Internal and external arbitrage effect in multiple electricity markets considering asymmetric development of renewable energy

References

• Aceleanu, M. I., A. C. Șerban, D. M. Pociovălișteanu, and G. C. Dimian. 2017. Renewable energy: A way for a sustainable development in Romania. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, & Policy 12 (11):958–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi-Khatir, A., A. J. Conejo, and R. Cherkaoui. 2013. Multi-area energy and reserve dispatch under wind uncertainty and equipment failures. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 28 (4):4373–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundsen, E. S., and L. Bergman. 2007. Integration of multiple national markets for electricity: The case of Norway and Sweden. Energy Policy 35 (6):3383–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apergis, N., and J. Payne. 2012. The electricity consumption-growth nexus: Renewable versus non-renewable electricity in Central America. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, & Policy 7 (4):423–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgharian, V., and M. Abdelaziz. 2020. A low-carbon market-based multi-area power system expansion planning model. Electric Power Systems Research 187:106500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri, A., and S. Jadid. 2021. A robust distributed market-clearing model for multi-area power systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 124:106275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayindir, R., S. Demirbas, E. Irmak, U. Cetinkaya, A. Ova, and M. Yesil. 2016. Effects of renewable energy sources on the power system. 2016 IEEE International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC), Varna, Bulgaria. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cifor, A., P. Denholm, E. Ela, B.-M. Hodge, and A. Reed. 2015. The policy and institutional challenges of grid integration of renewable energy in the western United States. Utilities Policy 33:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalou, K., and C. Diakaki. 2021. Day-ahead electricity price forecasting in coupled markets: An application in the Italian market. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Operations Management and Service Evaluation, IGI Global 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Felten, B., P. Osinski, T. Felling, and C. Weber. 2021. The flow-based market coupling domain-Why we can’t get it right. Utilities Policy 70:101136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, N. C., P. P. da Silva, and D. Bunn. 2016. Weather and market specificities in the regional transmission of renewable energy price effects. Energy 114:188–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glachant, J.-M., and S. Ruester. 2014. The EU internal electricity market: Done forever? Utilities Policy 31:221–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajebrahimi, A., I. Kamwa, M. M. A. Abdelaziz, and A. Moeini. 2020. Scenario-wise distributionally robust optimization for collaborative intermittent resources and electric vehicle aggregator bidding strategy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (5):3706–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B. F., F. A. Rijkers, and M. G. Boots. 2005. The more cooperation, the more competition? A Cournot analysis of the benefits of electric market coupling. The Energy Journal 26 (4):69–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Firouz, M., A. Alemi, B. Alefy, and S. Balalpour. 2021. Unit commitment model under uncertainty of wind power producer. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering 1–15. https://www.next-kraftwerke.com/knowledge/market-coupling.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaheh, Z., R. B. Kazemzadeh, and M. K. Sheikh-El-Eslami. 2021. Flexible ramping services in power systems: Background, challenges, and procurement methods. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering 45 (1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, A., H. Seifi, and M. K. Sheikh-El-Eslami. 2015. Market-based mechanism for multi-area power exchange management in multiple electricity markets. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 9 (13):1662–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaygusuz, K., Ö. Yüksek, and A. Sari. 2007. Renewable energy sources in the European Union: Markets and capacity. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, & Policy 2 (1):19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, M., K. Bruninx, F. Dominguez, and E. Delarue. 2021. Regulatory incentives for transmission system operators under flow-based market coupling. Energy, COVID, and Climate Change, 1st IAEE Online Conference, Online. International Association for Energy Economics. Accessed June 7–9, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Keppler, J. H., S. Phan, and Y. Le Pen. 2016. The impacts of variable renewable production and market coupling on the convergence of French and German electricity prices. The Energy Journal 37 (3):343–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., W. Wu, B. Zhang, and B. Wang. 2016. Decentralized multi-area dynamic economic dispatch using modified generalized benders decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31 (1):526–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M. V., J. Claro, and P. Fischbeck. 2019. Coordinating cross-border electricity interconnection investments and trade in market coupled regions. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 104:194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien, A., P. Luickx, A. Tirez, and D. Woitrin. 2013. Importance of design parameters on flow-based market coupling implementation. 2013 10th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Stockholm, Sweden. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mozdawar, S. A., A. A. Foroud, and M. Amirahmadi. 2019. Resource adequacy in interdependent electricity markets undergoing heterogeneous expansion in renewable energy. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 13 (18):4061–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozdawar, S. A., A. A. Foroud, and M. Amirahmadi. 2021. Multiple electricity markets design undergoing asymmetric policies on renewables expansion: Capacity adequacy and revenue sufficiency. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering 47:2781–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozdawar, S. A., A. A. Foroud, and M. Amirahmadi. 2022a. Interdependent electricity markets design: Market power and gaming. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 136:107641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozdawar, S. A., A. A. Foroud, and M. Amirahmadi. 2022b. Multiple electricity markets competitiveness undergoing symmetric and asymmetric renewables development policies. Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering 18 (1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa, C., and A. van Ackere. 2015. Winners and losers of market coupling. Energy 80:522–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parastegari, M., R.-A. Hooshmand, and M. Moazzami. 2019. Coordinated scheduling of renewable energy sources in the unit commitment problem: A review of recent literature. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering 43 (1):15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pekez, J., L. Radovanovc, E. Desnica, and M. Lambic. 2016. The increase of exploitability of renewable energy sources. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, & Policy 11 (1):51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena, I., C. B. Martinez-Anido, and B.-M. Hodge. 2017. An extended IEEE 118-bus test system with high renewable penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33 (1):281–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, D., and R. Poudineh. 2019. Electricity market design under increasing renewable energy penetration: Misalignments observed in the European Union. Utilities Policy 61:100970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, S., and F. Roques. 2015. Is the depressive effect of renewables on power prices contagious? A cross border econometric analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Shahidehpour, M., and Y. Fu. 2005. Benders decomposition in restructured power systems. Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago: IEEE Techtorial(April).
   Google Scholar
• van der Weijde, A. H., and B. F. Hobbs. 2011. Locational-based coupling of electricity markets: Benefits from coordinating unit commitment and balancing markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics 39 (3):223–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varkani, A. K., H. Seifi, and M. K. Sheikh-El-Eslami. 2014. Locational marginal pricing-based allocation of transmission capacity in multiple electricity markets. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 8 (5):983–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhold, R. 2021. Evaluating policy implications on the restrictiveness of flow-based market coupling with high shares of intermittent generation: A case study for central Western Europe. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04940.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, T., and E. Litvinov. 2006. Ex post pricing in the co-optimized energy and reserve market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 21 (4):1528–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar