Performance investigation on blade arc angle and blade shape factor of a Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using artificial neural network

References

• Abadi, E., A. Mohammad, M. Farzaneh-Gord, M. H. Ahmadi, R. Kumar, and K.-W. Chau. 2020. A numerical and experimental study on the energy efficiency of a regenerative heat and mass exchanger utilizing the counter-flow maisotsenko cycle. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 14 (1):1–12. doi:10.1080/19942060.2019.1617193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, K. R., Nawar MA, Ramadan A, Attai YA, Mohamed MH. 2022a. Performance improvement of a savonius turbine by using auxiliary blades. Energy 244:122575. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, K. R., Nawar MA, Ramadan A, Attai YA, Mohamed MH. 2022b. Performance investigation of a savonius rotor by varying the blade arc angles. Ocean Engineering. 260(July):112054. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112054.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Hamdeh, N. H., and K. H. Almitani. 2017. Construction and numerical analysis of a collapsible vertical axis wind turbine. Energy Conversion and Management 151 (June):400–13. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.015.
   Google Scholar
• Alit, I. B., I. A. Sri Andyani, and M. Mirmanto. 2018. Effect of overlapping ratio, blade shape factor, and blade arc angle to modified rotor savonius performances. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 13 (1):411–16.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shammari, S. A., A. Hassan Karamallah, and S. Aljabair. 2020. Blade Shape optimization of savonius wind turbine at low wind energy by artificial neural network. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science & Engineering 881 (1). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/881/1/012154.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, A., A. Nazari, and J. Sanjayan. 2019. The use of machine learning in boron-based geopolymers: function approximation of compressive strength by ANN and GP. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 141:241–49. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banan, A., A. Nasiri, and A. Taheri-Garavand. 2020. Deep learning-based appearance features extraction for automated carp species identification. Aquacultural Engineering 89 (January):102053. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102053.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuyan, S., and A. Biswas. 2014. Investigations on self-starting and performance characteristics of simple H andhybrid H-Savonius vertical axis wind rotors. Energy Conversion and Management 87:859–67. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A., Balduzzi F, Bachant P, Ferrara G, Ferrari L. 2017. Effectiveness of two-dimensional CFD simulations for darrieus VAWTs: A combined numerical and experimental assessment. Energy Conversion and Management 136:318–28. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, M. R., and E. Benini. 2011. Effect of blade inclination angle on a darrieus wind turbine. Journal of Turbomachinery 134 (3):1–10. doi:10.1115/1.4003212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. M., H. L. Bai, and D. Q. He. 2018. Blade shape optimization of the savonius wind turbine using a genetic algorithm. Applied Energy 213 (August 2017):148–57. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.029.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and Y. Lian. 2015. Numerical investigation of vortex dynamics in an H-Rotor vertical axis wind turbine. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 9 (1):21–32. doi:10.1080/19942060.2015.1004790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marco, A., D. P. Coiro, D. Cucco, and F. Nicolosi. 2014. A numerical study on a vertical-axis wind turbine with inclined arms. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/180498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffie, J. A., and W. A. Beckman. 2013. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes Fourth ed. 10.1002/9781118671603
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., Xu K, Wu H, Zheng Y, Tao B. 2020. Spatiotemporal modeling for nonlinear distributed thermal processes based on KL decomposition, MLP and LSTM network. IEEE Access 8:25111–21. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalandari, M., Ziamolki A, Mosavi A, Shamshirband S, Chau KW, Bornassi S. 2019. Aeromechanical optimization of first row compressor test stand blades using a hybrid machine learning model of genetic algorithm, artificial neural networks and design of experiments. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 13(1):892–904. doi:10.1080/19942060.2019.1649196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemian, M., Z. N. Ashrafi, and A. Sedaghat. 2017. A review on computational fluid dynamic simulation techniques for darrieus vertical axis wind turbines. Energy Conversion & Management 149:87–100. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golecha, K., T. I. Eldho, and S. V. Prabhu. 2012. Study on the Interaction between two hydrokinetic savonius turbines. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/581658.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., A. Biswas, and K. K. Sharma. 2008. Comparative study of a three-bucket savonius rotor with a combined three-bucket savonius-three-bladed darrieus rotor. Renewable Energy 33 (9):1974–81. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. K., and P. M. V. Subbarao. 2020. Development of a semi-analytical model to select a suitable airfoil section for blades of horizontal axis hydrokinetic turbine. Energy Reports 6 (February):32–37. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.014.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, T., L. Yan, and Y. Hara. 2005. Wind tunnel tests on a different phase three-stage. JSME International Journal, Series B 48 (1):9–16. doi:10.1299/jsmeb.48.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, K., V. Suphandani Djanali, and N. Ikhwan. 2020. Numerical study of bach-bladed savonius wind turbine with varying blade shape factor. The International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 4 (2):12. doi:10.12962/j25807471.v4i2.7839.
   Google Scholar
• Kamoji, M. A., S. B. Kedare, and S. V. Prabhu. 2008. Experimental investigations on single stage, two stage and three stage conventional savonius rotor. International Journal of Energy Research 32 (2008):877–95. doi:10.1002/er.1399.
   Google Scholar
• Kamoji, M. A., S. B. Kedare, and S. V. Prabhu. 2009. Experimental investigations on single stage modified savonius rotor. Applied Energy 86 (7–8):1064–73. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, F., K. Aslantaş, and A. Çiçek. 2016. Prediction of cutting temperature in orthogonal machining of AISI 316L using artificial neural network. Applied Soft Computing Journal 38:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. J., G. Bhuyan, M. T. Iqbal, and J. E. Quaicoe. 2009. Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: a technology status review. Applied Energy 86 (10):1823–35. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and R. P. Saini. 2017a. Performance analysis of a savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy 108:502–22. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and R. P. Saini. 2017b. Performance analysis of a single stage modified savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy 113:461–78. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinov, S., W. Sha, and J. J. McKeown. 2001. Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties in titanium alloys using artificial neural network. Computational Materials Science 21 (3):375–94. doi:10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00160-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, Z., and W. Tian. 2015. Effect of the blade arc angle on the performance of a savonius wind turbine. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7 (5):1–10. doi:10.1177/1687814015584247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marugán, A. P., F. Pedro García Márquez, J. María Pinar Perez, and D. Ruiz-Hernández. 2018. A survey of artificial neural network in wind energy systems. Applied Energy 228 (June):1822–36. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.084.
   Google Scholar
• Modi, V. J., M. S. U. K. Fernando, and N. J. Roth. 2006. Aerodynamics of the savonius rotor experiments ans analysis. Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference 1999 (December):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, M. H., G. Janiga, E. Pap, and D. Thévenin. 2011. Optimal blade shape of a modified savonius turbine using an obstacle shielding the returning blade. Energy Conversion and Management 52 (1):236–42. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadhassani, M., Nezamabadi-Pour H, Jumaat MZ, Jameel M, Arumugam AM. 2013. Application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Linear Regressions (LR) to predict the deflection of concrete deep beams. Computers and Concrete. 11(3):237–52. doi:10.12989/cac.2013.11.3.237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paish, O. 2002. Small hydro power: Technology and current status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 6 (6):537–56. doi:10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00006-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R., and V. Patel. 2022. Performance analysis of savonius hydrokinetic turbine using ‘C’ shaped deflector. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 44 (3):6618–31. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2101718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, A., K. Yousef, M. Said, and M. H. Mohamed. 2018. Shape optimization and experimental validation of a drag vertical axis wind turbine. Energy 151:839–53. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathod, U. H., V. Kulkarni, and U. K. Saha. 2022. On the application of machine learning in savonius wind turbine technology: an estimation of turbine performance using artificial neural network and genetic expression programming. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME 144 (6):1–16. doi:10.1115/1.4051736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengma, T. S., Sengupta AR, Basumatary M, Biswas A, Bhanja D. 2021. Performance analysis of a two bladed savonius water turbine cluster for perennial river-stream application at low water speeds. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 43 (5). doi: 10.1007/s40430-021-02982-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengma, T. S., and P. M. V. Subbarao. 2022a. Comparative analysis of savonius type ultra-micro hydrokinetic turbine of experimental and computational investigation. 380. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-3497-0_19.
   Google Scholar
• Rengma, T. S., and P. M. V. Subbarao. 2022b. Optimization of semicircular blade profile of savonius hydrokinetic turbine using artificial neural network. Renewable Energy 200:658–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh, M. B., N. M. Kamaruddin, and Z. Mohamed-Kassim. 2019. Savonius hydrokinetic turbines for a sustainable river-based energy extraction: a review of the technology and potential applications in Malaysia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 36 (July):100554. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2019.100554.
   Google Scholar
• Sarma, N. K., A. Biswas, and R. D. Misra. 2014. Experimental and computational evaluation of savonius hydrokinetic turbine for low velocity condition with comparison to savonius wind turbine at the same input power. Energy Conversion and Management 83:88–98. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savonius, S. J. 1931. The S-Rotor and Its Applications. Mechanical Engineering 53 (5):333–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, M., and S. Kumar Singal. 2021. A numerical analysis to determine wake recovery distance for the longitudinal arrangement of hydrokinetic turbine in the channel system. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 8:1–22. doi:10.1080/15567036.2021.1979695.
   Google Scholar
• Talukdar, P. K., A. Sardar, V. Kulkarni, and U. K. Saha. 2018. Parametric analysis of model savonius hydrokinetic turbines through experimental and computational investigations. Energy Conversion and Management 158 (January):36–49. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• Taormina, R., and K. Wing Chau. 2015. ANN-Based Interval forecasting of streamflow discharges using the LUBE method and MOFIPS. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 45:429–40. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, W., Z. Mao, B. Zhang, and L. Yanjun. 2018. Shape optimization of a savonius wind rotor with different convex and concave sides. Renewable Energy 117:287–99. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimal, P., T. I. E. Ganapathi Bhat, and S. V. Prabhu. 2017. Influence of overlap ratio and aspect ratio on the performance of savonius hydrokinetic turbine. International Journal of Energy Research 41 (6):829–44. doi:10.1002/er.3670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. L., and K. W. Chau. 2013. Prediction of rainfall time series using modular soft computingmethods. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26 (3):997–1007. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar