Identification of suitable sites for electric vehicle charging stations; a geographical information systems based multi criteria decision making approach

References

• Akbari, M., M. H. Shojaeefard, P. Asadi, and A. Khalkhali. 2017. Hybrid multi-objective optimization of microstructural and mechanical properties of B4C/A356 composites fabricated by FSP using TOPSIS and modified NSGA-II. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 27 (11):2317–33. doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60258-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcan, S., and M. A. Taş. 2019. Green supplier evaluation with SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method to reduce ecological risk factors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191 (12):736. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7884-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., K. Venkitusamy, S. Padmanaban, R. Selvamuthukumaran, F. Blaabjerg, and A. K. Singh. 2017. Optimal planning of electric vehicle charging station at the distribution system using hybrid optimization algorithm. Energy 133:70–78. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banihashemi, S. A., M. Khalilzadeh, J. Antucheviciene, and J. Šaparauskas. 2021. Trading off time–cost–quality in construction project scheduling problems with fuzzy SWARA–TOPSIS approach. Buildings 11 (9):387. doi:10.3390/buildings11090387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boujelben, M. K., and C. Gicquel. 2019. Efficient solution approaches for locating electric vehicle fast charging stations under driving range uncertainty. Computers & Operations Research 109:288–99. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2019.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyaci, A. C., A. Şişman, and K. Sarıcaoğlu. 2021. Site selection for waste vegetable oil and waste battery collection boxes: A GIS-based hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (14):17431–44. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-12080-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, H., X. Jia, A. Chiu, X. Hue, and M. Xu. 2014. Siting public electric vehicle charging stations in Beijing using big-data informed travel patterns of the taxi fleet. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 33:39–46. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso, C., and O. Veneri. 2015. Experimental study of a DC charging station for full electric and plug in hybrid vehicles. Applied Energy 152:131–42. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, P., R. Parker, T. Hoque, J. Cruz, L. Du, S. Wang, and S. Bhunia. 2022. Addressing the range anxiety of battery electric vehicles with charging en route. Scientific Reports 12 (1):5588. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08942-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, W., F. Calise, N. Dui´c, P. A. Østergaard, M. Vicidomini, and Q. Wang. 2020. Recent advances in technology strategy and application of sustainable energy systems. Energies 13 (19):5229. doi:10.3390/en13195229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csiszar, C., B. Csonka, D. Foldes, E. Wirth, and T. Lovas. 2019. Urban public charging station locating method for electric vehicles based on land use approach. Journal of Transport Geography 74:173–80. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H., Z. Hu, and Y. Song. 2015. Value of the energy storage system in an electric bus fast charging station. Applied Energy 157:630–39. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eghtesadifard, M., P. Afkhami, and A. Bazyar. 2020. An integrated approach to the selection of municipal solid waste landfills through GIS, K-Means and multi-criteria decision analysis. Environmental Research 185:109348. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, H., R. Hensley, S. Knupfer, and S. Sahdev. 2018. Charging ahead: Electric-vehicle infrastructure demand. Accessed January 2, 2021 https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/charging-ahead-electric-vehicle-infrastructure-demand.
   Google Scholar
• Erbas, M., M. Kabak, E. Ozceylan, and C. Çetinkaya. 2018. Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: A GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy 163:1017–31. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, S., İ. Çapar, İ. Çapar, and M. M. Nejad. 2022. Establishing a statewide electric vehicle charging station network in Maryland: A corridor-based station location problem. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 79:101127. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2021.101127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat, Y. 2019. Utility-scale solar photovoltaic hybrid system and performance analysis for eco-friendly electric vehicle charging and sustainable home. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 41 (6):734–45. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1520354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frade, I., A. Ribeiro, G. Gonçalves, and A. P. Antunes. 2011. Optimal location of charging stations for electric vehicles in a neighborhood in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2252 (1):91–98. doi:10.3141/2252-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler, D., and T. Yomralioglu. 2020. Suitable location selection for the electric vehicle fast charging station with AHP and fuzzy AHP methods using GIS. Annals of GIS 26 (2):169–89. doi:10.1080/19475683.2020.1737226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., and H. Zhao. 2015. Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective. Applied Energy 158:390–402. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, C., S. Das, C. Bussar, and D. U. Sauer. 2020. Representative, empirical, real-world charging station usage characteristics and data in Germany. eTransportation 6:100079. doi:10.1016/j.etran.2020.100079.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S., and M. D. Sarder. 2019. Development of a Bayesian network model for optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 105:110–22. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L., and K. Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. In Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, ed. M. Beckmann and H. P.Künzi, 58–191. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, G. E. O. 2022. Accessed August 31 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, H., H. Miao, G. Tian, M. Zhou, Y. Feng, Z. Li, and J. Li. 2020. Multiobjective bike repositioning in bike-sharing systems via a modified artificial bee colony algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 17 (2):909–20. doi:10.1109/TASE.2019.2950964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordán, J., J. Palanca, E. Val, V. Julian, and V. Botti. 2021. Localization of charging stations for electric vehicles using genetic algorithms. Neurocomputing 452:416–23. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabak, M., M. Erbaş, C. Çetinkaya, and E. Özceylan. 2018. A GIS-based MCDM approach for the evaluation of bike-share stations. Journal of Cleaner Production 201:49–60. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keršulienė, V., E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management 11 (2):243–58. doi:10.3846/jbem.2010.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. P., T. Zhang, J. Zhu, and T. Ma. 2018. Allocation optimization of electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) considering with charging satisfaction and distributed renewables integration. Energy 164:560–74. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meghana, P., C. Yammani, S. R. Salkuti, H. Malik, G. Chaudhary, S. Srivastava, H. Malik, G. Chaudhary, and S. Srivastava. 2022. Blockchain technology based decentralized energy management in multi-microgrids including electric vehicles. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 42 (2):991–1002. doi:10.3233/JIFS-189766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, G., A. Polimeni, S. Micari, L. Andaloro, and V. Antonucci. 2020. Optimal allocation of electric vehicle charging stations in a highway network: Part 1 Methodology and test application. Journal of Energy Storage 27:101102. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivas, M., R. K. P. R. Naidu, D. P. Mishra, and S. R. Salkuti. 2022. Modelling and analysis of solar-powered electric vehicles. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems 13 (1):480–87. doi:10.11591/ijpeds.v13.i1.pp480-487.
   Google Scholar
• Omrani, H., A. Alizadeh, and A. Emrouznejad. 2018. Finding the optimal combination of power plants alternatives: A multi response Taguchi neural network using TOPSIS and fuzzy best-worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production 203:210–23. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., and G. -H. Tzeng. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2):445–55. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagany, R., A. Marquardt, and R. Zink. 2019. Electric charging demand location model—A user- and destination-based locating approach for electric vehicle charging stations. Sustainability 11 (8):2301. doi:10.3390/su11082301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, A., A. Bhattacharya, and K. A. Chakraborty. 2021. Allocation of electric vehicle charging station considering uncertainties. Sustainable Energy Grids Networks 25:100422. doi:10.1016/j.segan.2020.100422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, R. X., H. C. Liao, A. Al-Barakati, and F. Cavallaro. 2019. Electric vehicle charging station site selection by an integrated hesitant FUZZY SWARA-WASPAS method. Transformations in Business and Economics 18 (2):103–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkuti, S. R. 2019. Optimal operation of microgrid considering renewable energy sources, electric vehicles and demand response, E3S Web of Conferences 87, 1st International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Future Electric Transportation, Hyderabad, India. 14–16 February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Salkuti, S. R. 2021. Energy storage and electric vehicles: technology, operation, challenges, and cost-benefit analysis. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 12 (4):40–45. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkuti, S. R. 2022. Emerging and Advanced Green Energy Technologies for Sustainable and Resilient Future Grid. Energies 15 (18):6667. doi:10.3390/en15186667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandeep, V., S. Shastri, A. Sardar, and S. R. Salkuti. 2020. Modeling of battery pack sizing for electric vehicles. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System 11 (4):1987–94. doi:10.11591/ijpeds.v11.i4.pp1987-1994.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, H. A., D. Ghosh, D. V. Riper, and S. M. Manson. 2010. How do you measure distance in spatial models? An example using open-space valuation. Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design 37 (5):874–94. doi:10.1068/b35126.
   Google Scholar
• Shahraki, N., H. Cai, M. Turkay, and M. Xu. 2015. Optimal locations of electric public charging stations using real world vehicle travel patterns. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 41:165–76. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., W. Gao, B. Li, and L. Wang. 2020. Locating charging stations for electric vehicles. Transport Policy 98:48–54. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supciller, A. A., and F. Toprak. 2020. Selection of wind turbines with multi-criteria decision making techniques involving neutrosophic numbers: A case from Turkey. Energy 207:118237. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, G., M. Zhou, J. Chu, T. Qiang, and H. Hu. 2015. Stochastic cost-profit tradeoff model for locating an automotive service enterprise. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 12; 2 (2):580–87. doi:10.1109/TASE.2013.2297623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSI. 2022. Turkish Statistical Institute. Accessed August 20 2022. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., C. Xie, C. Xu, and F. Li. 2017. A decision framework for electric vehicle charging station site selection for residential communities under an intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case of Beijing. Energies 10 (9):1270. doi:10.3390/en10091270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., M. Yang, H. Zhang, K. Chen, and Y. Wang. 2016. Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging stations based on a cloud model and the PROMETHEE method. Energies 9 (3):157. doi:10.3390/en9030157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., C. Zhang, P. Jiang, C. Li, and H. Cao. 2023. A prediction approach of fiber laser surface treatment using ensemble of metamodels considering energy consumption and processing quality. Green Manuf Open 1 (3): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., C. Zhang, K. Lian, H. Cao, and C. Li. 2022. Carbon emission modelling and mechanical properties of laser, arc and laser–arc hybrid welded aluminium alloy joints. Journal of Cleaner Production 378:134437. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Z., and J. Yan. 2008. Kernel density estimation of traffic accidents in a network space. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32 (5):396–406. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Q. Zhang, A. Farnoosh, S. Chen, and Y. Li. 2019. GIS-Based multi-objective particle swarm optimization of charging stations for electric vehicles. Energy 169:844–53. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., and N. Li. 2016. Optimal siting of charging stations for electric vehicles based on fuzzy delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision making approaches from an extended sustainability perspective. Energies 9 (4):270. doi:10.3390/en9040270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar