Energy Efficiency contribution to sustainable development: A multi-criteria approach in Greece

References

• Angelis, A., and P. Kanavos. 2017. Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in health technology assessment and beyond: The advance value framework. Social Science & Medicine 188:137–56. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslani, A., A. Bakhtiar, and M. H. Akbarzadeh. 2019. Energy-efficiency technologies in the building envelope: Life cycle and adaptation assessment. Journal of Building Engineering 21:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzadian, M., R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi. 2010. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 200 (1):198–215. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgen, S., and İ. Sarıkaya. 2016. Contribution of efficient energy use on economy, environment, and sustainability. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 11 (12):1166–72. doi:10.1080/15567249.2016.1177622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., and B. Mareschal. 2005. PROMETHEE methods, in ‘Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys’, ed. J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott. New York. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., and B. Mareschal. 1994. The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decision Support Systems 12 (4–5):297–310. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)90048-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., and P. Vincke. 1985. Note—A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Management Science 31 (6):647–56. doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal. 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research 24 (2):228–38. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgett, J. M., and A. R. Chini. 2013. Effective energy efficiency measures for existing residential homes in the Florida market. International Journal of Construction Education and Research 9 (1):61–80. doi:10.1080/15578771.2012.677966.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, F. 2009. Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies. Renewable Energy 34 (7):1678–85. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chedwal, R., J. Mathur, G. D. Agarwal, and S. Dhaka. 2015. Energy saving potential through Energy Conservation Building Code and advance energy efficiency measures in hotel buildings of Jaipur City, India. Energy and Buildings 92:282–95. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli, M., M. Kadziński, M. Gonzalez, and R. Słowiński. 2020. How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega 96:102261. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRES. 2015. Collection and process of final energy consumption data. Final Report prepared by ADEME, ENERDATA, FACETS, QUANTOS and PREDICTA-MRB.
   Google Scholar
• CRES. 2017. Bottom-up equations for the determination of energy savings attributed to energy conservation interventions in the context of the energy efficiency obligation scheme. Accessed March 20, 2019. http://www.cres.gr/obs/files/BUs%202017-v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diakoulaki, D., and F. Karangelis. 2007. Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 (4):716–27. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirutigliano, D., C. Delmastro, and S. Torabi Moghadam. 2018. A multi-criteria application to select energy retrofit measures at the building and district scale. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 6:457–64. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2018.04.007.
   Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., and A. Nikas. 2020. Decision support models in climate policy. European Journal of Operational Research 280 (1):1–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., A. Nikas, M. González-Eguino, I. Arto, and A. Anger-Kraavi. 2018. From integrated to integrative: Delivering on the Paris agreement. Sustainability 10 (7):2299. doi:10.3390/su10072299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., C. Karakosta, A. Flamos, and J. Psarras. 2014. Foresight for energy policy: Techniques and methods employed in Greece. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 9 (2):109–19. doi:10.1080/15567241003735217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., K. D. Patlitzianas, and J. Psarras. 2006. Supporting sustainable electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM. Resources Policy 31 (2):129–36. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2006.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstat. 2011a. Population and residences census 2001: House/Household amenities.
   Google Scholar
• Elstat. 2011b. Table7: Buildings per use and per construction year. Accessed June 15, 2019. http://www.statistics.gr/el/census-buildings-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Elstat. 2011c. Table: Cars and motorcycles per category, use and administrative department in Greece. Accessed June 15, 2019. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SME15/-.
   Google Scholar
• Elstat. 2013. Energy consumption in households, Press release. Accessed June 15, 2019. http://www.statistics.gr/documents/20181/e74d6134-8c02-404e-a02b-aa6d959219e3.
   Google Scholar
• Eskander, M. M., M. Sandoval-Reyes, C. A. Silva, S. M. Vieira, and J. M. C. Sousa. 2017. Assessment of energy efficiency measures using multi-objective optimization in Portuguese households. Sustainable Cities and Society 35:764–73. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2016. The Macroeconomic and Other Benefits of Energy Efficiency. Technical Report of European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2017. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council, All EU countries are required to use energy more efficiently at all stages of the energy chain, from production to final consumption, including a new 30% energy efficiency target for 2030, Brussels, 4.1.2017. Accessed June 20, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-directive.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: The European Green Deal, 11.12.2019, Accessed March 10, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T., and G. Killip. 2019. Re-thinking energy efficiency in European policy: Practitioners’ use of ‘multiple benefits’ arguments. Journal of Cleaner Production 210:1171–79. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J. R., and B. Roy. 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. European Journal of Operational Research 139 (2):317–26. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forouli, A., N. Gkonis, A. Nikas, E. Siskos, H. Doukas, and C. Tourkolias. 2019. Energy efficiency promotion in Greece in light of risk: Evaluating policies as portfolio assets. Energy 170:818–31. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, P. 1979. The Cost-Effectiveness of Some Measures for Energy Conservation in Buildings in the UK. Proc. the CIB (Conseil International du Bâtiment pour la Recherche, l’Etude et la Documentation/International Council for Building Research, Studies and Documentation) Symposium on Energy Conservation in the Built Environment, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Galatioto, A., R. Ricciu, T. Salem, and E. Kinab. 2019. Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian public historic buildings. Energy 176:58–66. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavurova, B., J. Belas, K. Kocisova, and T. Kliestik. 2017. Comparison of selected methods for performance evaluation of Czech and Slovak commercial banks. Journal of Business Economics and Management 18 (5):852–76. doi:10.3846/16111699.2017.1371637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, H., P. Harrington, A. H. Rosenfeld, S. Tanishima, and F. Unander. 2006. Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy 34 (5):556–73. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervasio, H., and S. L. Da Silva. 2012. A probabilistic decision-making approach for the sustainable assessment of infrastructures. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (8):7121–31. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkonis, N., A. Arsenopoulos, A. Stamatiou, and H. Doukas. 2020. Multi-perspective design of energy efficiency policies under the framework of national energy and climate action plans. Energy Policy 140:111401. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Limón, J. A., and Y. Martínez. 2006. Multi-criteria modelling of irrigation water market at basin level: A Spanish case study. European Journal of Operational Research 173 (1):313–36. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., M. Kadziński, and R. Sivakumar. 2017. Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain. Omega 71:129–45. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guitouni, A., and J. M. Martel. 1998. Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research 109 (2):501–21. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00073-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques, J., and J. Catarino. 2016. Motivating towards energy efficiency in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production 139:42–50. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. 2014. Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2019. Data and statistics. Accessed March 25, 2020. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tables/?country=WORLD&year=2017&energy=Balances, visited on February 25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lehr, U., J. Nitsch, M. Kratzat, C. Lutz, and D. Edler. 2008. Renewable energy and employment in Germany. Energy Policy 36 (1):108–17. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, P., F. Abastante, S. Torabi Moghadam, and J. Toniolo. 2017. Multicriteria spatial decision support systems for future urban energy retrofitting scenarios. Sustainability 9 (7):1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlener, R., K. Kowalski, and S. Stagl. 2007. New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energy Policy 35 (12):6060–74. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makropoulos, C., and D. Butler. 2006. Spatial ordered weighted averaging: Incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Environmental Modelling and Software 21 (1):69–84. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A., E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, D. Streimikiene, A. Jusoh, K. M. D. Nor, and M. Khoshnoudi. 2016. Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy saving technologies and solutions in five star hotels: A new hierarchical framework. Energy 117 (Part 1):131–48. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markaki, M., A. Belegri-Roboli, P. Michaelides, S. Mirasgedis, and D. P. Lalas. 2013. The impact of clean energy investments on the Greek economy: An input-output analysis (2010–2020). Energy Policy 57:263–75. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikučionienė, R., V. Martinaitis, and E. Keras. 2014. Evaluation of energy efficiency measures sustainability by decision tree method. Energy and Buildings 76:64–71. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Energy. 2018. Annual inventory submission of Greece under the convention Kyoto protocol for greenhouse and other gases for the years 1990–2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mirasgedis, S., C. Tourkolias, E. Pavlakis, and D. Diakoulaki. 2014. A methodological framework for assessing the employment effects associated with energy efficiency interventions in buildings. Energy and Buildings 82:275–86. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neofytou, H., A. Nikas, and H. Doukas. 2020. Sustainable energy transition readiness: A multicriteria assessment index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 131:109988. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, D., P. Baptista, M. Simoes, C. A. Silva, and J. R. Figueira. 2018. Designing a municipal sustainable energy strategy using multi-criteria decision analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 176:251–60. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., H. Neofytou, A. Karamaneas, K. Koasidis, and J. Psarras. 2020a. Sustainable and socially just transition to a post-lignite era in Greece: A multi-level perspective. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 1–32. doi:10.1080/15567249.2020.1769773
   Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., V. Stavrakas, A. Arsenopoulos, H. Doukas, M. Antosiewicz, J. Witajewski-Baltvilks, and A. Flamos. 2020b. Barriers to and consequences of a solar-based energy transition in Greece. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35:383-399. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., E. Ntanos, and H. Doukas. 2019. A semi-quantitative modelling application for assessing energy efficiency strategies. Applied Soft Computing 76:140–55. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., H. Doukas, J. Lieu, R. A. Tinoco, V. Charisopoulos, and W. van der Gaast. 2017. Managing stakeholder knowledge for the evaluation of innovation systems in the face of climate change. Journal of Knowledge Management 21 (5):1013–34. doi:10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., H. Doukas, and L. M. López. 2018. A group decision making tool for assessing climate policy risks against multiple criteria. Heliyon 4 (3):e00588. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidis, Y., P. A. Pilavachi, and A. Chletsis. 2009. Economic evaluation of energy saving measures in a common type of Greek building. Applied Energy 86 (12):2550–59. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oikonomou, V., A. Flamos, D. Zeugolis, and S. Grafakos. 2012. A qualitative assessment of EU energy policy interactions. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 7 (2):177–87. doi:10.1080/15567240902788996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oikonomou, V., A. Flamos, and S. Grafakos. 2014. Combination of energy policy instruments: Creation of added value or overlapping? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 9 (1):46–56. doi:10.1080/15567241003716696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papada, L., and D. Kaliampakos. 2020. Being forced to skimp on energy needs: A new look at energy poverty in Greece. Energy Research & Social Science 64:101450. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, G., L. Ntziachristos, P. Wüthrich, B. Notter, M. Keller, E. Fridell, H. Winnes, L. Styhre, and Å. Sjödin. 2013. Transport data collection supporting the quantitative analysis of measures relating to transport and climate change (TRACCS). Final Report, European Commission Directorate-General for Climate Action (DG CLIMA).
   Google Scholar
• Polatidis, H., D. A. Haralambopoulos, F. Bruinsma, R. Vreeker, and G. Munda. 2009. Decision aid with the MCDA-RES software: A wind-hydro energy application for an island of the Aegean, Greece. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 4 (4):407–19. doi:10.1080/15567240701759826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatidis, H., D. A. Haralambopoulos, G. Munda, and R. Vreeker. 2006. Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 1 (2):181–93. doi:10.1080/009083190881607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatidis, H., K. Haralambidou, and D. Haralambopoulos. 2015. Multi-criteria decision analysis for geothermal energy: A comparison between the ELECTRE III and the PROMETHEE II methods. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 10 (3):241–49. doi:10.1080/15567249.2011.565297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollin, R., J. Heintz, and H. Garrett-Peltier. 2009. The economic benefits of investing in clean energy: How the economic stimulus program and new legislation can boost US economic growth and employment. Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, D., Y. Li, F. Niu, and Z. O’Neill. 2019. Nationwide savings analysis of energy conservation measures in buildings. Energy Conversion and Management 188:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REGULATION (EU) 2018/1999 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, C. L., M. I. Piper, P. G. Pino, and G. Guido. 2018. Exploring the perceived image of energy efficiency measures in residential buildings: Evidence from Apulia, Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (Part 1):349–55. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J., K. Engelund Thomsen, O. C. Mørck, M. Sanchez Mayoral Gutierrez, and S. Østergaard Jensen. 2019. Refurbishing blocks of flats to very low or nearly zero energy level–technical and financial results plus co-benefits. Energy and Buildings 184:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadineni, S. B., S. Madala, and R. F. Boehm. 2011. Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (8):3617–31. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. J., J. Roop, R. Schultz, D. Anderson, and K. Cort. 2008. The impact of DOE building technology energy efficiency programs on US employment, income, and investment. Energy Economics 30 (5):2283–301. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanian, A., A. S. Milani, C. Carson, and R. C. Abeyaratne. 2008. A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos’ procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty. Knowledge-Based Systems 21 (7):709–20. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simos, J. 1990a. L’ évaluation environnementale: Un processus cognitif négocié. Thèse de doctorat. Lausanne: DGF-EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Simos, J. 1990b. Evaluer l’ impact sur l’environnement: Une approche originale par l’ analyse multicritère et la négociation. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
   Google Scholar
• Siskos, E., and N. Tsotsolas. 2015. Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: A robustness concern. European Journal of Operational Research 246 (2):543–53. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, L., J. Lieu, A. Nikas, A. Arsenopoulos, G. Vasileiou, and H. Doukas. 2020. Contested energy futures, conflicted rewards? Examining low-carbon transition risks and governance dynamics in China’s built environment. Energy Research & Social Science 59:101306. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridaki, N. A., and A. Flamos. 2014. A paper trail of evaluation approaches to energy and climate policy interactions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 40:1090–107. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridaki, N. A., A. Ioannou, A. Flamos, and V. Oikonomou. 2016. An ex-post assessment of the regulation on the energy performance of buildings in Greece and the Netherlands—A cross-country comparison. Energy Efficiency 9 (2):261–79. doi:10.1007/s12053-015-9363-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridaki, N. A., S. Banaka, and A. Flamos. 2016. Evaluating public policy instruments in the Greek building sector. Energy Policy 88:528–43. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridaki, N. A., V. Stavrakas, Y. Dendramis, and A. Flamos. 2020. Understanding technology ownership to reveal adoption trends for energy efficiency measures in the Greek residential sector. Energy Policy 140:111413. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strantzali, E., K. Aravossis, and G. A. Livanos. 2017. Evaluation of future sustainable electricity generation alternatives: The case of a Greek island. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76:775–87. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strantzali, E., K. Aravossis, G. A. Livanos, and C. Nikoloudis. 2019. A decision support approach for evaluating liquefied natural gas supply options: Implementation on Greek case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 222:414–23. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synapse Energy Economics. 2010. Co-Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, B., Y. Yavuz, E. N. Otay, and E. Çamlıbel. 2016. Optimal selection of energy efficiency measures for energy sustainability of existing buildings. Computers & Operations Research 66:258–71. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2015.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thema, J., F. Suerkemper, S. Thomas, D. Ürge-Vorsatz, J. Teubler, J. Couder, S. Chatterjee, S. Bouzarovski, N. Mzavanadze, and D. von Below. 2017. More than energy savings: Quantifying the multiple impacts of energy efficiency in Europe. ECEEE Summer Study, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Theodorou, S., G. Florides, and S. Tassou. 2010. The use of multiple criteria decision making methodologies for the promotion of RES through funding schemes in Cyprus, A review. Energy Policy 38 (12):7783–92. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabi Moghadam, S., and P. Lombardi. 2019. An interactive multi-criteria spatial decision support system for energy retrofitting of building stocks using CommuntiyVIZ to support urban energy planning. Building and Environment 163:106233. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ürge-Vorsatz, D., A. Kelemen, S. Tirado-Herrero, S. Thomas, J. Thema, N. Mzavanadze, D. Hauptstock, F. Suerkemper, J. Teubler, M. Gupta, et al. 2016. Measuring multiple impacts of low-carbon energy options in a green economy context. Applied Energy 179:1409–26. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2020. Sustainable development goals. Accessed January 10, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, O., S. Hanger-Kopp, A. Nikas, E. Spijker, H. Carlsen, H. Doukas, and J. Lieu. 2020. The importance of stakeholders in scoping risk assessments – lessons from low-carbon transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35:400-413. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Vasić, G. 2018. Application of multi criteria analysis in the design of energy policy: Space and water heating in households – City Novi Sad, Serbia. Energy Policy 113:410–19. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeeck, G., and H. Hens. 2005. Energy savings in retrofitted dwellings: Economically viable? Energy and Buildings 37 (7):747–54. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villca-Pozo, M., and J. P. Gonzales-Bustos. 2019. Tax incentives to modernize the energy efficiency of the housing in Spain. Energy Policy 128:530–38. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wątróbski, J., and J. Jankowski. 2016. Guideline for MCDA method selection in production management area. In New frontiers in information and production systems modelling and analysis. ed. P. Różewski, D. Novikov, N. Bakhtadze, O. Zaikin, 119–38. Springer.Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23338-3_6
   Google Scholar
• Wątróbski, J., J. Jankowski, P. Ziemba, A. Karczmarczyk, and M. Zioło. 2019. Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86:107–24. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., and J. Lai. 2018. Environmental and economic evaluations of building energy retrofits: Case study of a commercial building. Building and Environment 145:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlaugotne, B., L. Zihare, L. Balode, A. Kalnbalkite, A. Khabdullin, and D. Blumberga. 2020. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods comparison. Environmental and Climate Technologies 24 (1):454–71. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar