Comprehensive review on cogeneration systems for low and medium temperature heat recoveries

References

• https://grid.iamkate.com
   Google Scholar
• Abed, H., K. Atashkari, A. Niazmehr, and A. Jamali. 2013. Thermodynamic optimization of combined power and refrigeration cycle using binary organic working fluid. International Journal of Refrigeration 36 (8):2160–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2013.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abusoglu, A., and M. Kanoglu. 2009. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (9):2295–308. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Jimenez, J. A., N. Velazquez, R. Lopez-Zavala, R. Beltran, L. Hernandez-Callejo, L. A. Gonzalez-Uribe, and V. Alonso-Gomez. 2020. Low-temperature multiple-effect desalination/organic Rankine cycle system with a novel integration for fresh water and electrical energy production. Desalination 477:114269. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2019.114269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari, M., S. Mahmoudi, M. Yari, and M. A. Rosen. 2014. Energy and exergy analyses of a new combined cycle for producing electricity and desalinated water using geothermal energy. Sustainability 6 (4):1796–820. doi:10.3390/su6041796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhulaifi, Y. M., E. Baata, F. A. Al-Sulaiman, N. I. Ibrahim, and R. Ben-Mansour. 2021. Performance and exergoeconomic assessment of a novel combined ejector cooling with humidification-dehumidification (HDH) desalination system. Desalination 500:114843. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2020.114843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araghi, A. H., M. Khiadani, and K. Hooman. 2016. A novel vacuum discharge thermal energy combined desalination and power generation system utilizing R290/R600a. Energy 98:215–24. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaelahi, M., E. Mofidipour, and E. Rafat. 2019. Design, dynamic analysis and control-based exergetic optimization for solar-driven Kalina power plant. Energy 187:115977. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.115977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badami, M., and M. Mura. 2010. Exergetic analysis of an innovative small scale combined cycle cogeneration system. Energy 35 (6):2535–43. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkhordarian, O., A. Behbahaninia, and R. Bahrampoury. 2017. A novel ammonia-water combined power and refrigeration cycle with two different cooling temperature levels.Energy. Circulation Research 120 (5):816–26. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartela, Ł., J. Kotowicz, and K. Dubiel-Jurgaś. 2018. Investment risk for biomass integrated gasification combined heat and power unit with an internal combustion engine and a Stirling engine. Energy 150:601–16. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazmi, A. A., and G. Zahedi. 2011. Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (8):3480–500. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnam, P., M. Faegh, and M. B. Shafii. 2019. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined power and refrigeration cycle comprising of EKalina and ejector refrigeration cycles. International Journal of Refrigeration 104:291–301. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermanm, B. P., J. Brasz, F. J. Cogswell, J. Mulugeta, and L. Zhang. Inventors; United technologies corporation, assignee. cascaded organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system using waste heat from a reciprocating engine. US patent 0263380. 2010 October 21.
   Google Scholar
• Brizi, F., J. L. Silveira, U. Desideri, J. A. Dos Reis, C. E. Tuna, and W. de Queiroz Lamas. 2014. Energetic and economic analysis of a Brazilian compact cogeneration system: Comparison between natural gas and biogas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38:193–211. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglayan, H., and H. Caliskan. 2018. Energy, exergy and sustainability assessments of a cogeneration system for ceramic industry. Applied Thermal Engineering 136:504–15. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., J. Lou, J. Wang, and Y. Dai. 2018. Exergy analysis and optimization of a combined cooling and power system driven by geothermal energy for ice-making and hydrogen production. Energy Conversion and Management 174:886–96. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzopoulou, M. A., and C. N. Markides. 2018. Thermodynamic optimisation of a high-electrical efficiency integrated internal combustion engine–Organic Rankine cycle combined heat and power system. Applied Energy 226:1229–51. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, V., P. A. Kishan, and S. Gedupudi. 2019. Thermodynamic analysis of a combined cycle for cold storage and power generation using geothermal heat source. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 11:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2019.03.009.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Z. Guo, J. Wu, Z. Zhang, and J. Hua. 2015. Energy and exergy analysis of integrated system of ammonia–water Kalina–Rankine cycle. Energy 90:2028–37. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., D. Xu, Z. Chen, X. Gao, and W. Han. 2019. Energetic and exergetic analysis of a solar-assisted combined power and cooling (SCPC) system with two different cooling temperature levels. Energy Conversion and Management 182:497–507. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. H., C. M. Wang, L. H. Saw, A. T. Hoang, and A. A. Bandala. 2021. Performance evaluation and improvement of thermoelectric generators (TEG): Fin installation and compromise optimization. Energy Conversion and Management 250:114858. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., J. Wang, and L. Gao. 2009. Exergy analysis, parametric analysis and optimization for a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (10):1983–90. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalala, Z., M. Al-Omari, M. Al-Addous, M. Bdour, Y. Al-Khasawneh, and M. Alkasrawi. 2022. Increased renewable energy penetration in national electrical grids constraints and solutions. Energy 246:123361. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Neto, R., C. A. R. Sotomonte, and C. J. Coronado. 2021. Off-design model of an ORC system for waste heat recovery of an internal combustion engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 195:117188. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M. J., and C. Yoo. 2020. Three-step modification and optimization of Kalina power-cooling cogeneration based on energy, pinch, and economics analyses. Energy 205:118069. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhahad, H. A., H. M. Hussen, P. T. Nguyen, H. Ghaebi, and M. A. Ashraf. 2020. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of innovative integration of Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles for simultaneously cooling and power generation. Energy Conversion and Management 203:112241. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diangelakis, N. A., and E. N. Pistikopoulos. 2017. A multi-scale energy systems engineering approach to residential combined heat and power systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 102:128–38. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y., P. Han, X. Qiang, M. Hao, Y. Long, P. Zhao, and Y. Dai. 2018. Off-design performance analysis of a combined cooling and power system driven by low-grade heat source. Energy Conversion and Management 159:327–41. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y., and Y. Dai. 2018. Off-design performance analysis of a power-cooling cogeneration system combining a Kalina cycle with an ejector refrigeration cycle. Energy 161:233–50. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadollahi, M., H. Rostamzadeh, M. Z. Pedram, H. Ghaebi, and M. Amidpour. 2019. Proposal and multi-criteria optimization of two new combined heating and power systems for the Sabalan geothermal source. Journal of Cleaner Production 229:1065–81. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, A., B. Ghorbani, and M. Ziabasharhagh. 2020. Introducing a novel integrated cogeneration system of power and cooling using stored liquefied natural gas as a cryogenic energy storage system. Energy 206:117982. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi-Moghadam, A., A. J. Moghadam, and M. Farzaneh-Gord. 2020. Comprehensive techno-economic and environmental sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel heat and power system for natural gas city gate stations. Journal of Cleaner Production 262: 121261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi-Moghadam, A., A. J. Moghadam, M. Farzaneh-Gord, and K. Aliakbari. 2020. Proposal and assessment of a novel combined heat and power system: Energy, exergy, environmental and economic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 204:112307. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehyaei, M. A., A. Ahmadi, M. E. H. Assad, and M. A. Rosen. 2020. Investigation of an integrated system combining an organic Rankine cycle and absorption chiller driven by geothermal energy: Energy, exergy, and economic analyses and optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production 258:120780. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emadi, M. A., N. Chitgar, O. A. Oyewunmi, and C. N. Markides. 2020. Working-fluid selection and thermoeconomic optimisation of a combined cycle cogeneration dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) waste-heat recovery. Applied Energy 261:114384. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmanuel, M., K. Doubleday, B. Cakir, M. Marković, and B. M. Hodge. 2020. A review of power system planning and operational models for flexibility assessment in high solar energy penetration scenarios. Solar Energy 210:169–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyerer, S., F. Dawo, C. Wieland, and H. Spliethoff. 2020. Advanced ORC architecture for geothermal combined heat and power generation. Energy 205:117967. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, G., Y. Du, H. Li, and Y. Dai. 2021. Off-design behavior investigation of the combined supercritical CO2 and organic Rankine cycle. Energy 237:121529. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiaschi, D., A. Lifshitz, G. Manfrida, and D. Tempesti. 2014. An innovative ORC power plant layout for heat and power generation from medium-to low-temperature geothermal resources. Energy Conversion and Management 88:883–93. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigo, S., and G. Spazzafumo. 2018. Cogeneration of power and substitute of natural gas using biomass and electrolytic hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (26):11696–705. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaia, M., R. Bini, R. Vescovo, and E. Spagnoli. inventors; Cogenerative organic Rankine cycle system. PCT/IB2017/052880. 2017 November 23.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, N. S., and T. Srinivas. 2013. Thermodynamic assessment of heat source arrangements in Kalina power station. Journal of Energy Engineering 139 (2):99–108. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, N. S., and K. S. Giridharan. Combined renewable energy based heat, power generation and cooling system and a method thereof. Application No. 201941040473 A. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gargari, S. G., M. Rahimi, and H. Ghaebi. 2018. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel power-hydrogen cogeneration system. Energy Conversion and Management 171:1093–105. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaebi, H., T. Parikhani, and H. Rostamzadeh. 2017. Energy, exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system using low-temperature heat source and LNG cold energy recovery. Energy Conversion and Management 150:678–92. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaebi, H., T. Parikhani, H. Rostamzadeh, and B. Farhang. 2017. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a novel combined cooling and power (CCP) cycle by integrating of ejector refrigeration and Kalina cycles. Energy 139:262–76. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaebi, H., B. Farhang, T. Parikhani, and H. Rostamzadeh. 2018a. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system for power and hydrogen production purpose based on TRR method and using low grade geothermal source. Geothermics 71:132–45. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaebi, H., T. Parikhani, H. Rostamzadeh, and B. Farhang. 2018b. Proposal and assessment of a novel geothermal combined cooling and power cycle based on Kalina and ejector refrigeration cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering 130:767–81. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaebi, H., and H. Rostamzadeh. 2020. Performance comparison of two new cogeneration systems for fresh water and power production based on organic Rankine and Kalina cycles driven by salinity-gradient solar pond. Renewable Energy 156:748–67. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, B., R. Shirmohammadi, and M. Mehrpooya. 2020. Development of an innovative cogeneration system for fresh water and power production by renewable energy using thermal energy storage system. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 37:100572. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2019.100572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldshtein, L., E. I. I. G. Margolin, Y. Elgart, and M. Goldshtein. Inventors; Method and system of combined for waste heat conversion to electrical energy, heating and cooling. PCT/IL2016/051269. 2016 November 24.
   Google Scholar
• Grabner, M., O. Von Morstein, D. Rappold, W. Günster, G. Beysel, and B. Meyer. 2010. Constructability study on a German reference IGCC power plant with and without CO2-capture for hard coal and lignite. Energy Conversion and Management 51 (11):2179–87. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, T., H. X. Wang, and S. J. Zhang. 2011. Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources. Energy 36 (5):2639–49. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., Q. Liu, J. Sun, and H. Jin. 2018. A review on the utilization of hybrid renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 91:1121–47. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. R., A. K. Tiwari, and Z. Said. 2022. Solar organic Rankine cycle and its poly-generation applications–A review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 49:101732. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, W., Q. Chen, L. Sun, S. Ma, T. Zhao, D. Zheng, and H. Jin. 2014. Experimental studies on a combined refrigeration/power generation system activated by low-grade heat. Energy 74:59–66. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif, I., B. Aziz, and I. S. Chaudhry. 2019. Carbon emissions across the spectrum of renewable and non-renewable energy use in developing economies of Asia. Renewable Energy 143:586–95. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W. F., F. Wu, Y. P. Kong, T. Wen, J. J. Chen, and D. Han. 2019. Parametric analysis of a power-water cogeneration system based on single-extraction organic Rankine cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 148:382–90. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberle, F., and D. Brüggemann. 2010. Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal organic Rankine cycle for combined heat and power generation. Applied Thermal Engineering 30 (11–12):1326–32. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higa, M., E. Y. Yamamoto, J. C. D. de Oliveira, and W. A. S. Conceição. 2018. Evaluation of the integration of an ammonia-water power cycle in an absorption refrigeration system of an industrial plant. Energy Conversion and Management 178:265–76. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, A. T., and X. P. Nguyen. 2021. Integrating renewable sources into energy system for smart city as a sagacious strategy towards clean and sustainable process. Journal of Cleaner Production 305:127161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, J., A. Chitsaz, B. Eisavi, and M. Yari. 2018. Investigation on performance of an integrated SOFC-Goswami system using wood gasification. Energy 148:614–28. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, S., Y. Zhou, L. Yu, F. Zhang, S. Cao, and Y. Wu. 2018. Optimization of a novel cogeneration system including a gas turbine, a supercritical CO2 recompression cycle, a steam power cycle and an organic Rankine cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 172:457–71. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, J., Y. Chen, Y. Wang, and A. P. Roskilly. 2014. Thermodynamic analysis of ammonia–water power/chilling cogeneration cycle with low-grade waste heat. Applied Thermal Engineering 64 (1–2):483–90. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.12.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2021b. Global energy review 2020. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Isa, N. M., C. W. Tan, and A. H. M. Yatim. 2018. A comprehensive review of cogeneration system in a microgrid: A perspective from architecture and operating system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81:2236–63. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana, K., A. Ray, M. M. Majoumerd, M. Assadi, and S. De. 2017. Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution–A comprehensive review. Applied Energy 202:88–111. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahar, C. P., R. Saravanan, J. C. Bruno, and A. Coronas. 2013. Simulation studies on gax based Kalina cycle for both power and cooling applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 50 (2):1522–29. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., L. W. Wang, X. F. Zhang, C. Z. Liu, and R. Z. Wang. 2015. Performance prediction on a resorption cogeneration cycle for power and refrigeration with energy storage. Renewable Energy 83:1250–59. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., L. W. Wang, C. Z. Liu, and R. Z. Wang. 2016. Experimental study on a resorption system for power and refrigeration cogeneration. Energy 97:182–90. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., H. Lu, R. Wang, L. Wang, L. Gong, Y. Lu, and A. P. Roskilly. 2017. Investigation on an innovative cascading cycle for power and refrigeration cogeneration. Energy Conversion and Management 145:20–29. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., A. P. Roskilly, R. Z. Wang, and L. W. Wang. 2018. Analysis on innovative resorption cycle for power and refrigeration cogeneration. Applied Energy 218:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, X., and D. Zheng. 2014. Effect of cycle coupling-configuration on energy cascade utilization for a new power and cooling cogeneration cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 78:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurčević, M., S. Nižetić, D. Čoko, A. T. Hoang, and A. M. Papadopoulos. 2022. Experimental investigation of novel hybrid phase change materials. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 24 (1):201–12. doi:10.1007/s10098-021-02106-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalina, J., and M. Świerzewski. 2019. Identification of ORC unit operation in biomass-fired cogeneration system. Renewable Energy 142:400–14. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalina, J., M. Świerzewski, and R. Strzałka. 2019. Operational experiences of municipal heating plants with biomass-fired ORC cogeneration units. Energy Conversion and Management 181:544–61. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaliq, A. 2017. Energetic and exergetic performance investigation of a solar based integrated system for cogeneration of power and cooling. Applied Thermal Engineering 112:1305–16. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, J., and M. H. Arsalan. 2016. Solar power technologies for sustainable electricity generation–A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55:414–25. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılkış, Ş., G. Krajačić, N. Duić, M. A. Rosen, and M. Ahmad Al-Nimr. 2021. Accelerating mitigation of climate change with sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems. Energy Conversion and Management 245:114606. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., and H. Perez-Blanco. 2015. Performance analysis of a combined organic Rankine cycle and vapor compression cycle for power and refrigeration cogeneration. Applied Thermal Engineering 91:964–74. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordlar, M. A., and S. M. S. Mahmoudi. 2017. Exergeoconomic analysis and optimization of a novel cogeneration system producing power and refrigeration. Energy Conversion and Management 134:208–20. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosowski, K., K. Tucki, M. Piwowarski, R. Stępien, O. Orynycz, and W. Włodarski. 2019. Thermodynamic cycle concepts for high-efficiency power plants. part B: prosumer and distributed power industry. Sustainability 11 (9):2647. doi:10.3390/su11092647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koti Reddy, B., and A. K. Singh. 2021. Optimal operation of a photovoltaic integrated captive cogeneration plant with a utility grid using optimization and machine learning prediction methods. Energies 14 (16):4935. doi:10.3390/en14164935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, G. P., R. Saravanan, and A. Coronas. 2017. Experimental studies on combined cooling and power system driven by low-grade heat sources. Energy 128:801–12. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and D. Rakshit. 2021. A critical review on waste heat recovery utilization with special focus on organic Rankine cycle applications. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 5:100292. doi:10.1016/j.clet.2021.100292.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, A., B. Rezaie, and S. Beyerlein. 2017. Review of district heating and cooling systems for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 67:417–25. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Y. Hao, H. Wang, H. Liu, and J. Sui. 2017. Efficient and low-carbon heat and power cogeneration with photovoltaics and thermochemical storage. Applied Energy 206:1523–31. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., and S. S. Wang. 2019. Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a novel carbon dioxide based combined cooling and power system. Energy Conversion and Management 199:112048. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., S. S. Wang, K. Wang, and L. Song. 2020a. Thermo-economic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on carbon dioxide power cycle and absorption chiller for waste heat recovery of gas turbine. Energy Conversion and Management 224:113372. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Liu, G. Zhang, and Y. Yang. 2020b. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system utilizing liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic energy and low-temperature waste heat. Energy 199:117479. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., S. Khanmohammadi, S. Khanmohammadi, A. A. Al-Rashed, P. Ahmadi, and M. Afrand. 2020c. 3-E analysis and optimization of an organic rankine flash cycle integrated with a PEM fuel cell and geothermal energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (3):2168–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., G. Shu, H. Tian, X. Liang, H. Wei, and L. Liu. 2013. Analysis of an electricity–cooling cogeneration system based on RC–ARS combined cycle aboard ship. Energy Conversion and Management 76:1053–60. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, G., L. Liu, F. Zhang, E. Jiaqiang, and J. Chen. 2019. A novel combined cooling-heating and power (CCHP) system integrated organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery of bottom slag in coal-fired plants. Energy Conversion and Management 186:380–92. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., and N. Zhang. 2007. Proposal and analysis of a novel ammonia water cycle for power and refrigeration cogeneration. Energy 32 (6):961–70. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., M. Q. Nguyen, and M. He. 2020. Performance analysis and optimization of an electricity-cooling cogeneration system for waste heat recovery of marine engine. Energy Conversion and Management 214:112887. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Villada, J., D. S. Ayou, J. C. Bruno, and A. Coronas. 2014. Modelling, simulation and analysis of solar absorption power-cooling systems. International Journal of Refrigeration 39:125–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Y. Wang, C. Dong, L. Wang, and A. P. Roskilly. 2015. Design and assessment on a novel integrated system for power and refrigeration using waste heat from diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 91:591–99. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, N., and S. Khalilarya. 2019. Comprehensive thermodynamic investigation of three cogeneration systems including GT-HRSG/RORC as the base system, intermediate system and solar hybridized system. Energy 181:1252–72. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, S. M. S., and M. A. Kordlar. 2018. A new flexible geothermal based cogeneration system producing power and refrigeration. Renewable Energy 123:499–512. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manesh, M. K., S. M. Rabeti, M. Nourpour, and Z. Said. 2022. Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analysis of an innovative solar-geothermal-gas driven polygeneration system for combined power, hydrogen, hot water, and fresh water production. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 51:101861. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, L. C., D. S. Ayou, J. Navarro-Esbrí, J. C. Bruno, and A. Coronas. 2014. Small capacity absorption systems for cooling and power with a scroll expander and ammonia based working fluids. Applied Thermal Engineering 72 (2):258–65. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, N., T. Li, Y. Jia, H. Qin, Q. Liu, W. Zhao, and G. Lei. 2020. Techno-economic performance comparison of enhanced geothermal system with typical cycle configurations for combined heating and power. Energy Conversion and Management 205:112409. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemati, A., H. Nami, F. Ranjbar, and M. Yari. 2017. A comparative thermodynamic analysis of ORC and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery: A case study for CGAM cogeneration system. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 9:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemati, A., M. Sadeghi, and M. Yari. 2017. Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a marine engine waste heat driven RO desalination system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic working fluid. Desalination 422:113–23. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogriseck, S. 2009. Integration of Kalina cycle in a combined heat and power plant, a case study. Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (14–15):2843–48. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyekale, J., M. Petrollese, F. Heberle, D. Brüggemann, and G. Cau. 2020. Exergetic and integrated exergoeconomic assessments of a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle cogeneration plant. Energy Conversion and Management 215:112905. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, R. V., G. Demirkaya, D. Y. Goswami, E. Stefanakos, and M. M. Rahman. 2010. Analysis of power and cooling cogeneration using ammonia-water mixture. Energy 35 (12):4649–57. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, M., F. Lu, Y. Zhu, G. Huang, J. Yin, F. Huang, G. Chen, and Z. Chen. 2020. Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic and multi-objective optimization analysis of new ORC and heat pump system for waste heat recovery in waste-to-energy combined heat and power plant. Energy Conversion and Management 222:113200. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, A. M., J. Fordham, O. A. Oyewunmi, P. De Palma, and C. N. Markides. 2018. Integrating cogeneration and intermittent waste-heat recovery in food processing: Microturbines vs. ORC Systems in the Coffee Roasting Industry. Applied Energy 225:782–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, B., N. B. Desai, and S. S. Kachhwaha. 2017. Optimization of waste heat based organic Rankine cycle powered cascaded vapor compression-absorption refrigeration system. Energy Conversion and Management 154:576–90. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic, S., E. Bellos, and Z. Said. 2021. Cogeneration system driven by solar dish concentrators. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 40 (5):e13644. doi:10.1002/ep.13644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peris, B., J. Navarro-Esbrí, F. Moles, J. P. Martí, and A. Mota-Babiloni. 2015. Experimental characterization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for micro-scale CHP applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 79:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidi, J., P. Ifaei, I. J. Esfahani, A. Ataei, and C. K. Yoo. 2016. Thermodynamic and economic studies of two new high efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles. Energy Conversion and Management 127:170–86. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidi, J., and C. K. Yoo. 2017. Exergetic and exergoeconomic studies of two highly efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on the Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering 124:1023–37. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, S., X. Feng, and M. Yang. 2020. Emergy evaluation of power generation systems. Energy Conversion and Management 211:112749. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, P., M. Sengupta, and D. Rauch. 2015. Intelligent energy industrial systems 4.0. It Professional 17 (3):17–24. doi:10.1109/MITP.2015.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostamzadeh, H., H. Ghaebi, S. Vosoughi, and J. Jannatkhah. 2018. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a novel dual-loop power/refrigeration cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 138:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostamzadeh, H., H. Ghaebi, and T. Parikhani. 2018. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power (CCP) cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 139:474–87. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, Z., L. S. Sundar, A. K. Tiwari, H. M. Ali, M. Sheikholeslami, E. Bellos, and H. Babar. 2021. Recent advances on the fundamental physical phenomena behind stability, dynamic motion, thermophysical properties, heat transport, applications, and challenges of nanofluids. Physics Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Said, Z., P. Sharma, A. K. Tiwari, V. G. Bui, V. G. Bui, A. T. Hoang, and A. T. Hoang. 2022. Application of novel framework based on ensemble boosted regression trees and Gaussian process regression in modelling thermal performance of small-scale organic rankine cycle using hybrid nanofluid. Journal of Cleaner Production 360:132194. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seckin, C. 2018. Thermodynamic analysis of a combined power/refrigeration cycle: Combination of Kalina cycle and ejector refrigeration cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 157:631–43. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfouri, Z., M. Ameri, and M. A. Mehrabian. 2018. Exergo-economic analysis of a low-temperature geothermal-fed combined cooling and power system. Applied Thermal Engineering 145:528–40. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, R., and T. Srinivas. 2018. Performance investigation of Kalina cooling cogeneration cycles. International Journal of Refrigeration 86:163–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar Ganesh, N., S. Mahendiran, M. D. Manivannan, and N. Keerthivarman. Combined thermodynamic cycle based power generation system and A method thereof. Application No. 201941009276. 2019
   Google Scholar
• Shankar Ganesh, N., M. D. Manivannan, and A. R. Pradeep Kumar. Integrated organic Rankine cycle power generation and ejector refrigeration systems using waste heat recovery from multifuel research engine and A method thereof. Application No. 202241004714 A. 2022. METHOD THEREOF.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkar, R., and T. Srinivas. 2018. Novel cooling augmented cogeneration cycle. International Journal of Refrigeration 91:146–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., U. Singh, and S. S. Mahapatra. 2019. Prediction of cost and emission from Indian coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture and storage using artificial intelligence techniques. Frontiers in Energy 13 (1):149–62. doi:10.1007/s11708-017-0482-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. 2020. Gene expression programming-based model prediction of performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with linseed oil biodiesel/diesel blends: An artificial intelligence approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., and A. K. Sharma. 2021. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of fuel injection parameters of a dual fuel engine fuelled with producer gas-biodiesel blends. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., A. Chhillar, Z. Said, and S. Memon. 2021. Exploring the exhaust emission and efficiency of algal biodiesel powered compression ignition engine: application of box–behnken and desirability based multi-objective response surface methodology. Energies 14 (18):5968. doi:10.3390/en14185968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. 2022. Prediction-optimization of the effects of di-tert butyl peroxide-biodiesel blends on engine performance and emissions using multi-objective response surface methodology. Journal of Energy Resources Technology 144:7. doi:10.1115/1.4052237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokati, N., F. Ranjbar, and M. Yari. 2018. A comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of absorption power and cooling cogeneration cycles based on Kalina, part 1: Simulation. Energy Conversion and Management 158:437–59. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokati, N., and S. Khanahmadzadeh. 2018. The effect of different combinations of ammonia-water Rankine and absorption refrigeration cycles on the exergoeconomic performance of the cogeneration cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 141:1141–60. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.06.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, O. K. 2016. Performance enhancement of combined cycle power plant using inlet air-cooling by exhaust heat operated ammonia-water absorption refrigeration system. Applied Energy 180:867–79. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, O. K. 2020. Application of Kalina cycle for augmenting performance of bagasse-fired cogeneration plant of sugar industry. Fuel 267:117176. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Situmorang, Y. A., Z. Zhao, A. Yoshida, A. Abudula, and G. Guan. 2020. Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation (< 200 kW class): A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 117:109486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, R. J., C. A. Dos Santos, A. A. Ochoa, A. S. Marques, J. L. Neto, and P. S. Michima. 2020 August 1. Proposal and 3E (energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic) assessment of a cogeneration system using an organic Rankine cycle and an Absorption Refrigeration System in the Northeast Brazil: Thermodynamic investigation of a facility case study. Energy Conversion and Management 217: 113002. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., W. Han, X. Jing, D. Zheng, and H. Jin. 2013a. A power and cooling cogeneration system using mid/low-temperature heat source. Applied Energy 112:886–97. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., W. Han, D. Zheng, and H. Jin. 2013b. Assessment of an ammonia–water power/cooling cogeneration system with adjustable solution concentration. Applied Thermal Engineering 61 (2):443–50. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swierzewski, M., and J. Kalina. 2020. Optimisation of biomass-fired cogeneration plants using ORC technology. Renewable Energy 159:195–214. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita, K., Y. Amano, and T. Hashizume. 2005. Experimental study of advanced cogeneration system with ammonia–water mixture cycles at bottoming. Energy 30 (2–4):247–60. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takleh, H. R., and V. Zare. 2019. Employing thermoelectric generator and booster compressor for performance improvement of a geothermal driven combined power and ejector-refrigeration cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 186:120–30. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, L., O. Dumont, G. Manfrida, V. Lemort, and D. Fiaschi. 2020. Experimental investigation of an organic Rankine cycle Tesla turbine working with R1233zd (E). Applied Thermal Engineering 174:115293. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashtoush, B., and A. B. R. Algharbawi. 2019. Parametric study of a novel hybrid solar variable geometry ejector cooling with organic rankine cycles. Energy Conversion and Management 198:111910. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toujeni, N., N. Bouaziz, and L. Kairaouani. 2017. Energetic investigation of a new combined ORC-VCC system for cogeneration. Energy Procedia 139:670–75. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.270.
   Google Scholar
• Vera, D., A. Baccioli, F. Jurado, and U. Desideri. 2020. Modeling and optimization of an ocean thermal energy conversion system for remote islands electrification. Renewable Energy 162:1399–414. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialetto, G., and M. Noro. 2020. An innovative approach to design cogeneration systems based on big data analysis and use of clustering methods. Energy Conversion and Management 214:112901. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, A., R. Best, R. Rivero, and J. Cervantes. 2006. Analysis of a combined power and refrigeration cycle by the exergy method. Energy 31 (15):3401–14. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagar, W. R., C. Zamfirescu, and I. Dincer. 2010. Thermodynamic performance assessment of an ammonia–water Rankine cycle for power and heat production. Energy Conversion and Management 51 (12):2501–09. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Dai, and L. Gao. 2008. Parametric analysis and optimization for a combined power and refrigeration cycle. Applied Energy 85 (11):1071–85. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Dai, and L. Gao. 2009. Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry. Applied Energy 86 (6):941–48. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Dai, T. Zhang, and S. Ma. 2009. Parametric analysis for a new combined power and ejector–absorption refrigeration cycle. Energy 34 (10):1587–93. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Y. Dai, and Z. Sun. 2009. A theoretical study on a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle. International Journal of Refrigeration 32 (6):1186–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., F. Ziegler, A. P. Roskilly, R. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2013. A resorption cycle for the cogeneration of electricity and refrigeration. Applied Energy 106:56–64. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., J. Wang, P. Zhao, and Y. Dai. 2016. Thermodynamic analysis of a new combined cooling and power system using ammonia–water mixture. Energy Conversion and Management 117:335–42. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., J. Wang, P. Zhao, and Y. Dai. 2019. Proposal and thermodynamic assessment of a new ammonia-water based combined heating and power (CHP) system. Energy Conversion and Management 184:277–89. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., S. Zhang, Z. Fei, W. Zhang, L. Shao, and F. Sardari. 2020. Thermodynamic performance analysis a power and cooling generation system based on geothermal flash, organic Rankine cycles, and ejector refrigeration cycle; application of zeotropic mixtures. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 40:100749. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2020.100749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., L. Zhu, Y. He, Q. Zhou, and Q. Hao. 2021. Tech-economic assessment of chemical looping combustion coupled with the combined supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and ORC for power generation. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 129:197–206. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2021.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., X. Mo, P. Qin, Z. Zhao, and T. Ouyang. 2022. Multi-dimensional assessment and multi-objective optimization of electricity-cooling cogeneration system driven by marine diesel engine waste heat. Journal of Cleaner Production 334:130187. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilailak, S., J. H. Yang, C. G. Heo, K. S. Kim, S. K. Bang, I. H. Seo, U. Zahid, and C. J. Lee. 2021. Thermo-economic analysis of phosphoric acid fuel-cell (PAFC) integrated with organic ranking cycle (ORC). Energy 220:119744. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., J. Wang, J. Lou, P. Zhao, and Y. Dai. 2016. Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a combined cooling and power (CCP) system for engine waste heat recovery. Energy Conversion and Management 128:303–16. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., N. Zheng, L. Zhao, S. Deng, H. Li, and Z. Yu. 2016. Analysis of a novel combined power and ejector-refrigeration cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 108:266–74. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T., W. P. King, and N. Miljkovic. 2021. Phase change material-based thermal energy storage. Cell Reports Physical Science 2 (8):100540. doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100540.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, J., Z. Yu, C. Zhang, M. Tian, and J. Han. 2018a. Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel power/cooling cogeneration system for low-grade heat sources. Energy Conversion and Management 166:64–73. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, J., Z. Yu, C. Zhang, M. Tian, and J. Han. 2018b. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system driven by low-grade heat sources. Energy 156:319–27. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., J. Han, H. Liu, and H. Zhao. 2014. Theoretical study on a novel ammonia–water cogeneration system with adjustable cooling to power ratios. Applied Energy 122:53–61. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., X. Feng, and Y. Wang. 2016. Working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) considering the characteristics of waste heat sources. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 55 (5):1309–21. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., C. Feng, Y. Lai, G. Xu, and D. Wang. 2022. Performance assessment and optimization of two novel cogeneration systems integrating proton exchange membrane fuel cell with organic flash cycle for low temperature geothermal heat recovery. Energy 243:122725. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C., D. Han, W. Pu, and W. He. 2016. Parametric analysis of a vehicle power and cooling/heating cogeneration system. Energy 115:800–10. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare, V., S. M. S. Mahmoudi, and M. Yari. 2012. Ammonia–water cogeneration cycle for utilizing waste heat from the GT-MHR plant. Applied Thermal Engineering 48:176–85. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare, V., S. S. Mahmoudi, M. Yari, and M. Amidpour. 2012. Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cogeneration cycle. Energy 47 (1):271–83. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Z. Guo, Y. Chen, J. Wu, and J. Hua. 2015. Power generation and heating performances of integrated system of ammonia–water Kalina–Rankine cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 92:517–22. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., M. Chennells, and X. Xia. 2018. A power dispatch model for a ferrochrome plant heat recovery cogeneration system. Applied Energy 227:180–89. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Y. Chen, J. Wu, Z. Zhu, and F. Fang. 2019. Thermodynamic analysis on a Kalina cycle based power and chilling refrigeration cogeneration cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 161:114077. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., J. Wang, L. Cao, and Y. Wang. 2016. Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (Combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source. Energy 97:470–87. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhongming, Z., Linong, L., Xiaona, Y., Wangqiang, Z., and Wei, L. 2021a. Global energy review 2021. IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., W. Li, J. Li, H. Li, Y. Wang, and S. Li. 2020. Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycle combined heat and power system integrated with CO2 capture. Energy Conversion and Management 204:112310. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., G. Xie, H. Yuan, and S. Nizetic. 2022. Thermodynamic assessment of combined supercritical CO2 cycle power systems with organic Rankine cycle or Kalina cycle. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 52:102166. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zymełka, P., and M. Szega. 2021. Short-term scheduling of gas-fired CHP plant with thermal storage using optimization algorithm and forecasting models. Energy Conversion and Management 231:113860. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar