A new hybrid BIPV array for enhancing maximum power with reduced mismatch losses under extreme partial shading scenarios

References

• Al-Janahi, S. A., O. Ellabban, and S. G. Al-Ghamdi. 2020. A novel BIPV reconfiguration algorithm for maximum power generation under partial shading. Energies 13 (17):4470. doi:10.3390/en13174470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingöl, O., and B. Özkaya. 2018. Analysis and comparison of different PV array configurations under partial shading conditions. Solar Energy 160:336–43. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIPV module BIPV052-T86 details 52W sun energy tile. Available online: http://www.solarhub.com/product-catalog/pv-modules/16641-BIPV052-T86-BIPV. Accessed July 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bonthagorla, P. K., and S. Mikkili. 2020a. Performance analysis of PV array configurations (SP, BL, HC and TT) to enhance maximum power under non-uniform shading conditions. Engineering Reports 2 (8):e12214. doi:10.1002/eng2.12214.
   Google Scholar
• Bonthagorla, P. K., and S. Mikkili. 2020b. Performance investigation of hybrid and conventional PV array configurations for grid-connected/standalone PV systems. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonthagorla, P. K., and S. Mikkili. 2021. A novel fixed PV array configuration for harvesting maximum power from shaded modules by reducing the number of cross-ties. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics 9 (2):2109–21. doi:10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2979632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, A. A., and S. Mikkili. 2021. Novel hybrid PV configurations to enhance the output power and efficiency by minimising the number of peaks and mismatching loss. IETE Journal of Research 1–19. doi:10.1080/03772063.2021.1943012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, V., and U. S. Triar. 2019. A detailed comparative analysis of different photovoltaic array configurations under partial shading conditions. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 29 (6):e12020. doi:10.1002/2050-7038.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, V., “Performance analysis of hybrid photovoltaic array configurations under randomly distributed shading patterns,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Energy Research, IIT Bombay, 2021, pp. 1287–96.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B., S. Duan, and T. Cai. 2011. Photovoltaic DC-building-module-based BIPV system—concept and design considerations. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 26 (5):1418–29. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2010.2085087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patro, S. K., and R. P. Saini. 2021. Performance investigation of PV array under partial shading conditions with static array configuration and MPPT. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects 1–21. doi:10.1080/15567036.2021.1976323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendem, S. R., and S. Mikkili. 2018a. Modeling, simulation, and performance analysis of PV array configurations (series, series-parallel, bridge-linked, and honey-comb) to harvest maximum power under various partial shading conditions. International Journal of Green Energy 15 (13):795–812. doi:10.1080/15435075.2018.1529577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendem, S. R., and S. Mikkili. 2018b. Modelling and performance assessment of PV array topologies under partial shading conditions to mitigate the mismatching power losses. Solar Energy 160:303–21. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendem, S. R., V. V. Katru, and S. Mikkili, “Hybrid PV array configurations for reducing the multiple-peak power points in I-V and P-V characteristics under partial shading conditions,” in TENCON 2019 - 2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Kochi, India, 2019a, pp. 598–603.
   Google Scholar
• Pendem, S. R., V. V. Katru, and S. Mikkili, “Hybrid PV array configurations for mitigating the mismatching power loss and number of peaks in the output characteristics under various PSCs,” in IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Lisbon, Portugal, 2019b, vol. 1, pp. 2377–82.
   Google Scholar
• Premkumar, M., U. Subramaniam, T. S. Babu, R. M. Elavarasan, and L. Mihet-Popa. 2020. Evaluation of mathematical model to characterise the performance of conventional and hybrid PV array topologies under static and dynamic shading patterns. Energies 13 (12):3216. doi:10.3390/en13123216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju Pendem, S., S. Mikkili, S. S. Rangarajan, S. Avv, R. E. Collins, and T. Senjyu. 2021. Optimal hybrid PV array topologies to maximize the power output by reducing the effect of non-uniform operating conditions. Electronics 10 (23):3014. doi:10.3390/electronics10233014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, P. S., G. S. Ilango, and C. Nagamani. 2014. Maximum power from PV arrays using a fixed configuration under different shading conditions. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 4 (2):679–86. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2300239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo, S. K. 2016. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews solar photovoltaic energy progress in India: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 59:927–39. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, D., A. Kumar, and P. K. Sadhu. 2020. A survey on development and recent trends of renewable energy generation from BIPV systems. IETE Technical Review 37 (3):258–80. doi:10.1080/02564602.2019.1598294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, D., A. Kumar, and P. K. Sadhu. 2021. Different diode models comparison using Lambert W function for extracting maximum power from BIPV modules. International Journal of Energy Research 45 (1):691–702. doi:10.1002/er.5801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sechilariu, M., B. Wang, and F. Locment. 2013. Building integrated photovoltaic system with energy storage and smart grid communication. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 60 (4):1607–18. doi:10.1109/TIE.2012.2222852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subudhi, B., and R. Pradhan. 2013. A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 4 (1):89–98. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi, L., A. K. Mishra, A. K. Dubey, C. B. Tripathi, and P. Baredar. 2016. Renewable energy: An overview on its contribution in current energy scenario of India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 60:226–33. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidinasab, V., C. Ardalan, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, D. Giaouris, and S. L. Walker. 2021. Active building as an energy system: Concept, challenges, and outlook. IEEE Access 9:58009–24. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalva, M. G., J. R. Gazoli, and E. R. Filho. 2009. Comprehensive approach to modeling and simulation of photovoltaic arrays. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 24 (5):1198–208. doi:10.1109/TPEL.2009.2013862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, L., J. Hofer, and A. Schlueter. 2019. High-resolution, parametric BIPV and electrical systems modeling and design. Applied Energy 238:164–79. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., M. Wang, and H. Yang. 2018. A review of the energy performance and life-cycle assessment of building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. Energies 11 (11):3157. doi:10.3390/en11113157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zomer, C., A. Nobre, T. Reindl, and R. Rüther. 2016. Shading analysis for rooftop BIPV embedded in a high-density environment: A case study in Singapore. Energy and Buildings 121:159–64. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar