A Recent Review of Viscosity Models for Nanofluids

References

• Abdolbaqi, M. K., N. A. C. Sidik, A. Amir, R. Mamat, W. H. Azmi, M. N. A. W. M. Yazid, and G. Najafi. 2016a. An experimental determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of BioGlycol/water based TiO2 nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 77:22–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdolbaqi, M. K., N. A. C. Sidik, M. F. A. Rahim, R. Mamat, W. H. Azmi, M. N. A. W. M. Yazid, and G. Najafi. 2016b. Experimental investigation and development of new correlation for thermal conductivity and viscosity of BioGlycol/water based SiO2 nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 77:54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahi, A., M. H. K. Darvanjooghi, A. Karimipour, and M. R. Safaei. 2018. Experimental study to obtain the viscosity of CuO-loaded nanofluid: Effects of nanoparticles’ mass fraction, temperature and basefluid’s types to develop a correlation. Meccanica 53:3739–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberoumand, S., A. Jafarimoghaddam, M. Moravej, H. Aberoumand, and K. Javaherdeh. 2016. Experimental study on the rheological behavior of silver- heat transfer oil nanofluid and suggesting two empirical based correlations for thermal conductivity and viscosity of oil based nanofluids. Applied Thermal Engineering 101:362–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adewumi, G. A., F. Inambao, M. Sharifpur, and J. P. Meyer. 2018. Investigation of the Viscosity and Stability of Green Nanofluids from Coconut Fibre Carbon Nanoparticles: Effect of Temperature and Mass Fraction. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 13:8336–42.
   Google Scholar
• Adio, S. A., M. Mehrabi, M. Sharifpur, and J. P. Meyer. 2016. Experimental investigation and model development for effective viscosity of MgO–ethylene glycol nanofluids by using dimensional analysis, FCM-ANFIS and GA-PNN techniques. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 72:71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adio, S. A., M. Sharifpur, and J. P. Meyer. 2015. Investigation Into Effective Viscosity, Electrical Conductivity, and pH of γ-Al2O3-Glycerol Nanofluids in Einstein Concentration Regime. Heat Transfer Engineering 36:1241–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrand M, Nazari Najafabadi K and Akbari M. (2016). Effects of temperature and solid volume fraction on viscosity of SiO2-MWCNTs/SAE40 hybrid nanofluid as a coolant and lubricant in heat engines. Applied Thermal Engineering, 102 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrand, M., K. Nazari Najafabadi, and M. Akbari. 2016a. Effects of temperature and solid volume fraction on viscosity of SiO2-MWCNTs/SAE40 hybrid nanofluid as a coolant and lubricant in heat engines. Applied Thermal Engineering 102:45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrand, M., K. Nazari Najafabadi, N. Sina, M. R. Safaei, A. S. Kherbeet, S. Wongwises, and M. Dahari. 2016b. Prediction of dynamic viscosity of a hybrid nano-lubricant by an optimal artificial neural network. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:209–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrand, M. 2017. Experimental study on thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol containing hybrid nano-additives and development of a new correlation. Applied Thermal Engineering 110:1111–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshari, A., M. Akbari, D. Toghraie, and M. E. Yazdi. 2018. Experimental investigation of rheological behavior of the hybrid nanofluid of MWCNT–alumina/water (80%)–ethylene-glycol (20%). Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 132:1001–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghaei, A., H. Khorasanizadeh, and G. A. Sheikhzadeh. 2018. Measurement of the dynamic viscosity of hybrid engine oil -Cuo-MWCNT nanofluid, development of a practical viscosity correlation and utilizing the artificial neural network. Heat Mass Transfer 54:151–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghahadi, M. H., M. Niknejadi, and D. Toghraie. 2019. An experimental study on the rheological behavior of hybrid Tungsten oxide (WO3)-MWCNTs/engine oil Newtonian nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Structure 1197:497–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahammed, N., L. G. Asirvatham, and S. Wongwises. 2016. Effect of volume concentration and temperature on viscosity and surface tension of graphene–water nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 123:1399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Nadooshan, A., H. Eshgarf, and M. Afrand. 2018. Measuring the viscosity of Fe3O4-MWCNTs/EG hybrid nanofluid for evaluation of thermal efficiency: Newtonian and non-Newtonian behavior. Journal of Molecular Liquids 253:169–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, N., S. Saedodin, and S. H. Rostamian. 2020. Experimental investigation of rheological behavior of fullerene/hydraulic oil nanofluid. Chemical Papers 74:3963–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari, M., M. Afrand, A. Arshi, and A. Karimipour. 2017. An experimental study on rheological behavior of ethylene glycol based nanofluid: Proposing a new correlation as a function of silica concentration and temperature. Journal of Molecular Liquids 233:352–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akilu, S., A. T. Baheta, K. Kadirgama, E. Padmanabhan, and K. V. Sharma. 2019. Viscosity, electrical and thermal conductivities of ethylene and propylene glycol-based β -SiC nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids 284:780–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akilu, S., A. T. Baheta, and K. V. Sharma. 2017. Experimental measurements of thermal conductivity and viscosity of ethylene glycol-based hybrid nanofluid with TiO2-CuO/C inclusions. Journal of Molecular Liquids 246:396–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akilu, S., A. T. Baheta, and K. V. Sharma. 2020. Characterization and modelling of density, thermal conductivity, and viscosity of TiN–W/EG nanofuids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 140:1999–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyürek, E. F., K. Geliş, B. Şahin, and E. Manay. 2018. Experimental analysis for heat transfer of nanofluid with wire coil turbulators in a concentric tube heat exchanger. Results in Physics 9:376–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Wadhahi, M., G. R. Vakili-Nezhaad, and O. Al Ghafri. 2020. Dynamic Viscosity of Graphene- and Ferrous Oxide-Based Nanofluids: Modeling and Experiment. In Thermophysical Properties of Complex Materials (IntechOpen).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Waeli, A. H. A., K. Sopian, M. T. Chaichan, H. A. Kazem, H. A. Hasan, and A. N. Al-Shamani. 2017. An experimental investigation of SiC nanofluid as a base-fluid for a photovoltaic thermal PV/T system. Energy Conversion and Management 142:547–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Waeli, A. H. A., M. T. Chaichan, H. A. Kazem, and K. Sopian. 2019a. Evaluation and analysis of nanofluid and surfactant impact on photovoltaic-thermal systems. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 13:100392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Waeli, A. H. A., M. T. Chaichan, K. Sopian, and H. A. Kazem. 2019b. Influence of the base fluid on the thermo-physical properties of PV/T nanofluids with surfactant. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 13:100340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aladag, B., S. Halelfadl, N. Doner, T. Maré, S. Duret, and P. Estellé. 2012. Experimental investigations of the viscosity of nanofluids at low temperatures. Applied Energy 97:876–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarifi, I. M., A. B. Alkouh, V. Ali, H. M. Nguyen, and A. Asadi. 2019. On the rheological properties of MWCNT-TiO2/oil hybrid nano fluid: An experimental investigation on the effects of shear rate, temperature, and solid concentration of nanoparticles. Powder Technology 355:157–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A., S. U. Ilyas, S. Garg, M. Alsaady, K. Maqsood, R. Nasir, A. Abdulrahman, M. Zulfiar, A. B. Mahfouz, A. Ahmed, et al. 2020. Dynamic viscosity of Titania nanotubes dispersions in ethylene glycol/ water-based nanofluids: Experimental evaluation and predictions from empirical correlation and artificial neural network. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 118:104882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alirezaie, A., S. Saedodin, M. H. Esfe, and S. H. Rostamian. 2017. Investigation of rheological behavior of MWCNT (COOH functionalized)/MgO - Engine oil hybrid nanofluids and modelling the results with artificial neural networks. Journal of Molecular Liquids 241:173–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almanassra, I. W., A. D. Manasrah, U. A. Al-Mubaiyedh, T. Al-Ansari, Z. O. Malaibari, and M. A. Atieh. 2020. An experimental study on stability and thermal conductivity of water/CNTs nanofluids using different surfactants: A comparison study. Journal of Molecular Liquids 304:111025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amani, M., P. Amani, A. Kasaeian, O. Mahian, F. Kasaeian, and S. Wongwises. 2017. Experimental study on viscosity of spinel-type manganese ferrite nanofluid in attendance of magnetic field. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 428:457–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini, F., S. Z. Miry, A. Karimi, and M. Ashjaee. 2018. Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of SiO2 /Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Nanofluid. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 18:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anoop, K. B., T. Sundararajan, and S. K. Das. 2009. Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52:2189–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Hussain T, Yahya S Mohd, Chaturvedi P and Sardar N. (2018). Experimental Investigation of Viscosity of Nanofluids Containing Oxide Nanoparticles at Varying Shear Rate. j nanofluids, 7(6), 1075–1080. https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2018.1536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arani, A. A. A., and F. Pourmoghadam. 2019. Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity behavior of MWCNTS-Al2O3/ethylene glycol hybrid Nanofluid: Providing new thermal conductivity correlation. Heat and Mass Transfer, 55, 2329–2339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, A., and F. Pourfattah. 2019. Heat transfer performance of two oil-based nanofluids containing ZnO and MgO nanoparticles; a comparative experimental investigation. Powder Technology, 343, 296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, A., I. M. Alarif, H. M. Nguyen, and H. Moayedi. 2020. Feasibility of least‑square support vector machine in predicting the efects of shear rate on the rheological properties and pumping power of MWCNT–MgO/oil hybrid nanofuid based on experimental data. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 143, 1439–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, A., and I. M. Alarifi. 2020. Effects of ultrasonication time on stability, dynamic viscosity, and pumping power management of MWCNT-water nanofluid: An experimental study. Scientific Reports 10:15182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, A., M. Asadi, M. Rezaei, M. Siahmargoi, and F. Asadi. 2016. The effect of temperature and solid concentration on dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/MgO (20–80)–SAE50 hybrid nano-lubricant and proposing a new correlation: An experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 78:48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, M., and A. Asadi. 2016. Dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/ZnO–engine oil hybrid nanofluid: An experimental investigation and new correlation in different temperatures and solid concentrations. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aswad, Z. A. R. 1996. A New Approach for Selecting the Best Non-Newtonian Rheological Model. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering 35:233–41.
   Google Scholar
• Attari, H., F. Derakhshanfard, and M. H. K. Darvanjooghi. 2017. Effect of temperature and mass fraction on viscosity of crude oil-based nanofluids containing oxide nanoparticles. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 82:103–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aybar, H. S., M. Sharifpur, M. R. Azizian, M. Mehrabi, and J. P. Meyer. 2015. A Review of Thermal Conductivity Models for Nanofluids. Heat Transfer Engineering 36:1085–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azmi, W. H., K. Abdul Hamid, R. Mamat, K. V. Sharma, and M. S. Mohamad. 2016. Effects of Working Temperature on Thermo-Physical Properties and Forced Convection Heat Transfer of TiO2 Nanofluids in Water - Ethylene Glycol Mixture. Applied Thermal Engineering 106:1190–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babita, S., S. K. Sharma, and S. M. Gupta. 2016. Preparation and evaluation of stable nanofluids for heat transfer application: A review. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 79:202–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahiraei, M., and M. Hangi. 2016. An empirical study to develop temperature-dependent models for thermal conductivity and viscosity of water- Fe3O4 magnetic nanofluid. Materials Chemistry and Physics 181:333–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, L., C. Zhong, P. Jie, and Y. Hou. 2019. The effect of nanoparticle size and nanoparticle aggregation on the flow characteristics of nanofluids by molecular dynamics simulation. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 11:168781401988948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratpour, M., A. Karimipour, M. Afrand, and S. Wongwises. 2016. Effects of temperature and concentration on the viscosity of nanofluids made of single-wall carbon nanotubes in ethylene glycol. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 74:108–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardool, R., A. Bakhtyari, F. Esmaeilzadeh, and X. Wang. 2019. Nanofluid viscosity modeling based on the friction theory. Journal of Molecular Liquids 286:110923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor, G. K. 1977. The effect of brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 83:97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisl, S., A. Miltner, and A. Friedl. 2017. Lignin from Micro- to Nanosize: Production Methods. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18:1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benelmekki, M. 2015. An introduction to nanoparticles and nanotechnology. Designing Hybrid Nanoparticles 2053-2571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/978-1-6270-5469-0ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, M., L. Branchini, A. De Pascale, F. Melino, S. Ottaviano, A. Peretto, and N. Torricelli. 2019. Application and comparison of semi-empirical models for performance prediction of a kW-size reciprocating piston expander. Applied Energy 249:143–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkman, H. C. 1952. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solution. The Journal of Chemical Physics 20:571–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, S., and P. K. Panigrahi. 2020. Stability of nanofluid: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering 174:115259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekar, M., S. Suresh, and A. Chandra Bose. 2010. Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3/water nanofluid. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 34:210–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhari, S. S., R. R. Chakule, and P. S. Talmale. 2019. Experimental Study of Heat Transfer Characteristics of Al2O3 and CuO Nanofluids for Machining Application. Materials Today: Proceedings 18:788–97.
   Google Scholar
• Che Sidik, N. A., M. Mahmud Jamil, W. M. A. Aziz Japar, and I. Muhammad Adamu. 2017. A review on preparation methods, stability and applications of hybrid nanofluids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80:1112–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and J. Jia. 2017. Experimental study of TiO2 nanofluid coolant for automobile cooling applications. Materials Research Innovations 21:177–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., H. Xie, Y. Li, and W. Yu. 2008. Nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes treated by mechanochemical reaction. Thermochimica Acta 477:21–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., C. Qi, J. Tang, G. Wang, and Y. Yan. 2021. Numerical and experimental study on optimization of CPU system cooled by nanofluids. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 24:100848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiam, H. W., W. H. Azmi, N. A. Usri, R. Mamat, and N. M. Adam. 2017. Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Al2O3 Nanofluids for Different Based Ratio of Water and Ethylene Glycol Mixture. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 81:420–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcione, M. 2011. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Conversion and Management 52:789–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcione, M. 2012. A Semi-Empirical Model for Predicting the Effective Dynamic Viscosity of Nanoparticle Suspensions. Heat Transfer Engineering 33:575–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkılıç, A. S., Ö. Açıkgöz, B. O. Küçükyıldırım, A. A. Eker, B. Lüleci, C. Jumpholkul, and S. Wongwises. 2018. Experimental investigation on the viscosity characteristics of water based SiO2-graphite hybrid nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 97:30–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardan, E., M. Afrand, and A. H. Meghdadi Isfahani. 2016. Effect of suspending hybrid nano-additives on rheological behavior of engine oil and pumping power. Applied Thermal Engineering 109:524–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, P. K., N. Islam, A. K. Santra, and R. Ganguly. 2017. Experimental investigation of thermophysical properties of Al2O3–water nanofluid: Role of surfactants. Journal of Molecular Liquids 237:304–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepak, S. R., and S. Dhinakaran. 2017. Effective viscosity of nanofluids — A modified Krieger–Dougherty model based on particle size distribution (PSD) analysis. Journal of Molecular Liquid 225:20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, Y., A. Abdollahi, and A. Karimipour. 2019. Experimental investigation toward obtaining a new correlation for viscosity of WO3 and Al2O3 nanoparticles-loaded nanofluid within aqueous and non-aqueous basefluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 135:713–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkır, Ç., and H. Ertürk. 2020. Rheological and thermal characterization of graphene-water nanofluids: Hysteresis phenomenon. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 149:119113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devendiran, D. K., and V. A. Amirtham. 2016. A review on preparation, characterization, properties and applications of nanofluids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60:21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, D., P. Kumar, and S. Samantaray. 2017. A review of nanofluid preparation, stability, and thermo-physical properties. Heat Transfer - Asian Research 46:1413–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, F., D. Kwek, and A. Crivoi. 2011. Viscosity affected by nanoparticle aggregation in Al2O3-water nanofluids. Nanoscale Research Letters 6:248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duangthongsuk, W., and S. Wongwises. 2009. Measurement of temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of TiO2-water nanofluids. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 33:706–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. 1906. A new determination of molecular dimensions. Annals of Physics 19:289–306.
   Google Scholar
• Elcioglu, E. B., A. Guvenc Yazicioglu, A. Turgut, and A. S. Anagun. 2018. Experimental study and Taguchi Analysis on alumina-water nanofluid viscosity. Applied Thermal Engineering 128:973–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfe, M. H., H. Rostamian, M. Rejvani, and M. R. S. Emami. 2018. Rheological behavior characteristics of ZrO2-MWCNT/10w40 hybrid nano-lubricant affected by temperature, concentration, and shear rate: An experimental study and a neural network simulating. Physica. E, Low-dimensional Systems & Nanostructures 102:160–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfe, M. H., S. Saedodin, O. Mahian, and S. Wongwises. 2014a. Thermophysical properties, heat transfer and pressure drop of COOH-functionalized multi walled carbon nanotubes/water nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 58:176–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfe, M. H., S. Saedodin, O. Mahian, and S. Wongwises. 2014b. Heat transfer characteristics and pressure drop of COOH-functionalized DWCNTs/water nanofluid in turbulent flow at low concentrations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 73:186–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfe, M. H., S. Saedodin, S. Wongwises, and D. Toghraie. 2014. An experimental study on the effect of diameter on thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Fe/water nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 119:1817–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshgarf, H., and M. Afrand. 2016. An experimental study on rheological behavior of non-Newtonian hybrid nano-coolant for application in cooling and heating systems. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 76:221–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezekwem, C., and A. Dare. 2020. Experimental investigation on viscosity of AlN and SIC nanofluids. United Kingdom: Chemical Engineering Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Fedele, L., L. Colla, and S. Bobbo. 2012. Viscosity and thermal conductivity measurements of water-based nanofluids containing titanium oxide nanoparticles. International Journal of Refrigeration 35:1359–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel N and Acrivos A. (1967). On the viscosity of a concentrated suspension of solid spheres. Chemical Engineering Science, 22(6), 847–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(67)80149-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, N. A., and A. Acrivos. 1967. On the viscosity of a concentrated suspension of solid spheres. Chemical Engineering Science 22:847–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuskele, V., and R. M. Sarviya. 2017. Recent developments in Nanoparticles Synthesis. Preparation and Stability of Nanofluids 4:4049–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gangadevi, R., and B. K. Vinayagam. 2019. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of different nanofluids and its effect on a hybrid solar collector. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 136:199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly, S., and S. Chakraborty. 2009. Effective viscosity of nanoscale colloidal suspensions. Journal of Applied Physics 106:124309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoosi, F. 2020. Presenting two new empirical models for calculating the effective dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Powder Technology 366:788–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadimi, A., and I. H. Metselaar. 2013. The influence of surfactant and ultrasonic processing on improvement of stability, thermal conductivity and viscosity of titania nanofluid. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 51:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, S., and A. Karimipour. 2018. Experimental investigation of the effects of temperature and mass fraction on the dynamic viscosity of CuO-paraffin nanofluid. Applied Thermal Engineering 128:189–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa S O, Sharifpur M, Goodarzi M, Alsulami H and Meyer J P. (2021). Influence of base fluid, temperature, and concentration on the thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluids of alumina–ferrofluid: experimental data, modeling through enhanced ANN, ANFIS, and curve fitting. J Therm Anal Calorim, 143(6), 4149–4167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09372-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa, S. O., M. Sharifpur, J. P. Meyer, S. Wongwises, and O. Mahian. 2021b. Experimental measurement of viscosity and electrical conductivity of water‑based γ‑Al2O3/MWCNT hybrid nanofuids with various particle mass ratios. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 143:1037–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa, S. O., M. Sharifpur, M. Goodarzi, H. Alsulami, and J. P. Meyer. 2021a. Influence of base fluid, temperature, and concentration on the thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluids of alumina–ferrofluid: Experimental data, modeling through enhanced ANN, ANFIS, and curve fitting. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 143:4149–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa, S. O., M. Sharifpur, M. H. Ahmadi, and J. P. Meyer. 2020. Magnetohydrodynamic convection behaviours of nanofluids in non-square enclosures: A comprehensive review. In Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences (Wiley Online Library), 6424.
   Google Scholar
• Giwa, S. O., M. Sharifpur, M. H. Ahmadi, and J. P. Meyer. 2021a. A review of magnetic field influence on natural convection heat transfer performance of nanofluids in square cavities. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 145:2581–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa, S. O., M. Sharifpur, M. H. Ahmadi, S. M. Sohel Murshed, and J. P. Meyer. 2021b. Experimental Investigation on Stability, Viscosity, and Electrical Conductivity of Water-Based Hybrid Nanofluid of MWCNT-Fe2O3. Nanomaterials 11:136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodarzi, M., D. Toghraie, M. Reiszadeh, and M. Afrand. 2019. Experimental evaluation of dynamic viscosity of ZnO–MWCNTs/engine oil hybrid nanolubricant based on changes in temperature and concentration. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 136:513–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A. L. 1981. On the viscosity of suspensions of solid spheres. Applied Science Research 37:275–86.
   Google Scholar
• Haldar, A., S. Chatterjee, A. Kotia, N. Kumar, and S. K. Ghosh. 2020. Analysis of rheological properties of MWCNT/SiO2 hydraulic oil nanolubricants using regression and artificial neural network. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 116:104723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halelfadl, S., P. Estellé, B. Aladag, N. Doner, and T. Maré. 2013. Viscosity of carbon nanotubes water-based nanofluids: Influence of concentration and temperature. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 71:111–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, K. A., W. H. Azmi, M. F. Nabil, R. Mamat, and K. V. Sharma. 2018. Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity on nanoparticle mixture ratios of TiO2-SiO2 nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 116:1143–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., W. F. He, and F. Z. Asif. 2017. Experimental study of heat transfer enhancement using nanofluid in double tube heat exchanger. Energy Procedia 142:2547–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., A. A. Abbasian Arani, and M. Rezaie. 2015a. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Ag–MgO/water hybrid nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 66:189–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and H. Rostamian. 2017. Non-Newtonian power-law behavior of TiO2/SAE 50 Nano-lubricant: An experimental report and new correlation. Journal of Molecular Liquids 232:219–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., M. Afrand, D. Toghraie, and H. Rostamian. 2016a. An experimental study on viscosity of alumina-engine oil: Effects of temperature and nanoparticles concentration. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:202–08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., M. Afrand, W.-M. Yan, H. Yarmand, D. Toghraie, and M. Dahari. 2016b. Effects of temperature and concentration on rheological behavior of MWCNTs/SiO2(20–80)-SAE40 hybrid nano-lubricant. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:133–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and M. H. Kamyab. 2020. Viscosity analysis of enriched SAE50 by nanoparticles as lubricant of heavy-duty engines. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 140:79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and S. Alidoust. 2020. Experimental evaluation of MWCNT–Al2O3 (40–60%)/5W50 hybrid nanofluid and comparison with MWCNT–Al2O3 (35–65%)/5W50 hybrid nanofluid with focus on thermophysical properties and cost performance index. The European Physical Journal Plus 135:817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and S. Esfandeh. 2019. Rheological behavior of CuO/EG:W (20:80 v/v) nanofluid from a thermal perspective. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 135:61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and S. Esfandeh. 2020. A new generation of hybrid‑nanofuid: Thermal properties enriched lubricant fluids with controlled viscosity amount. SN Applied Sciences 2:1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and S. H. Rostamian. 2020. Rheological behavior characteristics of MWCNT-TiO2/EG (40%–60%) hybrid nanofluid affected by temperature, concentration, and shear rate: An experimental and statistical study and a neural network simulating. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 553:124061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., and S. Saedodin. 2014. An experimental investigation and new correlation of viscosity of ZnO–EG nanofluid at various temperatures and different solid volume fractions. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 55:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., S. Saedodin, A. Asadi, and A. Karimipour. 2015b. Thermal conductivity and viscosity of Mg(OH)2-ethylene glycol nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 120:1145–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., S. Saedodin, M. Rejvani, and J. Shahram. 2017. Experimental investigation, model development and sensitivity analysis of rheological behavior of ZnO/10W40 nano-lubricants for automotive applications. Physica. E, Low-dimensional Systems & Nanostructures 90:194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M., S. Saedodin, O. Mahian, and S. Wongwises. 2014. Efficiency of ferromagnetic nanoparticles suspended in ethylene glycol for applications in energy devices: Effects of particle size, temperature, and concentration. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 58:138–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M. 2016. The Investigation of Effects of Temperature and Nanoparticles Volume Fraction on the Viscosity of Copper Oxide-ethylene Glycol Nanoflids. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering 62:43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M. 2018. The Investigation of Effects of Temperature and Nanoparticles Volume Fraction on the Viscosity of Copper Oxide-ethylene Glycol Nanofluids. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering 62:43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmat Esfe, M. 2019. On the evaluation of the dynamic viscosity of non-Newtonian oil based nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 135:97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyhat, M. M., F. Kowsary, A. M. Rashidi, M. H. Momenpour, and A. Amrollahi. 2013. Experimental investigation of laminar convective heat transfer and pressure drop of water-based Al2O3 nanofluids in fully developed flow regime. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 44:483–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojjat, M., S. G. Etemad, R. Bagheri, and J. Thibault. 2011. Rheological characteristics of non-Newtonian nanofluids: Experimental investigation. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 38:144–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S. M., A. R. Moghadassi, and D. E. Henneke. 2010. A new dimensionless group model for determining the viscosity of nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 100:873–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., D. Yin, J. Xie, X. Chen, and C. Bai. 2020b. Experimental study of viscosity characteristics of graphite/engine oil (5 W‑40) nanofluids. Applied Nanoscience, 10, 1743–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., D. Yin, X. Chen, and G. Xiang. 2020a. Experimental investigation and mechanism analysis: Effect of nanoparticle size on viscosity of nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 314, 113604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huminic, A., G. Huminic, C. Fleaca, F. Dumitrache, and I. Morjan. 2015. Thermal conductivity, viscosity and surface tension of nanofluids based on FeC nanoparticles. Powder Technology 284:78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huminic, A., G. Huminic, C. Fleacă, F. Dumitrache, and I. Morjan. 2019. Thermo-physical properties of water based lanthanum oxide nanofluid An experimental study. Journal of Molecular Liquids 287:111013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huminic, G., A. Huminic, C. Fleacă, F. Dumitrache, and I. Morjan. 2021. Experimental study on viscosity of water based Fe-Si hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids 321:114938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas, S. U., R. Pendyala, and N. Marneni. 2017. Stability of Nanofluids, in: Engineering Applications of Nanotechnology. In Topics in Mining, Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. Cham: Springer, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Izadi, F., R. Ranjbarzadeh, R. Kalbasi, and M. Afrand. 2018. A new experimental correlation for non-Newtonian behavior of COOH-DWCNTs/antifreeze nanofluid. Physica. E, Low-dimensional Systems & Nanostructures 98:83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang H, Lee W Suk and Lee J. (2019). Rheological characteristics of non-Newtonian GPTMS-SiO2 nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 106 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarahnejad, M., E. B. Haghighi, M. Saleemi, N. Nikkam, R. Khodabandeh, B. Palm, M. S. Toprak, and M. Muhammed. 2015. Experimental investigation on viscosity of water-based Al2O3 and TiO2 nanofluids. Rheologica Acta 54:411–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehhef, K. A., and M. A. A. A. Siba. 2019. Effect of surfactant addition on the nanofluids properties: A Review. Acta Mechanica Malaysia 2:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J., C. Li, Y. Kwon, J. Lee, S. H. Kim, and R. Yun. 2013. Particle shape effect on the viscosity and thermal conductivity of ZnO nanofluids. International Journal of Refrigeration 36:2233–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurčević, M., S. Nižetić, M. Arıcı, and P. Ocłoń. 2020. Comprehensive analysis of preparation strategies for phase change nanocomposites and nanofluids with brief overview of safety equipment. Journal of Cleaner Production 274:122963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaggwa, A., and J. K. Carson. 2019. Developments and future insights of using nanofluids for heat transfer enhancements in thermal systems: A review of recent literature. International Nano Letters 9:277–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaggwa, A., J. K. Carson, M. Atkins, and M. Walmsley. 2019. The effect of surfactants on viscosity and stability of activated carbon, alumina and copper oxide nanofluids. Materials Today: Proceedings 18:510–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kallamu, U. M., J. S. Ibrahim, M. Sharifpur, and J. P. Meyer, 2016. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON VISCOSITY OF NANOFLUIDS PREPARED FROM BANANA FIBRE –NANOPARTICLES. 12th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Costa de Sol, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, A., M. A. Abdolahi Sadatlu, and M. Ashjaee. 2015. Experimental Studies on the Viscosity of Fe Nanoparticles Dispersed in Ethylene Glycol and Water Mixture. Thermal Science 20:1661–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimipour, A., S. Ghasemi, M. H. K. Darvanjooghi, and A. Abdollahi. 2018. A new correlation for estimating the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of CuO/liquid paraffin nanofluid using neural network method. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 92:90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katpatal, D. C., A. B. Andhare, and P. M. Padole. 2018. Viscosity behaviour and thermal conductivity prediction of CuO-blend oil based nano-blended lubricant, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Presented at the Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 233: 1154–1168.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, I., M. Sefid, and M. Afrand. 2020. A novel comparative experimental study on rheological behavior of mono & hybrid nanofluids concerned graphene and silica nano-powders: Characterization, stability and viscosity measurements. Powder Technology 366:216–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairul, M. A., K. Shah, E. Doroodchi, R. Azizian, and B. Moghtaderi. 2016. Effects of surfactant on stability and thermo-physical properties of metal oxide nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 98:778–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedkar, R. S., N. Shrivastava, S. Shriram.S., and K. L. Wasewar. 2016. Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of TiO2–ethylene glycol nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 73:54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedkar, R. S., S. Kiran. A., S. S. Sonawane, K. Wasewar, and S. Umre, Suresh. 2013. Thermo physical characterization of Paraffin based Fe3O4 nanofluids. Procedia Engineering 51:342–46.
   Google Scholar
• Khliyeva, O., V. Zhelezny, N. Khliiev, and Y. Hlek, 2020. The Semi-empirical Approach for Newtonian Nanofluids Viscosity Predicting, in: 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference Nanomaterials: Applications Properties (NAP), Sumy, Ukraine.
   Google Scholar
• Khodadadi, H., D. Toghraie, and A. Karimipour. 2018. Effects of nanoparticles to present a statistical model for the viscosity of MgO-Water nanofluid. Powder Technology 342:166–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodadadi, H., S. Aghakhani, H. Majd, R. Kalbasi, S. Wongwises, and M. Afrand. 2018. A comprehensive review on rheological behavior of mono and hybrid nanofluids: Effective parameters and predictive correlations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 127:997–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirithiga, R., and J. Hemalatha. 2020. Investigation of thermophysical properties of aqueous magnesium ferrite nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids 317:113944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koca, H. D., S. Doganay, A. Turgut, I. H. Tavman, R. Saidur, and I. M. Mahbubul. 2018. Effect of particle size on the viscosity of nanofluids: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82:1664–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kole, M., and T. K. Dey. 2011. Effect of aggregation on the viscosity of copper oxide-gear oil nanofluids. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 50:1741–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, I. M., and T. J. Dougherty. 1959. A Mechanism for NonNewtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres. Transactions of the Society of Rheology 3:137–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnakumar, T. S., A. Sheeba, V. Mahesh, and M. J. Prakash. 2019. Heat transfer studies on ethylene glycol/water nanofluid containing TiO2 nanoparticles. International Journal of Refrigeration 102:55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwek, D., A. Crivoi, and F. Duan. 2010. Effects of Temperature and Particle Size on the Thermal Property Measurements of Al2O3-Water Nanofluids. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 55:5690–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Ba, T., I. Várady, I. E. Lukács, J. Molnár, I. A. Balczár, S. Wongwises, and I. M. Szilágyi. 2021. Experimental investigation of rheological properties and thermal conductivity of SiO2–P25 TiO2 hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 146:493–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W., S. D. Park, S. Kang, I. C. Bang, and J. H. Kim. 2011. Investigation of viscosity and thermal conductivity of SiC nanofluids for heat transfer applications. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 54:433–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., L. Li, G. Zhong, Y. Zhai, and Z. Li. 2019. Effects of ultrasonic time, size of aggregates and temperature on the stability and viscosity of Cu-ethylene glycol (EG) nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 129:278–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., L. Wang, Y. He, Y. Hu, J. Zhu, and B. Jiang. 2015a. Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity and viscosity of ethylene glycol based ZnO nanofluids. Applied Thermal Engineering 88:363–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.10.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., C. Zou, T. Wang, and X. Lei. 2015b. Rheological behavior of ethylene glycol-based SiC nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 84:925–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., S. Asadi, A. Karimipour, A. Abdollahi, and I. Tlili. 2020. Experimental study of temperature and mass fraction effects on thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of SiO2-oleic acid/liquid paraffin nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 110:104436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-W., and H. C. Weng. 2018. Electrostatically Stabilized Nanofluid Preparation by Chemical Co-Precipitation and the Effect of Particle Size on Nanofluid Viscosity. Smart Science 6:197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., H. I. Mohammed, A. S. Ashkezari, A. K. Hussein, and S. Rostami. 2020. An experimental investigation on the rheological behavior of nanofluids made by suspending multi-walled carbon nanotubes in liquid paraffin. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 300: 112269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LotfizadehDehkordi, B., S. N. Kazi, M. Hamdi, A. Ghadimi, E. Sadeghinezhad, and H. S. C. Metselaar. 2013. Investigation of viscosity and thermal conductivity of alumina nanofluids with addition of SDBS. Heat Mass Transfer 49:1109–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, T. S. 1972. Slow flow through stationary random beds and suspensions of spheres. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 51:273–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddah, H., R. Aghayari, M. H. Ahmadi, M. Rahimzadeh, and N. Ghasemi. 2018. Prediction and modeling of MWCNT/Carbon (60/40)/SAE 10 W 40/SAE 85 W 90 (50/50)nanofluid viscosity using artificial neural network (ANN) and self-organizing map (SOM). Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 134:2275–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahbubul, I. M., T. H. Chong, S. S. Khaleduzzaman, I. M. Shahrul, R. Saidur, B. D. Long, and M. A. Amalina. 2014. Effect of Ultrasonication Duration on Colloidal Structure and Viscosity of Alumina–Water Nanofluid. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53:6677–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashali, F., E. M. Languri, J. Davidson, D. Kerns, and F. Alkhaldi, 2018. An Experimental Study on the Convective Heat Transfer Behaviour of Diamond Nanofluids in Electronic Cooling Applications, in: IMECE2018. Volume 8A: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Masoumi, N., N. Sohrabi, and A. Behzadmehr. 2009. A new model for calculating the effective viscosity of nanofluids. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42:055501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriläinen, A., A. Seppälä, K. Saari, J. Seitsonen, J. Ruokolainen, S. Puisto, N. Rostedt, and T. Ala-Nissila. 2013. Influence of particle size and shape on turbulent heat transfer characteristics and pressure losses in water-based nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 61:439–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meybodi, M. K., A. Daryasafar, M. M. Koochi, J. Moghadasi, R. B. Meybodi, and A. K. Ghahfarokhi. 2016. A novel correlation approach for viscosity prediction of water based nanofluids of Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and CuO. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 58:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., S. A. Adio, M. Sharifpur, and P. N. Nwosu. 2016. The Viscosity of Nanofluids: A Review of the Theoretical, Empirical, and Numerical Models. Heat Transfer Engineering 5:387–421.
   Google Scholar
• Minakov, A. V., D. V. Guzei, M. I. Pryazhnikov, V. A. Zhigarev, and V. Y. Rudyak. 2016. Study of turbulent heat transfer of the nanofluids in a cylindrical channel. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 102:745–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minea, A. A., and M. G. Moldoveanu. 2018. Overview of Hybrid Nanofluids Development and Benefits. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics 27:507–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. C., S. Mukherjee, S. K. Nayak, and A. Panda. 2014. A brief review on viscosity of nanofluids. International Nano Letters 4:109–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadpoor, M., S. Sabbaghi, M. M. Zerafat, and Z. Manafi. 2019. Investigating heat transfer properties of copper nanofluid in ethylene glycol synthesized through single and two-step routes. International Journal of Refrigeration 99:243–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldoveanu, G. M., C. Ibanescu, M. Danu, and A. A. Minea. 2018. Viscosity estimation of Al2O3, SiO2 nanofluids and their hybrid: An experimental study. Journal of Molecular Liquids 253:188–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondragón, R., D. Sánchez, R. Cabello, R. Llopis, and J. E. Juliá. 2019. Flat plate solar collector performance using alumina nanofluids: Experimental characterization and efficiency tests. PloS One 14:e0212260–e0212260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafizur, R. M., A. R. Abdul Aziz, R. Saidur, M. H. U. Bhuiyan, and I. M. Mahbubul. 2014. Effect of temperature and volume fraction on rheology of methanol based nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 77:765–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. B., S. Z. Heris, and M. G. Hosseini. 2019. Experimental investigation of MoS2/diesel oil nanofluid thermophysical and rheological properties. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 108:104298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. M., F. Esmaeilzadeh, and X. P. Wang. 2019a. A detailed investigation on the thermo-physical and rheological behavior of MgO/TiO2 aqueous dual hybrid nanofluid. Journal of Molecular Liquids 282:323–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. M., F. Esmaeilzadeh, and X. P. Wang. 2019b. Effects of temperature and particles volume concentration on the thermophysical properties and the rheological behavior of CuO/ MgO/TiO2 aqueous ternary hybrid nanofluid. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 137:879–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murshed, S. M. S., K. C. Leong, and C. Yang. 2008. Investigations of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 47:560–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murshed, S. M. S., M. Sharifpur, S. Giwa, and J. P. Meyer. 2020. Experimental Research and Development on the Natural Convection of Suspensions of Nanoparticles—A Comprehensive Review. Nanomaterials 10:1855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murshed, S. M. S., and P. Estellé. 2017. A state of the art review on viscosity of nanofluids. A State of the Art Review on Viscosity of Nanofluids 76:1134–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mutuku, W. N. 2016. Ethylene glycol (EG)-based nanofluids as a coolant for automotive radiator. Asia Pacific Journal on Computational Engineering 3:1.
   Google Scholar
• Nabeel Rashin, M., and J. Hemalatha. 2013. Viscosity studies on novel copper oxide–coconut oil nanofluid. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 48:67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabil, M. F., W. H. Azmi, K. Abdul Hamid, R. Mamat, and F. Y. Hagos. 2017. An experimental study on the thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of TiO2-SiO2 nanofluids in water: Ethylene glycol mixture. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 86:181–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namburu, P. K., D. P. Kulkarni, A. Dandekar, and D. K. Das. 2007. Experimental investigation of viscosity and specific heat of silicon dioxide nanofluids. Micro & Nano Letters 2:67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T., F. Desgranges, G. Roy, N. Galanis, T. Mare, S. Boucher, and H. Angue Mintsa. 2007b. Temperature and particle-size dependent viscosity data for water-based nanofluids – Hysteresis phenomenon. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 28:1492–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T., G. Roy, C. Gauthier, and N. Galanis. 2007a. Heat transfer enhancement using Al2O3–water nanofluid for an electronic liquid cooling system. Applied Thermal Engineering 27:1501–06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. E. 1970. Generalized equation for the elastic moduli of composite materials. Journal of Applied Physics 41:4626–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nižetić, S., M. Jurčević, M. Arıcı, A. V. Arasu, and G. Xie. 2020. Nano-enhanced phase change materials and fluids in energy applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 129:109931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omrani, A. N., E. Esmaeilzadeh, M. Jafari, and A. Behzadmehr. 2019. Effects of multi walled carbon nanotubes shape and size on thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. Diamond and Related Materials 93:96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouikhalfan, M., A. Labihi, M. Belaqziz, H. Chehouani, B. Benhamou, A. Sarı, and A. Belfkira. 2020. Stability and thermal conductivity enhancement of aqueous nanofluid based on surfactant-modified TiO2. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology 41:374–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastoriza-Gallego, M. J., C. Casanova, J. L. Legido, and M. M. Pineiro. 2011. CuO in water nanofluid: Influence of particle size and polydispersity on volumetric behaviour and viscosity. Fluid Phase Equilibria 300:188–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phuoc, T. X., and M. Massoudi. 2009. Experimental observations of the effects of shear rates and particle concentration on the viscosity of Fe2O3–deionized water nanofluids. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48:1294–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasher, R., D. Song, J. Wang, and P. Phelan. 2006. Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implications for thermal applications. Applied Physics Letters 89:133108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qasim, M., M. Sajid Kamran, M. Ammar, M. Ali Jamal, and M. Yasar Javaid. 2020. Heat Transfer Enhancement of an Automobile Engine Radiator using ZnO Water Base Nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Science 29:1010–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, Y., W. Sheng, C. He, C. Liu, and Z. Rao. 2021. Experimental study on the effect of different surfactants on the thermophysical properties of graphene filled nanofluids. International Journal of Energy Research 45:10043–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafati, M., A. A. Hamidi, and M. S. Niaser. 2012. Application of nanofluids in computer cooling systems (heat transfer performance of nanofluids). Applied Thermal Engineering 45–46:9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput, R. K., 2008. A Textbook of Hydraulic Machines. S. Chand Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. 1952. The viscosity of suspensions of rigid spheres. Journal of Applied Physics 3:267–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhani, B., D. Toghraie, M. Hekmatifar, and M. Hadian. 2019. Statistical investigation for developing a new model for rheological behavior of ZnO–Ag (50%–50%)/Water hybrid Newtonian nanofluid using experimental data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 525:741–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadri, R., G. Ahmadi, H. Togun, M. Dahari, S. N. Kazi, E. Sadeghinezhad, and N. Zubir. 2014. An experimental study on thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale Research Letters 9:151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi, A. H., M. Akbari, and D. Toghraie. 2018. An experimental study on rheological behavior of a nanofluid containing oxide nanoparticle and proposing a new correlation. Physica. E, Low-dimensional Systems & Nanostructures 99:285–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, R. R., and V. Kumar. 2020. Development of a new correlation to determine the viscosity of ternary hybrid nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 111:104451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, R. R. 2020. Experimental study on the viscosity of hybrid nanofluid and development of a new correlation. Heat and Mass Transfer 56:3023–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said Z, El Haj Assad M, Hachicha A Amine, Bellos E, Abdelkareem M Ali, Alazaizeh D Zeyad and Yousef B AA. (2019). Enhancing the performance of automotive radiators using nanofluids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardarabadi, M., M. Passandideh-fard, M. Maghrebi, and M. Ghazikhani. 2017. Experimental study of using both ZnO/ water nanofluid and phase change material (PCM) in photovoltaic thermal systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 161:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer, N., M. A. Atieh, and M. Koç. 2019. A comprehensive review on synthesis, stability, thermophysical properties, and characterization of nanofluids. Powder Technology 344:404–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J., M. Ranjan, V. Davariya, S. K. Gupta, and Y. Sonvane. 2017. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of synthesized α-alumina nanofluids. Applied Nanoscience 7:803–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahsavar, A., S. Khanmohammadi, A. Karimipour, and M. Goodarzi. 2019. A novel comprehensive experimental study concerned synthesizes and prepare liquid paraffin-Fe3O4 mixture to develop models for both thermal conductivity & viscosity: A new approach of GMDH type of neural network. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 131:432–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifpur, M., A. B. Solomon, J. P. Meyer, J. S. Ibrahim, and B. Immanuel, 2017. THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY AND VISCOSITY OF MANGO BARK/WATER NANOFLUIDS Presented at the 13th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Portorož, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Q., Y. Liu, F. Chen, and S. Dong. 2017. Investigation on rheological properties of carbon nanotube nanofluids. Physics and Chemistry of Liquids 57:37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., O. Sanchez, S. Ghosh, N. Kadimcherla, S. Sen, and G. Balasubramanian. 2015. Viscosity of magnetite–toluene nanofluids: Dependence on temperature and nanoparticle concentration. Physics Letters. A 379:2641–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani, O., and M. Akbari. 2016. Effects of temperature and particles concentration on the dynamic viscosity of MgO-MWCNT/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid: Experimental study. Physica. E, Low-dimensional Systems & Nanostructures 84:564–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subhedar, D. G., B. M. Ramani, and A. Gupta. 2018. Experimental investigation of heat transfer potential of Al2O3/Water-Mono Ethylene Glycol nanofluids as a car radiator coolant. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 11:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suganthi, K. S., V. L. Vinodhan, and K. S. Rajan. 2014. Heat transfer performance and transport properties of ZnO–ethylene glycol and ZnO–ethylene glycol–water nanofluid coolants. Applied Energy 135:548–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, L. S., E. V. Ramana, M. K. Singh, and A. C. M. De Sousa. 2012. Viscosity of low volume concentrations of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol and water mixture. Chemical Physics Letters 554:236–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, L. S., E. V. Ramana, M. K. Singh, and A. C. M. Sousa. 2014a. Thermal conductivity and viscosity of stabilized ethylene glycol and water mixture Al2O3 nanofluids for heat transfer applications: An experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 56:86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, L. S., E. V. Ramana, M. P. F. Graça, M. K. Singh, and A. C. M. Sousa. 2016b. Nanodiamond-Fe3O4 nanofluids: Preparation and measurement of viscosity, electrical and thermal conductivities. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 73:62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, L. S., K. V. Sharma, M. T. Naik, and M. K. Singh. 2013. Empirical and theoretical correlations on viscosity of nanofluids: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25:670–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, L. S., M. J. Hortiguela, M. K. Singh, and A. C. M. Sousa. 2016a. Thermal conductivity and viscosity of water based nanodiamond (ND) nanofluids: An experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:245–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, L. S., M. K. Singh, E. V. Ramana, B. Singh, J. Gracio, and A. C. M. Sousa. 2014b. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Nanodiamond-Nickel Nanocomposite Nanofluids. Scientific Reports 4:4039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, S., K. P. Venkitaraj, P. Selvakumar, and M. Chandrasekar. 2011. Synthesis of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluids using two step method and its thermo physical properties. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 388:41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syam Sundar, L., K. V. Sharma, M. K. Singh, and A. Sousa. 2017. Hybrid nanofluids preparation, thermal properties, heat transfer and friction factor – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68:185–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timofeeva, E. V., D. S. Smith, W. Yu, D. M. France, D. Singh, and J. L. Routbort. 2010. Particle size and interfacial effects on thermo-physical and heat transfer characteristics of water-based α-SiC nanofluids. Nanotechnology 21:215703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toghraie, D., S. M. Alempour, and M. Afrand. 2016. Experimental determination of viscosity of water based magnetite nanofluid for application in heating and cooling systems. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 417:243–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udawattha, D. S., M. Narayana, and U. P. L. Wijayarathne. 2019. Predicting the effective viscosity of nanofluids based on the rheology of suspensions of solid particles. Journal of King Saud University - Science 31:412–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urmi, W., M. M. Rahman, and W. A. W. Hamzah. 2020. An experimental investigation on the thermophysical properties of 40% ethylene glycol based TiO2-Al2O3 hybrid nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 116:104663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakilinejad, A., M. A. Aroon, M. Al-Abri, H. Bahmanyar, B. Al-Ghafri, M. T. Z. Myint, and G. R. Vakili-Nezhaad. 2021. Experimental investigation and modeling of the viscosity of some water-based nanofluids. Chemical Engineering Communications 208:1054–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo, J. P., S. Gómez-Barreiro, D. Cabaleiro, C. Gracia-Fernández, J. Fernández-Seara, and L. Lugo. 2018. Flow behaviour of suspensions of functionalized graphene nanoplatelets in propylene glycol–water mixtures. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 91:150–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignesh, V., S. Vijayan, and G. Selvakumar. 2020. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION AND MECHANISM ANALYSIS: EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION AND TEMPERATURE ON THE VISCOSITY OF NOVEL MWCNT-MUSTARD OIL NANOFLUID. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society 65:4948–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnuprasad, S., H. K, and P. V.t. 2019. Experimental study on the convective heat transfer performance and pressure drop of functionalized graphene nanofluids in electronics cooling system. Heat and Mass Transfer 55:2221–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., G. Li, T. Li, M. Zeng, and B. Sundén. 2021. Effect of various surfactants on stability and thermophysical properties of nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 143:4057–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wole-Osho, I., E. C. Okonkwo, D. Kavaz, and S. Abbasoglu. 2020. An experimental investigation into the effect of particle mixture ratio on specific heat capacity and dynamic viscosity of Al2O3-ZnO hybrid nanofluids. Powder Technology 363:699–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H., W. Yu, and W. Chen. 2010. MgO nanofluids: Higher thermal conductivity and lower viscosity among ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience 5:463–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Q. Nguyen, O. Malekahmadi, R. Hadi, Z. Jokar, A. Mardani, A. Karimipour, R. Ranjbarzadeh, Z. Li, and Q.-V. Bach. 2020. Synthesis and characterization of additive graphene oxide nanoparticles dispersed in water: Experimental and theoretical viscosity prediction of non-Newtonian nanofluid. In Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, (Wiley Online Library).
   Google Scholar
• Xuan, Z., Y. Zhai, M. Ma, Y. Li, and H. Wang. 2021. Thermo-economic performance and sensitivity analysis of ternary hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids 323:114889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, D., R. Kumar, B. Tiwary, and P. K. Singh. 2021. Rheological characteristics of CeO2, Al2O3 and their hybrid mixture in ethylene glycol base fuid in the wide range of temperature and concentration. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 143:1003–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, S.-R., R. Kalbasi, Q. Nguyen, and A. Karimipour. 2020. Rheological behavior of hybrid MWCNTs-TiO2/EG nanofluid: A comprehensive modeling and experimental study. Journal of Molecular Liquids 308:113058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., N. Zhao, Z. Li, and C. Sun. 2019. A combined theory model for predicting the viscosity of water-based Newtonian nanofluids containing spherical oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 135:1311–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., and K. Du. 2019. A comprehensive review on the natural, forced, and mixed convection of non‑Newtonian fluids (nanofluids) inside different cavities. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 140:2033–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiamsawas, T., A. S. Dalkilic, O. Mahian, and S. Wongwises. 2013. Measurement and Correlation of the Viscosity of Water-Based Al2O3 and TiO2 Nanofluids in High Temperatures and Comparisons with Literature Reports. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology 34:1697–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F., Y. Chen, X. Liang, J. Xu, C. Lee, Q. Liang, and P. Tao. 2017. Dispersion stability of thermal nanofluids. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 27:531–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., Y. Bian, Y. Liu, and X. Xu. 2019. Experimental investigation on rheological properties of water based nanofluids with low MWCNT concentrations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 135:175–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., Y. Bian, Y. Liu, and X. Xu. 2020. Experimental investigation of rheological properties of low concentrated TiO2/water and MWCNT-TiO2/water hybrid nanofluids. Heat and Mass Transfer 56:2545–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, A. D., and D. Toghraie. 2017. Experimental investigation for developing a new model for the dynamic viscosity of silver/ethylene glycol nanofluid at different temperatures and solid volume fractions. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 131:1449–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, Y., L. Li, J. Wang, and Z. Li. 2019. Evaluation of surfactant on stability and thermal performance of Al2O3-ethylene glycol (EG) nanofluids. Powder Technology 343:215–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., D. Han, Z. Meng, D. Wu, and C. Zhang. 2011. Preparation and thermal conductivity of CuO nanofluid via a wet chemical method. Nanoscale Research Letters 6:181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyła, G., and J. Fal. 2017. Viscosity, thermal and electrical conductivity of silicon dioxide–ethylene glycol transparent nanofluids: An experimental studies. Thermochimica Acta 650:106–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyła, G. 2017. Viscosity and thermal conductivity of MgO–EG nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 129:171–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żyła, G. 2020. Nanofluids containing low fraction of carbon black nanoparticles in ethylene glycol: An experimental study on their rheological properties. Journal of Molecular Liquids 297:111732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar