Optimization of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells model by developed design of horse optimizer

References

• Agwa, A. M., A. A. El-Fergany, and G. M. Sarhan. 2019. Steady-state modeling of fuel cells based on atom search optimizer. Energies 12 (10):1884. doi:10.3390/en12101884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbary, P., M. Ghiasi, M. R. R. Pourkheranjani, H. Alipour, and N. Ghadimi. 2019. Extracting appropriate nodal marginal prices for all types of committed reserve. Computational Economics 53 (1):1–26. doi:10.1007/s10614-017-9716-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shamma’a, A. A., F. A. A. Ali, M. S. Alhoshan, F. A. Alturki, H. M. Farh, J. Alam, and K. AlSharabi. 2021. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell parameter extraction using a supply–demand-based optimization algorithm. Processes 9(8):1416. doi:10.3390/pr9081416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Q. 2010. Analysis of particle swarm optimization algorithm. Computer and Information Science 3 (1):180. doi:10.5539/cis.v3n1p180.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, W., R. Mohammaditab, G. Fathi, K. Wakil, A. G. Ebadi, and N. Ghadimi. 2019. Optimal bidding and offering strategies of compressed air energy storage: A hybrid robust-stochastic approach. Renewable Energy 143:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Y. Li, G. Zhang, K. Jermsittiparsert, and N. Razmjooy. 2019. Experimental modeling of PEM fuel cells using a new improved seagull optimization algorithm. Energy Reports 5:1616–25. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., et al. 2022. Optimal modeling of combined cooling, heating, and power systems using developed African Vulture Optimization: A case study in watersport complex. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects. 44(2):4296–317. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2074174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M., M. Ghiasi, T. Niknam, A. Kavousi-Fard, M. Shasadeghi, N. Ghadimi, and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary. 2020. Blockchain-based securing of data exchange in a power transmission system considering congestion management and social welfare. Sustainability 13 (1):1–1. doi:10.3390/su13010090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhiman, G., and V. Kumar. 2018. Emperor penguin optimizer: A bio-inspired algorithm for engineering problems. Knowledge-Based Systems 159:20–50. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A. A. Z., H. I. Abdul‐Ghaffar, A. A. Ahmed, and H. A. Ramadan. 2022. An effective model parameter estimation of PEMFCs using GWO algorithm and its variants. IET Renewable Power Generation 16 (7):1380–400. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, F., et al. 2022. Model parameters identification of the PEMFCs using an improved design of Crow Search Algorithm. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47(79):33839–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, H., S. Barmayoon, M. Mohammadi, and N. Ghadimi. 2018. The price prediction for the energy market based on a new method. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 31 (1):313–37. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2018.1429291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlin, T., A. G. Ebadi, D. Mavaluru, M. Alshehri, A. A. B. Mohamed, and B. Sobhani. 2019. Parameter derivation of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on coevolutionary ribonucleic acid genetic algorithm. Computational Intelligence 35 (4):1021–41. doi:10.1111/coin.12230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., H. A. Moghadam, H. Zayandehroodi. et al. 2018. A new formulation to reduce the number of variables and constraints to expedite SCUC in bulky power systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences 89:311–321. doi:10.1007/s40010-017-0475-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., H. Sun, Z. Yuan, Z. Li, R. Shi, and N. Ghadimi. 2020. High voltage gain DC/DC converter using coupled inductor and VM techniques. IEEE Access 8:131975–87. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, B., P. Cheng, K. Dezhi, W. Xiping, L. Chaodong, G. Mingming, and N. Ghadimi. 2022. Optimum structure of a combined wind/photovoltaic/fuel cell-based on amended Dragon Fly optimization algorithm: A case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 44 (3):7109–31. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2105453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadimi, N., M. Sedaghat, K. K. Azar, B. Arandian, G. Fathi, and M. Ghadamyari. 2023. An innovative technique for optimization and sensitivity analysis of a PV/DG/BESS based on converged Henry gas solubility optimizer: A case study. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. doi:10.1049/gtd2.12773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheydi, M., A. Nouri, and N. Ghadimi. 2016. Planning in microgrids with conservation of voltage reduction. IEEE Systems Journal 12 (3):2782–90. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2016.2633512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, M., et al. 2023a. A comprehensive review of cyber-attacks and defense mechanisms for improving security in smart grid energy systems: Past, present and future. Electric Power Systems Research 215:108975. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108975.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, M., et al. 2023b. Evolution of smart grids towards the Internet of energy: Concept and essential components for deep decarbonisation. IET Smart Grid. 6(1):86–102. doi:10.1049/stg2.12095
   Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, M., N. Ghadimi, and E. Ahmadinia. 2019. An analytical methodology for reliability assessment and failure analysis in distributed power system. SN Applied Sciences 1 (1):44. doi:10.1007/s42452-018-0049-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollou, A. R., and N. Ghadimi. 2017. A new feature selection and hybrid forecast engine for day-ahead price forecasting of electricity markets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 32 (6):4031–45. doi:10.3233/JIFS-152073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W., and N. Razmjooy. 2020. A new optimisation algorithm based on OCM and PCM solution through energy reserve. International Journal of Ambient Energy 43:1–14. doi:10.1080/01430750.2020.1730952.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., et al. 2022. Parameter extraction of the SOFC mathematical model based on fractional order version of dragonfly algorithm. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47(57):24059–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamian, M., A. Darvishan, M. Hosseinzadeh, M. J. Lariche, N. Ghadimi, and A. Nouri. 2018. A framework to expedite joint energy-reserve payment cost minimization using a custom-designed method based on mixed integer genetic algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 72:203–12. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, E., and N. Ghadimi. 2022. Model identification of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells based on a hybrid convolutional neural network and extreme learning machine optimized by improved honey badger algorithm. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 52:102005. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatamlou, A. 2013. Black hole: A new heuristic optimization approach for data clustering. Information Sciences 222:175–84. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.08.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, R., S. Li, M. Wu, G. Ren, W. Gao, M. Khayatnezhad, and F. Gholinia. 2021. Assessing of impact climate parameters on the gap between hydropower supply and electricity demand by RCPs scenarios and optimized ANN by the improved Pathfinder (IPF) algorithm. Energy 237:121621. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., et al. 2022. Optimal economic scheduling of microgrids considering renewable energy sources based on energy hub model using demand response and improved water wave optimization algorithm. Journal of Energy Storage 55:105311. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.105311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jui, J. J., and M. A. Ahmad. 2021. A hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for identification of continuous-time Hammerstein systems. Applied Mathematical Modelling 95:339–60. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2021.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, H., X. Li, J. Zhu, H. Tang, Z. Zhang, and N. Ghadimi. 2018. A new wind power prediction method based on ridgelet transforms, hybrid feature selection and closed-loop forecasting. Advanced Engineering Informatics 36:20–30. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2018.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., P. Liu, C. Le, and B. Zhou. 2019. A novel hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm based on the cross-entropy method and firefly algorithm for global optimization. Entropy 21 (5):494. doi:10.3390/e21050494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., W. Wang, and N. Ghadimi. 2017. Electricity load forecasting by an improved forecast engine for building level consumers. Energy 139:18–30. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdinia, S., M. Rezaie, M. Elveny, N. Ghadimi, and N. Razmjooy. 2021. Optimization of PEMFC model parameters using meta-heuristics. Sustainability 13 (22):12771. doi:10.3390/su132212771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Q., T. Liu, C. Su, H. Niu, Z. Hou, and N. Ghadimi. 2020. A single-phase transformer-less grid-tied inverter based on switched capacitor for PV application. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems 31 (1):257–70. doi:10.1007/s40313-019-00531-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir, M., M. Shafieezadeh, M. A. Heidari, and N. Ghadimi. 2020. Application of hybrid forecast engine based intelligent algorithm and feature selection for wind signal prediction. Evolving Systems 11 (4):559–73. doi:10.1007/s12530-019-09271-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldovan, D. 2020. Horse optimization algorithm: A novel bio-inspired algorithm for solving global optimization problems. In Computer Science On-line Conference, ed. R. Silhavy, 195–209. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selem, S. I., H. M. Hasanien, and A. A. El‐Fergany. 2020. Parameters extraction of PEMFC’s model using manta rays foraging optimizer. International Journal of Energy Research 44 (6):4629–40. doi:10.1002/er.5244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, M. A., H. M. Hasanien, M. El Moursi, and A. A. El‐Fergany. 2021. Precise modeling of PEM fuel cell using improved chaotic MayFly optimization algorithm. International Journal of Energy Research 45 (13):18754–69. doi:10.1002/er.6987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D. 2008. Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 12 (6):702–13. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2008.919004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., D. Cao, Y. Ling, F. Xiang, Z. Sun, and F. Wu. 2021. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell model parameter identification based on dynamic differential evolution with collective guidance factor algorithm. Energy 216:119056. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tizhoosh, H. R. 2005. Opposition-based learning: A new scheme for machine intelligence. International conference on computational intelligence for modelling, control and automation and international conference on intelligent agents, web technologies and internet commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC’06), Vienna, Austria, vol. 1, pp. 695–701. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, O. E., and M. T. Coban. 2016. Optimal proton exchange membrane fuel cell modelling based on hybrid teaching learning based optimization–differential evolution algorithm. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 7 (1):347–60. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-C., W.-P. Lee, and C.-W. Chien. 2011. Modified the performance of differential evolution algorithm with dual evolution strategy. International conference on machine learning and computing, Singapore, vol. 3, pp. 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y.-P., P. Ouyang, S.-M. Xing, L.-Y. Qi, H. Jafari, and H. Jafari. 2021. Optimal structure design of a PV/FC HRES using amended Water Strider Algorithm. Energy Reports 7:2057–67. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., and N. Wang. 2012. A novel P systems based optimization algorithm for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37 (10):8465–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, M., X. Wang, and Y. Xu. 2009. Parameter identification for proton exchange membrane fuel cell model using particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 (2):981–89. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Z., and N. Razmjooy. 2020. PEMFC identification using deep learning developed by improved deer hunting optimization algorithm. International Journal of Power and Energy Systems 40 (2). doi:10.2316/J.2020.203-0189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., M. Khayatnezhad, and N. Ghadimi. 2022. Optimal model evaluation of the proton-exchange membrane fuel cells based on deep learning and modified African vulture optimization algorithm. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 44 (1):287–305. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2043956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., C. Xiao, and N. Razmjooy. 2020. Optimal parameter extraction of PEM fuel cells by meta-heuristics. International Journal of Ambient Energy 43:1–10. doi:10.1080/01430750.2020.1745276.
   Google Scholar