Significance of hydrodynamic cavitation to enhance reuse of secondary sedimentation tank effluent: a geometrical assessment

References

• Alfonso-Muniozguren, P., M. Hazzwan Bohari, A. Sicilia, C. Avignone-Rossa, M. Bussemaker, D. Saroj, and J. Lee. 2020. Tertiary treatment of real abattoir wastewater using combined acoustic cavitation and ozonation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 64 (January):104986. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.104986.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arabnejad, M. H., A. Amini, M. Farhat, and R. E. Bensow. 2020. Hydrodynamic mechanisms of aggressive collapse events in leading edge cavitation. Journal of Hydrodynamics 32 (1):6–19. doi:10.1007/s42241-020-0002-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arola, K., B. Van der Bruggen, M. Mänttäri, and M. Kallioinen. 2019. Treatment options for nanofiltration and reverse osmosis concentrates from municipal wastewater treatment: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 49 (22):2049–116. doi:10.1080/10643389.2019.1594519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badmus, K. O., J. O. Tijani, E. Massima, and L. Petrik. 2018. Treatment of persistent organic pollutants in wastewater using hydrodynamic cavitation in synergy with advanced oxidation process. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (8):7299–314. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-1171-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badve, M., P. Gogate, A. Pandit, and L. Csoka. 2013. Hydrodynamic cavitation as a novel approach for wastewater treatment in wood finishing industry. Separation and Purification Technology 106:15–21. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghele, N. S., A. K. Khambete, and R. A. Christian. 2022. Application of effective orifice jet length for treating SST effluent of STP by hydrodynamic cavitation. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom) 1–10. doi:10.1080/09593330.2022.2087047.
   Google Scholar
• Bargole, S., S. George, and V. Kumar Saharan. 2019. Improved rate of transesterification reaction in biodiesel synthesis using hydrodynamic cavitating devices of high throat perimeter to flow area ratios. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 139 (December 2018):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2019.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• Barik, A. J., and P. R. Gogate. 2016. Degradation of 4-chloro 2-aminophenol using a novel combined process based on hydrodynamic cavitation, UV photolysis and ozone. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 30:70–78. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basiri Parsa, J., and S. A. Ebrahimzadeh Zonouzian. 2013. Optimization of a heterogeneous catalytic hydrodynamic cavitation reactor performance in decolorization of Rhodamine B: Application of scrap iron sheets. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 20 (6):1442–49. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, A. P., and P. R. Gogate. 2021. Cavitation-Based pre-Treatment of wastewater and waste sludge for improvement in the performance of biological processes: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 9 (2):104743. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczkaj, G., M. Gągol, M. Klein, and A. Przyjazny. 2018. Effective method of treatment of effluents from production of bitumens under basic pH conditions using hydrodynamic cavitation aided by external oxidants. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 40 (September 2017):969–79. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.032.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braeutigam, P., M. Franke, Z.-L. Wu, and B. Ondruschka. 2010. Role of different parameters in the optimization of hydrodynamic cavitation. Chemical Engineering & Technology 33 (6):932–40. doi:10.1002/ceat.201000021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burzio, E., F. Bersani, G. C. A. Caridi, R. Vesipa, L. Ridolfi, and C. Manes. 2020. Water disinfection by orifice-induced hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 60: June 2019 doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, R. K., J. Kaur, and H. Kaur. 2019. Water shortage challenges and a way forward in India. Journal - American Water Works Association 111 (5):42–49. doi:10.1002/awwa.1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collivignarelli, M. C., A. Abbà, I. Benigna, S. Sorlini, and V. Torretta. 2018. Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10 (1):1–21. doi:10.3390/su10010086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPCB. March 2021. National Inventory of Sewage Treatment Plants March 2021. 183. https://cpcb.nic.in/openpdffile.php?id=UmVwb3J0RmlsZXMvMTIyOF8xNjE1MTk2MzIyX21lZGlhcGhvdG85NTY0LnBkZg==
   Google Scholar
• Dhanke, P. B., and S. M. Wagh. 2020. Intensification of the degradation of acid RED-18 using hydrodynamic cavitation. Emerging Contaminants 6:20–32. doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2019.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Z. Y., K. Zhang, and R. H. Yao. 2019. Degradation of refractory pollutants by hydrodynamic cavitation: key parameters to degradation rates. Journal of Hydrodynamics 31 (4):848–56. doi:10.1007/s42241-018-0131-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov, K., K. Dinesh, X. Sun, R. Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani, Z. Wang, S. Sonawane, and G. Boczkaj. 2022. Synergistic effects of hybrid advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on hydrodynamic cavitation phenomenon – a review. Chemical Engineering Journal 432: December 2021 doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.134191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov, K., X. Sun, and G. Boczkaj. 2021. Combination of hydrodynamic cavitation and SR-AOPs for simultaneous degradation of BTEX in water. Chemical Engineering Journal 417 (December 2020):128081. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128081.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, A., M. Gągol, P. Makoś, J. A. Khan, and G. Boczkaj. 2019. Integrated photocatalytic advanced oxidation system (TiO2/uv/o3/h2o2)for degradation of volatile organic compounds. Separation and Purification Technology 224 (February):1–14. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.012.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, A., P. Makoś, and G. Boczkaj. 2018. Treatment of bitumen post oxidative effluents by sulfate radicals based advanced oxidation processes (S-AOPs) under alkaline pH conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production 195:374–84. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, A., P. Makoś, J. A. Khan, and G. Boczkaj. 2019. Pilot scale degradation study of 16 selected volatile organic compounds by hydroxyl and sulfate radical based advanced oxidation processes. Journal of Cleaner Production 208:54–64. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gągol, M., E. Cako, K. Fedorov, R. D. C. Soltani, A. Przyjazny, and G. Boczkaj. 2020. Hydrodynamic cavitation based advanced oxidation processes: Studies on specific effects of inorganic acids on the degradation effectiveness of organic pollutants. Journal of Molecular Liquids 307: 113002. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gągol, M., A. Przyjazny, and G. Boczkaj. 2018. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation – a review. Chemical Engineering Journal 338 (September 2017):599–627. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.049.
   Google Scholar
• Giuseppe, M., L. Michela, and A. Gainni. 2020. A critical review of the current technologies in wastewater treatment plants by using hydrodynamic cavitation process: Principles and application. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. doi:10.1007/s40201-020-00444-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenzi, V., and M. Prisciandaro. 2021. Technical feasibility of biodiesel production from virgin oil and waste cooking oil: comparison between traditional and innovative process based on hydrodynamic cavitation. Waste Management 122:15–25. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenzi, V., M. Prisciandaro, F. Tortora, and F. Vegliò. 2018. Optimization of hydrodynamic cavitation process of azo dye reduction in the presence of metal ions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 6 (6):6787–96. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenzi, V., M. Prisciandaro, and F. Vegliò February 2020. Study of the effect of operative conditions on the decolourization of azo dye solutions by using hydrodynamic cavitation at the lab scale. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 98: 1980–88. doi:10.1002/cjce.23782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Y. Tu, X. Li, & H. Li (2018). Application of reverse osmosis in purifying drinking water. E3S Web of Conferences, 38. 10.1051/e3sconf/20183801037
   Google Scholar
• Kesari, K. K., R. Soni, Q. M. S. Jamal, P. Tripathi, J. A. Lal, N. K. Jha, M. H. Siddiqui, P. Kumar, V. Tripathi, and J. Ruokolainen. 2021. Wastewater treatment and reuse: a review of its applications and health implications. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 232 (5). doi: 10.1007/s11270-021-05154-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., X. Sun, B. Koo, and J. Y. Yoon. 2019. Experimental investigation of sludge treatment using a rotor-stator type hydrodynamic cavitation reactor and an ultrasonic bath. Processes 7 (11). doi: 10.3390/pr7110790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhe, N. S., A. R. Gupta, and V. K. Rathod. 2017. Production and purification of biodiesel produced from used frying oil using hydrodynamic cavitation. Resource-Efficient Technologies 3 (2):198–203. doi:10.1016/j.reffit.2017.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Kookana, R. S., P. Drechsel, P. Jamwal, and J. Vanderzalm. 2020. Urbanisation and emerging economies: Issues and potential solutions for water and food security. The Science of the Total Environment 732:139057. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, B., R. V. Wanjule, and H. H. Shinde. 2018. Study on sewage quality from sewage treatment plant at Vashi, Navi Mumbai. Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (1):1859–63. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.286.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Y. K. Oh, and J. I. Han. 2019. Design optimization of hydrodynamic cavitation for effectual lipid extraction from wet microalgae. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2):102942. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2019.102942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., D. Hasson, R. Semiat, and H. Shemer. 2019. Intermediate concentrate demineralization techniques for enhanced brackish water reverse osmosis water recovery – a review. Desalination 466 (May):24–35. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2019.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso, G., M. Langone, and G. Andreottola. 2017. A swirling jet-induced cavitation to increase activated sludge solubilisation and aerobic sludge biodegradability. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 35:489–501. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso, G., M. Langone, G. Andreottola, and L. Bruni. 2019. Effects of hydrodynamic cavitation, low-level thermal and low-level alkaline pre-treatments on sludge solubilisation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 59 (August):104750. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104750.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancuso, G., M. Langone, R. Di Maggio, A. Toscano, and G. Andreottola. 2022. Effect of hydrodynamic cavitation on flocs structure in sewage sludge to increase stabilization for efficient and safe reuse in agriculture. Bioremediation Journal 26 (1):41–52. doi:10.1080/10889868.2021.1900055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso, G., M. Langone, M. Laezza, and G. Andreottola. 2016. Decolourization of Rhodamine B: A swirling jet-induced cavitation combined with NaOcl. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 32:18–30. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniakova, G., I. Salmerón, M. Aliste, M. Inmaculada Polo-López, I. Oller, S. Malato, and L. Rizzo. 2022. Solar photo-Fenton at circumneutral pH using Fe(III)-EDDS compared to ozonation for tertiary treatment of urban wastewater: Contaminants of emerging concern removal and toxicity assessment. Chemical Engineering Journal 431: June 2021 doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.133474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. 2013. Manual on sewerage and sewage treatment systems - 2013-part a. Central Public Health & Environmental Engineering Organisation http://cpheeo.gov.in/cms/manual-on-sewerage-and-sewage-treatment.php.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., A. Mullick, R. Teja, P. Vadthya, A. Roy, and S. Moulik. 2020. Performance and energetic analysis of hydrodynamic cavitation and potential integration with existing advanced oxidation processes: A case study for real life greywater treatment. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 66 (September 2019):105116. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., T. Sundberg, and B. Schütt. 2020. Assessment of water security in socially excluded water, sanitation and hygiene. Water 2030:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, P. N., and P. R. Gogate. 2012. Degradation of methyl parathion using hydrodynamic cavitation: Effect of operating parameters and intensification using additives. Separation and Purification Technology 95:172–79. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, V. V., P. R. Gogate, A. P. Bhat, and P. K. Ghosh. 2020. Treatment of laundry wastewater containing residual surfactants using combined approaches based on ozone, catalyst and cavitation. Separation and Purification Technology 239:116594. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prilly, S., I. Arum, and D. Harisuseno. 2019. Domestic wastewater contribution to water quality of brantas river at Dinoyo Urban Village, Malang City. J-Pai 10 (2):84–91. doi:10.21776/ub.jpal.2019.010.02.02.
   Google Scholar
• Rajoriya, S., S. Bargole, S. George, and V. K. Saharan. 2018. Treatment of textile dyeing industry effluent using hydrodynamic cavitation in combination with advanced oxidation reagents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:1109–15. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randhavane, S. B. 2018. Comparing geometric parameters in treatment of pesticide effluent with hydrodynamic cavitation process. Environmental Engineering Research 24 (2):0–2. doi:10.4491/eer.2018.227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randhavane, S. B., and A. K. Khambete. 2018. Hydrodynamic cavitation: an approach to degrade chlorpyrifos pesticide from real effluent. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22 (7):2219–25. doi:10.1007/s12205-017-2045-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayaroth, M. P., C. T. Aravindakumar, N. S. Shah, and G. Boczkaj. 2022. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based wastewater treatment - unexpected nitration side reactions - a serious environmental issue: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal 430: October2021 doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.133002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, S., V. K. Saharan, and S. George. 2018. Enhanced synergistic degradation efficiency using hybrid hydrodynamic cavitation for treatment of tannery waste effluent. Journal of Cleaner Production 198:1406–21. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & S. Randhavane (2022). Hydrodynamic cavitation: its optimization and potential application in treatment of pigment industry wastewater. Materials Today: Proceedings, xxxx, 1–7. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.261
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf & EddyTchobanoglous, G., F. Burton, and H. D. Stensel. 2017. Wastewater engineering treatment disposal reuse. 4th. Boston: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Virdis, B., S. Freguia, R. A. Rozendal, K. Rabaey, Z. Yuan, and J. Keller. 2011. Microbial fuel cells. Treatise on Water Science 4:641–65. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53199-5.00098-1.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., A. Jia, Y. Wu, C. Wu, and L. Chen. 2015. Disinfection of bore well water with chlorine dioxide/sodium hypochlorite and hydrodynamic cavitation. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom) 36 (4):479–86. doi:10.1080/09593330.2014.952345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastewater, T., and A. Plan. 2019. Surat municipal corporation reuse & recycle of treated wastewater action plan 2019. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., and M. Bevir. 2018. The World Economic Forum. The Encyclopedia of Governance Sage Publications Ltd 671.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., Z. Y. Dong, and R. H. Yao. 2018. Pressure characteristics of hydrodynamic cavitation reactor due to the combination of Venturi tubes with multi-orifice plates. Journal of Hydrodynamics 30 (3):514–21. doi:10.1007/s42241-018-0056-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar