A review on performance, economic, and environmental analyses of integrated solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification systems

References

• Abuadala, A., and I. Dincer. 2011. Exergoeconomic analysis of a hybrid system based on steam biomass gasification products for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36 (20):12780–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advanced bıomass CCHP based on gasification, SOFC and cooling machines. n.d. https://www.era-learn.eu/network-information/networks/bestf3/11th-joint-call-of-era-net-bioenergy-and-1st-additional-call-of-bestf3/advanced-biomass-cchp-based-on-gasification-sofc-and-cooling-machines.
   Google Scholar
• Agu, C.E., C. Pfeifer, M. Eikeland, L.-A. Tokheim, and B.M.E. Moldestad. 2019. Detailed one-dimensional model for steam-biomass gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed. Energy & Fuels 33 (8):7385–97. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, T.Y., M.M. Ahmad, S. Yusup, A. Inayat, and Z. Khan. 2012. Mathematical and computational approaches for design of biomass gasification for hydrogen production: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (4):2304–15. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrenfeldt, J., T.P. Thomsen, U. Henriksen, and L.R. Clausen. 2013. Biomass gasification cogeneration – a review of state of the art technology and near future perspectives. Applied Thermal Engineering 50 (2):1407–17. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.12.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderucci, V., P. Antonucci, G. Maggio, N. Giordano, and V. Antonucci. 1994. Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC fuelled by biomass-derived gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 19 (4):369–76. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(94)90070-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audasso, E., F.R. Bianchi, and B. Bosio. 2020. 2D simulation for CH4 internal reforming-SOFCs: an approach to study performance degradation and optimization. Energies 13:4116. doi:10.3390/en13164116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang-Møller, C. 2010. Design and optimization of an integrated biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell system. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Bang-Møller, C., and M. Rokni. 2010. Thermodynamic performance study of biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid systems. Energy Conversion and Management 51 (11):2330–39. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang-Møller, C., M. Rokni, and B. Elmegaard. 2011. Exergy analysis and optimization of a biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system. Energy 36 (8):4740–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barchewitz, L., J. Palsson. 2000. Design of an SOFC system combined to the gasification of biomass. In: 4th European SOFC Forum Lucern, Switzerland, ed. A. McEvoy, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Baruah, D., and D.C. Baruah. 2014. Modeling of biomass gasification: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39: 806–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaze Project. 2021. https://www.blazeproject.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Bocci, E., M. Sisinni, M. Moneti, L. Vecchione, A. Di Carlo, and M. Villarini. 2014. State of art of small scale biomass gasification power systems: a review of the different typologies. Energy Procedia 45: 247–56. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.027.
   Google Scholar
• Borji, M., K. Atashkari, S. Ghorbani, and N. Nariman-Zadeh. 2015. Parametric analysis and pareto optimization of an integrated autothermal biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine CHP system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40 (41):14202–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broust, F. 2008. Green fuel cell, SOFC fuel cell fuelled by biomass gasification gas. Publishable final activity report of EU project SES6-CT-2004-503122.
   Google Scholar
• Cayan, F.N., M. Zhi, S.R. Pakalapati, I. Celik, N. Wu, and R. Gemmen. 2008. Effects of coal syngas impurities on anodes of solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 185 (2):595–602. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheddie, D.F., and N.D.H. Munroe. 2007. A dynamic 1D model of a solid oxide fuel cell for real time simulation. Journal of Power Sources 171 (2):634–43. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., J. Cherian, M.S. Sial, U. Zaman, and H. Niroumandi. 2021. Performance assessment of a novel biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell power generation cycle; economic analysis and optimization. Energy 224: 120134. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K., J. Kang, D.L. King, V. Subramanian, C. Zhou, Q. Zhang, and Y. Wang. 2017. Advances in catalysis for syngas conversion to hydrocarbons, 125–208. doi:10.1016/bs.acat.2017.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Colpan, C.O., I. Dincer, and F. Hamdullahpur. 2008. A review on macro-level modeling of planar solid oxide fuel cells. International Journal of Energy Research 32 (4):336–55. doi:10.1002/er.1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpan, C.O., F. Hamdullahpur, and I. Dincer. 2010. Solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasi cation systems for better efficiency and environmental impact solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification systems for better efficiency and environmental impact. 78:305–313.
   Google Scholar
• Corigliano, O., and P. Fragiacomo. 2020.Extensive analysis of SOFC fed by direct syngas at different anodic compositions by using two numerical approaches. Energy Conversion and Management 209: 112664.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto, N., V. Silva, E. Monteiro, P.S.D. Brito, and A. Rouboa. 2013. Experimental and numerical analysis of coffee husks biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor. Energy Procedia 36: 591–95. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.067.
   Google Scholar
• Dincer, I., and T.A.H. Ratlamwala. 2013. Importance of exergy for analysis, improvement, design, and assessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 2:335–49. doi:10.1002/wene.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, I., and M.A. Rosen. 2007. Exergy and energy analyses. Exergy 23–35. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-008044529-8.50005-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, W., A. Reynolds, and D. Kennedy. 2009. The effect of air preheating in a biomass CFB gasifier using ASPEN Plus simulation. Biomass & Bioenergy 33 (9):1158–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, W., A. Reynolds, and D. Kennedy. 2010. Computer simulation of a biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell power system using Aspen Plus. Energy 35 (12):4545–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Project Final Report. SARTRE Proj, 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Faheem, H.H., S.Z. Abbas, A.N. Tabish, L. Fan, and F. Maqbool. 2022. A review on mathematical modelling of direct internal reforming- solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 520: 230857. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M.L., U.M. Damo, A. Turan, and D. Sánchez. 2017. Hybrid systems based on solid oxide fuel cells. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119039044.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D.F., B.S. Haynes, J. Chen, and S.D. Joseph. 1998. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of an entrained flow biomass gasifier. Applied Mathematical Modelling 22 (10):747–57. doi:10.1016/S0307-904X(98)10025-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopoulos, C. 1987. Thermo-economic functional analysis and optimization. Energy 12 (7):563–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(87)90097-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffarpour, Z., M. Mahmoudi, A.H. Mosaffa, and L. Garousi Farshi. 2018. Thermoeconomic assessment of a novel integrated biomass based power generation system including gas turbine cycle, solid oxide fuel cell and Rankine cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 161: 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholamian, E., P. Hanafizadeh, A. Habibollahzade, and P. Ahmadi. 2018. Evolutionary based multi-criteria optimization of an integrated energy system with SOFC, gas turbine, and hydrogen production via electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (33):16201–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholamian, E., V. Zare, and S.M. Mousavi. 2016. Integration of biomass gasification with a solid oxide fuel cell in a combined cooling, heating and power system: a thermodynamic and environmental analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41 (44):20396–406. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gmeindl, F.D., R.A. Geisbrecht, K.R. Craig, S. Kasper, and V.B. Shah. 1989. New directions in MCFC systems. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual gasification and gas stream Cleanup Contract Meet, Morgantown.
   Google Scholar
• Gøbel, B., U. Henriksen, J. Ahrenfeldt, T.K. Jensen, C. Hindsgaul, B. Jd, and S. Lh. 2004. Status–2000 hours of operation with the VIKING gasifier. In: Proc. 2. World Biomass Conf. Technol. Exhib, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Habibollahzade, A., E. Gholamian, and A. Behzadi. 2019. Multi-Objective optimization and comparative performance analysis of hybrid biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell/solid oxide electrolyzer cell/gas turbine using different gasification agents. Applied Energy 233-234: 985–1002. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibollahzade, A., E. Gholamian, E. Houshfar, and A. Behzadi. 2018. Multi-objective optimization of biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell integrated with Stirling engine and electrolyzer. Energy Conversion and Management 171: 1116–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HiEff-BioPower. 2020. https://www.hieff-biopower.eu/home/.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, J., A. Chitsaz, B. Eisavi, and M. Yari. 2018. Investigation on performance of an integrated SOFC-Goswami system using wood gasification. Energy 148: 614–28. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, J., A. Chitsaz, L. Liu, and Y. Gao. 2020. Simulation of eco-friendly and affordable energy production via solid oxide fuel cell integrated with biomass gasification plant using various gasification agents 145. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.033.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, P. N., M. A. Musich, N. Patel, and D. D. T. Schmidt. 2003. Feasibility study of a thermally integrated SOFC-gasification system for biomass power generation. North Dakota: University of North Dakota.
   Google Scholar
• Indrawan, N., A. Kumar, M. Moliere, K.A. Sallam, and R.L. Huhnke. 2020. Distributed power generation via gasification of biomass and municipal solid waste: A review. Journal of the Energy Institute 93 (6):2293–313. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2020.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, Z., B. Zakrzewska, and P. Pianko-Oprych. 2017. On thermodynamic equilibrium of carbon deposition from gaseous C-H-O mixtures: Updating for nanotubes. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 33. doi:10.1515/revce-2016-0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, P., A. Mahmud Parvez, Y. Meng, X. Dong, M. Xu, X. Luo, K. Shi, and T. Wu. 2021. Novel two-stage fluidized bed-plasma gasification integrated with SOFC and chemical looping combustion for the high efficiency power generation from MSW: A thermodynamic investigation. Energy Conversion and Management 236: 114066. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, J., L. Shu, G. Zang, L. Xu, A. Abudula, and K. Ge. 2018. Energy analysis and techno-economic assessment of a co-gasification of woody biomass and animal manure, solid oxide fuel cells and micro gas turbine hybrid system. Energy 149: 750–61. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalina, J. 2019.Options for using solid oxide fuel cell technology in complex integrated biomass gasification cogeneration plants. Biomass & Bioenergy 122: 400–13. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, M.H., N. Chitgar, M.A. Emadi, P. Ahmadi, and M.A. Rosen. 2020. Performance assessment and optimization of a biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine system integrated with an organic rankine cycle. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (11):6262–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., and O. Singh. 2019. Thermoeconomic analysis of SOFC-GT-VARS-ORC combined power and cooling system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (50):27575–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzaretto, A., and G. Tsatsaronis. 2006. SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31 (8–9):1257–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., F. Liang, P. Guo, C. He, S. Li, S. Zhou, L. Deng, C. Bai, X. Zhang, G. Zhang. 2020. Study on the biomass-based SOFC and ground source heat pump coupling cogeneration system. Applied Thermal Engineering 165:114527. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Pang, H. Tu, F. Torrigino, S.M.A. Biollaz, Z. Li, Y. Huang, X. Yin, F. Grimm, J. Karl. 2021. Impact of syngas from biomass gasification on solid oxide fuel cells: a review study for the energy transition. Energy Conversion and Management 250:114894. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, M.A., and A. Valero. 1993. Theory of the exergetic cost. Energy 18 (9):939–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90006-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, X., X. Ding, and Y. Weng. 2019. Performance analysis of an intermediate-temperature-SOFC/Gas turbine hybrid system using gasified biomass fuel in different operating modes. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 141 (1):1–5. doi:10.1115/1.4040811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maekinen, T., J. Leppaelahti, E. Kurkela, and Y. Solantausta. 1992. New alternative for electricity production. Part 3: Electricity production from biomass and natural gas by a solid oxide fuel cell. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 93, 31862.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, S., G. Loreti, L. Wang, F. Maréchal, J. Van Herle, and C. Dong. 2022. Comparison and optimization of different fuel processing options for biogas-fed solid-oxide fuel cell plants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (1):551–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, V., E. Bocci, J.P. Ouweltjes, L. Del Zotto, and D. Monarca. 2020. Evaluation of sorbents for high temperature removal of tars, hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen chloride and ammonia from biomass-derived syngas by using Aspen Plus. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (11):6651–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, V., L. Del Zotto, J.P. Ouweltjes, and E. Bocci. 2022. Main issues of the impact of tar, H2S, HCl and alkali metal from biomass-gasification derived syngas on the SOFC anode and the related gas cleaning technologies for feeding a SOFC system: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (1):517–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, M.M. 2016. Syngas. Industrial Chemical Process Analysis and Design 199–297. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-101093-8.00005-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W., X. Xue, and G. Liu. 2018. Techno-Economic evaluation for hybrid renewable energy system: application and merits. Energy 159: 385–409. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., G. Tsatsaronis, J. Buchgeister, and L. Schebek. 2009. Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems. Energy 34 (1):75–89. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, G., Y.J. Park, and J. Hong. 2020. 1D thermodynamic modeling for a solid oxide fuel cell stack and parametric study for its optimal operating conditions. Energy Conversion and Management 209: 112614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojaver, P., S. Khalilarya, and A. Chitsaz. 2018. Performance assessment of a combined heat and power system: A novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system part I: thermodynamic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 171: 287–97. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojaver, P., S. Khalilarya, and A. Chitsaz. 2019. Multi-objective optimization using response surface methodology and exergy analysis of a novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system. Applied Thermal Engineering 156: 627–39. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojaver, P., S. Khalilarya, and A. Chitsaz. 2020. Multi-objective optimization and decision analysis of a system based on biomass fueled SOFC using couple method of entropy/vikor. Energy Conversion and Management 203: 112260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morandin, M., F. Maréchal, and S. Giacomini. 2013. Synthesis and thermo-economic design optimization of wood-gasifier-SOFC systems for small scale applications. Biomass & Bioenergy 49: 299–314. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narnaware, S.L., and N.L. Panwar. 2022. Biomass gasification for climate change mitigation and policy framework in India: a review. Bioresource Technology Reports 17: 100892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100892.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, M. 2010. 2D thermal-fluid modeling and parametric analysis of a planar solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Conversion and Management 51 (4):714–21. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoo, M.B., and N. Mahinpey. 2008. Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. Biomass & Bioenergy 32 (12):1245–54. doi:10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2008.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogorure, O.J., C.O.C. Oko, E.O. Diemuodeke, and K. Owebor. 2018. Energy, exergy, environmental and economic analysis of an agricultural waste-to-energy integrated multigeneration thermal power plant. Energy Conversion and Management 171: 222–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omosun, A., A. Bauen, N. Brandon, C. Adjiman, and D. Hart. 2004. Modelling system efficiencies and costs of two biomass-fuelled SOFC systems. Journal of Power Sources 131 (1–2):96–106. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owebor, K., C.O.C. Oko, E.O. Diemuodeke, and O.J. Ogorure. 2019. Thermo-environmental and economic analysis of an integrated municipal waste-to-energy solid oxide fuel cell, gas-, steam-, organic fluid- and absorption refrigeration cycle thermal power plants. Applied Energy 239: 1385–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, H., and I. Dincer. 2015. Performance evaluation of an SOFC based trigeneration system using various gaseous fuels from biomass gasification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40 (24):7798–807. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgoli, H.A., H. Ghadamian, and M. Pazouki. 2017. Economic analysis of biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid cycle. International Journal of Energy Research 7:1007–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomba, V., M. Prestipino, and A. Galvagno. 2017. Tri-Generation for industrial applications: development of a simulation model for a gasification-SOFC based system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (46):27866–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peksen, M., A. Al-Masri, L. Blum, and D. Stolten. 2013. 3D transient thermomechanical behaviour of a full scale SOFC short stack. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38 (10):4099–107. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, W., H. Chen, J. Liu, X. Zhao, and G. Xu. 2021. Techno-Economic assessment of a conceptual waste-to-energy CHP system combining plasma gasification, SOFC, gas turbine and supercritical CO2 cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 245: 114622. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J., J. Huang, X. Wu, Y. Xu, H. Chen, and X. Li. 2021. Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) performance evaluation, fault diagnosis and health control: a review. Journal of Power Sources 505: 230058. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna, A., M. Minutillo, E. Jannelli, V. Cigolotti, S.W. Nam, and K.J. Yoon. 2018. Performance assessment of a hybrid SOFC/MGT cogeneration power plant fed by syngas from a biomass down-draft gasifier. Applied Energy 227: 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierobon, L., M. Rokni, U. Larsen, and F. Haglind. 2013. Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated gasification solid oxide fuel cell plant combined with an organic rankine cycle. Renewable Energy 60: 226–34. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongratz, G., V. Subotić, H. Schroettner, B. Stoeckl, C. Hochenauer, A. Anca-Couce, and R. Scharler. 2021. Investigation of solid oxide fuel cell operation with synthetic biomass gasification product gases as a basis for enhancing its performance. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 11 (1):121–39. doi:10.1007/s13399-020-00726-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig-Arnavat, M., J.C. Bruno, and A. Coronas. 2010. Review and analysis of biomass gasification models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (9):2841–51. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radenahmad, N., A.T. Azad, M. Saghir, J. Taweekun, M.S.A. Bakar, M.S. Reza, and A. K. Azad. 2020.A review on biomass derived syngas for SOFC based combined heat and power application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 119: 109560. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadhani, F., M.A. Hussain, H. Mokhlis, and S. Hajimolana. 2017.Optimization strategies for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) application: A literature survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76: 460–84. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, A., E. Monteiro, and A. Rouboa. 2019. Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 110: 188–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan, K.R., and S.C. Kaushik. 2013. Energy, exergy and thermo-economic analysis of solar distillation systems: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27: 709–23. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recalde, M., T. Woudstra, and P. V. Aravind. 2019. Gasifier, solid oxide fuel cell integrated systems for energy production from wet biomass. Frontiers in Energy Research 7. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2019.00129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokni, M. 2014. Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine. Energy 77: 6–18. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokni, M. 2014. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a system with biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and Stirling engine. Energy 76: 19–31. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D., and S. Samanta. 2021. Development and multiobjective optimization of a novel trigeneration system based on biomass energy. Energy Conversion and Management 240: 114248. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D., S. Samanta, and S. Ghosh. 2019. Techno-Economic and environmental analyses of a biomass based system employing solid oxide fuel cell, externally fired gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle. Journal of Cleaner Production 225: 36–57. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D., S. Samanta, and S. Ghosh. 2019. Thermo-Economic assessment of biomass gasification-based power generation system consists of solid oxide fuel cell, supercritical carbon dioxide cycle and indirectly heated air turbine. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 21 (4):827–45. doi:10.1007/s10098-019-01671-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, M., A.S. Mehr, M. Zar, and M. Santarelli. 2018. Multi-objective optimization of a novel syngas fed SOFC power plant using a downdraft gasifier. Energy 148: 16–31. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian, S., R. Unnþórsson, and C. Richter. 2019. A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 110: 378–91. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansaniwal, S.K., M.A. Rosen, and S.K. Tyagi. 2017. Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: an overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80: 23–43. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer, H., J.H. Mason, I.B. Celik, and T. Yang. 2021. Three-dimensional modeling of performance degradation of planar SOFC with phosphine exposure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46 (9):6803–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabbar, S., and I. Janajreh. 2013. Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of coal gasification using Gibbs energy minimization method. Energy Conversion and Management 65: 755–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafie, S. M., A. H. Nu’Man, and N. N. A. N. Yusuf. 2021. Biogas to fuel cell state of the art: a review. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 86 (1):87–104. doi:10.37934/arfmts.86.1.87104.
   Google Scholar
• Shayan, E., V. Zare, and I. Mirzaee. 2019. On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: a comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization. Energy 171: 1126–38. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, H., Q. Li, W. Tan, H. Qiu, and C. Su. 2020. Solid oxide fuel cells in combination with biomass gasification for electric power generation. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 28 (4):1156–61. doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2020.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siefert, N.S., and S. Litster. 2014. Exergy & economic analysis of biogas fueled solid oxide fuel cell systems. Journal of Power Sources 272: 386–97. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., E. Hernández-Pacheco, P.N. Hutton, N. Patel, and M.D. Mann. 2005. Carbon deposition in an SOFC fueled by tar-laden biomass gas: a thermodynamic analysis. Journal of Power Sources 142 (1–2):194–99. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucipta, M., S. Kimijima, and K. Suzuki. 2007. Performance analysis of the SOFC–MGT hybrid system with gasified biomass fuel. Journal of Power Sources 174 (1):124–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toonssen, R., S. Sollai, P. V. Aravind, N. Woudstra, and A.H.M. Verkooijen. 2011. Alternative system designs of biomass gasification SOFC/GT hybrid systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36 (16):10414–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, C., and A. Valero. 2021. The exergy cost theory revisited. Energies 14 (6):1594. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ud Din, Z., and Z.A. Zainal. 2016. Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: technology overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53: 1356–76. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecten, S., B. Herbert, M. Wilkinson, A. Shaw, N. Bimbo, and R. Dawson. 2018. Integrated plasma gasification and SOFC system simulation using Aspen Plus. In: 13th European SOFC & SOE Forum 2018, 3-6 July 2018, Lucerne Switzerland, pp. 0–10.
   Google Scholar
• von Spakovsky, M.R., and R.B. Evans. 1993. Engineering functional analysis—Part I. Journal of Energy Resources Technology 115 (2):86–92. doi:10.1115/1.2905985.
   Google Scholar
• W2W (Waste to Watts). 2022. https://waste2watts-project.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., X. Lv, and Y. Weng. 2020. Performance analysis of a biogas-fueled SOFC/GT hybrid system integrated with anode-combustor exhaust gas recirculation loops. Energy 197: 117213. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, P.J., and R.C. Brown. 2013. A review of cleaning technologies for biomass-derived syngas. Biomass & Bioenergy 52: 54–84. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., P. Zhu, J. Yao, S. Zhang, J. Ren, F. Yang, and Z. Zhang. 2020. Combined biomass gasification, SOFC, IC engine, and waste heat recovery system for power and heat generation: energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluations. Applied Energy 279: 115794. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, L., Y. Cao, and B. He. 2019. Energy, exergy and economic analyses of a novel biomass fueled power plant with carbon capture and sequestration. The Science of the Total Environment 690: 812–20. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar