176
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Technological progress in achieving environmental sustainability in Central and Southern Africa: The role of fossil fuels and institutional quality

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmad, M., S. I. Khattak, S. Khan, and Z. U. Rahman. 2020. Do aggregate domestic consumption spending & technological innovation affect industrialization in South Africa? An application of linear & non-linear ARDL models. Journal of Applied Economics 23 (1):44–23. doi:10.1080/15140326.2019.1683368.
  • Aluko, O. A., and A. A. Obalade. 2020. Financial development and environmental quality in sub-saharan Africa: Is there a technology effect? Science of the Total Environment 747:141515. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141515.
  • Amari, M., K. Mouahkar, and A. Jarboui. 2022. ICT development, governance quality and the environmental performance: Avoidable thresholds from the lower and lower-middleincome countries. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 33 (2):125–40. doi:10.1108/MEQ-12-2020-0299.
  • Asongu, S. A., M. O. Agboola, A. A. Alola, and F. V. Bekun. 2020. The criticality of growth, urbanization, electricity and fossil fuel consumption to environment sustainability in Africa. Science of the Total Environment 712:136376. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136376.
  • Asongu, S. A., O. O. Messono, and K. T. Guttemberg. 2022. Women political empowerment and vulnerability to climate change: Evidence from 169 countries. Climatic Change 174 (3–4):30.
  • Asongu, S. A., S. L. Roux, and N. Biekpe. 2018. Enhancing ICT for environmental sustainability in sub-saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127:209–16. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.022.
  • Azam, M., A. I. Hunjra, E. Bouri, Y. Tan, and A. M. S. Al-Faryan. 2021. Impact of institutional quality on sustainable development: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management 298:113465. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113465.
  • Bhattacharya, M., C. S. Awaworyi, and S. R. Paramati. 2017. The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renewable Energy 111:157–67. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.102.
  • Canay, I. A.2011. A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal 14 (3):368–86.
  • Chien, F., A. Anwar, C. Hsu, A. Sharif, A. Razzaq, and A. Sinha. 2021. The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technology in Society 65:101587. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101587.
  • Danish Ulucak, R. 2021. Renewable energy, technological innovation and the environment: A novel dynamic auto-regressive distributive lag simulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 150:111433. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111433.
  • Das, G. G., and I. Drine. 2020. Distance from the technology frontier: How could Africa catch-up via socio-institutional factors and human capital? Technological Forecasting & Social Change 150:119755. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119755.
  • Dietz, T. and E. A. Rosa. 1994. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review 1 (2):277–300.
  • Driscoll, J. C., and A. C. Kraay. 1998. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4):549–60. doi:10.1162/003465398557825.
  • Erdogan, S. 2021. Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and buildings Sector’s carbon emission in BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management 293:112780. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780.
  • Friedrichs, J., and O. R. Inderwildi. 2013. The carbon curse: Are fuel rich countries doomed to high CO2 intensities?. Energy Policy 62:1356–65.
  • Galvao Jr, A. F. 2011. Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics 164 (1):142–57.
  • Ganda, F. 2019. The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 217:469–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235.
  • Gao, Y., M. Murshed, I. Ozturk, N. Saqib, A. B. Siddik, and M. M. Alam. 2023. Can financing technological development programs mitigate mineral resource consumption-related environmental problems faced by Sub-Saharan African nations? Resources Policy 87 (Part A):104343. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104343.
  • Gyamfi, B. A., A. B. Ampomah, F. V. Bekun, and S. A. Asongu. 2022. Can information and communication technology and institutional quality help mitigate climate change in E7 economies? An environmental Kuznets curve extension. Journal of Economic Structures 11 (14). doi:10.1186/s40008-022-00273-9.
  • Haldar, A., and N. Sethi. 2021. Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions−an empirical investigation for developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (12):15485–503. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11532-2.
  • Hussain, M., and E. Dogan. 2021. The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. Journal of Cleaner Production 304:127059. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059.
  • Juodis, A., Y. Karavias, and V. Sarafidis. 2021. A homogeneous approach to testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Empirical Economics 60 (1):93–112. doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01970-9.
  • Karim, S., M. Appiah, M. A. Naeem, B. M. Lucey, and M. Li. 2022. Modelling the role of institutional quality on carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan African countries. Renewable Energy 198:213–21. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.074.
  • Khan, A., F. Muhammed, Y. Chenggang, J. Hussain, S. Bano, and M. A. Khan. 2020. The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: A new look into BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment 727:138265. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138265.
  • Khan, A., A. K. Sampene, and S. Ali. 2023. Towards environmental degradation mitigation: The role of regulatory quality, technological innovation and government effectiveness in the CEMAC countries. Heliyon 9 (6):e17029. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17029.
  • Khattak, S. I., A. M. Khan, M. K. Khan, C. Li, J. Liu, and Z. Pi. 2022. Do regional government green innovation preferences promote industrial structure upgradation in China? Econometric assessment based on the environmental regulation threshold effect model. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10:995990. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.995990.
  • Lasisi, T. T., A. A. Alola, O. B. Muoneke, and K. K. Eluwole. 2022. The moderating role of environmental-related innovation and technologies in growth-energy utilization nexus in highest-performing eco-innovation economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 183:121953. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121953.
  • Liguo, X., M. Ahmad, S. Khan, Z. U. Haq, and S. I. Khattak. 2023. Evaluating the role of innovation in hybrid electric vehicle-related technologies to promote environmental sustainability in knowledge-based economies. Technology in Society 74:102283. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102283.
  • Liu, S., K. I. Okere, and O. B. Muoneke. 2023. Energizing Small and Medium‐sized Enterprises for environmental sustainability in poor Europe: Do green finance and bureaucratic quality matter? Natural Resources Forum. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12375.
  • Machado, J. A., and J. S. Silva. 2019. Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics 213 (1):145–73.
  • Muoneke, O. B., K. I. Okere, and C. N. Nwaeze. 2022. Agriculture, globalization, and ecological footprint: The role of agriculture beyond the tipping point in the Philippines. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (36):54652–76. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19720-y.
  • Naeem, M. A., M. Appiah, S. Karim, and L. Yarovaya. 2023. What abates environmental efficiency in African economies? Exploring the influence of infrastructure, industrialization, and innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 186:122272. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122172.
  • Nguyen, T. T., T. A. T. Pham, and H. T. X. Tram. 2020. Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management 261:110162. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110162.
  • Nwani, C., O. Usman, K. I. Okere, and F. V. Bekun. 2023. Technological pathways to decarbonisation and the role of renewable energy: A study of European countries using consumption-based metrics. Resources Policy 83:103738. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103738.
  • Okere, K. I., F. C. Onuoha, O. B. Muoneke, and N. C. Nwaeze. 2022. Sustainability challenges in Peru: Embossing the role of economic integration and financial development—application of novel dynamic ARDL simulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (24):36865–86. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17756-0.
  • Okere, K. I., F. C. Onuoha, O. B. Muoneke, and A. M. Oyeyemi. 2021. Towards sustainability path in Argentina: The role of finance, energy mix, and industrial value-added in low or high carbon emission—application of DARDL simulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (39):55053–71. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14756-y.
  • Omri, A. 2020. Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 83:106398. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106398.
  • Onifade, S. T. 2023. Environmental impacts of energy indicators on ecological footprints of oil-exporting African countries: Perspectives on fossil resources abundance amidst sustainable development quests. Resources Policy 82:103481. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103481.
  • Pesaran, M. H. 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  • Pesaran, M. H. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22 (2):265–312. doi:10.1002/jae.951.
  • Pesaran, M. H.2015. Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews 34 (6–10):1089–117.
  • Pesaran, M. H.2021. General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics 60 (1):13–50.
  • Pesaran, M. H., and T. Yamagata. 2008. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics 142 (1):50–93.
  • Riti, J. S., Y. Shu, and M. Kamah. 2021. Institutional quality and environmental sustainability: The role of freedom of press in most freedom of press countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 91:106656. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106656.
  • Rosa, E. A., and T. Dietz. 2012. Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Climate Change 2 (8):581–86. doi:10.1038/nclimate1506.
  • Saba, C. S., C. R. T. Djemo, J. H. Eita, and N. Ngepah. 2023. Towards environmental sustainability path in Africa: The critical role of ICT, renewable energy sources, agriculturalization, industrialization and institutional quality. Energy Reports 10:4025–50. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.039.
  • Sah, M. R. 2021. Effects of institutional quality on environmental protection in CEMAC Countries. Modern Economy 12 (5):903–18. doi:10.4236/me.2021.125045.
  • Sakariyahu, R., R. Lawal, O. F. Etudaiye-Muhtar, and F. M. Ajide. 2023. Reflections on COP 27: How do technological innovations and economic freedom affect environmental quality in Africa. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 195:122782. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122782.
  • Santana, N. B., D. A. N. Rebelatto, A. E. Perico, H. F. Moralles, and W. L. Filho. 2015. Technological innovation for sustainable development: An analysis of different types of impacts for countries in the BRICS and G7 groups. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. doi:10.1080/13504509.2015.1069766.
  • Shobande, O. A., and L. Ogbeifun. 2022. Has information and communication technology improved environmental quality in the OECD? —a dynamic panel analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 29 (1):39–49. doi:10.1080/13504509.2021.1909172.
  • Shouwu, J., T. Xu, K. Shehzad, B. U. Zaman, and L. Wuyue. 2024. The role of environmental technologies and clean energy transition in shaping the N-shaped environmental kuznets curve: A North African perspective. Environmental Technology & Innovation 33:103463. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2023.103463.
  • Solaymani, S., and O. Montes. 2023. The role of financial development and good governance in economic growth and environmental sustainability. Energy Nexus 13:100268. doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100268.
  • Su, Y., Q. Jiang, S. I. Khattak, M. Ahmad, and H. Li. 2021. Do higher education research and development expenditures affect environmental sustainability? New evidence from Chinese provinces. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (47):66656–76. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14685-w.
  • Udeagha, M. C., and C. Ngepah. 2023. Striving towards environmental sustainability in the BRICS economies: The combined influence of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 30 (2):111–25. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2123411.
  • Usman, M., and M. Radulescu. 2022. Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: Does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Science of the Total Environment 841:156662. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156662.
  • Villanthenkodath, M. A., M. A. Ansari, P. Kumar, and Y. N. Raju. 2022. Effect of information and communication technology on the environmental sustainability: An empirical assessment for South Africa. Telematics and Informatics Reports 7:100013. doi:10.1016/j.teler.2022.100013.
  • Wang, M. L., V. S. Ntim, J. Yang, Q. Zheng, and L. Geng. 2021. Effect of institutional quality and foreign direct investment on economic growth and environmental quality: Evidence from African countries. Economic Research 35 (1):4065–91. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2021.2010112.
  • Xiao, J., Y. Karavias, A. Juodis, V. Sarafidis, and J. Ditzen. 2023. Improved tests for Granger noncausality in panel data. The Stata Journal 23 (1):230–42. doi:10.1177/1536867X231162034.
  • Zhou, Q., J. Wu, M. Imran, A. A. Nassani, R. H. Binsaeed, and K. Zaman. 2023. Examining the trade-offs in clean energy provision: Focusing on the relationship between technology transfer, renewable energy, industrial growth, and carbon footprint reduction. Heliyon 9 (10):e20271. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20271.