Comparison of preparation methods for improving coke resistance of Ni-Ru/MgAl₂O₄ catalysts in dry reforming of methane for syngas production

References

• Abdullah, B., N. A. Abd Ghani, and D.-V. N. Vo. 2017. Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts. Journal of Cleaner Production 162:170–85. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alipour, Z., M. Rezaei, and F. Meshkani. 2014. Effect of alkaline earth promoters (MgO, CaO, and BaO) on the activity and coke formation of Ni catalysts supported on nanocrystalline Al2O3 in dry reforming of methane. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 20 (5):2858–63. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzouz, A., D. Nistor, D. Miron, A.V. Ursu, T. Sajin, F. Monette, P. Niquette, R. Hausler. 2006. Assessment of acid–base strength distribution of ion-exchanged montmorillonites through NH3 and CO2-TPD measurements. Thermochimica Acta. 449(1–2):27–34. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2006.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobadilla, L., V. Garcilaso, M. Centeno, and J. Odriozola. 2018. CO2 reforming of methane over Ni-Ru supported catalysts: On the nature of active sites by operando DRIFTS study. Journal of CO2 Utilization 24:509–15. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “price of Ruthenium (a) and Nickel (b).” (a) https://pmm.umicore.com/en/prices/ruthenium/https://www.kores.net/komis/price/mineralprice/basemetals/pricetrend/baseMetals.do.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., and A. Maitra. 1995. The chemistry of methane reforming with carbon dioxide and its current and potential applications. Fuel Processing Technology 42 (2–3):269–89. doi:10.1016/0378-3820(94)00105-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, X., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Wang, C., Huang, Q., Xu, X., Peng, H., Liu, W., Wang, X., Zhou, W. 2018. Methane dry reforming over Ni/Mg-Al-O: On the significant promotional effects of rare earth Ce and Nd metal oxides. Journal of CO2 Utilization 25:242–53. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2018.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, J. M., J. Piña, T. El Solh, and H. I. De Lasa. 2005. Coke formation over a nickel catalyst under methane dry reforming conditions: Thermodynamic and kinetic models. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 44 (14):4846–54. doi:10.1021/ie0496333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., H. Lou, H. Zhao, D. Chai, and X. Zheng. 2004. Dry reforming of methane over nickel catalysts supported on magnesium aluminate spinels. Applied Catalysis. A, General 273 (1–2):75–82. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2004.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. H., and E. Ruckenstein. 2002. Binary MgO-based solid solution catalysts for methane conversion to syngas. Catalysis Reviews 44 (3):423–53. doi:10.1081/CR-120005742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., Jakobsen, J.G., Shim, S.S., Kleis, J., Andersson, M.P., Rossmeisl, J., Abild-Pedersen, F., Bligaard, T., Helveg, S., Hinnemann., et al. 2008. First principles calculations and experimental insight into methane steam reforming over transition metal catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 259(1):147–60. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2008.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, R., and S. Sengupta. 2020. Catalytic CO2 reforming of CH4 over MgAl2O4 supported Ni-Co catalysts for the syngas production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (43):22775–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucci, F. R., M. D. Marcinkowski, T. J. Lawton, and E. C. H. Sykes. 2015. H2 activation and spillover on catalytically relevant Pt–Cu single atom alloys. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119 (43):24351–57. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoo, M. K., and N. Amin. 2011. Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide reforming of methane in view of solid carbon formation. Fuel Processing Technology 92 (3):678–91. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. E., K. Y. Koo, U. H. Jung, J. H. Lee, H.-S. Roh, and W. L. Yoon. 2015. Syngas production by combined steam and CO2 reforming of coke oven gas over highly sinter-stable La-promoted Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40 (40):13909–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsapur, R. K., S. Chatterjee, and K.-W. Huang. 2020. The insignificant role of dry reforming of methane in CO2 emission relief. ACS Energy Letters 5 (9):2881–85. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Gomez, A., R. Pereniguez, and A. Caballero. 2018. Nickel particles selectively confined in the mesoporous channels of SBA-15 yielding a very stable catalyst for DRM reaction. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 122 (2):500–10. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b03835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostrupnielsen, J., and J. B. Hansen. 1993. CO2-reforming of methane over transition metals. Journal of Catalysis 144 (1):38–49. doi:10.1006/jcat.1993.1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-José-Alonso, D., J. Juan-Juan, M. Illán-Gómez, and M. Román-Martínez. 2009. Ni, Co and bimetallic Ni–Co catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis. A, General 371 (1–2):54–59. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehested, J. 2006. Four challenges for nickel steam-reforming catalysts. Catalysis Today 111 (1–2):103–10. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şener, A. N., M. E. Günay, A. Leba, and R. Yıldırım. 2018. Statistical review of dry reforming of methane literature using decision tree and artificial neural network analysis. Catalysis Today 299:289–302. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Ozdemir, E., Ramesh, S., Adishev, A., Subramanian, S., Harale, A., Albuali, M., Fadhel, B.A., Jamal, A., Moon D., et al. 2020. Dry reforming of methane by stable Ni–Mo nanocatalysts on single-crystalline MgO. Science. 367(6479):777–81. doi:10.1126/science.aav2412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengfei, H., L. Yusheng, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, and C. Weijie. 2015. Ethanol dry reforming for syngas production over Ir/CeO2 catalyst. Journal of Rare Earths 33 (1):42–45. doi:10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60381-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsyganok, A. I., M. Inaba, T. Tsunoda, S. Hamakawa, K. Suzuki, and T. Hayakawa. 2003. Dry reforming of methane over supported noble metals: A novel approach to preparing catalysts. Catalysis Communications 4 (9):493–98. doi:10.1016/S1566-7367(03)00130-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Wang, Y., Chen, M., Liang, D., Yang, Z., Cheng, W., Tang, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, H. 2021a. Recent advances during CH4 dry reforming for syngas production: A mini review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46: 5852-5874. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.240.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H, et al. 2020b. Hierarchical Fe-modified MgAl 2 O 4 as a Ni-catalyst support for methane dry reforming. Catalysis Science & Technology 10 (20):6987–7001. doi:10.1039/D0CY01119C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., G. Lu, and G. J. Millar. 1996. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane to produce synthesis gas over metal-supported catalysts: State of the art. Energy & Fuels 10 (4):896–904. doi:10.1021/ef950227t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., Yang, B., Miao, S., Liu, W., Xie, J., Lee, S., Pellin, M.J., Xiao, D., Su, D., Ma, D. 2019. Lattice strained Ni-Co alloy as a high-performance catalyst for catalytic dry reforming of methane. ACS Catalysis. 9(4):2693–700. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b02821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., H. Wang, and A. K. Dalai. 2007. Development of stable bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Journal of Catalysis 249 (2):300–10. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2007.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R.-J., G.-F. Xia, M.-F. Li, W. Yu, N. Hong, and D.-D. Li. 2015. Effect of support on the performance of Ni-based catalyst in methane dry reforming. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 43 (11):1359–65. doi:10.1016/S1872-5813(15)30040-2.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Yang, B., Miao, S., Liu, W., Xie, J., Lee, S., Pellin, M.J., Xiao, D., Su, D., Ma, D. 2018. A single source method to generate Ru-Ni-MgO catalysts for methane dry reforming and the kinetic effect of Ru on carbon deposition and gasification. Applied Catalysis. B, Environmental 233:143–59. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar