310
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Nuclear and Non-nuclear Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Taiwan

, , &

REFERENCES

  • Altinay, G., and Karagol, E. 2004. Structural break, unit root, and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey. Economics 26:985–994.
  • Ang, J. B. 2008. Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. J. Policy Model. 30:271–278.
  • Apergis, N., and Payne, J. E. 2010. A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth. Energ. Econ. 32:545–549.
  • Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., Menyah, K., and Wolde-Rufael, Y. 2010. On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth. Eco. Econ. 69:2255–2260.
  • Baek, E., and Brock, W. 1992. A general test for nonlinear granger causality: Bivariate model. Working Pager, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • Bodie, Z., Alex, K., and Alan, M. J. 2001. Essentials of Investments. 5th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Brock, W., Dechect, W., and Scheinkman, J. 1987. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • Chiou-Wei, S. Z., Chen, C. F., and Zhu, Z. 2008. Economic growth and energy sonsumption revisited-evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality. Energ. Econ. 30:3063–3076.
  • Diks, C., and Panchenko, V. 2005. A note on the Hiemstra-Jones test for Granger noncausality. Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. E. 9:1–7.
  • Diks, C., and Panchenko, V. 2006. A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 30:1647–1669.
  • Erdal, G., Erdal, H., and Esengun, K., 2008. The causality between energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Energ. Policy 36:3838–3842.
  • Ewing, B. T., Sari, R., Soytas, U. 2007. Disaggrate energy consumption and industiral output in the United States. Energ. Policy 35:1274–1281.
  • Glasure, Y. U. 2002. Energy and national income in Korea: Further evidence on the role of omitted variables. Energ. Econ. 24:355–365.
  • Granger, C. W. J. 1969. Investigate causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438.
  • Halicioglu, F. 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energ. Policy 37:1156–1164.
  • Hiemstra, C., and Jones, J. 1994. Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. J. Financ. 49:1639–1664.
  • Jobert, T., and Karanfil, F. 2007. Sectoral energy consumption by source and economic growth in Turkey. Energ. Policy 35:5447–5456.
  • Karanfil, F. 2008. Energy consumption and economic growth revisited: Does the size of unrecorded economy matter? Energ. Policy 36:3029–3035.
  • Kraft, J., and Kraft, A. 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP. J. Energ. Dev. 3:401–403.
  • Lee, C. C. 2006. The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries revisited. Energ. Policy 34:1086–1093.
  • Lee, C. C., and Chang, C. P. 2005. Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: Evidence from Taiwan. Energy Econ. 27:857–872.
  • Lee, C. C., and Chang, C. P. 2007. The impact of energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from linear models in Taiwan. Energy 32:2282–2294.
  • Lee, C. C., and Chiu, Y. B. 2011. Nuclear energy consumption, oil prices, and economic growth: Evidence from highly industrialized countries. Energ. Econ. 33:236–248.
  • Lise, W., and Van Montfort, K. 2007. Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is there a co-integration relationship? Energ. Econ. 29:1166–1178.
  • Menyah, K., and Wolde-Rufael, Y. 2010. CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energ. Policy 38:2911–2915.
  • Nazlioglu, S., and Soytas, U. 2011. World oil prices and agricultural commodity prices: evidence from an emerging market. Energ. Econ. 33:488–496.
  • Oh, W., and Lee, K. 2004.Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP: The case of Korea 1970–1999. Energ. Econ. 26:51–59.
  • Oikonomou, V., Becchis, F., Steg, L., and Russolillo, D. 2009. Energy saving and energy efficiency concepts for policy making. Energ. Policy 37:4787–4796.
  • Paul, S., and Bhattacharya, R. N. 2004. Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: a note on conflicting results. Energ. Econ. 26:977–983.
  • Payne, J. E. 2009. On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Appl. Energ. 86:575–577.
  • Payne, J. E., and Taylor, J. P. 2010. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in the US: An empirical note. Energ. Source. Part B 5:301–307.
  • Wolde-Rufael, Y. 2010. Bounds test approach to cointegration and causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in India. Energ. Policy 38:52–58.
  • Wolde-Rufael, Y., and Menyah, K. 2010. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in nine developed countries. Energ. Econ. 32:550–556.
  • Sims, C. A. 1980. Comparison of interwar and postwar business cycles: monetarism reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 70:250–257.
  • Soytas, U., and Sari, R. 2003. Energy consumption and GDP: Causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets. Energ. Econ. 25:33–37.
  • Soytas, U., and Sari, R. 2006. Energy consumption and income in G7 countries. J. Policy Model. 28:739–750.
  • World Nuclear Association. 2010. Nuclear Power in Taiwan. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/country-profiles/others/nuclear-power-in-taiwan/.
  • Yang, C. L., Lin H. P., and Chang, C. H. 2010. Linear and nonlinear causality between sectoral electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Taiwan. Energ. Policy 38:6570–6573.
  • Yang, H. Y. 2000. A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energ. Econ. 22:309–317.
  • Yoo, S. H., and Jung, K. O. 2005. Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in Korea. Prog. Nucl. Energ. 46:101–109.
  • Yoo, S. H., and Ku, S. J. 2009. Casual relationship between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth: A multi-country analysis. Energ. Policy 37:1905–1913.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.