Geographical information systems-based analysis of site selection for wind power plants in Kozlu District (Zonguldak-NW Turkey) by multi-criteria decision analysis method

References

• Acar, E., and A. Doğan, 2008. Evaluation of Turkey’s wind and hydropower potential and environmental impact. VII. National Clean Energy Symposium, UTES’2008, Istanbul, December 17-19, 675–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ağbulut, Ü. 2019. Turkey’s electricity generation problem and nuclear energy policy. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 41 (18):2281–98. doi:10.1080/15567036.2019.1587107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdağ, S. A., and Ö. Güler. 2010. Evaluation of wind energy investment interest and electricitygeneration cost analysis for Turkey. Applied Energy 87:2574–80. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgül, F. G., and B. Şenoğlu. 2019. Comparison of wind speed distributions: A case study for Aegean coast of Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–18. doi:10.1080/15567036.2019.1663309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgün, A., and N. Türk. 2010. Mapping erosion susceptibility by a multivariate statistical method: A case study from the Ayvalık region, NW Turkey. Computers & Geosciences 37 (9):1515–24. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpınar, A. 2013. Evaluation of wind energy potentiality at coastal locations along the north eastern coasts of Turkey. Energy 50:395–405. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alan, I., and A. Aksay. 2002. 1:100000 scale geological map of Turkey Zonguldak E-27-F 27 sections, No: 28, Geological studies office. Ankara: General Directorate of Mineral Research.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, H. 2003. Wind energy status and its assessment in Turkey. Renewable Energy 28:2213–20. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00130-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arca, D., S. H. Kutoglu, and K. Becek. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping in an area of underground mining using the multicriteria decision analysis method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 190:725. doi:10.1007/s10661-018-7085-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atici, K. B., A. B. Simsek, A. Ulucan, and M. U. Tosun. 2015. A GIS-based multiple criteria decision analysis approach for wind power plant site selection. Utilities Policy 37:86–96. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2015.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalew, L., and H. Yamagishi. 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat, M. 2009. A review of modern wind turbine technology. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 31:1561–72. doi:10.1080/15567030802094045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A. D. S., R. A. Shayani, and M. A. G. D. Oliveira. 2018. Multi-criteria decision analysis method for regulatory evaluation of electricity distribution service quality. Utilities Policy 53:38–48. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2018.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathrellos, G., and H. Skilodimou. 2007. Using the analytic hierarchy process to create an erosion risk map, a case study in Malakasiotiko Stream, Trikala Perfecture. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 40 (4):1904–15. doi:10.12681/bgsg.17205.
   Google Scholar
• Bayar, R. 2005. Location choice for shopping mall centers using GIS: Case study of Ankara. Journal of Geographical Sciences 3 (2):19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraç, H. N. 2011. Global wind energy policies and applications. Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society XXX (1):37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Can, E. 2019. Analysis of risks that are based on the aerial photography used in photogrammetric monitoring maps for environmental wind power energy plant projects. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191:746. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7944-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çetin, A. C., 2009. Wind energy and the selection of a facility location for a wind plant in Isparta. International Davraz Congress, 24-27 September, Isparta, pp.: 368–89.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A. 2006. Global renewable energy resources. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 28:779–92. doi:10.1080/00908310600718742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbaş, A., and R. Bakiş. 2004. Energy from renewable sources in Turkey: Status and future direction. Energy Sources 26 (5):473–84. doi:10.1080/00908310490429759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate General of Highways of Turkey. 2020. Turkey road map. https://www.kgm.gov.tr/SiteCollectionImages/KGMimages/Haritalar/turistik.jpg
   Google Scholar
• Doğancı, Ö., M. Ertürk, A. Özsunar, and E. Arcaklıoğlu. 2016. A study of the estimation of the wind energy in the Central-Western Black sea region. Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences 5 (1):153–63.
   Google Scholar
• Dursun, B., and B. Alboyaci. 2011. An evaluation of wind energy characteristics for four different locations in Balikesir. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 33 (11):1086–103. doi:10.1080/15567030903330850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Atlas. 2019. Zonguldak wind plants. October 28. https://www.enerjiatlasi.com/ruzgar-enerjisi-haritasi/zonguldak.
   Google Scholar
• Governorship of Zonguldak Province. 2019. Kozlu. October 10. http://www.zonguldak.gov.tr/kozlu.
   Google Scholar
• Guerri, O., A. Dali, M. S. Boudia, and N. Yassaa. 2020. Performance evaluation of a wind farm using different power density distributions. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–13. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1775727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney, Y. 2018. The use of frequency ratio method in erosion susceptibility analysis: The case of Selendi River Basin (Manisa). Soil Science Society of Turkey 6 (2):73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hepbasli, A., and O. Ozgener. 2004. A review on the development of wind energy in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8 (3):257–76. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilkiliç, C., and I. Türkbay. 2010. Determination and utilization of wind energy potential for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14:2202–07. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, Y. 2019. Measuring the sustainability of cities in Turkey with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Open Journal of Social Sciences 2019 (7):322–34. doi:10.4236/jss.2019.74025.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakis, N., I. Kougias, and T. Patsialis. 2015. Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: Application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. Science of the Total Environment 538:555–63. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köksal, E., and Ş. Ardıyok. 2018. Regulatory and market disharmony in the Turkish electricity industry. Utilities Policy 55:90–98. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2018.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurşunoğlu, N., and M. Önder, 2014. Selection of suitable ventilator with analytical hierarchy process method in underground mining operations. 19th Coal Congress of Turkey, Zonguldak, 115–22.
   Google Scholar
• MENRT. 2016. Budget presentation of 2017. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Turkey Strategy Development Directorate, Ankara, 170. October 28. http://www.elder.org.tr/Content/yayinlar/2017_B%C3%BCt%C3%A7e_Sunu%C5%9Fu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MENRT Directorate General of Energy Affairs. 2019a. Renewable energy-wind. November 20. https://www.eigm.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Ruzgar.
   Google Scholar
• MENRT Directorate General of Energy Affairs. 2019b. Renewable energy-REPA. Guidance information of provinces regarding the technical potentials of wind energy in Türkiye. November 20. https://www.eigm.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/REPA.
   Google Scholar
• MENRT Directorate General of Energy Affairs. 2019c. Zonguldak Province Wind Source Information. November 20. https://www.eigm.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2f4%2fDocuments%2frepa%2fZONGULDAK-REPA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MEUT. 2004. Environmental Atlas of Turkey. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of Turkey, General Directorate of EIA and Planning, Department of Environmental Inventory, Ankara, 457. November 25. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/turk-yecevreatlas–20180514084340.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MEUT. 2019. Air Quality Analysis Report of Zonguldak Province. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization Northern Central Anatolia Clean Air Central Directorate Ankara. 81. October 8. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/kiathm/icerikler/zonguldak-20181002101510.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, S., and W. Vahrson. 1994. Macrozonation methodology for landslide hazard determination. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 31 (1):49–58. doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.xxxi.1.49.
   Google Scholar
• Nişancı, R., V. Yıldırım, and A. E. Özçelik, 2010. Determination of the wind energy areas using GIS: Case study in Trabzon in Turkey. III. Proceedings of the Symposium on Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems, Kocaeli, Turkey, 213–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ogulata, R. T. 2003. Energy sector and wind energy potential in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 7:469–84. doi:10.1016/S1364-0321(03)00090-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ömürbek, N., S. Üstündağ, and Ö. C. Helvacıoğlu. 2013. Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in location decision: A study in Isparta region. Journal of Management Sciences 11 (21):101–16.
   Google Scholar
• Önal, F., and R. Z. Yarbay. 2010. The potential and future of renewable energy sources in Turkey. Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Science 9 (18):77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Özşahin, E., and Ç. K. Kaymaz. 2013. A GIS analysis on the selection of the location of wind energy plant (WEP) installation: Sample of hatay. The Journal Of Tubav Science 6 (2):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanization. 2018. Report of Zonguldak province 2017 environmental status. Zonguldak Governorship Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanization, Zonguldak. 83.
   Google Scholar
• Raissouni, A., L. K. Issa, A. El Arrım, M. Maâtouk, and R. Passalacqua. 2012. GIS-based model to assess erosion sensitivity in Northern Morocco, Laou Watershed case study. International Journal of Geosciences 3:610–26. doi:10.4236/ijg.2012.33061.
   Google Scholar
• REN21. 2019. Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st century Paris, France, 336. November 19. https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchical structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15:234–81. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2000. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Soba, M., and T. Bildik. 2013. Determining the selection of faculty place in towns by using analytic hierarchy process. Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty 4 (5):51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sözen, A., A. Mirzapour, M. T. Çakır, Ü. İskender, and F. Çipil. 2015. Selecting best location of wind plants using dea and topsis approach in Turkish cities. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences 1 (1):173‐194.
   Google Scholar
• Taşkın, B. 2013.Wind power plants installed in Niğde physical and economic analysis. MSc thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Niğde University, Department of Physics, Niğde, Turkey, pp:96.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute. 2019. Address based population registration system results. March 09. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr.
   Google Scholar
• URL-1. 2019. Road map of migratory birds. October 10. https://www.biyologlar.com/gocmen-kuslarin-yol-haritasi.
   Google Scholar
• Uyan, M., 2011. Establishing and application of spatial decision support systems for land consolidation projects. Ph.D Thesis, The Graduate School Of Natural And Applied Science Of Selcuk University The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy In Geomatic Engineering, Konya, Turkey, 176.
   Google Scholar
• Uyan, M. 2017. GIS-Supported mapping of solar power plant sites using AHP method. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 23 (4):343–51. doi:10.5505/pajes.2016.59489.
   Google Scholar
• Uyar, T. S., 1985. Wind energy systems. July 10-14. Graduate Summer School, Yildiz Technical University, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R., and A. Kelman. 1999. An extension of the analytical hierarchy process using OWA operators. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Applications in Engineering and Technology 7 (4):401–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, A., S. Reis, A. C. Aydinoglu, and T. Yomralioglu. 2011. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85 (3):274–87. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, U., Y. Gazibey, and A. Güngör. 2012. Wind energy potential of Nigde Province. Nigde Omer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences 1 (1):37–47. doi:10.28948/ngumuh.239392.
   Google Scholar