Evaluation of sustainable energy performance for OECD countries

References

• Abdullah, L., W. Chan, and A. Afshari. 2019. Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: A comparative result based on preference functions. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 15 (2):271–85. doi:10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z.
   Google Scholar
• Aceleanu, M. I., A. C. Șerban, D. M. Pociovălișteanu, and G. C. Dimian. 2017. Renewable energy: A way for a sustainable development in romania. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12 (11):958–63. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1328621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adedoyin, F. F., M. I. Gumede, F. V. Bekun, M. U. Etokakpan, and D. Balsalobre-lorente. 2020. Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: Does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment 710:136284. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgobek, O., I. Nisanci, S. Kaya, and T. Eren. 2015. Veri zarflama analizi yaklaşimini kullanarak bir eğitim kurumunun şubelerinin performanslarini ölçme. Social Sciences Research Journal 4 (3):43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Aladag, Z., A. Alkan, E. Guler, and Y. Ozdin. 2018. Akademik birimlerin veri zarflama analizi ve PROMETHEE yöntemleri ile performans değerlendirmesi: Kocaeli üniversitesi örneği. Erciyes University Journal of Institute of Science and Technology 34 (1):1–13. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesfen/issue/37078/406003.
   Google Scholar
• Alidrisi, H., and B. O. Al-Sasi. 2017. Utilization of energy sources by G20 countries: A TOPSIS-BASED approach. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12 (11):964–70. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1336812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alola, A. A., and U. V. Alola. 2018. Agricultural land usage and tourism impact on renewable energy consumption among coastline Mediterranean countries. Energy & Environment 29 (8):1438–54. doi:10.1177/0958305X18779577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., and N. C. Petersen. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (10):1261–64. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar, A., M. Siddique, E. Dogan, and A. Sharif. 2020. The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Renewable Energy 956–67. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atan, S., and E. Sahin. 2017. Türkiye ile bazı OECD ülkelerinin elektrik üretim sektörleri için verimlilik ve etkinliklerinin karşılaştırmalı analizi. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 19 (3):845–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bagherikahvarin, M., and Y. De Smet. 2016. A ranking method based on DEA and PROMETHEE II (a rank based on DEA & PR. II). Measurement 89:333–42. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (9):1078–92. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., and B. Mareschal. 2005. PROMETHEE Methods. In Multiple criteria decision analysis, state of the art survey, ed. V. Figueira. New York: Springer Science, pp. 163-186.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal. 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research doi. 24 (2):228–38. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerqueira, P. A., E. Soukiazis, and S. Proença. 2020. Assessing the linkages between recycling, renewable energy and sustainable development: Evidence from the OECD countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1–26. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00780-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. P., and J. L. Hu. 2010. Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: An empirical study of china. Applied Energy 87 (10):3262–70. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, and L. M. Seiford. 1997. Data envelopment analysis theory, methodology and applications. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (3):332–33. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6):429–44. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, V. 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis. 1sted. ed. USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• yh-Min Chiang, Marko J. Spasojevic, Helene C. Muller-Landau, I-Fang Sun, Yiching Lin, Sheng-Hsin Su, Zueng-Sang Chen, Chien-Teh Chen, Nathan G. Swenson & Ryan W. McEwan  2016. Functional composition drives ecosystem function through multiple mechanisms in a broadleaved subtropical forest. Oecologia 182 (3):829–40. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3717-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, T., and J.-L. Hu. 2007. Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies. Energy Policy 35 (7):3606–15. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cîrstea, Ş. D., C. S. Martiş, A. Cîrstea, A. Constantinescu-Dobra, and M. T. Fülöp. 2018. Current situation and future perspectives of the Romanian renewable energy. Energies 11 (12):3289. doi:10.3390/en11123289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. J. 1995. Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39 (3):219–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00552.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., L. M. Seiford, and J. Zhu. 2011. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nded. ed. USA: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren, M. 2008. Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19 (4):397–406. doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0091-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbag, M., E. Tatoglu, and K. W. Glaister. 2009. Equity-based entry modes of emerging country multinationals: Lessons from Turkey. Journal of World Business 44 (4):445–62. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2008.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, P., A. Jain, and A. Gupta. 2020. Performance analysis of non-banking finance companies using two-stage data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research 1–26. doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03705-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, and P. Matschoss. 2011. Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 1sted. ed. USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekiz, M., and C. Tuncer Sakar. 2020. A new approach to rank all alternatives in data envelopment analysis: ASES. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 35 (2):683–95. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.506640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., and M. Tavana. 2014. Performance measurement with fuzzy data envelopment analysis. 1sted. ed. USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ervural, B. C., S. Zaim, and D. Delen. 2018. A two-stage analytical approach to assess sustainable energy efficiency. Energy 164:822–36. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fancello, G., M. Carta, and P. Serra. 2020. Data envelopment analysis for the assessment of road safety in urban road networks: A comparative study using CCR and BCC models. Case Studies on Transport Policy 8 (3):736–44. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2020.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General) 120 (3):253–81. doi:10.2307/2343100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervásio, H., and L. S. Da Silva. 2012. A probabilistic decision-making approach for the sustainable assessment of infrastructures. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (8):7121–31. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokgoz, F., and M. T. Guvercin. 2018. Energy security and renewable energy efficiency in EU. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 96:226–39. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler, E., S. Kandemir Yerel, and E. Acikkalp. 2020. Türkiye’deki enerji dağıtım şirketlerinin etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Journal of Science 7 (1):66–79. doi:10.35193/bseufbd.683652.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle, D. E., W. Wiersma, and S. G. Jurs. 2003. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 663). Houghton Mifflin College Division.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. D., and K. Y. Jeong. 2020. Cross-evaluation based super efficiency DEA approach to designing disaster recovery center location-allocation-routing network schemes. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 10 (4):485–508. doi:10.1108/JHLSCM-03-2020-0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honma, S., and J.-L. Hu. 2008. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy 36 (2):821–33. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, J. L., and S. C. Wang. 2006. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy 34 (17):3206–17. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M. D., and A. A. Alola. 2020. Integrated analysis of energy-economic development-environmental sustainability nexus: Case study of MENA countries. Science of the Total Environment 737:139768. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet Adress: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/sustainable-energy-for-all# ( Access date: 23.JULY.2020)
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Brans. L’ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In R. Nadeau and M. Landry, editors, L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir, pages 183–213, Québec, Canada, 1982. Presses de l’Université Laval
   Google Scholar
• Khare, R., V. G. K. Villuri, and D. Chaurasia. 2020. Urban sustainability assessment: The evaluation of coordinated relationship between BRTS and land use in transit-oriented development mode using DEA model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Y. Peng, and G. Wang. 2014. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods. Information Sciences 275 (1–12):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and R. Gulati. 2014. Deregulation and efficiency of Indian banks.
   Google Scholar
• Lepchak, A., and S. B. Voese. 2020. Evaluation of the efficiency of logistics activities using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Gestão & Produção 27 (1):1–20. doi:10.1590/0104-530X3371-20.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., A. Li, and X. Guo. 2020. The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry-A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods. Energy 212:118694. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2020. Analyzing efficiencies of city commercial banks in China: An application of the bootstrapped DEA approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal: 62:101372. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., S. Y. Cho, D. M. Sun, and Z. D. Qiu. 2010. A Spearman correlation coefficient ranking for matching-score fusion on speaker recognition. TENCON 2010–2010 IEEE Region 10 Conference, IEEE. Fukuoka, Japan. doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2010.5686608.
   Google Scholar
• Luptáčik, M. 2010. Data Envelopment Analysis. In Mathematical Optimization and Economic Analysis, 135–86. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mahlknecht, J., and R. González-Bravo. 2018. Measuring the water-energy-food nexus: The case of Latin America and the Caribbean region. Energy Procedia 153:169–73. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.065.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrocinque, E., F. J. Ramírez, A. Honrubia-Escribano, and D. T. Pham. 2020. An AHP-based multi-criteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector. Expert Systems with Applications 150:113321. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, J. C. C. S., L. A. Meza, J. Q. Da Silveira, and E. G. Gomes. 2013. About negative efficiencies in cross evaluation BCC input oriented models. European Journal of Operational Research 229 (3):732–37. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi-Nasab, S. H., and A. Sotoudeh-Anvari. 2017. A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Materials & Design 121:237–53. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukaka, M. M. 2012. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal 24 (3):69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neofytou, H., A. Nikas, and H. Doukas. 2020. Sustainable energy transition readiness: A multicriteria assessment index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 131:109988. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neofytou, H., Y. Sarafidis, N. Gkonis, S. Mirasgedis, and D. Askounis. 2020. Energy efficiency contribution to sustainable development: A multi-criteria approach in greece. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 1–33. doi:10.1080/15567249.2020.1849449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, Y. A. 2014. Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation, 210. Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. Springer Science, Business Media, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ozden, U. H. 2008. Veri zarflama analizi (VZA) ile Türkiye’deki vakıf üniversitelerinin etkinliğinin ölçülmesi. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration 37 (2):167–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkale, C., C. Celik, A. C. Turkmen, and E. S. Cakmaz. 2017. Decision analysis application intended for selection of a power plant running on renewable energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70:1011–21. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozveri, O., and M. Kabak. 2018. İşletmelerin ürün kalitesi etkinliğinin analiz edilmesi için bulanik veri zarflama analizi yönteminin kullanilmasi. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences 18 (3):145–58.
   Google Scholar
• Phillis, A., E. Grigoroudis, and V. S. Kouikoglou. 2020. Assessing national energy sustainability using multiple criteria decision analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 1–18. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1780646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohekar, S. D., and M. Ramachandran. 2004. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8 (4):365–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatidis, H., and D. A. Haralambopoulos. 2007. Decomposition analysis and design of sustainable renewable energy systems: A new approach. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2 (4):371–80. doi:10.1080/15567240600705235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puth, M. T., M. Neuhäuser, and G. D. Ruxton. 2015. Effective use of spearman’s and kendall’s correlation coefficients for association between two measured traits. Animal Behaviour 102:77–84. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, J., D. Xu, H. Cao, S. A. Wei, L. Dong, and M. E. Goodsite. 2016. Sustainability decision support framework for industrial system prioritization. AIChE Journal 62 (1):108–30. doi:10.1002/aic.15039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadorsky, P. 2009. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 37 (10):4021–28. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J. 2000. A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool. European Journal of Operational Research 123 (3):543–57. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00099-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selam, A. A., S. Ozel, and M. O. A. Akan. 2014. Yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı açısından Türkiye’nin OECD ülkeleri arasındaki yeri. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science 317–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, D., A. Pandey, C. Kumar, and R. K. Ranjan. 2019. Assessment & anthology of sustainable sources of energy using an approach of PROMETHEE. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, Greater Noida, India.
   Google Scholar
• Shuai, S., and Z. Fan. 2020. Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of china: Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model. Journal of Environmental Management 261:110227. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solangi, Y. A., Q. Tan, N. H. Mirjat, and S. Ali. 2019. Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 236:117655. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soylemez, A. 2015. Graphical representation of data envelopment analysis by Robust CoPlot. Master’s Thesis. Hacettepe University Institute of Science, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Sozen, A., and F. Karik. 2017. Comparison of Turkey’s renewable energy performance with OECD and BRICS countries by multiple criteria. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12 (5):487–94. doi:10.1080/15567249.2016.1200163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskopru, V. 2014. Classic data envelopment analysis with categorical data envelopment analysis models a comparative examination of energy productivity. Master thesis, Mimar Sinan University Institute of Science, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Tipi, T., N. Yildiz, M. Nargelecekenler, and B. Cetin. 2009. Measuring the technical efficiency and determinants of efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa) farms in Marmara region, Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 37 (2):121–29. doi:10.1080/01140670909510257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uludag, A. S., and H. Dogan. 2018. Sürdürülebilir enerji odakli bir etkinlik ve performans analizi: AB üyesi ülkeler ile Türkiye karşılaştırması. In IV. International Caucasus-Central Asia Foreign Trade and Logistics Congress, 7-8 September, Didim- Aydin, Turkey, 335–48.
   Google Scholar
• Vavrek, R., and J. Chovancová. 2019. Assessment of economic and environmental energy performance of EU countries using CV-TOPSIS technique. Ecological Indicators 106:105519. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visani, F., and F. Boccali. 2020. Purchasing price assessment of leverage items: A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Production Economics 223:107521. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. 2015. A generalized MCDA–DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis–data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator. Energy 80:114–22. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., Z. Zhu, and Y. Wang. 2016. A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Information Sciences 345:27–45. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., L. Xu, and Y. A. Solangi. 2020. Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 52:101861. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, C., Y. Chung, D. Chun, H. Seo, and S. Hong. 2015. The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: A Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 47:367–76. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., H. Ouyang, K. Fang, L. Ye, and J. Zhang. 2015. Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecological Indicators 51:13–19. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenioglu, Z. A., and V. Ates. 2019. Yenilenebilir enerji kullanımındaki göreceli etkinliklerin veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye ve bazı Avrupa ülkeleri örneği. Journal of Polytechnic 22 (4):863–69. doi:10.2339/politeknik.446110.
   Google Scholar
• Yulek, M. Â. 2018. Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth. 1sted. ed. USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., and W. D. Cook. 2007. Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. 1sted. ed. USA: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zurano-Cervelló, P., C. Pozo, J. M. Mateo-Sanz, L. Jiménez, and G. Guillén-Gosálbez. 2019. Sustainability efficiency assessment of the electricity mix of the 28 EU member countries combining data envelopment analysis and optimized projections. Energy Policy 134:110921. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar