A Jaya-based approach to wind turbine placement problem

References

• An, X.-Y., Z. Yan, and J.-M. Jia. 2020. A new distribution for modeling wind speed characteristics and evaluating wind power potential in Xinjiang, China. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, And Environmental Effects 1–19. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1758250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan, M., M. Gunduz, and M. S. Kiran. 2019. JayaX: Jaya algorithm with xor operator for binary optimization. Applied Soft Computing 82:105576. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baş, E., and E. Ülker. 2020. A binary social spider algorithm for continuous optimization task. Soft Computing 1–27. doi:10.1007/s00500-020-04718-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beşkirli, M., İ. Koç, H. Haklı, and H. Kodaz. 2018. A new optimization algorithm for solving wind turbine placement problem: Binary artificial algae algorithm. Renewable Energy 121:301–08. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beşkirli, M., I. Koc, and H. Kodaz. 2019. Optimal placement of wind turbines using novel binary invasive weed optimization. Tehnicki Vjesnik 26:56–63. doi:10.17559/TV-20170725231351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgen, S., K. Kaygusuz, and A. Sari. 2004. Renewable energy for a clean and sustainable future. Energy Sources 26:1119–29. doi:10.1080/00908310490441421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changshui, Z., H. Guangdong, and W. Jun. 2011. A fast algorithm based on the submodular property for optimization of wind turbine positioning. Renewable Energy 36:2951–58. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., W. Xie, and X. Zou. 2015. A binary differential evolution algorithm learning from explored solutions. Neurocomputing 149:1038–47. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo, A., and J. Herna. 1996. Turbulence characteristics in wind-turbine wakes. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 61:71–85. doi:10.1016/0167-6105(95)00033-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrac, J., S. García, D. Molina, and F. Herrera. 2011. A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1:3–18. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, I. 2001. Environmental issues: Ii-potential solutions. Energy Sources 23:83–92. doi:10.1080/00908310151092218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami, A., and P. Noghreh. 2010. New approach on optimization in placement of wind turbines within wind farm by genetic algorithms. Renewable Energy 35:1559–64. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., H. Yang, L. Lin, and P. Koo. 2015. Wind turbine layout optimization using multi-population genetic algorithm and a case study in Hong Kong offshore. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 139:89–99. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geem, Z. W. 2005. Harmony search in water pump switching problem. International Conference on Natural Computation, 751–60. Springer. doi:10.1007/11539902_92
   Google Scholar
• González, J. S., A. G. G. Rodriguez, J. C. Mora, J. R. Santos, and M. B. Payan. 2010. Optimization of wind farm turbines layout using an evolutive algorithm. Renewable Energy 35:1671–81. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, S., M. Hussaini, and M. M. Abdullah. 2005. Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms. Renewable Energy 30:259–70. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakli, H. 2019. A new approach for wind turbine placement problem using modified differential evolution algorithm. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 27:4659–72. doi:10.3906/elk-1901-192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 1975. Adaption in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-S. 2009. Efficient hybrid distributed genetic algorithms for wind turbine positioning in large wind farms. 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2196–201. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ISIE.2009.5213603
   Google Scholar
• Ituarte-Villarreal, C. M., and J. F. Espiritu. 2011. Optimization of wind turbine placement using a viral based optimization algorithm. Procedia Computer Science 6:469–74. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.08.087.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N. O. 1983. A note on wind generator interaction, Risø National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Kumawat, M., N. Gupta, N. Jain, and R. Bansal. 2020. Jaya algorithm based optimal allocation of distributed energy resources. In Intelligent computing techniques for smart energy systems, 805–14. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0214-9_85.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, A. 2010. Optimization of the layout of large wind farms using genetic algorithm. MS thesis. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, P., K. Kulkarni, and K. Mitra. 2016. A novel hybrid optimization methodology to optimize the total number and placement of wind turbines. Renewable Energy 86:133–47. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, P., and K. Mitra. 2018. Determining layout of a wind farm with optimal number of turbines: A decomposition based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 202:342–59. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, P., and K. Mitra. 2019. In search of flexible and robust wind farm layouts considering wind state uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production 119195. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy, C. B., and M. Deshmukh. 2015. A new approach to optimise placement of wind turbines using particle swarm optimisation. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 34:396–405. doi:10.1080/14786451.2013.860140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosetti, G., C. Poloni, and B. Diviacco. 1994. Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 51:105–16. doi:10.1016/0167-6105(94)90080-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer, A. M. 2008. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12:2265–300. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgener, O., K. Ulgen, and A. Hepbasli. 2004. Wind and wave power potential. Energy Sources 26:891–901. doi:10.1080/00908310490465948.
   Google Scholar
• Panwar, N., S. Kaushik, and S. Kothari. 2011. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15:1513–24. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parada, L., C. Herrera, P. Flores, and V. Parada. 2017. Wind farm layout optimization using a Gaussian-based wake model. Renewable Energy 107:531–41. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, J., V. Savsani, V. Patel, and R. Patel. 2017. Layout optimization of a wind farm to maximize the power output using enhanced teaching learning based optimization technique. Journal of Cleaner Production 158:81–94. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pookpunt, S., and W. Ongsakul. 2013. Optimal placement of wind turbines within wind farm using binary particle swarm optimization with time-varying acceleration coefficients. Renewable Energy 55:266–76. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouraltafi-Kheljan, S., A. Azimi, B. Mohammadi-ivatloo, and M. Rasouli. 2018. Optimal design of wind farm layout using a biogeographical based optimization algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production 201:1111–24. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, T., V. Singh, S. Singh, and S. Mohanty. 2017. Binary Jaya algorithm based optimal placement of phasor measurement units for power system observability.
   Google Scholar
• Rakhshani, E., H. Mehrjerdi, and A. Iqbal. 2020. Hybrid wind-diesel-battery system planning considering multiple different wind turbine technologies installation. Journal of Cleaner Production 247:119654. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. 2016. Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 7:19–34. doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, R. V. 2019. Jaya: An advanced optimization algorithm and its engineering applications. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78922-4.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, R. V., and A. Saroj. 2019. An elitism-based self-adaptive multi-population Jaya algorithm and its applications. Soft Computing 23:4383–406. doi:10.1007/s00500-018-3095-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. V., D. P. Rai, and J. Balic. 2017. A multi-objective algorithm for optimization of modern machining processes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 61:103–25. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, S., S. Ali, and S. A. Khan. 2016. Wind farm layout design using cuckoo search algorithms. Applied Artificial Intelligence 30:899–922. doi:10.1080/08839514.2017.1279043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoaib, M., I. Siddiqui, S. Rehman, S. Khan, and L. M. Alhems. 2019. Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system. Journal of Cleaner Production 216:346–60. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P., and H. Chaudhary. 2020. Optimal shape synthesis of a metallic flywheel using non-dominated sorting Jaya algorithm. Soft Computing 24:6623–34. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04302-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Global Wind Energy Council. 2016. Global wind report 2016.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. 2000. World energy assessment 2000 – Energy and the challenge of sustainability. New York, NY: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Uzlu, E. 2019. Application of Jaya algorithm-trained artificial neural networks for prediction of energy use in the nation of Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 14:183–200. doi:10.1080/15567249.2019.1653405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, C., J. Wang, G. Yang, X. Li, and X. Zhang. 2009a. Optimal micro-siting of wind turbines by genetic algorithms based on improved wind and turbine models. Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference, 5092–96. IEEE. doi:10.1109/CDC.2009.5399571
   Google Scholar
• Wan, C., J. Wang, G. Yang, and X. Zhang. 2009b. Optimal siting of wind turbines using real-coded genetic algorithms. Proceedings of European wind energy association conference and exhibition, Marseille, France, 16–19 March 2009, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Warid, W. 2020. Optimal power flow using the AMTPG-Jaya algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 106252. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106252.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., and Y. He. 2020. Solving the set-union knapsack problem by a novel hybrid Jaya algorithm. Soft Computing 24:1883–902. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04021-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, W.-L., M.-Q. An, Y.-Z. Li, R.-C. He, and J.-F. Zhang. 2014. A novel discrete global-best harmony search algorithm for solving 0-1 knapsack problems. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/573731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, D., L. Gao, S. Li, and J. Wu. 2011. Solving 0–1 knapsack problem by a novel global harmony search algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 11:1556–64. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2010.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar