Making the sun shine at night: comparing the cost of dispatchable concentrating solar power and photovoltaics with storage

References

• 1414 degrees. (2019, November 29). 1414 degrees acquiring Aurora Project near Port Augusta. Company Website. https://1414degrees.com.au/acquiring-aurora-project/
   Google Scholar
• Balmorel. (2019). Balmorel model provided by the Balmorel Community on Github. Accessed April 1, 2019. https://github.com/balmorelcommunity/Balmorel
   Google Scholar
• Barragán-Beaud, C., A. Pizarro-Alonso, M. Xylia, S. Syri, and S. Silveira. 2018. Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector. Energy Policy 122 (August):287–99. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.010.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, M., and J. Seel. (2018). Utility-scale solar: Empirical trends in project technology, cost, performance, and PPA pricing in the United States - 2018 Edition. https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl_utility_scale_solar_2018_edition_report.pdf%0Ahttps://emp.lbl.gov/utility-scale-solar
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, M., J. Seel, and D. Robson. (2019). Utility-scale solar: Empirical trends in project technology, cost, performance, and PPA pricing in the United States – 2019 Edition. http://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl_utility_scale_solar_2018_edition_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• COBRA. (2019). CSP industry’s data.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W., and A. W. Frazier (2019). Cost projections for utility-scale battery storage. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-73222. www.nrel.gov/publications.
   Google Scholar
• CSP.guru. (2020). CSP.guru (Version 2020-01-01) [Data set]. https://doi.org/https://zenodo.org/record/3909229
   Google Scholar
• De Vita, A., I. Kielichowska, P. Mandatowa, P. Capros, E. Dimopoulou, S. Evangelopoulou, and G. Dekelver (2018). Technology pathways in decarbonisation scenarios. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2018_06_27_technology_pathways_-_finalreportmain2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Denholm, P., R. Margolis, and J. Eichman (2017). Evaluating the technical and economic performance of PV plus storage power plants. doi:10.2172/1376049
   Google Scholar
• Denholm, P., M. O’Connell, and G. Brinkman. 2015. Overgeneration from solar energy in California: A field guide to the duck chart. Golden, CO: National Renewable EnergyLaboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckmann, S., J. Dersch, S. Giuliano, M. Puppe, E. Lüpfert, K. Hennecke, … P. Ralon (2017). LCOE reduction potential of parabolic trough and solar tower CSP technology until 2025. AIP Conference Proceedings, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 1850 (June). doi:10.1063/1.4984538.
   Google Scholar
• ESTELA, DCSP, & Protermosolar. (2015). Understanding the costs of solar thermal electricity plants. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n6p525-532.
   Google Scholar
• EU Science Hub. (2019). Photovoltaic Geographical Information System. Accessed October 2, 2019. https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/tools.html#TMY
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Going climate-neutral by 2050: A strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral EU economy. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/long_term_strategy_brochure_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2019). HICP - inflation rate. Annual average ratio of change (%). EU (28 countries). Accessed December 2, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tec00118%0A
   Google Scholar
• Fedato, E., M. Baldini, A. Dalla Riva, D. F. Mora Alvarez, A. K. Wiuff, J. Hethey, … J. M. Estebaranz. 2019. Feasibility analysis of GRIDSOL technology in Fuerteventura: A case study. The Journal of Engineering (2019 (18):5208–13. doi:10.1049/joe.2018.9285.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D., R. Margolis, J. Stekli, D. Feldman, R. Margolis, and J. Stekli (2016). Exploring the potential competitiveness of utility-scale photovoltaics plus batteries with concentrating solar power, 2015 – 2030.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, J., S. Zurmühlen, J. Badeda, P. Stenzel, J. F. Hake, and D. U. Sauer. 2016. Model-based economic assessment of stationary battery systems providing primary control reserve. Energy Procedia 99 (March):11–24. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.093.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, R., D. Feldman, and R. Margolis (2018). U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Benchmark: Q1 2018. In NREL/PR-6A20-72133. doi:10.7799/1325002.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, R., T. Remo, R. Margolis, R. Fu, T. Remo, and R. Margolis (2018). 2018 U. S. Utility-scale photovoltaics- plus-energy storage system costs benchmark. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (November), 32. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/71714.pdf.%0Ahttps://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/71714.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heath, G. A., and J. J. Burkhardt III. 2011. Meta-analysis of estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from concentrating solar power preprint. In NREL/CP-6A20-52191, Vol. 16560. http://www.osti.gov/bridge
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, K., and O. Balyk. 2013. Energy system investment model incorporating heat pumps with thermal storage in buildings and buffer tanks. Energy 63:356–65. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsdale Power Reserve. (2020). Overview of hornsdale power reserve. Accessed June 26, 2020. https://hornsdalepowerreserve.com.au/overview/
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2019. IEA PVPS - Task 1 Strategy PV Analysis and Outreach. Paris: International Energy Agency. http://www.iea-pvps.org/?id=266.
   Google Scholar
• IEA-ETSAP, & IRENA. (2013). Thermal energy storage. In IEA-ETSAP and IRENA Technology Brief E17.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2012). Concentrating solar power. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-812959-3.00012-5.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2019a. Renewable electricity capacity and generation statistics. Masdar, UAE: International Renewable Energy Agency [Online]. http://resourceirena.irena.org.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2019b. Renewable power generation costs in 2018. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2020). Renewable power generation costs in 2019. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jun/IRENA_Power_Generation_Costs_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jamil, U., and W. Ali (2016). Performance tests and efficiency analysis of Solar Invictus 53S - A parabolic dish solar collector for direct steam generation. AIP Conference Proceedings, Cape Town, South Africa, 1734 (May 2016). doi:10.1063/1.4949165.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, I. G., F. Wiese, R. Bramstoft, and M. Münster. 2020. Potential role of renewable gas in the transition of electricity and district heating systems. Energy Strategy Reviews 27 (November 2019):100446. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100446.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, J., M. Mehos, and P. Denholm (2016). Comparing the net cost of CSP-TES to PV deployed with battery storage. AIP Conference Proceedings, Cape Town, South Africa, 1734(May 2016). doi:10.1063/1.4949183.
   Google Scholar
• Kariuki, S. K., G. T. Machinda, and S. Chowdhury (2012). Solar multiple optimization and dispatch analysis of a potential parabolic CSP plant in Kenya. Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference, Orlando, Florida, 1–6. doi:10.1109/TDC.2012.6281594.
   Google Scholar
• Kittner, N., F. Lill, and D. M. Kammen. 2017. Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition. Nature Energy 2 (9):17125. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurup, P., and C. S. Turchi (2015). Parabolic Trough Collector Cost Update for the System Advisor Model (SAM). In Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-65228 National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65228.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lazard. (2018). Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage 2018. https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-and-levelized-cost-of-storage-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., T. Barradi, N. Caldés, M. Gomez, S. Hanger, J. Kern, and A. Patt. 2018. Policies to keep and expand the option of concentrating solar power for dispatchable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 116 (February):193–97. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.014.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., M. Labordena, A. Patt, and S. Pfenninger. 2017. Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change. Nature Energy 2:17094. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, J., L. Ollier, M. Labordena, S. Pfenninger, and R. Thonig. 2020. The near- to mid-term outlook for concentrating solar power: Mostly cloudy, chance of sun. Energy Sources Part B. doi:10.1080/15567249.2020.1773580.
   Google Scholar
• Lovegrove, K., G. James, D. Leitch, M. A. Ngo, J. Rutovitz, M. Watt, and J. Wyder (2018). Comparison of dispatchable renewable electricity options. In Technologies for an Orderly Transition. https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/10/Comparison-Of-Dispatchable-Renewable-Electricity-Options-ITP-et-al-for-ARENA-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lunz, B., P. Stöcker, R. Pitz-Paal, and D. U. Sauer. 2016. Evaluating the value of concentrated solar power in electricity systems with fluctuating energy sources. 1734:160010. doi:10.1063/1.4949251.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., T. S. Schmidt, and J. Huenteler. 2019. The role of inter-sectoral learning in knowledge development and diffusion: Case studies on three clean energy technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146:464–87. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehos, M., C. Turchi, J. Jorgenson, P. Denholm, C. K. Ho, and K. Armijo (2016). On the Path to SunShot: Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability. CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5500-65688, (May), 1–66. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-087872-0.00319-X.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Steinhagen, H., and F. Trieb. 2004. Concentrating solar power - A review of the technology. In Future Energy. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-054808-1.00010-7.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., Y. Sun, W. Cole, G. Maclaurin, C. Turchi, and M. Mehos (2019). The potential role of concentrating solar power within the context of DOE’s 2030 solar cost targets. In NREL Technical Report - NREL/TP-6A20-71912.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, P. K., S. Mahesh, H. J. Snaith, and D. Cahen. 2019. Photovoltaic solar cell technologies: Analysing the state of the art. Nature Reviews Materials 4 (4):269–85. doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0097-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NREL. (2019). Annual Technology Baseline: Electricity. Utility-Scale PV. Accessed December 6, 2019. https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2019/index.html?t=su
   Google Scholar
• ÖNB. (2019). Euro Time Series. Accessed August 13, 2019. https://www.oenb.at/zinssaetzewechselkurse/zinssaetzewechselkurse?lang=en&mode=zeitreihenzumeuro
   Google Scholar
• Payaro, A., A. A. Naik, R. Guedez, and B. Laumert (2018). Identification of required cost reductions for CSP to retain its competitive advantage as most economically viable solar-dispatchable technology. AIP Conference Proceedings, Santiago, Chile, 2033. doi:10.1063/1.5067064.
   Google Scholar
• Pfenninger, S., P. Gauché, J. Lilliestam, K. Damerau, F. Wagner, and A. Patt. 2014. Potential for concentrating solar power to provide baseload and dispatchable power. Nature Climate Change 4:689–92. doi:10.1038/nclimate2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn, H. F. (2001). The Bamorel Model: Theoretical background. http://www.balmorel.com/images/downloads/the-balmorel-model-theoretical-background.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, O., S. Melchior, A. Hawkes, and I. Staffell. 2019. Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies. Joule 3 (1):81–100. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlain, A. (2019). The noun project. Accessed December 13, 2019. https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=transmission+tower&i=304344
   Google Scholar
• SolarPACES. (2019). CSP projects around the world. Accessed December 13, 2019. https://www.solarpaces.org/csp-technologies/csp-projects-around-the-world/
   Google Scholar
• SolarPACES. (2020). Morocco Pioneers PV with Thermal Storage at 800 MW Midelt CSP Project. Retrieved July 9, 2020from CSP News & Analysis website:. https://www.solarpaces.org/morocco-pioneers-pv-to-thermal-storage-at-800-mw-midelt-csp-project/
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, A., C. R. Bening, T. S. Schmidt, M. Schwarz, and V. H. Hoffmann. 2019. The role of inter-sectoral knowledge spillovers in technological innovations: The case of lithium-ion batteries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148:119718. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiropoulos, I., D. Tarvydas, and N. Lebedeva (2018). Li-ion batteries for mobility and stationary storage applications - Scenarios for costs and market growth. doi:10.2760/87175.
   Google Scholar
• Turchi, C. S., M. Boyd, D. Kesseli, P. Kurup, M. Mehos, T. Neises, and T. Wendelin (2019). CSP systems analysis - Final project report CSP systems analysis - final project report.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. 2019. Chapter 6 - Thermal storage systems. In Design of solar thermal power plants, ed. Z. Wang, 387–415. Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-815613-1.00006-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wiese, F., R. Bramstoft, H. Koduvere, A. Pizarro Alonso, O. Balyk, J. G. Kirkerud, and H. Ravn. 2018. Balmorel open source energy system model. Energy Strategy Reviews 20:26–34. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi, K., R. Sioshansi, and P. Denholm. 2019. Evaluating a concentrating solar power plant as an extended-duration peaking resource. Solar Energy 191 (September):686–96. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.008.
   Google Scholar
• Zurita, A., C. Mata-Torres, C. Valenzuela, C. Felbol, J. M. Cardemil, A. M. Guzmán, and R. A. Escobar. 2018. Techno-economic evaluation of a hybrid CSP + PV plant integrated with thermal energy storage and a large-scale battery energy storage system for base generation. Solar Energy 173 (January):1262–77. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.061.
   Google Scholar