200
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Optimum Site Selection of Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic (PV) - Hydro Power Plants in off Grid Locations in Cameroon using the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 8076-8091 | Received 08 Feb 2023, Accepted 08 Jun 2023, Published online: 22 Jun 2023

References

  • Akther, A., T. Ahamed, R. Noguchi, T. Genkawa, and T. Takigawa. 2018. Site suitability analysis of biogas digester plant for municipal waste using GIS and multi-criteria analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science 3 (1):61–93. doi:10.1007/s41685-018-0084-2.
  • Almeida, A. C. 2019. Multi actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to build indicators and localize sustainable development goal 11 in Brazilian municipalities. Heliyon 5 (8):e02128. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02128.
  • Aras, H., S. Erdogmus, and E. Koc. 2004. Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renewable Energy 29 (8):1383–92. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.020.
  • Azadeh, A., S. F. Ghaderi, and A. Maghsoudi. 2008. Location optimization of solar plants by an integrated hierarchical DEA PCA approach. Energy Policy 36 (10):3993–4004. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.034.
  • Bagocius, V., E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis. 2014. Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive-multiplicative utility function. Journal Civil Engineering Management 20 (4):590–99. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.932836.
  • Belton, V., and T. Gear. 1983. On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11 (3):228–30. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6.
  • Beskese, A., A. Camci, G. T. Temur, E. Erturk, and C. Kahraman. 2020. Wind turbine evaluation using the hesitant fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method with a case in Turkey. Journal Intelligent Fuzzy Systems 38 (1):997–1011. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179464.
  • Bishnoi, D., and H. Chaturvedi. 2022. Optimised site selection of hybrid renewable installations for flare gas reduction using Multi-Criteria decision making. Energy Conversion and Management 10 (13):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100181.
  • Chase, R. B., N. J. Aquilano, and F. R. Jacobs. 1998. Production and operations management manufacturing and services. 8th ed. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin McGraw Hill.
  • Chowdhury, S., J. Zhang, A. Messac, and L. Castillo. 2013. Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions. Renewable Energy 52:273–82. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.017.
  • Çoban, V. 2020. “Solar energy plant project selection with AHP decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic evaluation. Complex Intelligences System 6 (3):507–29. doi:10.1007/s40747-020-00152-5.
  • Dinmohammadi, A., and M. Shafiee. 2017. Determination of the most suitable technology transfer strategy for wind turbines using an integrated AHP-TOPSIS decision model. Energies 10 (5):642. doi:10.3390/en10050642.
  • Dong, Y., J. Wang, H. Jiang, and X. Shi. 2013. Intelligent optimized wind resource assessment and wind turbines selection in Huitengxile of Inner Mongolia, China. Applied Energy 109:239–53. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.028.
  • Dyer, J. S. 1990. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 36 (3):249–58. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249.
  • Fatemi, M., and K. Rezaei-Moghaddam. 2019. Multi-criteria evaluation in paradigmatic perspectives of agricultural, environmental management. Heliyon 5 (2):e01229. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01229.
  • Guarini, M. R., F. Battisti, and A. Chiovitti. 2018. A methodology for the selection of multicriteria decision analysis methods in real estate and land management processes. Sustainability 10 (2):507. doi:10.3390/su10020507.
  • Helgason, K. 2012. Selecting Optimum Location and Type of Wind Turbines in Iceland. Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavík University.
  • Hwang, C., and K. Yoon. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Methods for multiple attribute decision making, 58–191. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3.
  • Iweh, C. D., S. Gyamfi, E. Tanyi, and E. Effah-Donyina. 2023. Assessment of the optimum location and hosting capacity of distributed solar pv system in the southern interconnected grid of cameroon. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 1–22. doi:10.1080/14786451.2023.2168002.
  • Iweh, C. D., G. C. Semassou, R. H. Ahouansou, and W. B. Nsanyuy. 2022. The sustainability of renewable energy-based electrification projects in Cameroon: technical, institutional and policy perspectives. Network Industries Quarterly 24 (4):8–17.
  • Jahanshahloo, G. R., F. H. Lotfi, and M. Izadikhah. 2006. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Applied Mathematics and Computing 181 (2):1544–51. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057.
  • Junior, F. R., L. Osiro, and L. C. Carpinetti. 2014. A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing 21:194–209. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014.
  • Khan, S. A. and S. Rehman, “On the use of unified and-or fuzzy aggregation operator for multi-criteria decision making in wind farm design process using wind turbines in 500 Kw–750 kW range,” in IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
  • Kigozi, R., A. Aboyade and E. Muzenda, Technology selection of biogas digesters for OFMSW via multi-criteria decision analysis’. in World Congress on Engineering (WCE 2014), London, Uk, 2014.
  • Masebinu, S. O., E. T. Akinlabi, E. Muzenda, C. Mbohwa, A. O. Aboyade and T. Mahlatsi, “Environmental sustainability: Multi-criteria decision analysis for resource recovery from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bali Nusa, Indonesia, 2016.
  • Ministry of Economy, Planning and Regional Development (MINEPAT). 2009. Cameroon Vision 2035. Yaounde, Cameroon: MINEPAT.
  • Mungwe, J., S. Mandelli, and E. Colombo. 2016. Community pico and micro hydropower for rural electrification: Experiences from the mountain regions of Cameroon. AIMS Energy 4 (1):190–205. doi:10.3934/energy.2016.1.190.
  • Ohunakin, O. S., and B. O. Saracoglu. 2018. A comparative study of selected multi-criteria decision-making methodologies for location selection of very large concentrated solar power plants in Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 10 (5):551–67. doi:10.1080/20421338.2018.1495305.
  • Perkin, S., D. Garrett, and P. Jensson. 2015. Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: A case-study for Búrfell, Iceland. Renewable Energy 75:165–72. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.043.
  • Rey, M., P. Soriano, and E. Stampfli. 1995. La Localisation D’Une Installation De Stockage De Dechets Stabilises : Le Cas De La Suisse Romande. INFOR 33 (1):50–62. doi:10.1080/03155986.1995.11732266.
  • Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Saaty, L. G. V., and L. Thomas. 1987. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 32:93–94.
  • Sánchez-Lozano, J. M., J. Teruel-Solano, P. Soto-Elvira, and G.-C. M. Socorro. 2013. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 24:544–56. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019.
  • Sarja, J., and V. Halonen. 2013. Wind turbine selection criteria: A customer perspective. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 7:1795.
  • Schmenner, R. W. 1982. Making business location decisions. Hoboken, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Sedaghat, A., F. Alkhatib, A. Eilaghi, M. Sabati, L. Borvayeh, and A. Mostafaeipour. 2019. A new strategy for wind turbine selection using optimization based on rated wind speed. Energy Procedia 160:582–89. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.209.
  • Seddiki, M., and A. Bennadji. 2019. Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 110:101–17. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.046.
  • Shafiqur, R., M. A. Luai, and L. M. Alhems. 2020. Application of TOPSIS approach to multi-criteria selection of wind turbines for on-shore sites. Applied Science 10 (21):7595. doi:10.3390/app10217595.
  • Shirgholami, Z., S. N. Zangeneh, and M. Bortolini. 2016. Decision system to support the practitioners in the wind farm design: A case study for Iran mainland. Sustainable Energy Technology Assessment 16:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2016.04.004.
  • Tzeng, G., M. Teng, J. Chen, and S. Opricovic. 2002. Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management 21 (2):71–87. doi:10.1016/S0278-4319(02)00005-1.
  • Wang, J. J., Y. Y. Jing, C. F. Zhang, and J. H. Zhao. 2009. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (9):2263–78. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021.
  • Yimen, N., O. Hamandjoda, L. Meva’a, B. Ndzana, and J. Nganhou. 2018. Analyzing of a photovoltaic/wind/biogas/pumped-hydro off-grid hybrid system for rural electrification in SubSaharan Africa - Case study of Djoundé in Northern Cameroon. Energies 11 (10):1–30. doi:10.3390/en11102644.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.