An analysis on Turkey’s natural gas hub development through a game-theoretic model application

References

• Abada, I., S. Gabriel, V. Briat, and O. Massol. 2013. A generalized Nash–Cournot model for the northwestern European natural gas markets with a fuel substitution demand function: The GaMMES model. Network. Spatial Econ 13 (1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-012-9171-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazaraa, M. S., H. D. Sherali, and C. M. Shetty. 1993. Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Biresselioglu, M. E., M. D. Kaplan, and E. Ozyorulmaz. 2019. Towards a liberalized Turkish natural gas market: A SWOT analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 14 (2):25–33. doi:10.1080/15567249.2019.1587795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boots, M. G., F. A. M. Rijkers, and B. F. Hoobs. 2004. Trading in the downstream European gas market a successive oligopoly approach. The Energy Journal 25 (3):73–102. doi:10.5547/0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No3-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOTAŞ. 2019. Satış Fiyat Tarifesi. Accessed December 10, 2019. https://www.botas.gov.tr/Sayfa/satis-fiyat-tarifesi/439.
   Google Scholar
• BOTAŞ. 2020a. 2020 Almanak. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.botas.gov.tr/uploads/sayfaResim/745066-almanak-son-26-subat-1-baski.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BOTAŞ. 2020b. BOTAŞ EBT. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.ebt.botas.gov.tr.
   Google Scholar
• BP. 2019. BP statistical review of world energy. London: BP. 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Chyong, C., and B. Hobbs. 2014. Strategic Eurasian natural gas market model for energy security and policy analysis: Formulation and application to South Stream. Energy Economics 44:198–211. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. 2019. Long-Term Gas Contracting: Terms, definitions, pricing-Theory and practice. Athens: Institute of Energy for South-East Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckhoner, C., S. Lochner, and D. Lindenberger. 2013. European natural gas infrastructure: The impact of market developments on gas flows and physical market integration. Applied Energy 102:994–1003. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doviz724. 2020. Aylara Göre Amerikan Doları Kuru. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.doviz724.com/aylara-gore-ortalama-amerikan-dolari-kuru.html.
   Google Scholar
• Egging, R. G., and S. A. Gabriel. 2006. Examining market power in the European natural gas market. Energy Policy 34 (17):2762–78. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egging, R., S. Gabriel, F. Holz, and J. Zhuang. 2008. A complementarity model for the European natural gas market. Energy Policy 36(7):2385–414. enpol.2008.01.044. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egging, R., F. Holz, and S. Gabriel. 2010. The world gas model: A multi-period mixed complementarity model for the global natural gas market. Energy 35 (10):4016–29. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMRA. 2019. 2018 natural gas development report; EPDK, Ankara, 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• EMRA. 2020. EMRA Sectoral Reports. Accessed May 15, 2020. http://www.epdk.org.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-166/resmi-istatistikleri.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, S., and Y. Smeers. 2006. Complementarity problems in restructured natural gas markets. Recent Advances in Optimization 563:343–73.
   Google Scholar
• Golombek, R., E. Gjelsvik, and K. Rosendahl. 1995. Effects of liberalizing the natural gas markets in Western Europe. The Energy Journal 16 (1):85–111. doi:10.5547/0195-6574-EJ-Vol16-No1-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandi, L. 2014. European gas markets: From oil indexation prices to spot prices? Energy Brains. https://www.europeangashub.com/wp-content/uploads/attach_429.pdf Accessed 12 03 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanov, M. 2016. An analysis of economic benefits of the southern gas corridor. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy 11 (11):999–1005. doi:10.1080/15567249.2014.932864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanov, M. 2017. Analyzing the effects of import liberalization in the Turkish natural gas market. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy 12 (3):237–42. doi:10.1080/15567249.2015.1072598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heater, P. 2015. The evolution of European traded gas hubs. OIES PAPER: NG-104. OIES.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, F., P. Richter, and R. Egging . 2013 The role of natural gas in a low-carbon Europe: Infrastructure and Regional Supply Security in the Global Gas model. Berlin: DIW. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2239652.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, F., C. Von Hirschhausen, and C. Kemfert. 2008. A strategic model of European gas supply (GASMOD). Energy Economics 30 (3):766–88. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICE. 2020. Future Prices. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.ice.if5.com/ViewData/EndOfDay/FuturesReport.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Khazeni, S., A. Sheikhi, M. Rayati, S. Soleymani, and A. M. Ranjbar. 2019. Retail market equilibrium in multicarrier energy systems: A game theoretical approach. IEEE Systems Journal 13 (1):738–47. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2018.2812807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, A., A. Selei, and B. T. Toth. 2016. A top-down approach to evaluating cross-border natural gas infrastructure projects in Europe. Energy Journal 37 (1). doi:10.5547/01956574.37.SI3.akis.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmar, M. 2017. Principle of microeconomics: An intagrative approach. Sn. Gallen: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, R., and P. Sykes 2019. Going Global: The TTF as an LNG Benchmark. Accessed January 24, 2021. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/cjp-rbi-icis/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/09/13114453/ICIS_market_insight_going_global_the_ttf_as_a_global_benchmark.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lochner, S. 2011. Identification of congestion and valuation of transport infrastructures in the European natural gas market. Energy 36(5):2483–92. energy.2011.01.040. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochner, S., and D. Bothe 2007. From Russia with gas: An analysis of the Nord Stream pipeline’s impact on the European Gas Transmission System with the TIGER-Model. EWI Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, L., K. Roland, and K. Thosnstad. 1987. The European natural gas market: Degrees of market power on the selling side. In Natural Gas Markets and Contracts, ed. R. Golombek, M. Hoel, and J. Vislie. Amsterdam: North-Holland 27–58 .
   Google Scholar
• Melling, J. 2010. Natural Gas Pricing and Its Future: Europe as the Battleground. Massachusetts: Carnegie Endowment.
   Google Scholar
• Miriello, C., and M. Polo. 2015. The development of gas hubs in Europe. Energy Policy 84:177–90. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, F., A. Pierru, and Y. Smeers. 2016. Tutorial on building policy models as mixed-complementarity problems. Informs Journal on Applied Analytics 46 (6):465–81. doi:10.1287/inte.2016.0842.
   Google Scholar
• Nikas, A., A. Gambhir, E. Trutnevyte, K. Koasidis, H. Lund, J. Z. Thellufsen, I. Sognnaes, G. Zachmann, L. J. Miguel, and N. Ferreras-Alonso. 2020. Perspective of comprehensive and comprehensible multi-model energy and climate science in Europe. Energy 215 (A):119153. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119153.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, V. 2017. Doğal Gaz Piyasaları: Türkiye Enerji Güvenliği Üzerine Tezler. Ankara: Kaynak Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, J., and A. Seeliger. 2004. Prospects of gas supplies to the European market until 2030-results from the simulation model EUGAS. Utilities Policy 12 (4):291–302. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2004.04.014.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, H. 2008. Game Theory: A Multi-Leveled Approach. Maastrichts: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PETFORM. 2020. Türkiye Doğal Gaz Piyasası. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.petform.org.tr/dogal-gaz-piyasasi/turkiye-dogal-gaz-piyasasi/.
   Google Scholar
• Polo, M., and C. Scarpa. 2013. Liberalizing the gas industry: Take-or-pay contracts, retail competition and wholesale trade. International Journal of Industrial Organization 31 (1):64–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, P., and F. Holz. 2015. All quiet on the eastern front? Disruption scenarios of Russian natural gas supply to Europe. Energy Policy 80(7):177–89. enpol.2015.01.024. doi:.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, T. F. 1995. Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19 (8):1299–324. doi:10.1016/0165-1889(94)00831-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzayeva, G. 2018. Gas supply changes in Turkey. Accessed 13 03 2022. (OIES). https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/gas-supply-changes-turkey/
   Google Scholar
• Sheikhi, A., S. Khazeni, M. Rayati, and A. Ashourizadeh. 2020. Bi‐level equilibrium of energy retailer–smart energy hub game in integrated energy market. IET Smart Grid 4 (3):284–96. doi:10.1049/stg2.12028.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J., and K. Yafimava 2017. The EU competition investigation of Gazprom’s sales in central and Eastern Europe: A detailed analysis of the commitments and the way forward. OIES Paper: NG-121. OIES.
   Google Scholar
• Theisen, N. 2014. Natural Gas Pricing in the EU: From oil-indexation to hybrid pricing system. Budapest: Research Fellow, Regional Center for Energy Policy Research (REKK).
   Google Scholar
• Toth, B. T., P. Kotek, and A. Selei. 2020. Rerouting Europe’s gas transit landscape – Effects of Russian natural gas infrastructure strategy on V4. Energy Policy 146:111748. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle, A., P. Duenas, S. Wogrin, and J. Reneses. 2017. A fundamental analysis on the implementation and development of virtual gas hubs. Energy Economics 67:520–32. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xunpeng, S., and H. M. P. Variam. 2018. Key elements for functioning gas hubs: A case study of East Asia. Natural Gas Industry B 5 (2):167–76. doi:10.1016/j.ngib.2018.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, G., and M. Mulder. 2006. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. (Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis).
   Google Scholar