The Fukushima accident and its implications for Korea

References

• Allen, F. R., Garlick, A. R.,Hayns, M. R., and Taig, A. R. 1989. The Management of Risk to Society from Potential Accidents. London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Y. 1997. Environmental risk analysis: Factors influencing nuclear risk perception and policy implications. State University of New York, Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, D. H., and Choi, Y. H., 2011. Paradigm Shift and Governmental Strategies for Public Confidence. Paper presented at the NURE Policy and Technology Conference, Ilsan, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson, Clive. 2011. Experts see low risk of another Chernobyl. Financial Times, March 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., and Johnson, S. M. 2000. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decision Making. 13:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, James, Burns, William, Mertz, C. K., and Slovic, Paul. 1992. Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of a structural model. Risk Anal. 12:417–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIF. 2002 A technology roadmap for Generation IV nuclear energy systems.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, C. H. 2002. Information sharing with local society for acceptance of nuclear energy. In Fall Conference of KAPS: Korean Association for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D. H. 2011. Reactor system technology. Paper presented at the NURE Policy and Technology Conference, Ilsan, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J. J. 2011. Improving public understanding and confidence. Paper presented at the NURE Policy and Technology Conference, Ilsan, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E., Kim, Y. P., and Jeong, Y. S. 2007. Analysis on determinants of social acceptance of energy source & associated risks. Korea J. Public Administration. 16:189–217.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K. 2010. Current activities in EMWG. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. G. 2011. Policy-making on nuclear safety in Korea. Paper presented at the NURE Policy and Technology Conference, Ilsan, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Zhang, Z., and Kidd, S. 2008. Establishing an objective system for the assessment of public acceptance of nuclear power in China. Nucl. Eng. Des. 238:2834–2838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melber, Barbara D. 1982. The impact of TMI upon the public acceptance of nuclear power. Prog. Nuc. Energy. 10:387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, J. H., and Choi, Y. H. 2008. Research on nuclear information network. Korean J. Policy Stud. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., Lorenzoni, I., and Poortinga, W. 2008. Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environ. Change. 18:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Cvetkovich, George, and Roth, Claudia. 2000. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal. 20:353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, J. S. Trust in nuclear power plant, perceived risk and benefit, and acceptance. Korean J. Policy Stud. 18:93–122.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Kraus, N., Lappe, H., and Major, M. 1991. Risk perception of prescription drugs: Report on a survey in Canada. Canadian J. Pub. Health. 82:S15–S20.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, Paul. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Anal. 13:675–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soble, Jonathan. 2011. Doubt over Meltdown Dispelled. Financial Times, May 19 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, C. 1969. Social benefit versus technological risk. What is our society willing to pay for safety? Science. 165:1232–1238.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, Scott Victor, and Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2010. The socio-political economy of nuclear power development in Japan and South Korea. Energy Policy. 38:7971–7979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pligt, Joop, Richard Eiser, J., and Spears, Russell. 1984. Public attitudes to nuclear energy. Energy Policy. 12:302–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, Vivianne H. M., Keller, Carmen, and Siegrist, Michael. Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy. 39:3621–3629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamano, N., Shioda, A., and Sawada, T. 2008. Local civic forum: An experimental study promoting public acceptance on nuclear energy. Prog. Nucl. Energy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, W. C. 2006. Economic analysis of nuclear reactor: Simulation & real options approach. Korean Energy Econ. Rev. 5:27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychol. 35:151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar