106
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Financial development and environmental quality nexus: Testing the double materiality hypothesis

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abbas, S., P. Gui, A. Chen, and N. Ali. 2022. The effect of renewable energy development, market regulation, and environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (39):59483–18. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20013-7.
  • Abid, A., U. Mehmood, S. Tariq, and Z. U. Haq. 2022. The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: Evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (8):11654–11662. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x.
  • Ahmad, S., D. Khan, and R. Magda. 2022. Assessing the influence of financial inclusion on environmental degradation in the ASEAN region through the panel PMG-ARDL approach. Sustainability 14 (12):7058. doi:10.3390/su14127058.
  • Ali, N., K. Phoungthong, K. Techato, W. Ali, S. Abbas, J. A. Dhanraj, and A. Khan. 2022. FDI, green innovation and environmental quality nexus: New insights from BRICS economies. Sustainability 14 (4):2181. doi:10.3390/su14042181.
  • Al-Silefanee, R. R., J. Mamkhezri, M. Khezri, M. S. Karimi, and Y. A. Khan. 2022. Effect of Islamic financial development on carbon emissions: A spatial econometric analysis. Frontiers in Public Health 10:865903. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.850273.
  • Amin, A., W. Ameer, H. Yousaf, and M. Akbar. 2022. Financial development, institutional quality, and the influence of various environmental factors on carbon dioxide emissions: Exploring the nexus in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9:838714. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.838714.
  • Baloch, M. A., J. Zhang, K. Iqbal, and Z. Iqbal. 2019. The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: Evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (6):6199–6208. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9.
  • Bersvendsen, T., and J. Ditzen. 2021. Testing for slope heterogeneity in Stata. The Stata Journal 21 (1):51–80. doi:10.1177/1536867X211000004.
  • Bui, D. T. 2020. Transmission channels between financial development and CO2 emissions: A global perspective. Heliyon 6 (11):e05509. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05509.
  • Cheikh, N. B., and H. M. Cheikh. 2013. A panel cointegration analysis of the exchange rate pass-through. Economics Bulletin 33 (4):2778–90.
  • Chiu, Y. B., and W. Zhang. 2023. Moderating effect of financial development on the relationship between renewable energy and carbon emissions. Energies 16 (3):1467. doi:10.3390/en16031467.
  • Chudik, A., and M. H. Pesaran. 2015. Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics 188 (2):393–420. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007.
  • Danish, W. B., and Z. Wang. 2018. Imported technology and CO2 emission in China: Collecting evidence through bound testing and VECM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 82:4204–14. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.002.
  • De Haas, R., and A. Popov (2019). Finance and carbon emissions, Working Paper Series 2318, European Central Bank.
  • Demekas, D. G., and P. Grippa. 2021. Financial regulation, climate change, and the transition to a low-carbon economy: A survey of the issues. 2021 (296): 1. Working Paper No. 2021/296. 10.5089/9781616356521.001.
  • Duan, K., M. Cao, N. A. Kader Malim, and Y. Song. 2023. Nonlinear relationship between financial development and CO2 emissions—based on a PSTR model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 (1):661. doi:10.3390/ijerph20010661.
  • Eberhardt, M. 2012. Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. The Stata Journal 12 (1):61–71. doi:10.1177/1536867X1201200105.
  • Eberhardt, M., and F. Teal. 2011. Econometrics for grumblers: A new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys 25 (1):109–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00624.x.
  • Energy Institute (June 26, 2023). Distribution of coal production worldwide in 2022, by major countries [graph]. In Statista. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/265638/distribution-of-coal-production-worldwide/
  • European Commission (2019a). Guidelines on reporting climate-related information. https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/190618-climate-related-information-reporting-guidelines_en.
  • European Commission. 2019b. Communication from the commission – guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information. Official Journal of the European Union. 2019/C 209/01. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019XC0620(01)&from=EN
  • Faiella, I., and A. Mistretta. 2015. Spesa energetica e competitività delle imprese italiane. Economia Pubblica 3:85–121. doi:10.3280/EP2015-003004.
  • Farbotko, C. 2019. Global financial stability, rapid transition to a low-carbon economy and social justice: can climate-related financial risk disclosure do it all? Australian Geographer 50 (3):273–78. doi:10.1080/00049182.2018.1519874.
  • Geyikci, U. B., S. Çınar, and F. M. Sancak. 2022. Analysis of the relationships among financial development, economic growth, energy use, and carbon emissions by Co-integration with multiple structural breaks. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14 (10):6298. doi:10.3390/su14106298.
  • Habiba, U., and C. Xinbang. 2022. The impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: New evidence from developed and emerging countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (21):31453–66. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18533-3.
  • Hu, X., N. Ali, M. Malik, J. Hussain, J. Fengyi, and M. Nilofar. 2021. Impact of economic openness and innovations on the environment: A new look into ASEAN countries. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 30 (4):3601–3613. doi:10.15244/pjoes/130898.
  • Hussain, J., K. Zhou, F. Muhammad, D. Khan, A. Khan, N. Ali, and R. Akhtar. 2021. Renewable energy investment and governance in countries along the belt & road initiative: Does trade openness matter? Renewable Energy 180:1278–1289. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.020.
  • International - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2022). https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/petroleum-and-other-liquids/annual-petroleum-and-other-liquids-production.
  • Jahanger, A., D. Balsalobre-Lorente, A. Samour, F. Joof, M. Ali, and T. Tursoy. 2022. Do renewable energy and the real estate market promote environmental quality in South Africa: Evidence from the bootstrap ARDL approach. Sustainability 14 (24):16466. doi:10.3390/su142416466.
  • Jahanger, A., M. R. Hossain, M. Usman, and J. C. Onwe. 2023. Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist? Resources Policy 81:103382. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103382.
  • Joof, F., and A. Z. Isiksal. 2021. Do human capital and export diversification decline or increase CO2 emissions? Empirical evidence from the MINT countries. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 9 (2):111–25. doi:10.5890/JEAM.2021.06.002.
  • Joof, F., A. Samour, T. Tursoy, and M. Ali. 2022. Climate change, insurance market, renewable energy, and biodiversity: Double-materiality concept from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30 (11):28676–28689. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-24068-4.
  • Kedward, K., J. Ryan-Collins, and H. Chenet. 2023. Biodiversity loss and climate change interactions: Financial stability implications for central banks and financial supervisors. Climate Policy 23 (6):763–781. doi:10.1080/14693062.2022.2107475.
  • Khan, A., Y. Chenggang, J. Hussain, and Z. Kui. 2021. Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & road initiative countries. Renewable Energy 171:479–491. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.075.
  • Kihombo, S., Z. Ahmed, S. Chen, T. S. Adebayo, and D. Kirikkaleli. 2021. Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: What is the role of technological innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (43):61235–61245. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1.
  • Latif, Y., G. Shunqi, Z. Fareed, S. Ali, and M. A. Bashir. 2023. Do financial development and energy efficiency ensure green environment? Evidence from RCEP economies. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 36 (1):51–72. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2022.2066555.
  • Mark, N. C., and D. Sul. 2003. Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long-run money demand. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 (5):655–80. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2003.00066.x.
  • Mesagan, E. P., and C. N. Olunkwa. 2022. Heterogeneous analysis of energy consumption, financial development, and pollution in Africa: The relevance of regulatory quality. Utilities Policy 74:101328. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2021.101328.
  • Metz, B., O. Davidson, H. C. De Coninck, M. Loos, and L. Meyer. (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nathaniel, S. P. 2021. Ecological footprint and human well-being nexus: Accounting for broad-based financial development, globalization, and natural resources in the next-11 countries. Future Business Journal 7 (1):1–18. doi:10.1186/s43093-021-00071-y.
  • NGFS. 2021a. Adapting central bank operations to a hotter world. Reviewing Some Options – Technical Document.
  • NGFS (2021b). Occasional paper on biodiversity and financial stability: Exploring the case for action.
  • NGFS-INSPIRE (2022). Central banking and supervision in the biosphere: An agenda for action on biodiversity loss, financial risk and system stability. NGFS Occasional Paper.
  • Ngoc, B. H., and A. Awan. 2022. Does financial development reinforce ecological footprint in Singapore? Evidence from ARDL and bayesian analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (16):24219–33. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17565-5.
  • Oman, W., and R. Svartzman. 2021. What justifies sustainable finance measures? financial-economic interactions and possible implications for policymakers. CESifo Forum 22 (3):3–11.
  • Pedroni, P. 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (s1):653–70. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14.
  • Pedroni, P. 2001. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels”. In Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, Baltagi B. H., Fomby T. B., and Carter Hill R. (Eds.). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 93–130. doi:10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2.
  • Pesaran, M. H. 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 435. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.572504.
  • Pesaran, M. H. 2006. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74 (4):967–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x.
  • Pesaran, M. H. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Economics 22 (2):265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
  • Pesaran, M. H., and R. Smith. 1995. Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1):79–113. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F.
  • Pesaran, M. H., and T. Yamagata. 2008. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics 142 (1):50–93. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
  • Radulescu, M., D. Balsalobre-Lorente, F. Joof, A. Samour, and T. Türsoy. 2022. Exploring the impacts of banking development, and renewable energy on ecological footprint in OECD: New evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Energies 15 (24):9290. doi:10.3390/en15249290.
  • Ramzan, M., S. A. Raza, M. Usman, G. D. Sharma, and H. A. Iqbal. 2022. Environmental cost of non-renewable energy and economic progress: Do ICT and financial development mitigate some burden? Journal of Cleaner Production 333:130066. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130066.
  • Rauf, A., N. Ali, M. N. Sadiq, S. Abid, S. A. Kayani, and A. Hussain. 2023. Foreign direct investment, technological innovations, energy use, economic growth, and environmental sustainability nexus: New perspectives in BRICS economies. Sustainability 15 (18):14013. doi:10.3390/su151814013.
  • Renzhi, N., and Y. J. Baek. 2020. Can financial inclusion be an effective mitigation measure? evidence from panel data analysis of the environmental kuznets curve. Finance Research Letters 37:101725. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101725.
  • Sahay, R., M. Cihák, P. N’Diaye, A. Barajas, R. Bi, D. Ayala, Y. Gao, A. Kyobe, L. Nguyen, C. Saborowski, et al. 2015. Rethinking financial deepening: Stability and growth in emerging markets. In IMF staff discussion note, Vol. 15, 08 5, Washington: International Monetary Fund (May).
  • Samour, A., F. Joof, M. Ali, and T. Tursoy. 2023. Do financial development and renewable energy shocks matter for environmental quality: Evidence from top 10 emitting emissions countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30 (32):1–12. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-27946-7.
  • Samour, A., D. Moyo, and T. Tursoy. 2022. Renewable energy, banking sector development, and carbon dioxide emissions nexus: A path toward sustainable development in South Africa. Renewable Energy 193:1032–1040. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.013.
  • Saqib, N., I. Ozturk, and M. Usman. 2023. Investigating the implications of technological innovations, financial inclusion, and renewable energy in diminishing ecological footprints levels in emerging economies. Geoscience Frontiers 14 (6):101667. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101667.
  • Sarkar, S. 2012. Impact of global warming on biodiversity. The Science Probe 1 (2):22–33.
  • Shahbaz, M., F. A. Jam, S. Bibi, and N. Loganathan. 2016. Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy intensity and economic growth in Portugal: Evidence from cointegration and causality analysis. Technology and Economic Development of Economy 22 (1):47–74. doi:10.3846/20294913.2014.989932.
  • Shin, Y., B. Yu, and M. Greenwood-Nimmo. 2014. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt, 281–314. New York: Springer.
  • Shoaib, H. M., M. Z. Rafique, A. M. Nadeem, and S. Huang. 2020. Impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis of developing countries (D8) and developed countries (G8). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (11):12461–75. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z.
  • Sohag, K., K. Chukavina, and N. Samargandi. 2021. Renewable energy and total factor productivity in OECD member countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 296:126499. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126499.
  • Statista (December 5, 2023). Distribution of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2022, by select country [graph]. In Statista. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/271748/the-largest-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world/.
  • Sun, Y., M. Usman, M. Radulescu, U. K. Pata, and D. Balsalobre-Lorente. 2023. New insights from the STIPART model on how environmental-related technologies, natural resources and the use of the renewable energy influence load capacity factor. Gondwana Research.
  • Täger. (2021, April 21). ‘Double materiality’: what is it and why does it matter? - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/double-materiality-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter/.
  • TCFD - Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/recommendations/.
  • TCFD - Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (2020). Task force on climate-related financial disclosures guidance on risk management integration and disclosure. P.35–40. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/.
  • Tinoco-Zermeño, M. Á. 2023. Energy consumption, financial development, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in 23 developing economies. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas 18 (1):1–24. doi:10.21919/remef.v18i1.775.
  • TNFD - Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (2022). The TNFD nature-related risk and opportunity management and disclosure framework, beta v0.1 release. https://framework.tnfd.global/.
  • Tol, R. S. J. 2009. The economic effects of climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (2):29–51. doi:10.1257/jep.23.2.29.
  • UNEP (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication - a synthesis for policy makers, https://www.unep.org/greeneconomy.
  • Usman, M., D. Balsalobre-Lorente, A. Jahanger, and P. Ahmad. 2023. Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions. Gondwana Research 113:53–70. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2022.10.018.
  • Usman, M., K. Khalid, and M. A. Mehdi. 2021. What determines environmental deficit in Asia? Embossing the role of renewable and non-renewable energy utilization. Renewable Energy 168:1165–1176. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.012.
  • Usman, M., and M. Radulescu. 2022. Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: Does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Science of the Total Environment 841:156662. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156662.
  • Wang, J., M. Usman, N. Saqib, M. Shahbaz, and M. R. Hossain. 2023. Asymmetric environmental performance under economic complexity, globalization and energy consumption: Evidence from the world’s largest economically complex economy. Energy 279:128050. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128050.
  • WDI (2018). World bank development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
  • Wen, J., W. Ali, J. Hussain, N. A. Khan, H. Hussain, N. Ali, and R. Akhtar. 2021. Dynamics between green innovation and environmental quality: New insights into South Asian economies. Economia Politica 39 (2):1–23. doi:10.1007/s40888-021-00248-2.
  • Westerlund, J. 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 (6):709–748. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x.
  • Xu, D., S. Abbas, K. Rafique, and N. Ali. 2023. The race to net-zero emissions: Can green technological innovation and environmental regulation be the potential pathway to net-zero emissions? Technology in Society 75:102364. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102364.
  • Zhao, J., M. Shahbaz, X. Dong, and K. Dong. 2021. How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation. Technology, Forecasting and Social Chang 168:120751. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120751.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.