The near- to mid-term outlook for concentrating solar power: mostly cloudy, chance of sun

References

• Agarwal, R., and B. L. Bayus. 2002. The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Science 48 (8):1024–41. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1024.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P., and M. Tushman. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (4):604–33. doi:10.2307/2393511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azure. 2020. New incremental offshore wind power proejcts will be excluded from the central REDF subsidy. Accessed April 18, 2020. http://www.azure-international.com/index.php/china-energy-transition-updates/renewable/breaking-news-new-incremental-offshore-wind-power-projects-will-be-excluded-from-the-central-redf-subsidy.
   Google Scholar
• Baharoon, D. A., H. A. Rahman, W. Z. W. Omar, and S. O. Fadhl. 2015. Historical development of concentrating solar power technologies to generate clean electricity efficiently - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 41:996–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bento, N., and C. Wilson. 2016. Measuring the duration of formative phases for energy technologies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 21:95–112. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, J. 2008. Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entreprenuers and policy makers. In Innovation for a low carbon economy: Economic, institutional and management approaches, ed. T. Foxon, J. Köhler, and C. Oughton. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., M. Hekkert, S. Jacobson, J. Markard, B. Sandén, and B. Truffer. 2015. Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16:51–64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37:407–29. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., J. Gosens, T. Hansen, and U. Elmer Hansen. 2017. Toward technology-sensitive catching-up policies: Insights from renewable energy in China. World Development 96:418–37. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanov, D., J. Farfan, K. Sadovskaia, A. Aghahosseini, M. Child, A. Gulagi, A. Oyewo, L. Barbosa, and C. Breyer. 2019. Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps. Nature Communications 10:1077. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boie, I., C. Kost, S. Bohn, M. Agsten, P. Bretschneider, O. Snigovyi, M. Pudlik, M. Ragwitz, T. Schlegl, and D. Westermann. 2016. Opportunities and challenges of high renewable energy deployment and electricity exchange for North Africa and Europe - Scenarios for power sector and transmission infrastructrue in 2030 and 2050. Renewable Energy 87:130–44. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, B., and K. Blok. 2015. Renewable energy perspectives for the North African electricity systems: A comparative analysis of model-based scenario studies. Energy Strategy Reviews 6:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldés-Gómez, N., and A. Díaz-Vázquez. 2018. Promoting solar electricity exports from southern to central and northern European countries. Luxembourg: Joint Research Center of the European Commission (JRC).
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1:93–118. doi:10.1007/BF01224915.
   Google Scholar
• csp.guru. 2017. CSP guru ( Version: August 2016). Zürich, Johan Lilliestam: ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• csp.guru. 2018. CSP guru ( Version: May 2018). Zürich, Johan Lilliestam: ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• csp.guru. 2019. CSP guru ( Version: January 2019). Potsdam, Richard Thonig, Johan Lilliestam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS).
   Google Scholar
• csp.guru. 2020. CSP guru ( Version: January 2020). Potsdam, Richard Thonig, Johan Lilliestam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS).
   Google Scholar
• de la Tour, A., M. Glachant, and Y. Ménière. 2010. Economic analysis of the CSP industry. Paris: CERNA, Mines ParisTech.
   Google Scholar
• Deign, J. 2020. America’s concentrated solar power companies have all but disappeared. Accessed April 18, 2020. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/americas-concentrated-solar-power-companies-have-all-but-disappeared.
   Google Scholar
• del Río, P., and P. Mir-Artigues. 2019. Designing auctions for concentrating solar power. Energy for Sustainable Development 48:67–81. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2018.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Rio, P., C. Peñasco, and P. Mir-Artigues. 2018. An overview of drivers and barriers to concentrated solar power in the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81:1019–29. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOE. 2012. SunShot vision study. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy (DOE).
   Google Scholar
• Du, E., N. Zhang, B.-M. Hodge, C. Kang, B. Kroposki, and Q. Xia. 2018. Economic justification of concentrating solar power in high renewable energy penetrated power systems. Applied Energy 222:649–61. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Iceberg. 2020. China’s renewable power price and subsity: “new” design in 2020? Accessed April 18, 2020. https://energyiceberg.com/china-renewable-power-price/.
   Google Scholar
• Gort, M., and S. Klepper. 1982. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. The Economic Journal 92 (367):630–53. doi:10.2307/2232554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosens, J., C. Binz, and R. Lema. 2020. China’s role in the next phase of the energy transition: Contributions to global niche formation in the concentrated solar power sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34:61–75. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosens, J., T. Kåberger, and Y. Wang. 2017. China’s next renewable energy revolution: Goals and mechanisms in the 13th five year plan for energy. Energy Science & Engineering 5 (3):141–55. doi:10.1002/ese3.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, S., and J. Lilliestam. 2019. The global renewable power support policy dataset ( Version: October 2017. J. Lilliestam). Potsdam, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS).
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M., R. Suurs, S. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. Smits. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74:413–32. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huenteler, J., T. S. Schmidt, J. Ossenbrink, and V. Hoffmann. 2016. Technology life-cycles in the energy sector - technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 104:102–21. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. 2010. Technology roadmap. Concentrating solar power. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2018a. Renewable energy and jobs. Annual review 2018. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2018b. Renewable power generation costs in 2017. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2020. Renewable energy statistics 2019. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, J., P. Denholm, and M. Mehos. 2014. Estimating the value of utility-scale solar technologies in California under a 40% renewable portfolio standard. Golden: NREL.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. 1997. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1):145–81. doi:10.1093/icc/6.1.145.
   Google Scholar
• Labordena, M., A. Patt, M. Bazilian, M. Howells, and J. Lilliestam. 2017. Impact of political and economic barriers for concentrating solar power in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy 102:52–72. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., and F. Malerba. 2017. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46 (2):338–51. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., T. Barradi, N. Caldés, M. Gomez, S. Hanger, J. Kern, N. Komendantova, M. Mehos, W. M. Hong, Z. Wang, et al. 2018. Policies to keep and expand the option of concentrating solar power for dispatchable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 116:193–97. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., M. Labordena, A. Patt, and S. Pfenninger. 2017. Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change. Nature Energy 2:17094. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., L. Ollier, and S. Pfenninger. 2019a. The dragon awakens: Will China save or conquer concentrating solar power? AIP conference Proceedings: SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca, Morocco, 130006.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., and A. Patt. 2015. Barriers, risks and policies for renewables in the Gulf States. Energies 2015 (8):8263–85. doi:10.3390/en8088263.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., and R. Pitz-Paal. 2018. Concentrating solar power for less than USD 0.07 per kWh: Finally the breakthrough? Renewable Energy Focus 26:17–21. doi:10.1016/j.ref.2018.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., R. Thonig, L. Späth, N. Caldés, Y. Lechón, P. del Río, C. Kiefer, G. Escribano, and L. Lázaro Touza. 2019b. Policy pathways for the energy transition in Europe and selected European countries. Update September 2019. MUSTEC project deliverable 7.3. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS).
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J. 2020. The life cycle of technological innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153 (April 2020):119407. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards and integrated framework. Research Policy 37:596–615. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martìn, H., J. de la Hoz, G. Velasco, M. Castilla, and J. L. Garcìa de Vicuña. 2015. Promotion of concentrating solar power (CSP) in Spain: Performance analysis of the period 1998–2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 50:1052–68. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masen. 2019. Masen launches Noor Midelt II solar farm tender process. Accessed October 6, 2019. http://www.masen.ma/en/masen-news/masen-launches-noor-midelt-ii-solar-farm-tender-process.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. 2005. Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review 47 (2):5–32. doi:10.2307/41166293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., N. Kelsey, E. Biber, and J. Zysman. 2015. Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science 349 (6253):1170–71. doi:10.1126/science.aab1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehos, M., C. Turchi, J. Jorgenson, P. Denholm, C. Ho, and K. Armijo. 2016. On the path to SunShot: Advancing concentrating solar power technology, performance, and dispatchability. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. (2020). 关于促进非水可再生能源发电健康发展的若干意见. http://jjs.mof.gov.cn/zhengcefagui/202001/t20200122_3463379.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mir-Artigues, P., P. del Río, and N. Caldés. 2019. The economics and policy of concentrating solar power. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montt, G., K. Wiebe, M. Harsdorff, M. Simas, A. Bonnet, and R. Wood. 2018. Does climate action destroy jobs? International Labour Review 157 (4):519–56. doi:10.1111/ilr.12118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemet, G. 2019. How solar energy became cheap: A model for low-carbon innovation. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• NewEnergyUpdate. 2019a. Noor Midelt winner optimizes CSP trough, storage to hit record price. Accessed October 9, 2019. https://analysis.newenergyupdate.com/csp-today/noor-midelt-winner-optimizes-csp-trough-storage-hit-record-price.
   Google Scholar
• NewEnergyUpdate. 2019b. Noor Midelt winner optimizes CSP trough, storage to hit record price. Accessed June 30, 2019. https://analysis.newenergyupdate.com/csp-today/noor-midelt-winner-optimizes-csp-trough-storage-hit-record-price.
   Google Scholar
• Oerlemans, L., M. Meeus, and F. Boekema. 2003. Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the econominc network approach in analysing innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Geography 89 (3):298–309.
   Google Scholar
• Peltoniemi, M. 2011. Reviewing industry life-cycle theory: Avenues for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews 13:349–75. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00295.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, C., and L. Soete. 1988. Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In Technical change and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete. pp. 458-479. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfenninger, S., P. Gauché, J. Lilliestam, K. Damerau, F. Wagner, and A. Patt. 2014. Potential for concentrating solar power to provide baseload and dispatchable power. Nature Climate Change 4 (8):689–92. doi:10.1038/nclimate2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quitzow, R., J. Huenteler, and H. Asmussen. 2017. Development trajectories in China’s wind and solar energy industries: How technology-related differences shape the dynamics of industry localization and catching up. Journal of Cleaner Production 158:122–33. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragwitz, M., W. Schade, B. Breitschopf, R. Walz, N. Helfrich, M. Rathmann, G. Resch, C. Panzer, T. Faber, R. Haas, et al. 2009. EmployRES. The impact of renewable energy policy on economic growth and employment in the European Union. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (ISI).
   Google Scholar
• REN21. 2014. Renewables 2014. Global status report. Paris: REN21.
   Google Scholar
• REN21. 2018. Renewables 2017. Paris: REN21.
   Google Scholar
• REN21. 2019. Renewables 2019. Global status report. Paris: REN21.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, A., and B. van der Zwaan. 2006. Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy 34:2601–08. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T. S., N. Schmid, and S. Sewerin. 2019. Policy goals, partisanship and paradigmatic change in energy policy - analyzing parliamentary discourse in Germany over 30 years. Climate Policy 19 (6):771–86. doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1594667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöniger, F., R. Thonig, G. Resch, and J. Lilliestam. this issue. Making the sun shine at night: Comparing concentrated solar power and photovoltaics with storage. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 1999. On the economics and analysis of diversity. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Trieb, F. 2005. Concentrating solar power for the Mediterranean region. Stuttgart: German Aerospace Centre (DLR).
   Google Scholar
• Trieb, F. 2006. Trans-Mediterranean interconnection for concentrating solar power. Stuttgart: German Aerospace Centre (DLR).
   Google Scholar
• Trieb, F., T. Fichter, and M. Moser. 2013. Concentrating solar power in a sustainable future electricity mix. Sustainability Science 9:47–60. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0229-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trieb, F., T. Fichter, and M. Moser. 2014. Concentrating solar power in a sustainable future electricity mix. Sustainability Science 9 (1):47–60. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0229-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trieb, F., D. Hess, J. Kern, T. Fichter, M. Moser, U. Pfenning, N. Caldés, C. de la Rúa, A. Tuerk, D. Frieden, et al. 2015. North Africa case study. Stuttgart: German Aerospace Centre (DLR).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. P. 1936. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 3 (4):122–28. doi:10.2514/8.155.
   Google Scholar