References
- Cha, D. L., and Zhou, D. Q. 2010. The research on China s energy efficiency rebound effect based on CGE model. J. Quant. Tech. Econ. 12:39–53.
- Dellink, R. B. 2005. Modeling the Costs of Environmental Policy: A Dynamic Applied General Equilibrium Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Dellink, R. B., and VanIerland, E. 2006. Pollution abatement in the Netherlands: a dynamic applied general equilibrium assessment. J. Policy Model. 28:207–222.
- Guo, Z. Q., Liu H. B., and Niu D. X. 2012. Simulation analysis on China carbon tax policy affected to energy and carbon dioxide emission base on CGE model. Coal Engineering. 1:138–140.
- He, J. H., Shen, K. T., and Xu S. L. 2002. CGE model of the carbon tax and carbon dioxide emission reduction. Quant. Techn. Econ. 10:39–47.
- Hu, Z. Y., Cai, W. B., and Chen, H. 2008. The impact on energy intensity and economic growth exerted by energy price: aCGE approach. The Theory and practice of finance Econ. 29:91–95.
- Li, A. J. 2010. Analysis on energy-saving & emission-reduction effects of technological progresses in coal-fired power industry of China. Energy Technology and Economics 11:44–48.
- Pattanayak, S. K., Ross, M. T., Depro, B. M., Bauch, S. C., Timmins, C., Wendland, K. J., and Alger, K. 2009. Climate change and conservation in Brazil: CGEevaluation of health and wealth impacts. B. E. J. Econ. Anal. policy 9:1935–1682.
- Rive, N. 2010.Climate policy in Western Europe and avoided costs of air pollution control. Econ. Modell. 27:103–115.
- Roland-holst, D. 2008. Energy Efficiency, Innovation, and Job Creation in California. Research papers on energy, resources, and economic sustainability. Berkeley: University of California.
- Whalley, J., and Wigle, R. 1991. Cutting CO2 emissions: the effects of alternative policy approaches. Energy J. 12:109–124.