837
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Can intra-regional trade, renewable energy use, foreign direct investments, and economic growth mitigate ecological footprints in South Asia?

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • ADB (2016). South Asia Economic Report. Asian Development Bank. Available at: Retrieved 30 June 2021. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/27966/economic-report.pdf
  • Ahmad, M., and Z. Y. Zhao. 2018. Empirics on linkages among industrialization, urbanization, energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: A heterogeneous panel study of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (30):30617–26. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3054-3.
  • Ajmi, A. N., and R. Inglesi-Lotz. 2020. Revisiting the Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia: Carbon dioxide vs. Ecological Footprint. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 16 (4):345–56.
  • Al-Mulali, U., C. Weng-Wai, L. Sheau-Ting, and A. H. Mohammed. 2015. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators 48:315–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029.
  • Al-Tal, R., M. Murshed, A. J. K. Alfar, P. Ahmad, A. J. K. Alfar, M. Elheddad, M. Nurmakhanova, and H. Mahmood. 2021. The Non-Linear Effects of Energy Efficiency gains on the Incidence of Energy Poverty. Sustainability 13 (19):11055. doi:10.3390/su131911055.
  • Ali, S., Z. Yusop, S. R. Kaliappan, and L. Chin. 2020. Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from OIC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:11671–11682. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7.
  • Ansari, M. A., S. Haider, and T. Masood. 2021. Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: An analysis of top renewable energy countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (6):6719–32. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10786-0.
  • Atasoy, B. S. 2017. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the US: Evidence from panel mean group estimators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 77:731–47. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.050.
  • Aydin, M., and Y. E. Turan. 2020. The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (34):43233–45. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9.
  • Bai, J., and J. L. Carrion-I-Silvestre. 2009. Structural changes, common stochastic trends, and unit roots in panel data. The Review of Economic Studies 76 (2):471–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00530.x.
  • Balsalobre-Lorente, D., K. K. Gokmenoglu, N. Taspinar, and J. M. Cantos-Cantos. 2019. An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (22):23010–26. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x.
  • Banerjee, A., and J. L. Carrion-i-silvestre. 2017. Testing for panel cointegration using common correlated effects estimators. Journal of Time Series Analysis 38 (4):610–36. doi:10.1111/jtsa.12234.
  • Banerjee, S., and M. Murshed. 2020. Do emissions implied in net export validate the pollution haven conjecture? Analysis of G7 and BRICS countries. International Journal of Sustainable Economy 12 (3):297–319. doi:10.1504/IJSE.2020.111539.
  • Breusch, T. S., and A. R. Pagan. 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies 47 (1):239–53. doi:10.2307/2297111.
  • Bulut, U. 2020. Environmental sustainability in Turkey: An environmental Kuznets curve estimation for ecological footprint. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 28 3 227–237 doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1793425.
  • Charfeddine, L., and Z. Mrabet. 2017. The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76:138–54. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031.
  • Cho, C. H., Y. P. Chu, and H. Y. Yang. 2014. An environment Kuznets curve for GHG emissions: A panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 9 (2):120–29. doi:10.1080/15567241003773192.
  • Chudik, A., and M. H. Pesaran (2013). Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: A survey. CAFE Research Paper, (13.15).
  • Cui L, Weng S, Nadeem A Majeed, Rafique M Zahid and Shahzad U. (2022). Exploring the role of renewable energy, urbanization and structural change for environmental sustainability: Comparative analysis for practical implications. Renewable Energy, 184 215–224. 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.075
  • Dai, D., H. Liu, and J. Wu. 2018. Urbanization, energy use, and CO2 emissions: A provincial-level analysis of China. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 13 (4):205–10. doi:10.1080/15567249.2011.637543.
  • Danish, K., N. Baloch, M. A, S. Saud, and T. Fatima. 2018. The effect of ICT on CO 2 emissions in emerging economies: Does the level of income matters? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (23):22850–60. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2.
  • Danish, U. R., and S. U. D. Khan. 2020. Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society 54:101996. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996.
  • Destek, M. A., and A. Sinha. 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 242:118537. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537.
  • Dietz, T., and E. A. Rosa. 1997. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94 (1):175–79. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.1.175.
  • Ding, Q., S. I. Khattak, and M. Ahmad. 2021. Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27:254–68. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004.
  • Dogan, E., N. Taspinar, and K. K. Gokmenoglu. 2019. Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy & Environment 30 (6):1065–86. doi:10.1177/0958305X19834279.
  • Dong, K., X. Dong, and Q. Jiang. 2020. How renewable energy consumption lower global CO2 emissions? Evidence from countries with different income levels. The World Economy 43 (6):1665–98. doi:10.1111/twec.12898.
  • Doytch, N. 2020. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Ecological Footprints of Nations. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 8 doi:10.1016/j.indic.2020.100085 1000085 .
  • Dumitrescu, E. I., and C. Hurlin. 2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29 (4):1450–60. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.
  • Eberhardt, M. 2012. Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. Stata Journal 12 (1):61–71. doi:10.1177/1536867X1201200105.
  • Eberhardt, M., and F. Teal (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production. Eco-nomics Series Working Papers 515, University of Oxford Department of Economics.
  • Ehrlich, P. R., and J. P. Holdren. 1971. Impact of population growth. Science 171 (3977):1212–17. doi:10.1126/science.171.3977.1212.
  • El Menyari, Y. 2021. The effects of international tourism, electricity consumption, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in North Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (32):44028–38. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13818-5.
  • Erdogan, S., I. Okumus, and A. E. Guzel. 2020. Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in OECD countries: The role of renewable, non-renewable energy, and oil prices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (19):23655–63. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08520-x.
  • Esen, Ö., D. Ç. Yıldırım, and S. Yıldırım. 2020. Threshold effects of economic growth on water stress in the Eurozone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (25):31427–38. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09383-y.
  • GFN. (2020). Global Footprint Network. Available at: Accessed 30 June 2021. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/
  • Goretti, M., D. Kihara, R. Salgado, and A. Gulde. 2019. Is South Asia Ready for Take Off?: A Sustainable and Inclusive Growth Agenda. Journal Issue 2019:18.
  • Granger, C. W. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 37 (3):424–38. doi:10.2307/1912791.
  • Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115 (1):53–74. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.
  • IQAir. (2020). 2019 World Air Quality Report: Region & City PM2.5 Ranking. Retrieved from :Retrieved 30 June 2021. file:///E:/BACKUP%206%20OCT%2019/Downloads/2019-World-Air-Report-V8-20200318.pdf
  • Iqbal, K., S. T. Hassan, and H. K. Peng. 2019. Analyzing the role of information and telecommunication technology in human development: Panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (15):15153–61. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04918-4.
  • Ișik, C., M. Ahmad, U. K. Pata, S. Ongan, M. Radulescu, F. F. Adedoyin, A. Ongan, S. Aydın, and A. Ongan. 2020. An evaluation of the tourism-induced environmental Kuznets curve (T-EKC) hypothesis: Evidence from G7 Countries. Sustainability 12 (21):9150. doi:10.3390/su12219150.
  • Kao, C., and M. H. Chiang. 2000. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics 15:179–222.
  • Kathuria, S. 2018. A glass half full: The promise of regional trade in South Asia. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  • Kaushik, S. (2015). Picture Trade: How we can visualize intra-regional trade in South Asia and beyond. World Bank Blogs. Available at :Retrieved 30 June 2021. https://blogs.worldbank.org/trade/picture-how-we-can-visualize-intra-regional-trade-south-asia-and-beyond
  • Khan, A., Y. Chenggang, J. Hussain, and S. Bano. 2019. Does energy consumption, financial development, and investment contribute to ecological footprints in BRI regions? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (36):36952–66. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-06772-w.
  • Khan, A., Y. Chenggang, W. Xue Yi, J. Hussain, L. Sicen, and S. Bano. 2020. Examining the pollution haven, and environmental kuznets hypothesis for ecological footprints: An econometric analysis of China, India, and Pakistan. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 26 (3): 462–482. doi:10.1080/13547860.2020.1761739.
  • Khan, I., and F. Hou. 2020. The dynamic links among energy consumption, tourism growth, and the ecological footprint: The role of environmental quality in 38 IEA countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 : 5049–5062. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10861-6.
  • Khoshnevis Yazdi, S., and E. Ghorchi Beygi. 2018. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions: For selected African countries. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 13 (1):13–20. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1377319.
  • Kumar, N., M. Hammill, S. Raihan, and S. Panda (2016). Strategies for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in South Asia: Lessons from Policy Simulations ( No. 1601). United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) South and South-West Asia Office.
  • Lu, W. C. 2020. The interplay among ecological footprint, real income, energy consumption, and trade openness in 13 Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (36):45148–60. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10399-7.
  • Mehmood, U. 2021. Biomass energy consumption and its impacts on ecological footprints: Analyzing the role of globalization and natural resources in the framework of EKC in SAARC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16586-4.
  • Mehmood, U., and S. Tariq. 2020. Globalization and CO 2 emissions nexus: Evidence from the EKC hypothesis in South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (29):37044–56. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09774-1.
  • Mikayilov, J. I., S. Mukhtarov, J. Mammadov, and S. Aliyev. 2020. Environmental consequences of tourism: Do oil-exporting countries import more CO2 emissions? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 15 (3):172–85. doi:10.1080/15567249.2020.1753856.
  • Mrabet, Z., and M. Alsamara. 2017. Testing the Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Qatar: A comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70:1366–75. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.039.
  • Murshed, M. 2018. Does improvement in trade openness facilitate renewable energy transition? Evidence from selected South Asian economies. South Asia Economic Journal 19 (2):151–70. doi:10.1177/1391561418794691.
  • Murshed, M. 2020a. Are Trade Liberalization policies aligned with Renewable Energy Transition in low and middle income countries? An Instrumental Variable approach. Renewable Energy 151:1110–23. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.106.
  • Murshed, M. 2020b. LPG consumption and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in South Asia: A time-series ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1–36. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10701-7.
  • Murshed, M., R. Ahmed, C. Kumpamool, M. Bassim, and M. Elheddad. 2021a. The effects of regional trade integration and renewable energy transition on environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian neighbours. Business Strategy and the Environment 30 (8):4154–70. doi:10.1002/bse.2862.
  • Murshed, M., and N. T. T. Dao. 2020. Revisiting the CO 2 emission-induced EKC hypothesis in South Asia: The role of Export Quality Improvement. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10270-9.
  • Murshed, M., M. A. Rahman, M. S. Alam, P. Ahmad, and V. Dagar. 2021b. The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: Linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (36):49967–88. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z.
  • Murshed, M., and M. M. Tanha. 2021. Oil price shocks and renewable energy transition: Empirical evidence from net oil-importing South Asian economies. Energy, Ecology & Environment 6 (3): 111–132. doi:10.1007/s40974-020-00188-w.
  • Naradda Gamage, S. K., R. Hewa Kuruppuge, and I. U. Haq. 2017. Energy consumption, tourism development, and environmental degradation in Sri Lanka. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12 (10):910–16. doi:10.1080/15567249.2017.1324533.
  • Nathaniel, S. P. 2021. Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal 86: 2057–2070. doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10175-7.
  • Nathaniel, S., O. Anyanwu, and M. Shah. 2020. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27: 14601–14613. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7.
  • Nathaniel, S. P., and C. O. Iheonu. 2019. Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Science of the Total Environment 679:337–45. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011.
  • Nathaniel, S., and S. A. R. Khan. 2020. The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 272:122709. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709.
  • Ogino, K., M. Nakayama, and D. Sasaki. 2019. Domestic socioeconomic barriers to hydropower trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal. Sustainability 11 (7):2062. doi:10.3390/su11072062.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics No. 0435.
  • Pesaran, M. H. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22 (2):265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
  • Pesaran, M. H., and T. Yamagata. 2008. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics 142 (1):50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
  • Qayyum, U., S. Anjum, and S. Sabir. 2021. Armed Conflicts, Militarisation and Ecological Footprints: Empirical Evidence from South Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production 281 doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125299 125299 .
  • Sabir, S., and M. S. Gorus. 2019. The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (32):33387–98. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3.
  • Sabir, S., U. Qayyum, and T. Majeed. 2020. FDI and environmental degradation: The role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 32544–32553 doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09464-y.
  • Saboori, B., J. Sulaiman, and S. Mohd. 2016. Environmental Kuznets curve and energy consumption in Malaysia: A cointegration approach. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 11 (9):861–67. doi:10.1080/15567249.2012.662264.
  • Saqib, M., and F. Benhmad. 2021. Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 13634–13648 doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11517-1.
  • Selim, J. E., and M. F. Rivas. 2020. Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Uruguay using Ecological Footprint as a Measure of Environmental Degradation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 10 (4):473. doi:10.32479/ijeep.9361.
  • Shahbaz, M., S. J. H. Shahzad, M. K. Mahalik, and P. Sadorsky. 2018. How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis. Applied Economics 50 (13):1479–94. doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1366640.
  • Shahbaz, M., and A. Sinha. 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO 2 emissions: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies 46 (1):106–68. doi:10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249.
  • Sharif, A., O. Baris-Tuzemen, G. Uzuner, I. Ozturk, and A. Sinha. 2020. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 57:102138. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138.
  • Sharma, R., A. Sinha, and P. Kautish. 2021. Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production 285:124867. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867.
  • Shukla, A. K., K. Sudhakar, and P. Baredar. 2017. Renewable energy resources in South Asian countries: Challenges, policy and recommendations. Resource-Efficient Technologies 3 (3):342–46. doi:10.1016/j.reffit.2016.12.003.
  • Singh, A., T. Jamasb, R. Nepal, and M. Toman. 2018. Electricity cooperation in South Asia: Barriers to cross-border trade. Energy Policy 120:741–48. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.048.
  • Swamy, P. A. 1970. Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 38 (2):311–23. doi:10.2307/1913012.
  • Usman, M., R. Kousar, M. R. Yaseen, and M. S. A. Makhdum. 2020a. An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: A continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (31):38995–9018. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3.
  • Usman, M., M. S. A. Makhdum, and R. Kousar. 2020b. Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustainable Cities and Society 65 doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590 102590 .
  • Wang, H., C. Dong, and Y. Liu. 2019. Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: A pollution haven or pollution halo effect? Journal of Cleaner Production 239:118062. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118062.
  • Wang, Q., and L. Wang. 2021. The nonlinear effects of population aging, industrial structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions: A panel threshold regression analysis of 137 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 287:125381. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125381.
  • Wang, Q., X. Wang, and R. Li. 2022. Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries. Sustainable Cities and Society 76:103382. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103382.
  • Wang, Q., and F. Zhang. 2020. Does increasing investment in research and development promote economic growth decoupling from carbon emission growth? An empirical analysis of BRICS countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 252:119853. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119853.
  • Wang, Q., and F. Zhang. 2021. The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 279:123838. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123838.
  • Westerlund, J. 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 (6):709–48. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x.
  • Wijayatunga, P., and P. Fernando (2013). An overview of energy cooperation in South Asia. Available at :Retrieved 30 June 2021. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/30262/overview-energy-cooperation-south-asia.pdf
  • World Bank. 2020a. “COVID-19 and Informality” South Asia Economic Focus (October). License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1640-6.
  • World Bank (2020b). World Development Indicators.Accessed 30 June 2021. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
  • Xue, L., M. Haseeb, H. Mahmood, T. T. Y. Alkhateeb, and M. Murshed. 2021. Renewable energy use and ecological footprints mitigation: Evidence from selected South Asian economies. Sustainability 13 (4):1613. doi:10.3390/su13041613.
  • Yan, Y., R. Wang, X. Zheng, and Z. Zhao. 2020. Carbon endowment and trade-embodied carbon emissions in global value chains: Evidence from China. Applied Energy 277:115592. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115592.
  • Yavuz, N. Ç. 2014. CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: Evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 9 (3):229–35. doi:10.1080/15567249.2011.567222.
  • Yilanci, V., and U. K. Pata. 2020. Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: The role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (26):32683–94. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4.
  • Yıldırım, D. Ç., S. Yıldırım, S. Erdoğan, I. Demirtaş, G. Couto, and R. A. Castanho. 2021. Time-Varying Convergences of Environmental Footprint Levels between European Countries. Energies 14 (7):1813. doi:10.3390/en14071813.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.