Modeling energy efficiency investment choices – a case study on Croatia’s residential sector

References

• Achtnicht, M., and R. Madlener. 2014. Factors influencing German house owners’ preferences on energy retrofits. Energy Policy 68:254–63. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. S., P. C. Stern, and J. T. Elworth. 1985. Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology 70(1):3–21. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukarica, V. 2013. Integration of Multi-Criteria Analysis in Energy Efficiency Policy Making Thesis (Ph.D). University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Cayla, J.-M., N. Maizi, and C. Marchand. 2011. The role of income in energy consumption behaviour: Evidence from French households data. Energy Policy 39 (12): 7874–83. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.09.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayla, J.-M., and M. Nadia. 2015. Integrating household behavior and heterogeneity into the TIMES-households model. Applied Energy 139(February):56–67. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.015.
   Google Scholar
• De Lauretis, S., F. Ghersi, and J.-M. Cayla. 2017. Energy consumption and activity patterns: An analysis extended to total time and energy use for French households. Applied Energy 206 (March): 634–48. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.180.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., H. Polatidis, and D. Haralambopoulos. 2014. Integrated energy planning for the residential sector: The case study of Cyprus. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 9 (2): 183–95. Taylor & Francis Group. doi: 10.1080/15567241003773200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOOR, FER, IRMO, and SSSH. 2014. Citizen Participation in Energy Efficiency Action Planning: Results of 2nd Online Survey.http://door.hr/portfolio/cenep-2/
   Google Scholar
• DOOR, FER, IRMO, and SSSH. 2013. “Citizen participation in energy efficiency action planning: Results of 1st online survey.” http://door.hr/portfolio/cenep-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Državni zavod za statistiku. 2016. Rezultati ankete o potrošnji kućanstava u 2014. Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. “Final energy consumption by sector (Tsdpc320).” Accessed January 15. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=tsdpc320&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E. 2015. Regression modeling strategies. Springer series in statistics. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2009. Logistic Regression Models. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., and R. N. Stavins. 1994. The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology. Resource and Energy Economics 16(2):91–122. doi:10.1016/0928-7655(94)90001-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureti, T., and L. Secondi. 2012. Determinants of households’ space heating type and expenditures in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research 6(4):1025–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillemo, S. C., F. Alfnes, B. Halvorsen, and M. Wik. 2013. Households’ heating investments: The effect of motives andattitudes on choice of equipment. Biomass and Bioenergy 57: 4–12. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, M. A. R., C. H. Antunes, and N. Martins. 2015. Towards more effective behavioural energy policy: An integrative modelling approach to residential energy consumption in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science 7(May):84–98. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Marinakis, V., H. Doukas, E. Spiliotis, and I. Papastamatiou. 2017. Decision support for intelligent energy management in buildings using the thermal comfort model. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 10(1):882. doi:10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministarstvo graditeljstva i prostornog uređenja. 2014. Program energetske obnove obiteljskih kuća za razdoblje od 2014. do 2020. godine s detaljnim planom za razdoblje od 2014. do 2016. godine. Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Ministarstvo graditeljstva i prostornoga uređenja. 2017. Pravilnik o energetskom pregledu zgrade i energetskom certificiranju (NN 88/17) Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Ministarstvo zaštite okoliša i prirode, Fond za zaštitu okoliša i energetsku učinkovitost, and Ministarstvo graditeljstva i prostornog uređenja. 2016. Primjeri dobre prakse projekata energetske učinkovitosti.
   Google Scholar
• Moezzi, M., M. Iyer, L. Lutzenhiser, and J. Woods. 2009. Behavioral assumptions in energy efficiency potential studies.California Institute for Energy and Environment (no. May).
   Google Scholar
• Oikonomou, V., A. Flamos, D. Zeugolis, and S. Grafakos. 2012. A qualitative assessment of EU energy policy interactions. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy 7(2):177–87. doi:10.1080/15567240902788996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei-Hao, L., I. Keppo, and N. Strachan. 2018. Incorporating homeowners’ preferences of heating technologies in the UK TIMES model. Energy 148 (April): 716–27. Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.150.
   Google Scholar
• Polinder, H., M. Schweiker, A. Van Der Aa, K. Schakib-Ekbatan, V. Fabi, R. Andersen, N. Morishita, et al. 2013. “Occupant behavior and modeling (Vol. 2), total energy use in buildings: Analysis and evaluation methods (Final Report Annex 53).”
   Google Scholar
• Rouvinen, S., and J. Matero. 2013. Stated Preferences of Finnish Private Homeowners for Residential Heating Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Biomass and Bioenergy 57. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sözen, A. M., A. Akçayol, and E. Arcakliolu. 2006. Forecasting net energy consumption using artificial neural network. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy 1(2):147–55. doi:10.1080/009083190881562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ürge-Vorsatz, D., A. Novikova, S. Köppel, and B. Boza-Kiss. 2009. Bottom–up assessment of potentials and costs of CO2 emission mitigation in the buildings sector: Insights into the missing elements. Energy Efficiency 2(4):293–316. doi:10.1007/s12053-009-9051-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar