Exergy, energy, and economic analyses of pyramid solar still integrated with solar water heater

References

• Abdullah, A. S., W. H. Alawee, S. A. Mohammed, A. Majdi, Z. M. Omara, and F. A. Essa. 2022. Increasing the productivity of modified cords pyramid solar still using electric heater and various wick materials. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 169:169–76. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawee, W. H., S. A. Mohammed, H. A. Dhahad, A. S. Abdullah, Z. M. Omara, and F. A. Essa. 2021. Improving the performance of pyramid solar still using rotating four cylinders and three electric heaters. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 148:950–58. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hamadani, A. A. F., and A. H. Yaseen. 2021. A multistage solar still with photovoltaic panels and DC water heater using a pyramid glass cover enhanced by external cooling shower and PCM. Heat Transfer 50 (7):7001–19. doi:10.1002/htj.22214.
   Google Scholar
• Alwan, N. T., S. E. Shcheklein, and O. M. Ali. 2021. Evaluation of distilled water quality and production costs from a modified solar still integrated with an outdoor solar water heater. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 27:101216. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2021.101216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia, M. E. H., A. E. Kabeel, M. Abdelgaied, F. A. Essa, and Z. M. Omara. 2021. Enhancement of hemispherical solar still productivity using iron, zinc and copper trays. Solar Energy 216:295–302. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellila, A., M. E. H. Attia, A. E. Kabeel, M. Abdelgaied, K. Harby, and J. Soli. 2021. Productivity enhancement of hemispherical solar still using Al2O3-water-based nanofluid and cooling the glass cover. Applied Nanoscience 11 (4):1127–39. doi:10.1007/s13204-021-01677-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhivagar, R., and M. Mohanraj. 2021. Performance improvements of single slope solar still using graphite plate fins and magnets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (16):20499–516. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11737-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sebaii, A., and A.E.M. Khallaf. 2020. Mathematical modeling and experimental validation for square pyramid solar still. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (26):32283–95. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07587-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essa, F. A., A. S. Abdullah, W. H. Alawee, A. Alarjani, U. F. Alqsair, S. Shanmugan, Z. M. Omara, and M. M. Younes. 2022. Experimental enhancement of tubular solar still performance using rotating cylinder, nanoparticles’ coating, parabolic solar concentrator, and phase change material. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 29:101705. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2021.101705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahzadeh, R., L. Aref, N. Gholamiarjenaki, Z. Nonejad, and M. Saghi. 2020. Experimental investigation of the effect of using water and ethanol as working fluid on the performance of pyramid-shaped solar still integrated with heat pipe solar collector. Solar Energy 207:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathy, M., H. Hassan, and M. Salem Ahmed. 2018. Experimental study on the effect of coupling parabolic trough collector with double slope solar still on its performance. Solar Energy 163:54–61. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghandourah, E., H. Panchal, O. Fallatah, H. M. Ahmed, E. B. Moustafa, and A. H. Elsheikh. 2022. Performance enhancement and economic analysis of pyramid solar still with corrugated absorber plate and conventional solar still: A case study. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 35:101966. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2022.101966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanaraj, S. J. P., and V. Velmurugan. 2022. Experimental investigation on the performance of modified single basin double slope solar stills. International Journal of Ambient Energy 43 (1):206–15. doi:10.1080/01430750.2019.1636861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goshayeshi, H. R., I. Chaer, M. Yebiyo, and H. F. Öztop. 2022. Experimental investigation on semicircular, triangular and rectangular shaped absorber of solar still with nano-based PCM. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 147 (4):3427–39. doi:10.1007/s10973-021-10728-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeel, A. E., W. M. El-Maghlany, M. Abdelgaied, and M. M. Abdel-Aziz. 2020. Performance enhancement of pyramid-shaped solar stills using hollow circular fins and phase change materials. Journal of Energy Storage 31:101610. doi:10.1016/j.est.2020.101610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeel, A. E., Y. Taamneh, R. Sathyamurthy, P. Naveen Kumar, A. M. Manokar, and T. Arunkumar. 2019. Experimental study on conventional solar still integrated with inclined solar still under different water depth. Heat Transfer-Asian Research 48 (1):100–14. doi:10.1002/htj.21370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., A. Dubey, and G. N. Tiwari. 2014. A solar still augmented with an evacuated tube collector in forced mode. Desalination 347:15–24. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoj Kumar, P., D. Sudarvizhi, K. B. Prakash, A. M. Anupradeepa, S. Boomiha Raj, S. Shanmathi, K. Sumithra, and S. Surya. 2021. Investigating a single slope solar still with a nano-phase change material. Materials Today: Proceedings 45:7922–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.804.
   Google Scholar
• Manokar, A. M. 2018. Experimental investigation on pyramid solar still in passive and active mode. Heat and Mass Transfer 55:1045–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi, K. V., and K. H. Nayi. 2020. Efficacy of forced condensation and forced evaporation with thermal energy storage material on square pyramid solar still. Renewable Energy 153:1307–19. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthu Manokar, A., Y. Taamneh, A. E. Kabeel, D. Prince Winston, P. Vijayabalan, D. Balaji, R. Sathyamurthy, S. Padmanaba Sundar, and D. Mageshbabu. 2020. Effect of water depth and insulation on the productivity of an acrylic pyramid solar still – an experimental study. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 10:100319. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100319.
   Google Scholar
• Parsa, S. M., A. Yazdani, H. Dhahad, W. H. Alawee, S. Hesabi, F. Norozpour, D. Javadi Y, H. M. Ali, and M. Afrand. 2021. Effect of Ag, Au, TiO2 metallic/metal oxide nanoparticles in double-slope solar stills via thermodynamic and environmental analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 311:127689. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, A., and R. Jayaprakash. 2021. Performance evaluation of stepped multiple basin pyramid solar still. Materials Today: Proceedings 45:1950–56. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.227.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbar, N., A. Asadi, and E. Fotouhi-Bafghi. 2018. Performance evaluation of two solar stills of different geometries: Tubular versus triangular: Experimental study, numerical simulation, and second law analysis. Desalination 443:44–55. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2018.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahbar, N., and J. A. Esfahani. 2012. Experimental study of a novel portable solar still by utilizing the heatpipe and thermoelectric module. Desalination 284:55–61. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj Kamal, M. D., B. Parandhaman, B. Madhu, D. Magesh Babu, and R. Sathyamurthy. 2021. Experimental analysis on single and double basin single slope solar still with energy storage material and external heater. Materials Today: Proceedings 46:10288–92. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.444.
   Google Scholar
• Sambare, R. 2014. Enhancement of heat transfer in solar collectors with nanofluid: A Review. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology 3:480–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sambare, R. K., S. K. Dewangan, P. K. Gupta, and S. Joshi. 2022a. Augmenting the productivity of tubular solar still using low-cost energy storage materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (52):78739–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21324-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambare, R. K., S. K. Dewangan, P. K. Gupta, and S. Joshi. 2022b. Energy, exergy and economic analyses of Tubular solar still with various transparent cover materials. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 168:1101–08. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambare, R. K., S. K. Dewangan, P. K. Gupta, and S. S. Joshi. 2021. Exergy and thermo-economic analyses of various tubular solar still configurations for improved performance. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 43 (21):2672–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2021.1887977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambare, R., S. Joshi, and N. Kanojiya. 2023. Improving the freshwater production from tubular solar still using sensible heat storage materials. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 38:101676. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101676.
   Google Scholar
• Sambare, R., T. Sathe, N. Kanojiya, N. Sunheriya, and S. Mahakalkar. 2021. Experimental investigation on enhancement of convective heat transfer coefficient in parabolic collector using nanofluids. Applied Solar Energy (English Transl Geliotekhnika) 57 (2):160–69. doi:10.3103/S0003701X21020110.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanan, A., and M. Murugan. 2020. Performance evaluation of square pyramid solar still with various vertical wick materials – an experimental approach. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 19:100581. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100581.
   Google Scholar
• Sasikumar, C., A. M. Manokar, M. Vimala, D. Prince Winston, A. E. Kabeel, R. Sathyamurthy, and A. J. Chamkha. 2020. Experimental studies on passive inclined solar panel absorber solar still. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 139 (6):3649–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08770-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma Sn& GSRKR, N. 2021. Effect of copper fins on fresh water productivity of pyramid solar still. Recent Trends Thermal Science and Engineering 83–91. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-3132-0_9.
   Google Scholar
• Sharshir, S. W., M. Abd Elaziz, and M. R. Elkadeem. 2020. Enhancing thermal performance and modeling prediction of developed pyramid solar still utilizing a modified random vector functional link. Solar Energy 198:399–409. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharshir, S. W., A. W. Kandeal, A. M. Algazzar, Eldesoukey, A., El-Samadony, M. O. A, Hussien, A. A. 2022. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 4-E analysis of pyramid solar still augmented with external condenser, evacuated tubes, nanofluid and ultrasonic foggers: A comprehensive study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 164:408–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharshir, S. W., M. A. Rozza, M. Elsharkawy, Youns, M. M, Abou-Taleb, F., Kabeel, A. E. (2022). Performance evaluation of a modified pyramid solar still employing wick, reflectors, glass cooling and TiO 2 nanomaterial. Desalination 539. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2022.115939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharshir, S. W., M. A. Rozza, A. Joseph, A. W. Kandeal, A. A. Tareemi, F. Abou-Taleb, and A. E. Kabeel. 2022. A new trapezoidal pyramid solar still design with multi thermal enhancers. Applied Thermal Engineering 213:47–49. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R. S., G. Kumaresan, R. Ajith, U. Sabarivasan, K. K. Gowthamaan, and S. Anudeep. 2021. Performance analysis of modified solar still integrated with flat plate collector. Materials Today: Proceedings 45:1382–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.409.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, R., and G. N. Tiwari. 2006. Thermal modeling of passive and active solar stills for different depths of water by using the concept of solar fraction. Solar Energy 80 (8):956–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T., G. Xie, W. Chen, Wu, Z., Xu, J., Liu, Y. 2021. Experimental study on three-effect tubular solar still under vacuum and immersion cooling. Desalination 515:115211. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2021.115211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar