Sustainable development goal interactions for a just transition: multi-scalar solar energy rollout in Portugal

References

• APREN (Portuguese Renewable Energy Association) 2019 APREN Yearbook 2019 Accessed on April 27, 2020 https://www.apren.pt/en/publications/apren/apren-yearbook-2019
   Google Scholar
• Best, R., P. J. Burke, and S. Nishitateno. 2019. Evaluating the effectiveness of Australia’s Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme for rooftop solar. Energy Economics 84:104475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2018. The map is not the territory: A sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn. Energy Research & Social Science 36:11–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, M. C., N. Gomes, T. Santos, and J. A. Tenedório. 2012. Photovoltaic potential in a Lisbon suburb using LiDAR data. Solar Energy 86 (1):283–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.09.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilo, F. M., R. Castro, M. E. Almeida, and V. F. Pires. 2017. Economic assessment of residential PV systems with self-consumption and storage in Portugal. Solar Energy 150:353–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, I., G. Pontes Luz, E. Marín-González, S. Gährs, S. Hall, and L. Holstenkamp. 2020. Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU. Energy Policy 138:111212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DGEG (Directorate General for Energy and Geology) 2020 Renewables Summary Statistics 193: December 2020. Accessed March 19, 2021: https://www.dgeg.gov.pt/media/zazjmhkh/dgeg-arr-2020-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2019 Portugal. Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021–2030. Accessed July 15, 2020 https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/pt_final_necp_main_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, L., and P. Ferreira. 2014. Renewable energy scenarios in the Portuguese electricity system. Energy 69:51–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2):219–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouveia, J. P., J. Seixas, and G. Long. 2018. Mining Households' energy data to disclose fuel poverty: Lessons for Southern Europe . Journal of Cleaner Production 178:534–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Portugal 2019 Decree Law No. 162/2019, Republic Diary No. 206/2019, I 2019-10-2545-62. Lisbon: Presidency of the Council of Ministers. Accessed January 27, 2021 https://dre.pt/web/en/home/-/contents/125692189/details/normal
   Google Scholar
• Healy, N., and J. Barry. 2017. Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy 108:451–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., K. Tews, and B. Turner. 2018. Is there a prosumer pathway? Exploring household solar energy development in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 42:258–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2020. Renewable Energy Statistics 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygusuz, K. 2007. Energy for sustainable development: Key issues and challenges. Energy Sources, Part B 2 (1):73–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240500402560.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L. 2008. The conduct of qualitative interviews. In Handbook of Research on New Literacies, ed. J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. Leu, 133–49. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koirala, B. P., E. Koliou, J. Friege, R. A. Hakvoort, and P. M. Herder. 2016. Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56:722–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1994. Ten standard objections to qualitative research interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 25 (2):147–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/156916294X00016.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 2017. China’s strategy for the development of renewable energies. Energy Sources, Part B 12 (11):971–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1336813.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 2018. What is the future of solar energy? Economic and policy barriers. Energy Sources, Part B 13 (3):169–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1416704.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, C. 2014. Of what is this a case? Analytical movements in qualitative social science research. Human Organization 73 (3):224–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.73.3.e35q482014x033l4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T., S. Becker, and M. Naumann. 2015. Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environment 20 (12):1547–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerini, F. F., B. Sovacool, N. Hughes, L. Cozzi, E. Cosgrave, M. Howells, M. Tavoni, J. Tomei, H. Zerriffi, and B. Milligan. 2019. Connecting climate action with other sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability 2 (8):674–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0334-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerini, F. F., J. Tomei, L. S. To, I. Bisaga, P. Parikh, M. Black, A. Borrion, C. Spataru, V. C. Broto, G. Anandarajah, et al. 2018. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Energy 3 (1):10–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., V. Stavrakas, A. Arsenopoulos, H. Doukas, M. Antosiewicz, J. Witajewski-Baltvilks, and A. Flamos. 2018. Barriers to and consequences of a solar-based energy transition in Greece. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35:383–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PORDATA 2020 Electricity prices for households and industrial users (Euro/ECU) www.pordata.pt
   Google Scholar
• Rigo, P. D., J. C. M. Siluk, D. P. Lacerda, C. B. Rosa, and G. Rediske. 2019. Is the success of small-scale photovoltaic solar energy generation achievable in Brazil? Journal of Cleaner Production 240:118243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S., R. Torabikalaki, F. Faria, N. Cafôfo, X. Chen, A. R. Ivaki, H. Mata-Lima, and F. J. S. E. Morgado-Dias. 2016. Economic feasibility analysis of small scale PV systems in different countries. Solar Energy 131:81–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S. 2020. Metrics for an accountable energy transition? Legitimating the governance of solar uptake. Geoforum 114:30–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S., D. Baillie, and J. Kleinwächter. 2018. Transitions to future energy systems: Learning from a community test field. Sustainability 10 (12):4513. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S., and H. Haarstad. 2018. Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions. Applied Energy 228:624–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sareen, S., and H. Haarstad. 2020. Legitimacy and accountability in the governance of sustainable energy transitions. Global Transitions 2:47–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, L., and S. Sareen. 2020. Solar photovoltaic energy infrastructures, land use and sociocultural context in Portugal. ahead-of-print. Local Environment 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvast, A., R. Williams, S. Hyysalo, K. Rommetveit, and C. Raab. 2018. Who ‘uses’ smart grids? The evolving nature of user representations in layered infrastructures. Sustainability 10 (10):3738. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solar Power Europe. 2017. Global market outlook for solar power 2017–2021. Solar Power Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., M. Burke, L. Baker, C. K. Kotikalapudi, and H. Wlokas. 2017. New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice. Energy Policy 105:677–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2014. Beyond localism: The spatial scale and scaling in energy transitions. In Scale-sensitive governance of the environment, ed. F. Padt, P. Opdam, N. Polman, and C. Termeer, 106–21. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K. 2018. Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics 27 (1):21–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, N., and K. Roelich. 2020. Substantiating Energy Justice: Creating a Space to Understand Energy Dilemmas. Sustainability 12 (5):1917. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1981. The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge 3 (1):97–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106.
   Google Scholar