A comprehensive review on techno-environmental analysis of state-of-the-art production and storage of hydrogen energy: challenges and way forward

References

• Abdalla, A. M., S. Hossain, O. B. Nisfindy, A. T. Azad, M. Dawood, and A. K. Azad. 2018. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy Conversion & Management 165:602–27. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelkareem, M. A., K. Elsaid, T. Wilberforce, M. Kamil, E. T. Sayed, and A. Olabi. 2021. Environmental aspects of fuel cells: A review. The Science of the Total Environment 752:141803. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar, C., and I. Dincer. 2019. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. Journal of Cleaner Production 218:835–49. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadeh, M. I., M. P. Moghaddam, N. Amjady, P. Siano, and M. K. Sheikh-El-Eslami. 2016. Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 57:1186–93. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, M. P., W. Gul, C. A. Cimini Junior, and S. K. Ha. 2022. A review on industrial perspectives and challenges on material, manufacturing, design and development of compressed hydrogen storage tanks for the transportation sector. Energies 15:5152. doi:10.3390/en15145152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzaharani, A. A., I. Dincer, and G. Naterer. 2013. Performance evaluation of a geothermal based integrated system for power, hydrogen and heat generation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38:14505–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A., K. Brindhadevi, S. H. Salmen, T. A. Alahmadi, A. Marouskova, M. Sangeetha, and M. Sekar. 2022. Effects of nanofluids on the photovoltaic thermal system for hydrogen production via electrolysis process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:37183–91. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeli, S. D., G. Monteleone, A. Giaconia, and A. A. Lemonidou. 2014. State-of-the-art catalysts for CH4 steam reforming at low temperature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39:1979–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avargani, V. M., S. Zendehboudi, N. M. C. Saady, and M. B. Dusseault. 2022. A comprehensive review on hydrogen production and utilization in North America: Prospects and challenges. Energy Conversion & Management 269:115927. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azni, M. A., and R. Md Khalid. 2021. Hydrogen fuel cell legal framework in the United States, Germany, and South Korea—A model for a regulation in Malaysia. Sustainability 13:2214. doi:10.3390/su13042214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balachandra, P., and B. S. Reddy. 2007. Hydrogen energy for Indian transport sector: A well-to-wheel techno-economic and environmental feasibility analysis. Mumbai, India: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
   Google Scholar
• Balat, M. 2008a. Possible methods for hydrogen production. Energy sources, Part A: Recovery. Utilization, and Environmental Effects 31:39–50. doi:10.1080/15567030701468068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat, M. 2008b. Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33:4013–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, M., and M. Wietschel. 2009a. The future of hydrogen–opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34:615–27. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, M., and M. Wietschel. 2009b. The hydrogen economy: Opportunities and challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, F. 2010. Hydrogen distribution infrastructure for an energy system: Present status and perspectives of technologies. Hydrogen and Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technologies and Applications 78-1:121–48.
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy, H., M. Weber, and F. Barbier. 2017. Hydrogen storage: Recent improvements and industrial perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42:7254–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, S., C. Beyer, F. Dethlefsen, P. Dietrich, R. Duttmann, M. Ebert, V. Feeser, U. Gorke, R. Kober, O. Kolditz, et al. 2013. Impacts of the use of the geological subsurface for energy storage: An investigation concept. Environmental Earth Sciences 70:3935–43. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2883-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykara, S. Z. 2018. Hydrogen: A brief overview on its sources, production and environmental impact. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43:10605–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.022.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari, R., and R. R. Shah. 2021. Hydrogen as energy carrier: Techno-economic assessment of decentralized hydrogen production in Germany. Renewable Energy 177:915–31. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicakova, O., and P. Straka. 2012. Production of hydrogen from renewable resources and its effectiveness. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37:11563–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birol, F. 2019. The future of hydrogen: Seizing today’s opportunities. IEA Report prepared for the G, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Bochirol, L., J. Doulat, A. Lacaze, and L. Weil. 1963. A liquid-hydrogen reactor irradiation device. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering: Proceedings of the 1963 Cryogenic Engineering Conference University of Colorado College of Engineering and National Bureau of Standards Boulder Laboratories, Boulder, Colorado, August 19–21. 1964. Springer, 552–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bocklisch, T. 2016. Hybrid energy storage approach for renewable energy applications. Journal of Energy Storage 8:311–19. doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, A., I. Dincer, and M. Agelin-Chaab. 2020. Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production process with aluminum and water chemical reaction. Energy 205:117978. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boryaev, A., I. Chernyaev, and Y. Zhu. 2022. The use of liquid, slush, gel and solid hydrogen in fuel systems of transport equipment. Proceedings of ARCTD 2021: Arctic Territorial Development, St. Petersburg, Russia, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, T., F. Ammouri, D. Baraldi, and P. Moretto. 2018. The temperature evolution in compressed gas filling processes: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43:2268–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. D. 2017. Hydrogen aircraft technology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G., and R. Morris. 1975. Minimum energy, liquid hydrogen supersonic cruise vehicle study.
   Google Scholar
• Burstall, A. 1927. Experiments on the behaviour of various fuels in a high-speed internal combustion engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Automobile Engineers, 22, 358–92.
   Google Scholar
• Caglayan, D. G., N. Weber, H. U. Heinrichs, J. Linben, M. Robinius, P. A. Kukla, and D. Stolten. 2020. Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45:6793–805. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo, M., D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel, and D. Stolten. 2013. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38:4901–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawdhury, P., D. Ray, T. Vinodhkumar, and C. Subrahmanyam. 2019. Catalytic DBD plasma approach for methane partial oxidation to methanol under ambient conditions. Catalysis Today 337:117–25. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2019.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., S. -F. Chou, F. Blaabjerg, and P. Davari. 2022. Overview of power electronic converter topologies enabling large-scale hydrogen production via water electrolysis. Applied Sciences 12:1906. doi:10.3390/app12041906.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., K. O. Kirlikovali, K. B. Idrees, M. C. Wasson, and O. K. Farha. 2022. Porous materials for hydrogen storage. Chem 8:693–716. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. S., and J. H. Kim. 2011. Hydrogen production by splitting water on solid acid materials by thermal dissociation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36:8192–202. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortazar, M., N. Gao, C. Quan, M. A. Suarez, G. Lopez, S. Orozco, L. Santamaria, M. Amutio, and M. Olazar. 2022. Analysis of hydrogen production potential from waste plastics by pyrolysis and in line oxidative steam reforming. Fuel Processing Technology 225:107044. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.107044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, H. 2020. Path to hydrogen competitiveness: A cost perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, H., and H. Zhu. 2022. Enhancement of partial oxidation reformer by the free-section addition for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy 190:425–33. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, L. 1991. Exhaust emission characterization of hydrogen-operated engine system: Nature of pollutants and their control techniques. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 16:765–75. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(91)90075-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, L. 2016. Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines. Compendium of hydrogen energy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S. K., P. Garg, S. Mishra, S. Chakraborty, and D. Elangovan. 2022. Investigation of adaptive intelligent mppt algorithm for a low-cost iot enabled standalone PV system. Australian Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 19:261–69. doi:10.1080/1448837X.2021.2023251.
   Google Scholar
• Dawood, F., M. Anda, and G. Shafiullah. 2020. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45:3847–69. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059.
   Google Scholar
• De Miguel, N., R. O. Cebolla, B. Acosta, P. Moretto, F. Harskamp, and C. Bonato. 2015. Compressed hydrogen tanks for on-board application: Thermal behaviour during cycling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40:6449–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A. 2001. Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples. Fuel 80:1885–91. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00070-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A. 2005. Recovery of chemicals and gasoline-range fuels from plastic wastes via pyrolysis. Energy Sources 27:1313–19. doi:10.1080/009083190519500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A., and G. Arin. 2004. Hydrogen from biomass via pyrolysis: Relationships between yield of hydrogen and temperature. Energy Sources 26:1061–69. doi:10.1080/00908310490494568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dileep, G. 2020. A survey on smart grid technologies and applications. Renewable Energy 146:2589–625. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, I. 2012. Green methods for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37:1954–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, I., and C. Acar. 2015. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40:11094–111. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, I., and C. Zamfirescu. 2011. Sustainable energy systems and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Dnv, G. 2014. Integration of renewable energy in Europe. Bonn: Imperial College and NERA Economic Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Duman, G., M. A. Uddin, and J. Yanik. 2014. Hydrogen production from algal biomass via steam gasification. Bioresource Technology 166:24–30. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins, P. 2010. Hydrogen energy: Economic and social challenges. Washington DC: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Elbadawi, A. H., L. GE, Z. LI, S. Liu, S. Wang, and Z. Zhu. 2021. Catalytic partial oxidation of methane to syngas: Review of perovskite catalysts and membrane reactors. Catalysis Reviews 63:1–67. doi:10.1080/01614940.2020.1743420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shafie, M., S. Kambara, and Y. Hayakawa. 2019. Hydrogen production technologies overview.
   Google Scholar
• Erdemir, D., and I. Dincer. 2023. Development and assessment of a novel hydrogen storage unit combined with compressed air energy storage. Applied Thermal Engineering 219:119524. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R., and W. Campbell. 1934. Hydrogen: A commercial fuel for internal-combustion engines and other purposes. Journal of the Institute of Fuel;(United Kingdom) 6:277–85.
   Google Scholar
• Favas, J., E. Monteiro, and A. Rouboa. 2017. Hydrogen production using plasma gasification with steam injection. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42:10997–1005. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fch, J. 2015a. Commercialisation of energy storage in Europe. FCH JU, March. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Fch, J. 2015b. Commercialisation of energy storage in Europe. Final report. Fuss, S., Lamb, WF, Callaghan, MW, Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T. & Luderer, G.(2018). Negative emissions—Part, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, D., M. Gamba, A. Lanzini, and M. Santarelli. 2016. Power-to-Gas Hydrogen: Techno-economic assessment of processes towards a multi-purpose energy carrier. Energy Procedia 101:50–57. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• Fischedick, M., K. Arnold, A. Pastowski, D. Schuwer, J. Adnolf, C. H. Balzer, J. Louis, and U. Schabla. 2017. Shell Wasserstoff-Studie. In Energie der Zukunft? Nachhaltige Mobilität durch Brennstoffzelle und H2, 71. Hamburg: Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Galassi, M. C., E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi, E. Funnemark, E. Haland, A. Engebo, G. P. Haugom, T. Jordan, and A. V. Tchouvelev. 2012. Hiad–hydrogen incident and accident database. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37:17351–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammon, B. E. 1951. Preliminary evaluation of the air and fuel specific-impulse characteristics of several potential ram-jet fuels IV: Hydrogen, a-methylnaphthalene, and carbon.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F. -Y., P. -C. YU, and M. -R. GAO. 2022. Seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production: Challenges and opportunities. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 36:100827. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2022.100827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilleau, B., F. Touchard, and J. Granddier. 2014. Numerical study of influence of temperature and matrix cracking on type IV hydrogen high pressure storage vessel behavior. Composite Structures 111:98–110. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghenai, C., and M. Bettayeb. 2019. Grid-tied solar PV/fuel cell hybrid power system for university building. Energy Procedia 159:96–103. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.12.025.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, D., E. Taibi, and R. Miranda. 2019. Hydrogen: A renewable energy perspective. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, W., and L. Niedrach. 1960. Batteries with solid ion‐exchange membrane electrolytes: II. Low‐temperature hydrogen‐oxygen fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 107:131. doi:10.1149/1.2427622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. -R., S. -J. Park, H. Kim, S. Lee, and J. M. Lee. 2022. Centralized and distributed hydrogen production using steam reforming: Challenges and perspectives. UK: Sustainable Energy & Fuels.
   Google Scholar
• He, H. -Z., Y. Zhang, Y. LI, and P. Wang. 2021. Recent innovations of silk-derived electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction and oxygen reduction reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46:7848–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay, J. D., J. Hu, D. L. King, and Y. Wang. 2009. An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today 139:244–60. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., J. Lee, H. Cho, M. Kim, I. Moon, and J. Kim. 2022. Multi-objective optimization of CO2 emission and thermal efficiency for on-site steam methane reforming hydrogen production process using machine learning. Journal of Cleaner Production 359:132133. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S. E. 2022a. Hydrogen has found its way to become the fuel of the future. Future Energy 1:11–12. doi:10.55670/fpll.fuen.1.3.2.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S. E. 2022b. Transition away from fossil fuels toward renewables: Lessons from Russia-Ukraine crisis. Future Energy 1:2–5. doi:10.55670/fpll.fuen.1.1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S. E., and M. A. Wahid. 2016. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 57:850–66. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida, S., and K. Sakata. 2019. Hydrogen technologies and developments in Japan. Clean Energy 3:105–13. doi:10.1093/ce/zkz003.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, E., and K. Gogan. 2020. Missing link to a livable climate: How hydrogen-enabled synthetic fuels can help deliver the Paris goals. London & Cambridge, MA: LucidCatalyst.
   Google Scholar
• Ishaq, H., and I. Dincer. 2020. The role of hydrogen in global transition to 100% renewable energy. Accelerating the Transition to a 100% Renewable Energy Era 74:275–307.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, A. A., and D. W. BAHNEMANN. 2014. Photochemical splitting of water for hydrogen production by photocatalysis: A review. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 128:85–101. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2014.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahromi, A. F., E. Ruiz-Lopez, F. Dorado, E. A. Baranova, and A. DE Lucas-Consuegra. 2022. Electrochemical promotion of ethanol partial oxidation and reforming reactions for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy 183:515–23. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaweera, D. 2016. Smart power systems and renewable energy system integration. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiwen, L., Y. Bin, and Z. Tao. 2018. Economic analysis of hydrogen production from steam reforming process: A literature review. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, & Policy 13:109–15. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1387619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalamaras, C. M., and A. M. Efstathiou. 2013. Hydrogen production technologies: Current state and future developments. Conference papers in science, Limassol, Cyprus, Hindawi.
   Google Scholar
• Kaliski, M., and A. Sikora. 2013. Wodór a podziemne magazynowanie energii w strukturach solnych. Przegląd Solny 9:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Karbouj, H., Z. H. Rather, D. Flynn, and H. W. Qazi. 2019. Non-synchronous fast frequency reserves in renewable energy integrated power systems: A critical review. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 106:488–501. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.09.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, M., H. Mokhlis, K. Naidu, S. Uddin, and A. A. Bakar. 2016. Photovoltaic penetration issues and impacts in distribution network–A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 53:594–605. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassakian, J. G., R. Schmalensee, G. Desgroseilliers, T. D. Heidel, K. Afridi, A. Farid, J. Grochow, W. Hogan, H. Jacoby, and J. Kirtley. 2011. The future of the electric grid. US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 197–234. Tech. Rep
   Google Scholar
• Kayan, D. B., T. Baran, and A. Menteş. 2022. Functionalized Rgo-Pd nanocomposites as high-performance catalysts for hydrogen generation via water electrolysis. Electrochimica acta 422:140513. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., H. Zhao, W. Zou, Z. Chen, W. Cao, J. Fang, J. Xu, L. Zhang, and J. Zhang. 2018. Recent progresses in electrocatalysts for water electrolysis. Electrochemical Energy Reviews 1:483–530. doi:10.1007/s41918-018-0014-z.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkels, A. F., and G. P. Verbong. 2011. Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 15:471–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkerud, J. G., T. F. Bolkesjø, and E. Trømborg. 2017. Power-to-heat as a flexibility measure for integration of renewable energy. Energy 128:776–84. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, R., D. Buddhi, and R. L. Sawhney. 2008. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 12:553–63. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, O., F. Crotogino, R. Prelicz, and T. Rudolph. 2013. Assessment of the potential, the actors and relevant business cases for large scale and seasonal storage of renewable electricity by hydrogen underground storage in Europe. KBB Undergr Technol GmbH 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. S., and V. Himabindu. 2019. Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis–A review. Materials Science for Energy Technologies 2:442–54. doi:10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kunstman, A., K. Poborska-Młynarska, and K. Urbańczyk. 2009. Geologiczne i górnicze aspekty budowy magazynowych kawern solnych. Przegląd geologiczny 57:819–928.
   Google Scholar
• Kuroki, T., N. Sakoda, K. Shinzato, M. Monde, and Y. Takata. 2018. Prediction of transient temperature of hydrogen flowing from pre-cooler of refueling station to inlet of vehicle tank. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43:1846–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankof, L., and R. Tarkowski. 2020. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45:19479–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., Y. Bai, C. Zhang, Y. Song, S. Jiang, D. Grouset, and M. Zhang. 2019. Review on the research of hydrogen storage system fast refueling in fuel cell vehicle. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44:10677–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., L. Chen, S. Xia, R. Kong, and Y. Ge. 2022. Multi-objective optimal configurations of a membrane reactor for steam methane reforming. Energy Reports 8:527–38. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., G. Liu, J. Xue, X. Wang, and Q. Li. 2022. Hydrogen as a carrier of renewable energies toward carbon neutrality: State-of-the-art and challenging issues. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy & Materials 29:1073–89. doi:10.1007/s12613-022-2449-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., L. Sun, Z. Li, M. Fujii, Y. Geng, L. Dong, and T. Fujita. 2020. Trends and future challenges in hydrogen production and storage research. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 27:31092–104. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09470-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Y. Zhao, S. Heberlein, A. Veksha, A. Giannis, W. P. Chan, T. T. Lim, and G. Lisak. 2022. Hydrogen and power co-production from autothermal biomass sorption enhanced chemical looping gasification: Thermodynamic modeling and comparative study. Energy Conversion & Management 269:116087. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., J. Zhu, M. Chen, W. Xin, Z. Yang, and L. Kong. 2014. Hydrogen production via catalytic pyrolysis of biomass in a two-stage fixed bed reactor system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39:13128–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokesh, S. P. A., and A. Ranjbar. 2022. Thermodynamic modelling of cryo compressed hydrogen storage tanks for trucks.
   Google Scholar
• Lowesmith, B. J., G. Hankinson, and S. Chynoweth. 2014. Safety issues of the liquefaction, storage and transportation of liquid hydrogen: An analysis of incidents and HAZIDS. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39:20516–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., J. Wang, M. Dooner, and J. Clarke. 2015. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Applied Energy 137:511–36. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, D. G., D. O’Nolan, N. Rampal, R. Babu, C. Çamur, A. N. Al Shakhs, S. Y. Zhang, G. A. Rance, J. Perez, N. P. Maria Casati, et al. 2022. Densified HKUST-1 monoliths as a route to high volumetric and gravimetric hydrogen storage capacity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 144:13729–39. doi:10.1021/jacs.2c04608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malleswararao, K., N. Aswin, P. Kumar, P. Dutta, and S. S. Murthy. 2022. Experiments on a novel metal hydride cartridge for hydrogen storage and low temperature thermal storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:16144–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder, G. C., S. N. Shams, M. H. Rahman, and S. Huque. 2021. Production of green hydrogen in Bangladesh and its levelized cost. Dhaka University Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 6:64–71. doi:10.3329/dujase.v6i2.59220.
   Google Scholar
• Melaina, M. W., O. Antonia, and M. Penev. 2013. Blending hydrogen into natural gas pipeline networks: A review of key issues.
   Google Scholar
• Melideo, D., D. Baraldi, M. C. Galassi, R. O. Cebolla, B. A. Iborra, and P. Moretto. 2014. CFD model performance benchmark of fast filling simulations of hydrogen tanks with pre-cooling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39:4389–95. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mielke, E., L. D. Anadon, and V. Narayanamurti. 2010. Water consumption of energy resource extraction, processing, and conversion. Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, US: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, C. D., C. B. LaFleur, and C. W. San Marchi. 2017. Hydrogen safety risk assessment and material compatibility R&D. Sandia national lab.(SNL-CA). Livermore, CA (United States): Sandia National.
   Google Scholar
• Molburg, J. C., and R. D. Doctor. 2003. Hydrogen from steam-methane reforming with CO2 capture. 20th annual international Pittsburgh coal conference, Pittsburgh, PA. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi, R., and K. M. Groth. 2019. Hydrogen storage and delivery: Review of the state of the art technologies and risk and reliability analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44:12254–69. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouli-Castillo, J., G. Orr, J. Thomas, N. Hardy, M. Crowther, R. S. Haszeldine, M. Wheeldon, and A. McIntosh. 2021. A comparative study of odorants for gas escape detection of natural gas and hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46:14881–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msheik, M., S. Rodat, and S. Abanades. 2021. Methane cracking for hydrogen production: A review of catalytic and molten media pyrolysis. Energies 14:3107. doi:10.3390/en14113107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradov, N. 2003. Emission-free fuel reformers for mobile and portable fuel cell applications. Journal of Power Sources 118:320–24. doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00078-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradov, N. Z., and T. N. Veziroǧlu. 2005. From hydrocarbon to hydrogen–carbon to hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30:225–37. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzhikyan, A., S. O. Muhanji, G. D. Moynihan, D. J. Thompson, Z. M. Berzolla, and A. M. Farid. 2019. The 2017 ISO New England system operational analysis and renewable energy integration study (SOARES). Energy Reports 5:747–92. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami, H., O. B. Rizvandi, C. Chatzichristodoulou, P. V. Hendriksen, and H. L. Frandsen. 2022. Techno-economic analysis of current and emerging electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Conversion & Management 269:116162. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niaz, S., T. Manzoor, and A. H. Pandith. 2015. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 50:457–69. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidis, P., and A. Poullikkas. 2017. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 67:597–611. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, L. J. 2022. Biomass gasification as an industrial process with effective proof-of-concept: A comprehensive review on technologies, processes and future developments. Results in Engineering 100408:100408. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100408.
   Google Scholar
• Nurdiawati, A., I. N. Zaini, A. R. Irhamna, D. Sasongko, and M. Aziz. 2019. Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 112:369–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, J. M. 2001. Review of small stationary reformers for hydrogen production. Report to the international energy agency, 609.
   Google Scholar
• O’hayre, R., S. W. Cha, W. Colella, and F. B. Prinz. 2016. Fuel cell fundamentalsVol. 10, 9781119191766. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
   Google Scholar
• Oni, A. O., K. Anaya, T. Giwa, G. Di Lullo, and A. Kumar. 2022. Comparative assessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions. Energy Conversion & Management 254:115245. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard, P. A., R. M. Johannsen, and N. Duic. 2020. Sustainable development using renewable energy systems. International journal of sustainable energy planning 2020. Sustainable development using renewable energy systems. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 29:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, N. 2004. Using natural gas transmission pipeline costs to estimate hydrogen pipeline costs.
   Google Scholar
• Pasini, J. M., C. Corgnale, B. A. van Hassel, T. Motyka, S. Kumar, and K. L. Simmons. 2013. Metal hydride material requirements for automotive hydrogen storage systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38:9755–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S. K., S. Ray, J. Prakash, J. H. Wee, S. Y. Kim, J. K. Lee, and V. C. Kalia. 2019. Co-digestion of biowastes to enhance biological hydrogen process by defined mixed bacterial cultures. Indian Journal of Microbiology 59:154–60. doi:10.1007/s12088-018-00777-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, S., A. Lanzini, and P. Leone. 2017. Greening the gas network–The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 70:266–86. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschka, W. 2012. Liquid hydrogen: Fuel of the future. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. R., and A. J. Ros. 2018. The future of the electric grid and its regulation: Some considerations. Electricity Journal 31:18–25. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2018.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Petitpas, G., and S. M. Aceves. 2013. Modeling of sudden hydrogen expansion from cryogenic pressure vessel failure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38:8190–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, I., F. Bauer, R. Blasko, N. Dahlback, M. Dumpelmann, K. Kainurinne, S. Luedge, P. Opdenacker, I. P. Chamorro, D. Romano, et al. 2011. Flexible generation: Backing up renewables. Brussels: EURELECTRIC Renewables Action Plan (RESAP).
   Google Scholar
• Pinsky, R., P. Sabharwall, J. Hartvigsen, and J. O’Brien. 2020. Comparative review of hydrogen production technologies for nuclear hybrid energy systems. Progress in Nuclear Energy 123:103317. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuster, P., A. Alekseev, and P. Wasserscheid. 2017. Hydrogen storage technologies for future energy systems. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 8:445–71. doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puszkiel, J., A. Gasnier, G. Amica, and F. Gennari. 2019. Tuning LiBH4 for hydrogen storage: Destabilization, additive, and nanoconfinement approaches. Molecules 25:163. doi:10.3390/molecules25010163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D. A. J., and R. M. Dell. 2007. Hydrogen energy: Challenges and prospects.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, M. D., M. K. Al Mesfer, H. Naseem, and M. Danish. 2015. Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: A review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high temperature water electrolysis. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 4(3): 2249–8958.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnakar, R. R., N. Gupta, K. Zhang, C. van Doorne, J. Fesmire, B. Dindoruk, and V. Balakotaiah. 2021. Hydrogen supply chain and challenges in large-scale LH2 storage and transportation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46:24149–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.025.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, J., N. M. Musyoka, H. W. Langmi, M. Mathe, and S. Liao. 2017. Current research trends and perspectives on materials-based hydrogen storage solutions: A critical review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42:289–311. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo, H. R. 1923. Further note on fuel research. Proc Institution Automotive Engineers 18:327.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J., C. Atallah, R. Siriwardane, and R. Stevens. 2021. Technoeconomic analysis for hydrogen and carbon Co-Production via catalytic pyrolysis of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46:20338–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, E., M. Trudeau, and K. Zaghib. 2019. Hydrogen storage for mobility: A review. Materials 12:1973. doi:10.3390/ma12121973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian, S., R. Unnthorsson, and C. Richter. 2022. Hydrogen production via biomass gasification: Simulation and performance analysis under different gasifying agents. Biofuels 13:717–26. doi:10.1080/17597269.2021.1894781.
   Google Scholar
• Safari, F., and I. Dincer. 2022. Assessment and multi-objective optimization of a vanadium-chlorine thermochemical cycle integrated with algal biomass gasification for hydrogen and power production. Energy Conversion & Management 253:115132. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sai, D. P., N. Kumar, and V. Saxena. 2022. Analysis of the potential metal hydrides for hydrogen storage in automobile applications. Advanced Combustion for Sustainable Transport 299–330.
   Google Scholar
• Salkeld, R. 1971. Mixed-mode propulsion for the space shuttle(Mixed mode propulsion system for optimization of reusable space shuttle, discussing one-stage-to- orbit vehicle advantages and feasibility). Astronautics and Aeronautics 9:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Samantara, A. K., and S. Ratha. 2019. Metal oxides/chalcogenides and composites: Emerging materials for electrochemical water splitting. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Bastardo, N., R. Schlogl, and H. Ruland. 2021. Methane pyrolysis for zero-emission hydrogen production: A potential bridge technology from fossil fuels to a renewable and sustainable hydrogen economy. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 60:11855–81. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Hidalgo, M. A., and M. D. Cano. 2018. A survey on visual data representation for smart grids control and monitoring. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 16:351–69. doi:10.1016/j.segan.2018.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapountzi, F. M., J. M. Gracia, H. O. Fredriksson, J. H. Niemantsverdriet, and J. W. (. Niemantsverdriet. 2017. Electrocatalysts for the generation of hydrogen, oxygen and synthesis gas. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science 58:1–35. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schastlivtsev, A. I., and V. I. Borzenko. 2017 October. Hydrogen-oxygen steam generator applications for increasing the efficiency, maneuverability and reliability of power production. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, Moscow, Russian Federation, IOP Publishing, 012213.
   Google Scholar
• Schlapbach, L., and A. Züttel. 2001. Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Nature 414:353–58. doi:10.1038/35104634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. B., W. H. Denton, and C. M. Nicholls, eds. 2013. Technology and uses of liquid hydrogen. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, S., R. Balaji, K. Ramya, K. S. Dhathathreyan, and M. Velan. 2013. Graphene oxide modified non-noble metal electrode for alkaline anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38:14934–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsi, M., A. A. Obaid, S. Farokhi, and A. Bayat. 2022. A novel process simulation model for hydrogen production via reforming of biomass gasification tar. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:772–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.055.
   Google Scholar
• Shaqsi, A. Z. A., K. Sopian, and A. Al-Hinai. 2020. Review of energy storage services, applications, limitations, and benefits. Energy Reports 6:288–306. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., and S. K. Ghoshal. 2015. Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: From production to applications. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 43:1151–58. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, A., and E. W. Hall. 1955. Liquid hydrogen as a jet fuel for high-altitude aircraft. US: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cleveland Oh Lewis Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. P., R. K. Asthana, and A. P. Singh. 2007. Prospects of sugarcane milling waste utilization for hydrogen production in India. Energy Policy 35:4164–68. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, M. K., P. Nijhawan, and A. S. Oberoi. 2021. Hydrogen fuel and fuel cell technology for cleaner future: A review. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 28:15607–26. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-12231-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloop, J. L. 1981. Liquid-hydrogen for space-flight-the long step from proposal to reality. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences 29:373–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., S. Gkantonas, and E. Mastorakos. 2022. Modelling of boil-off and sloshing relevant to future liquid hydrogen carriers. Energies, 15:2046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B. E. N. T. 2007. Underground hydrogen storage in geological formations, and comparison with other storage solutions. In Hydrogen power theoretical and engineering international symposium VII”, Merida, Mexico, Paper HU-02: CDROM. January.
   Google Scholar
• Sternfeld, H. J., and P. Heinrich. 1989. A demonstration plant for the hydrogen/oxygen spinning reserve. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 14:703–16. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(89)90087-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolten, D., R. C. Samsun, and N. Garland, eds. 2016. Fuel cells: Data, facts, and figures. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Suman, S. 2018. Hybrid nuclear-renewable energy systems: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 181:166–77. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tareen, W. U., S. Mekhilef, M. Seyedmahmoudian, and B. Horan. 2017. Active power filter (APF) for mitigation of power quality issues in grid integration of wind and photovoltaic energy conversion system. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 70:635–55. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasneem, A., and A. Sa. 2011. ‘Renewable’hydrogen: Prospects and challenges. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 15:3034–40. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taube, M., D. W. T. Rippin, D. L. Cresswell, and W. Knecht. 1983. A system of hydrogen-powered vehicles with liquid organic hydrides. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 8:213–25. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(83)90067-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. B., J. E. A. Alderson, K. M. Kalyanam, A. B. Lyle, and L. A. Phillips. 1986. Technical and economic assessment of methods for the storage of large quantities of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 11:5–22. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(86)90104-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezer, Ö., N. Karabağ, A. Öngen, C. Ö. Çolpan, and A. Ayol. 2022. Biomass gasification for sustainable energy production: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:15419–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thellufsen, J. Z., H. Lund, P. Sorknæs, P. A. Østergaard, M. Chang, D. Drysdale, S. Nielsen, S. R. Djørup, and K. Sperling. 2020. Smart energy cities in a 100% renewable energy context. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 129:109922. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2000. Overview of storage development DOE hydrogen program. Sandia National Laboratories 9.
   Google Scholar
• Twaha, S., and M. A. Ramli. 2018. A review of optimization approaches for hybrid distributed energy generation systems: Off-grid and grid-connected systems. Sustainable Cities and Society 41:320–31. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uliasz-Misiak, B., and A. Przybycin. 2016. Present and future status of the underground space use in Poland. Environmental Earth Sciences 75:1–15. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-6227-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursua, A., L. M. Gandia, and P. Sanchis. 2011. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Current status and future trends. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 410–26.
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, M. A., J. Barreiro-Gomez, N. Quijano, A. I. Cadena, and M. Shahidehpour. 2019. Distributed model predictive control for economic dispatch of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy resources. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 113:607–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeiren, P., W. Adriansens, J. P. Moreels, and R. Leysen. 1998. Evaluation of the Zirfon® separator for use in alkaline water electrolysis and Ni-H2 batteries. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 23:321–24. doi:10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00069-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., T. He, J. Qin, J. WuU, J. LI, Z. ZI, G. LIU, J. WU, and L. Sun. 2015. Gasification of biomass with oxygen-enriched air in a pilot scale two-stage gasifier. Fuel 150:386–93. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., M. Liao, Z. Jiang, B. Liang, J. Weng, Q. Song, M. Zhao, Y. Chen, and L. Lei. 2022. Sorption-enhanced propane partial oxidation hydrogen production for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications. Energy 247:123463. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., R. Ren, B. LIU, and Y. O. U. C. 2022. Hydrogen production with an auto-thermal MSW steam gasification and direct melting system: A process modeling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:6508–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.009.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., B. Wang, Q. Pan, Y. WU, L. Jlang, Z. Wang, and Z. Gan. 2022. Modeling and thermodynamic analysis of thermal performance in self-pressurized liquid hydrogen tanks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:30530–45. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., X. Zhang, R. Shi, J. Zhao, Z. Yuan, and T. Zhang. 2022. Light-driven hydrogen production from steam methane reforming via bimetallic PdNi catalysts derived from layered double hydroxide nanosheets. Energy & Fuels 36:11627–35. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01349.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Y. Zhao, X. Dong, J. Yang, H. Guo, and M. Gong. 2022. Thermodynamic analysis of low-temperature and high-pressure (cryo-compressed) hydrogen storage processes cooled by mixed-refrigerants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:28932–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., and J. Perrin. 2008. Hydrogen transport and distribution. Hydrogen technology: Mobile and portable applications, 129–49. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow, J. R., J. B, R. J. Weber, and K. C. Civinskas. 1972. Preliminary appraisal of hydrogen and methane fuel in a Mach 2.7 supersonic transport.
   Google Scholar
• Widera, B. 2020. Renewable hydrogen implementations for combined energy storage, transportation and stationary applications. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 16:100460. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2019.100460.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, O., R. Botwin, Y. Brill, M. Ellison, F. Forbes, S. Giffoni, V. Monteil, and L. Thompson. 1976. Liquid rockets in perspective. I- Developments in the 1960 s. Astronautics and Aeronautics 14:47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J., Y. S. Lim, J. H. Tang, and E. Morris. 2014. Grid-connected photovoltaic system in Malaysia: A review on voltage issues. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 29:535–45. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. M., T. Y. Wu, and J. C. Juan. 2014. A review of sustainable hydrogen production using seed sludge via dark fermentation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 34:471–82. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D., A. Lucci, J. Campbell, and J. Lee. 1978. Hydrogen turbine power conversion system assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, Y., Z. Yang, and Y. Zhu. 2013. Porous carbon-based materials for hydrogen storage: Advancement and challenges. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 1:9365–81. doi:10.1039/c3ta10583k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., H. Xu, Q. Lu, W. Bao, L. Lin, B. AI, and B. Zhang. 2020. Development of standards for hydrogen storage and transportation. E3S Web of Conferences, Shanghai, China, EDP Sciences, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Y., Z. XU, F. Han, Z. Wang, and Z. NI. 2022. Energy control of providing cryo-compressed hydrogen for the heavy-duty trucks driving. Energy 242:122817. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, S., and X. Yang. 2022. Research progress of lossless and safe storage technology for cryogenic liquid tanks. International Journal of Green Energy 19:1230–51. doi:10.1080/15435075.2021.1987915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M., W. Chen, R. Kania, G. Vanboven, and J. Been. 2016. Crack propagation of pipeline steel exposed to a near-neutral pH environment under variable pressure fluctuations. International Journal of Fatigue 82:658–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, K., and D. Zhang. 2010. Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science 36:307–26. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Y. Yan, J. Zhang, F. Zhang, Z. Wang, and Z. NI. 2022. Analysis of multilayered carbon fiber winding of cryo-compressed hydrogen storage vessel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:10934–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.136.
   Google Scholar
• Zhen, X., and Y. Wang. 2015. An overview of methanol as an internal combustion engine fuel. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 52:477–93. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q. -L., and Q. Xu. 2014. Metal–organic framework composites. Chemical Society Reviews 43:5468–512. doi:10.1039/C3CS60472A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar