References
- Barker, T., and Ekins, P. 2004. The costs of Kyoto for the US economy. Energy J. 25:53–71.
- Broda, C., and Weinstein, D. E. 2006. Globalization and the gains from variety. Q. J. Econ. 121:541–585.
- Choinière, C. J., and Horowitz, J. K. 2006. A Production Function Approach to the GDP-Temperature Relationship. Working Paper. University of Maryland.
- Coondoo, D., and Dinda, S. 2002. Causality between income and emission: A Country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecol. Econ. 40:351–367.
- Dell, M., Jones, B., and Olken, B. 2008. Climate Change and Economic Growth over the Last Half Century. NBER Working Paper No. 14132.
- Dell, M., Jones, B., and Olken, B. 2009. Temperature and income: Reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 99:198–204.
- Dellink, R., Briner G., and Clapp C. 2010. Costs, Revenues, and Effectiveness of the Copenhagen Accord Emission Pledges for 2020. OECD Environment Working Papers No. 22.
- Frankel, J., and Romer, D. 1999. Does trade cause growth? Am. Econ. Rev. 89(3):379–399.
- Hasan, I., and Tucci, C. L. 2010. The innovation-economic growth Nexus: Global evidence. Res. Policy 39:1264–1276.
- Horowitz, J. 2009. The income-temperature relationship in a cross-section of Countries and its implications for predicting the effects of global warming. Environ. Resour. Econ. 44:475–493.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/.
- Kaya, Y., and Yokobori, K. 1997. Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability. New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.
- Kuik, O., Brander, L., and Tol, R. S. J. 2009. Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy 37:1395–1403.
- Maeda, A. 2013. Estimating the impact of emission reduction target-setting on the macroeconomy. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. doi: 10.1007/s10018-013-0062-x.
- Ng, P., and Zhao, X. 2011. No matter how it is measured, income declines with global warming. Ecol. Econ. 70:963–970.
- Nordhaus, W. D. 1991. To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ. J. 101:920–937.
- Nordhaus, W. 2006. Geography and macroeconomics: New data and findings. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103:3510–3517.
- Ozturk, I. 2010. A literature survey on energy-growth Nexus. Energy Policy 38:340–349.
- Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M., Jacoby, H. D., and Morris, J. F. 2009. The cost of climate policy in the United States. Energy Econ. 31:5235–5243.
- Pereira, A. M., and Pereira, R. M. M. 2010. Is fuel-switching a no-regrets environmental policy? VAR evidence on carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic performance in Portugal. Energy Econ. 32:227–242.
- Rogelj, J., Nabel, J., Chen, C., Hare, W., Markmann, K., Meinshausen, M., Schaeffer, M., Macey K., and Hohne, N. 2010. Copenhagen accord pledges are paltry. Nature 464:1126–1128.
- Romer, P. 1987. Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual, S. Fischer (Ed.). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Schmalensee, R., Stoker, T. M., and Judson, R. A. 1998. World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950–2050. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80:15–27.
- Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
- Thompson, H. 2006. The applied theory of energy substitution in production. Energy Econ. 28:410–425.
- Tol, R. S. J. 2013. Targets for global climate policy: An overview. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 37:911–928.
- van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. 2010. Safe climate policy is affordable—12 Reasons. Climatic Change 101(3):339–385.
- Wacziarg, R., and Welch, K. H. 2008. Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. World Bank Econ. Rev. 22:187–231.