application of firefly algorithm for design optimization of a shell and tube heat exchanger from economic point of view. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 102:228–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, D. K. 2016b. Gravitational search algorithm for economic optimization design of a shell and tube heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering 107:184–93. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozden, E., and I. Tari. 2010. Shell side CFD analysis of a small shell-and-tube heat exchanger. Energy Conversion and Management 51 (5):1004–14. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pačíska, T., V. Turek, Z. Jegla, and B. Kilkovský. 2014. Suitability of some commonly available software for unconventional condenser analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering 70 (2):1195–201. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.04.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, E., I. Kumar, J. B. Joshi, and N. K. Maheshwari. 2016. CFD simulations of shell-side flow in a shell-and-tube type heat exchanger with and without baffles. Chemical Engineering Science 143:314–40. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2016.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikshit, B., K. R. Spandana, V. Krishna, T. R. Seetharam, and K. N. Seetharamu. 2015. A simple method to calculate shell side fluid pressure drop in a shell and tube heat exchanger. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 84:700–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdomo-Hurtado, L., J. S. Rincon Tabares, D. M. Correa, and F. A. Perdomo. 2017. Castor oil preheater selection based on entropy generation and exergy effectiveness criteria. Energy 120:805–15. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prithiviraj, M., and M. J. Andrews. 1999. Comparison of a three-dimensional numerical model with existing methods for prediction of flow in shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Heat Transfer Engineering 20 (2):15–19. doi:10.1080/014576399271538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakib, M. I., R. Saidur, E. N. Mohamad, and A. M. Afifi. 2017. Waste-heat utilization – the sustainable technologies to minimize energy consumption in Bangladesh textile sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 142:1867–76. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, M., M. Khaled, H. Jaber, J. Faraj, H. Bazzi, and T. Lemenand. 2019. Numerical simulation of multi-tube tank heat exchanger: Optimization analysis. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects 1–11. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1623939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. V., and A. Saroj. 2017. Economic optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchanger using Jaya algorithm with maintenance consideration. Applied Thermal Engineering 116:473–87. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.01.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouag, A., A. Benchabane, and C. E. Mehdid. 2018. Thermal design of earth-to-air heat exchanger. Part I a new transient semi-analytical model for determining soil temperature. Journal of Cleaner Production 182:538–44. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahuddin, U., M. Bilal, and H. Ejaz. 2015. A review of the advancements made in helical baffles used in shell and tube heat exchangers. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 67:104–08. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serna, M., and A. Jiménez. 2005. A compact formulation of the Bell-Delaware method for heat exchanger design and optimization. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 83 (5):539–50. doi:10.1205/cherd.03192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serna-González, M., J. M. Ponce-Ortega, A. J. Castro-Montoya, and A. Jiménez-Gutiérrez. 2007. Feasible design space for shell-and-tube heat exchangers using the bell - Delaware method. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 46 (1):143–55. doi:10.1021/ie051371x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serth, R. W. 2007. Process heat transfer principles and applications. Elsevier: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinde, S., and U. Chavan. 2018. Numerical and experimental analysis on shell side thermo-hydraulic performance of shell and tube heat exchanger with continuous helical FRP baffles. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 5 (September 2017):158–71. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2017.11.006.
   Google Scholar
• Short, M., A. J. Isafiade, D. M. Fraser, and Z. Kravanja. 2016. Synthesis of heat exchanger networks using mathematical programming and heuristics in a two-step optimisation procedure with detailed exchanger design. Chemical Engineering Science 144:372–85. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2016.01.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahery, A. A., S. Khalilarya, and S. Jafarmadar. 2017. Effectively designed NTW shell-tube heat exchangers with segmental baffles using flow hydraulic network method. Applied Thermal Engineering 120:635–44. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufactures Association). 2007. Standards of the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Assocciation,New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tharakeshwar, T. K., K. N. Seetharamu, and B. Durga Prasad. 2017. Multi-objective optimization using bat algorithm for shell and tube heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering 110:1029–38. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdat Azad, A., and N. Vahdat Azad. 2016. Application of nanofluids for the optimal design of shell and tube heat exchangers using genetic algorithm. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 8:198–206. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2016.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, J., H. Yang, G. Jian, X. Tong, K. Li, and S. Wang. 2016. Energy and cost optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger with helical baffles using Kriging metamodel based on MOGA. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 98:29–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. F., Y. L. He, and W. Q. Tao. 2009. 3D numerical simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with middle-overlapped helical baffles and continuous baffles - Part I: Numerical model and results of whole heat exchanger with middle-overlapped helical baffles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52 (23–24):5371–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. F., B. Li, W. J. Huang, Y. G. Lei, Y. L. He, and W. Q. Tao. 2009. Experimental performance comparison of shell-side heat transfer for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with middle-overlapped helical baffles and segmental baffles. Chemical Engineering Science 64 (8):1643–53. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar