270
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Undesirable output in efficiency and productivity: Example of the G20 countries

, , &

References

  • Asmild, M., and Tam, F. 2007. Estimating global frontier shifts and global malmquist indices. J. Prod. Anal. 27:137–148.
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30:1078–1092.
  • Caves, D., Christensen, L., and Diewert, E. 1982. Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. Econ. J. 92:73–86.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodels, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 6:429–444.
  • Chung, Y. H., Fare, R., and Grosskopf, S. 1997. Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage. 51:229–240.
  • Emrouznejad, A., LatefAnouze, A. and Thanassoulis, E. 2010. A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200:297–304.
  • Färe, R., and Grosskpof, S. 1992. Malmquist indexes and Fisher ideal indexes. Econ. J. 102:158–160.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Pasurka, C. 2001. Accounting for air pollution emissions in measuring state manufacturing productivity growth. J. Regional Sci. 41:381–409.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., and Roos, P. 1995. Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. In: Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A. Y., and Seiford, L.M. (Eds.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 253–272.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, A. K., and Pasurka, C. 1989. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Rev. Econ. Stat. 71:90–98.
  • Hailu, A., and Veeman, T. S. 2001. Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 83:605–616.
  • Kortelainen, M. 2008. Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach. Ecol. Econ. 64:707–715.
  • Kumar, S. 2006. Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist–Luenberger index. Ecol. Econ. 56:280–293.
  • Li, M. 2010. Decomposing the change of CO2 emissions in China: A distance function approach. Ecol. Econ. 70:77–85.
  • Lozano, S., and Gutiérrez, E. 2008. Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Ecol. Econ. 66:687–699.
  • Ramanathan, R. 2005. Estimating energy consumption of transport modes in India using DEA and application to energy and environmental policy. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56:732–737.
  • Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. A. K., and Thijssen, G. J. 2000. “Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables: Estimated with SFA and DEA. European. J. Oper. Res. 121:287–303.
  • Scheel, H. 2001. Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132:400–410.
  • Seiford, L. M., and Zhu, J. 2002. Modeling undesirable factor in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142:16–20.
  • Seiford, L. M., and Zhu, J. 2005. A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 161:579–581.
  • Sharp, J. A., Meng, W., and Liu, W. 2007. A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with “natural” negative outputs and inputs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58:1672–1677.
  • Sueyoshi, T., and Goto, M. 2011. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energ. Econ. 33:292–303.
  • Tone, K. 2001. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130:498–509.
  • Tone, K., andTsutsui, M. 2010. Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega 38:145–156.
  • Wang, Q., Zhou, P., and Zhou, D. 2012. Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions: The case of China. Appl. Energ. 90:161–166.
  • Yang, H., and Pollitt, M. 2009. Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197:1095–1105.
  • Yörük, B. K., and Osman, Z. 2005. Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices. J. Comp. Econ. 33:401–420.
  • Yu, M.-M. 2007. The capacity productivity change and the variable input productivity change: A new decomposition of the Malmquist productivity index. Appl. Math. Comput. 185:375–381.
  • Zhou, P., and Ang, B. W. 2008. Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: A production-theoretical approach. Energ. Econ. 30:1054–1067.
  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., and Poh, K. L. 2008. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189:1–18.
  • Zhou, P., Poh, K. L., and Ang, B. W. 2007. A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178:1–9.
  • Zhu, J. 2003. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Zhu, J., and Chen, Y. 1993. Assessing textile factory performance. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 2:119–133.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.