Statistical assessment of wind energy potential for power generation at Imphal, Manipur (India)

References

• Akgül, F. G., B. Senoglu, and T. Arslan. 2016. An alternative distribution to Weibull for modeling the wind speed data: Inverse Weibull distribution. Energy Conversion and Management 114:234–40. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpinar, E. K., and S. Akpinar. 2005. An assessment on seasonal analysis of wind energy characteristics and wind turbine characteristics. Energy Conversion and Management 46:1848–67. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2004.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, O., K. Mohammadi, and A. Mostafaeipour. 2016. Evaluating the suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: A case of study of east and southeast parts of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management 119:101–08. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad, A. K., M. G. Rasul, and T. Yusuf. 2014. Statistical diagnosis of the best Weibull methods for wind power assessment for agricultural applications. Energies 7:3056–85. doi:10.3390/en7053056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. P. 2011. Performance comparison of six numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy application. Applied Energy 88:272–82. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia, R. N. 2003. The wind shear in a Mediterranean island climate. Renewable Energy 28:647–53. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(02)00066-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghania, G. R., Z. N. Ashrafi, and A. Sedaghat. 2018. Extrapolating wind data at high altitudes with high precision methods for accurate evaluation of wind power density, case study: Center of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management 157:317–38. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualtieri, G., and S. Secci. 2012. Methods to extrapolate wind resource to the turbine hub height based on power law: A 1-h wind speed vs. Weibull distribution extrapolation comparison. Renewable Energy 43:183–200. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Wind Power Magazine. October–November 2016 & April–May 2017 Issue. https://www.scribd.com/document/348776780/Indian-Wind-Power-Magazine-April-May-2017
   Google Scholar
• Keyhani, A., M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M. Khanali, and R. Abbaszadeh. 2010. An assessment of wind energy potential as a power generation source in the capital of Iran, Tehran. Energy 35:188–201. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa, D., A. Benretem, L. Herous, and I. Meghlaoui. 2014. Evaluation of the adequacy of the wind speed extrapolation laws for two different roughness meteorological sites. American Journal of Applied Sciences 11 (4):570–83. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2014.570.583.
   Google Scholar
• Lawan, S. M., W. A. W. Z. Abidin, W. Y. Chai, A. Baharun, and T. Masri. 2013. The status of Wind Resource Assessment (WRA) techniques, wind energy potential and utilization in Malaysia and other countries. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 8 (12):1039–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, K., O. Alavi, A. Mostafaeipour, N. Goudarzi, and M. Jalilvand. 2016. Assessing different parameters estimation methods of Weibull distribution to compute wind power density. Energy Conversion and Management 108:322–35. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozay, C., and M. S. Celiktas. 2016. Statistical analysis of wind speed using two-parameter Weibull distribution in Alaçatı region. Energy Conversion and Management 121:49–54. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., A. Keyhani, and P. Sefeedpari. 2015. Wind speed and power density analysis based on Weibull and Rayleigh distributions (A case study: Firouzkooh county of Iran). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42:313–22. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. M., and H. Chattopadhyay. 2019. Performance evaluation of four widely accepted numerical methods to estimate Weibull parameters for wind speed data of Kolkata, India. International Conference on Recent Developments in Mechanical Engineering, (ICRDME 2019), Chennai, India: S.A. Engineering College, March 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, S., M. Shoaib, I. Siddiqui, F. Ahmed, M. R. Tanveer, and S. Jilani. 2015. Effect of wind shear coefficient for the vertical extrapolation of wind speed data and its impact on the viability of wind energy project. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 11:90–100. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.12.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, H., A. A. E. Aly, and S. Abdel-Hady. 2012. Assessment of different methods used to estimate Weibull distribution parameters for wind speed in Zafarana wind farm, Suez Gulf, Egypt. Energy 44:710–19. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, A. R., A. Biswas, and R. Gupta. 2016. An analysis of wind energy potential of Silcher (Assam, India) by using different models. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences 7 (2):100–07.
   Google Scholar
• Usta, I. 2016. An innovative estimation method regarding Weibull parameters for wind energy applications. Energy 106:301–14. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisser, D. A. 2003. Wind energy analysis of Grenada: An estimation using the ‘Weibull’ density function. Renewable Energy 28:1803–12. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00016-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werapun, W., Y. Tirawanichakul, and J. Waewsak. 2015. Comparative study of five methods to estimate Weibull parameters for wind speed on Phangan Island, Thailand. Energy Procedia 79:976–81. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.596.
   Google Scholar
• Werapun, W., Y. Tirawanichakul, and J. Waewsak. 2017. Wind shear coefficients and their effect on energy production. Energy Procedia 138:1061–66. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.111.
   Google Scholar