Unlocking green potentials for carbon neutrality in OECD countries

References

• Abrantes, I., A. F. Ferreira, A. Silva, and M. Costa. 2021. Sustainable aviation fuels and imminent technologies-CO2 emissions evolution towards 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production 313:127937. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, S., and A. O. Acheampong. 2019. Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy. Journal of Cleaner Production 240:118245. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo, T. S., H. Rjoub, G. D. Akinsola, and S. D. Oladipupo. 2021. The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: New evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (2):1–22. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15706-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adom, P. K., P. A. Kwakwa, and A. Amankwaa. 2018. The long-run effects of economic, demographic, and political indices on actual and potential CO2 emissions. Journal of Environmental Management 218:516–26. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alataş, S. 2021. Do environmental technologies help to reduce transport sector CO2 emissions? Evidence from the EU15 countries. Research in Transportation Economics 91:101047. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albulescu, C. T., M. E. Boatca-Barabas, and A. Diaconescu. 2022. The asymmetric effect of environmental policy stringency on CO2 emissions in OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (18):27311–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aller, C., L. Ductor, and D. Grechyna. 2021. Robust determinants of CO2 emissions. Energy Economics 96:105154. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, S., and R. Breunig. 2018. The role of spillovers in research and development expenditure in Australian industries. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 27 (1):14–38. doi:10.1080/10438599.2017.1290898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgili, F., S. P. Nathaniel, S. Kuşkaya, and Y. Kassouri. 2021. Environmental pollution and energy research and development: An Environmental Kuznets Curve model through a quantile simulation approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (38):1–16. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14506-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakamera, C., and P. Alagidede. 2018. Electricity crisis and the effect of CO2 emissions on infrastructure-growth nexus in Sub Saharan Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 94:945–58. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., X. Ren, K. Dong, X. Dong, and Z. Wang. 2021. How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management 280:111818. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and C. C. Lee. 2020. Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? cross-country evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production 263:121550. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clulow, Z., M. Ferguson, P. Ashworth, and D. Reiner. 2021. Comparing public attitudes towards energy technologies in Australia and the UK: The role of political ideology. Global Environmental Change 70:102327. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (366a):427–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., K. A. Frank, C. T. Whitley, J. Kelly, and R. Kelly. 2015. Political influences on greenhouse gas emissions from US states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (27):8254–59. doi:10.1073/pnas.1417806112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin, G., M. G. Pollitt, and D. M. Newbery. 2020. The political economy of carbon pricing: A panel analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 72 (2):472–500. doi:10.1093/oep/gpz042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzator, J., A. O. Acheampong, and M. Dzator. 2021. The impact of transport infrastructure development on carbon emissions in OECD countries. In Environmental Sustainability and Economy, ed. P. Singh, P. Verma, D. Perrotti, and K. K. Srivastava, 3–17. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-822188-4.00006-3.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, S. 2021. Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and buildings Sector’s carbon emission in BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management 293:112780. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmann, S. 2014. Do government ideology and fragmentation matter for reducing CO2-emissions? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Ecological Economics 105:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholipour, H. F., A. Arjomandi, and S. Yam. 2022. Green property finance and CO2 emissions in the building industry. Global Finance Journal 51:100696. doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokkir, B., and J. S. Barkin. 2019. Are liberal states greener? Political ideology and CO2 emissions in American states, 1980–2012. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 9 (4):386–96. doi:10.1007/s13412-019-00563-y.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, W. B. 2015. Environmental regulations and business decisions. Bonn, Germany: IZA World of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar, H., and S. C. Jagers. 2006. Can trust in politicians explain individuals’ support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Climate Policy 5 (6):613–25. doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hille, E., and B. Lambernd. 2020. The role of innovation in reducing South Korea’s energy intensity: Regional-data evidence on various energy carriers. Journal of Environmental Management 262:110293. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., H. Riaz, M. Ahmed, and A. Saeed. 2021. Does green finance really deliver what is expected? An empirical perspective. Borsa Istanbul Review 22 (3):586–93. doi:10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakwa, P. A. 2023b. Sectoral growth and carbon dioxide emission in Africa: Can renewable energy mitigate the effect? Research in Globalization 6:100130. doi:10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100130.
   Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., G. Pignataro, and A. Tampieri. 2020. Competition among coalitions in a cournot industry: A validation of the porter hypothesis. The Japanese Economic Review 73 (4):1–35. doi:10.1007/s42973-020-00063-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, W. F., and J. C. Minx. 2020. The political economy of national climate policy: Architectures of constraint and a typology of countries. Energy Research & Social Science 64:101429. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestari, E. R., W. A. P. Dania, C. Indriani, and I. A. Firdausyi. 2021. The impact of customer pressure and the environmental regulation on green innovation performance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 733 (1):012048. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/733/1/012048.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, S., C. Flachsland, and M. Jakob. 2020. Political economy determinants of carbon pricing. Global Environmental Politics 20 (2):128–56. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., M. Elheddad, and N. Doytch. 2021. The impact of innovation on environmental quality: Evidence for the non-linear relationship of patents and CO2 emissions in China. Journal of Environmental Management 292:112781. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., and A. Prakash. 2023. Does carbon pricing spur climate innovation? A panel study, 1986–2019. Journal of Cleaner Production 395:136459. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B., and R. Ma. 2021. Towards carbon neutrality: The role of different paths of technological progress in mitigating China’s CO2 emissions. Science of the Total Environment 152588. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152588. 813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B., and B. Xu. 2018. Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China’s agriculture sector: A quantile regression. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 94:15–27. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B., and J. Zhu. 2019a. Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. Journal of Environmental Management 247:662–71. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., C. Zhangchuan, S. Li, and A. Usman. 2021. Energy Efficiency and Green Innovation and Its Asymmetric Impact on CO2 Emission in China: A New Perspective. https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1013410/v1/2a58b4b1-ba96-476d-bc15-b003270c4f8a.pdf?c=1637336475.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Z. Lu, and X. Long. 2020. Heterogeneous effects of endogenous and foreign innovation on CO2 emissions stochastic convergence across China. Energy Economics 91:104893. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maureen, N., and I. Maxwell. 2020. Panel Data Estimators in the Presence of Serial and Spatial Correlation with Panel Heteroscedasticity: A Simulation Study. Quarterly Journal of Econometrics Research 6 (1):1–11. doi:10.18488/journal.88.2020.61.1.11.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., R. E. Dunlap, and S. T. Marquart-Pyatt. 2016. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics 25 (2):338–58. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meo, M. S., and M. Z. Abd Karim. 2022. The role of green finance in reducing CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review 22 (1):169–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongo, M., F. Belaïd, and B. Ramdani. 2021. The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 118:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvaney, D., Ed. 2011. Green politics: An A-to-Z guide. Washington DC: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2023. ENVIRONMENT AT A GLANCE INDICATORS. https://www.oecd.org/environment/environment-at-a-glance/Environment%20at%20a%20Glance%20Indicators%20Climate%20Q1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2021. General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics 60 (1):13–50. doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The UCL Green Innovation Policy Commission. 2021. Innovation for a Green Recovery: Business and Government in Partnership. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/sustainable/sites/bartlett/files/the_commissions_final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah, S., I. Ozturk, M. T. Majeed, and W. Ahmad. 2021. Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production 316:128239. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzar, U. 2020. Political economy of renewable energy: Does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption? Renewable Energy 155:591–603. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdolini, E., C. Bak, J. Ruet, and A. Venkatachalam. 2018. Innovative green-technology SMEs as an opportunity to promote financial de-risking. Economics 12 (1):20180014. doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-14.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., X. Li, and S. Wang. 2021. Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: A data-driven scientometric analysis. Energy Policy 154:112295. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and Y. Zhu. 2020. Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement? A spatial perspective. Science of the Total Environment 726:138574. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, J., Y. Hao, G. F. Feng, and C. P. Chang. 2016. Does government ideology influence environmental performance? Evidence based on a new dataset. Economic Systems 40 (2):232–46. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., and Y. Du. 2019. Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’economy in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research 10 (1):152–61. doi:10.1016/j.apr.2018.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., and P. Huang. 2020. Local governments’ incentives and governing practices in low-carbon transition: A comparative study of solar water heater governance in four Chinese cities. Cities 96:102477. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakari, A., I. Khan, D. Tan, R. Alvarado, and V. Dagar. 2021. Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Energy 239:122365. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakari, A., and J. Toplak. 2021. Investigation into the social behavioural effects on a country’s ecological footprint: Evidence from central Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 170:120891. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., M. Shahbaz, X. Dong, and K. Dong. 2021. How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 168:120751. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar