Prediction and parametric analysis of bubble humidifier performance in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell test system by response surface methodology

References

• Ahmaditaba, A. H., E. Afshari, and S. Asghari. 2018. An experimental study on the bubble humidification method of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 40 (12):1508–19. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1477877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Y. Qin, Y. Yin, J. Zhang, and X. Li. 2018. Humidification strategy for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells–A review. Applied Energy 230:643–62. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, E., and M. Preißinger. 2020. Experimental analysis of the humidification of air in bubble columns for thermal water treatment systems. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 115:110063. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houreh, N. B., and E. Afshari. 2014. Three-dimensional CFD modeling of a planar membrane humidifier for PEM fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (27):14969–79. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houreh, N. B., H. Shokouhmand, and E. Afshari. 2019. Effect of inserting obstacles in flow field on a membrane humidifier performance for PEMFC application: A CFD model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (57):30420–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, D., and J. Kim. 2004. Study of external humidification method in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 126 (1–2):98–103. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.08.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijaodola, O. S., Z. El-Hassan, E. Ogungbemi, F. N. Khatib, T. Wilberforce, J. Thompson, and A. G. Olabi. 2019. Energy efficiency improvements by investigating the water flooding management on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Energy 179:246–67. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, M., and Z. Wei. 2009. A review of water management in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Energies 2 (4):1057–106. doi:10.3390/en20401057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanfil, G. 2020. Importance and applications of DOE/optimization methods in PEM fuel cells: A review. International Journal of Energy Research 44 (1):4–25. doi:10.1002/er.4815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuri, A. I., and S. Mukhopadhyay. 2010. Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdisciplinary reviews. Computational Statistics 2 (2):128–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, T., K. Wang, Q. Zhou, W. Lin, M. Cong, and W. Jia. 2019. Numerical study on humidification performance of fuel cell test platform humidifier. Energies 12 (20):3839. doi:10.3390/en12203839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikiforow, K., J. Ihonen, T. Keränen, H. Karimäki, and V. Alopaeus. 2014. Modeling and experimental validation of H2 gas bubble humidifier for a 50 kW stationary PEMFC system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (18):9768–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, Y., H. Janßen, and W. Lehnert. 2017. Characterizing membrane electrode assemblies for high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using design of experiments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (2):1189–202. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, S., S. Swaminathan, S. Bhardwaj, H. K. Tanneru, B. Bullecks, and R. Rengaswamy. 2019. Rapid humidity regulation by mixing of dry and humid gases with feedback control for PEM fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (1):389–407. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasmito, A. P., J. C. Kurnia, T. Shamim, and A. S. Mujumdar. 2017. Optimization of an open-cathode polymer electrolyte fuel cells stack utilizing Taguchi method. Applied Energy, Clean, Efficient and Affordable Energy for a Sustainable Future 185 (1):1225–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sayadi, P., S. Rowshanzamir, and M. J. Parnian. 2016. Study of hydrogen crossover and proton conductivity of self-humidifying nanocomposite proton exchange membrane based on sulfonated poly (ether ketone). Energy 94:292–303. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffe, H. 1999. . In The analysis of variance, (New York: John Wiley and sons).
   Google Scholar
• Sung, C. C., C. Y. Bai, J. H. Chen, and S. J. Chang. 2013. Controllable fuel cell humidification by ultrasonic atomization. Journal of Power Sources 239:151–56. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasu, G., A. K. Tangirala, B. Viswanathan, and K. S. Dhathathreyan. 2008. Continuous bubble humidification and control of relative humidity of H2 for a PEMFC system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33 (17):4640–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. L., III, S. Y. Jung, and T. V. Nguyen. 1998. Effect of direct liquid water injection and interdigitated flow field on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta 43 (24):3795–809. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00139-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G., K. Guo, and T. Wang. 2017. Numerical simulation of the bubble column at elevated pressure with a CFD-PBM coupled model. Chemical Engineering Science 170:251–62. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar