Entry-exit versus distance-related transmission pricing – The European Southern Gas Corridor

References

• ACER. 2012. Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators. http://www.acer.europa.eu, Visited site on March 15th 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, A., Olmos, L., and Serrano, M. 2010. Application of an entry-exit tariff model to the gas transportation system in Spain. Energy Policy J. 38:5133–5140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Chronicle. 2009. The great geopolitical battle over energy transit routes. American Chronicle, November 18, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, B., and İşeri, E. 2009. The nabucco natural gas pipeline: From opera to reality. SETA Found. Political, Econ. Social Res. 34:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Asche, F., Osmundsen, P., and Sandsmark, M. 2006. The UK Market for Natural Gas, Oil and Electricity: Are the Prices Decoupled. Energy J. 27: 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaliere, A. 2007. The Liberalization of Natural Gas Markets: Regulatory Reform and Competion Failures in Italy. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies NG20.
   Google Scholar
• CEER. 2002. Establishing the Preferred Tariff Methodology for Intrastate, Cross-Border and Transit Flows in European Gas Markets. Madrid Forum - 30/31 October 2002.
   Google Scholar
• CEGH. 2012. Company Webpage of Central European Gas Hub. http://www.cegh.at, Visited site on April 15th 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cremer, H., Gasmi, F., and Laffont, J.-J. 2003. Access to pipelines in competitive gas markets. J. Regul. Econ. 24:5–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurasia Daily Monitor. 2011. Nabucco Project Support Agreements meet Interests of Caspian Gas Producers. The Jamestown Foundation: Eurasia Daily Monitor. 8/113, June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. 2012. Nabucco Pipeline Plans Scaled Down. Financial Times, March 15, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Freifeld, D. 2009. The great pipeline opera. Foreign Policy 174:120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gasmi, F., and Oviedo, J. D. 2010. Investment in transport infrastructure, regulation, and gas-gas competition. Energy Econ. 32:726–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard Business School. 2011. Energy Security in Europe: The Southern Corridor. Harv. Bus. School Case Stud. 711-033:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. 2011. Domestic Gas Prices in Russia – Towards Export Netback?. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies NG57.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P. 2008. Entry–Exit Transmission Pricing with Notional Hubs: Can it Deliver a Pan-European Wholesale Market in Gas?. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies NG23.
   Google Scholar
• IGA. 2009. Inter-Governmental Agreement among the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Hungary, Romania and the Republic of Turkey regarding the Nabucco Project. Ankara, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lapuerta, C., and Moselle, B. 2002. Convergence of Non-Discriminatory Tariff and Congestion Management Systems in the European Gas Sector. Report commissioned by the European Commission from The Brattle Group, pp. 5–6 and 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrakis, D., Thomaidis, F., and Ntroukas, I. 2006. An Assessment of the Natural Gas Supply Potential of the South Energy Corridor from the Caspian Region to the EU. Energy Policy 34:1671–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, D., and Zhu, Z., 2011. Natural Gas Prices, LNG Transport Costs, and the Dynamics of LNG Imports. Energy Econ. 33:217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. D. 1995. Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 13:151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabucco. 2012. Company Webpage of Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH. http://www.nabucco-pipeline.com, Visited site on April 11th 2012.
   Google Scholar
• NERA. 2002. Network Access Conditions and Gas Markets in North America. Report. 28–38 and 52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the European Union. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 on Conditions for Access to the Natural Gas Transmission Networks and Repealing Regulation: Article 13. The European Parliament and Council, July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Percebois, J. 2008. Electricity Liberalization in the European Union: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Energy J. 29:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickl, M., and Wirl, F. 2011. Auction Design for Gas Pipeline Transportation Capacity – The Case of Nabucco and its Open Season. Energy Policy 39:2143–2151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickl, M., and Wirl. F. 2010. Enhancing the EU’s Energy Supply Security – An Evaluation of the Nabucco Project and an Introduction to its Open Season Capacity Allocation Process. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, Wiesbaden, Deutschland, 3/2010, 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Pickl, M., Wagner, E., and Wirl. F. 2009. The Impact of Introducing 7-Day-Trading on the Austrian Electricity Market. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, Wiesbaden, Deutschland, 4/2009, 322–329.
   Google Scholar
• Raineri, R. B., and Kuflik, A. T. 2003. Secondary Market and Futures Market for the Provision of Gas Pipeline Transportation Capacity. Energy J. 24:23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, M. B. 2008. The Great Gas Pipeline Game: Monopolistic Expansion of Russia’s Gazprom into European Markets. Foresight 10:11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Smeenk, T. 2010. Russian Gas for Europe: Creating Access and Choice - Underpinning Russia’s Gas Export Strategy with Gazprom’s Infrastructure Investments. Dissertation at Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Standard. 2012. Lostage für europäisches Pipelineprojekt. June 21 2012, Der Standard.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2009. Europe: Joschka Fischer v Gerhard Schröder; German Politicians and Pipelines. The Economist. London: Jul 18, 2009. 392, 8640; 48.
   Google Scholar
• World Energy Outlook. 2011. World Energy Outlook 2011 - Special Report: Are we entering a golden age of gas?. International Energy Agency, Paris, France, 2011.
   Google Scholar