Thermal Performance Testing of a Solar Water Heating System Using Core-Shell Structured Nanofluids

References

• A. Ahmed, H. Baig, S. Sundaram, and T. K. Mallick, “Use of nanofluids in solar PV/thermal systems,” Int. J. Photoenergy, vol. 2019, pp. 1–17, Jun. 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8039129.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bellos, Z. Said, and C. Tzivanidis, “The use of nanofluids in solar concentrating technologies: a comprehensive review,” J. Clean. Prod, vol. 196, pp. 84–99, Sep. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.048.
   Google Scholar
• P. K. Nagarajan, J. Subramani, S. Suyambazhahan, and R. Sathyamurthy, “Nanofluids for solar collector applications: a review,” Energy Procedia, vol. 61, pp. 2416–2434, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.017.
   Google Scholar
• A. S. Abdelrazik, F. Al-Sulaiman, R. Saidur, and R. Ben-Mansour, “A review on recent development for the design and packaging of hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) Solar Systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, vol. 95, pp. 110–129, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.013.
   Google Scholar
• M. N. Pantzali, A. G. Kanaris, K. D. Antoniadis, A. A. Mouza, and S. V. Paras, “Effect of nanofluids on the performance of a miniature plate heat exchanger with modulated surface,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 691–699, Aug. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• L. Das, et al., “Hydrothermal performance improvement of an inserted double pipe heat exchanger with Ionanofluid,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng, vol. 28, no. August, pp. 101533, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101533.
   Google Scholar
• A. Sözen, et al. “Upgrading of the performance of an air-to-air heat exchanger using graphene/water nanofluid,” Int. J. Thermophys, vol. 42, no, 3, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10765-020-02790-w.
   Google Scholar
• M. U. Sajid and H. M. Ali, “Recent advances in application of nanofluids in heat transfer devices: a critical review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 103, pp. 556–592, Apr. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.057.
   Google Scholar
• S. Koçak Soylu, İ. Atmaca, M. Asiltürk, and A. Doğan, “Improving heat transfer performance of an automobile radiator using Cu and Ag doped TiO2 based nanofluids,” Appl. Therm. Eng, vol. 157, pp. 113743, Jul. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113743.
   Google Scholar
• S. Koçak Soylu, Z. Yeşil Acar, M. Asiltürk, and İ. Atmaca, “Effects of doping on the thermophysical properties of Ag and Cu doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their nanofluids,” J. Mol. Liq, vol. 368, pp. 120615, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120615.
   Google Scholar
• O. Mahian, A. Kianifar, S. A. Kalogirou, I. Pop, and S. Wongwises, “A review of the applications of nanofluids in solar energy,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 582–594, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.037.
   Google Scholar
• F. Hossain, M. R. Karim, and A. A. Bhuiyan, “A review on recent advancements of the usage of nano fluid in hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) Solar Systems,” Renew. Energy, vol. 188, pp. 114–131, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.116.
   Google Scholar
• N. Abbas, et al. “Applications of nanofluids in photovoltaic thermal systems: a review of recent advances,” Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl, vol. 536, pp. 122513, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122513.
   Google Scholar
• A. H. A. Al-Waeli, et al., “An experimental investigation of SiC nanofluid as a base-fluid for a photovoltaic thermal PV/T system,” Energy Convers. Manag, vol. 142, pp. 547–558, Jun. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.076.
   Google Scholar
• J. J. Michael and S. Iniyan, “Performance analysis of a copper sheet laminated photovoltaic thermal collector using copper oxide – water nanofluid,” Sol. Energy, vol. 119, pp. 439–451, Sep. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.028.
   Google Scholar
• F. Jamil, H. M. Ali, and M. M. Janjua, “MXene based advanced materials for thermal energy storage: a recent review,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 35, no. January, pp. 102322, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102322.
   Google Scholar
• D. Shin and D. Banerjee, “Enhancement of specific heat capacity of high-temperature silica-nanofluids synthesized in alkali chloride salt eutectics for solar thermal-energy storage applications,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf, vol. 54, no. 5–6, pp. 1064–1070, Feb. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.11.017.
   Google Scholar
• O. Bait and M. Si-Ameur, “Enhanced heat and mass transfer in solar stills using nanofluids: a review,” Solar Energy, vol. 170, pp. 694–722, Aug. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.020.
   Google Scholar
• K. Y. Leong, et al., “An overview on current application of nanofluids in solar thermal collector and its challenges,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, vol. 53, pp. 1092–1105, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.060.
   Google Scholar
• A. A. Minea and W. M. El-Maghlany, “Influence of hybrid nanofluids on the performance of parabolic trough collectors in solar thermal systems: recent findings and numerical comparison,” Renew. Energy, vol. 120, pp. 350–364, May. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.093.
   Google Scholar
• M. H. Yazdi, et al., “Thermal performance of nanofluid flow inside evacuated tube solar collector,” Int. J. Heat Technol, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1262–1270, 2021. DOI: 10.18280/ijht.390424.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Sharafeldin and G. Gróf, “Efficiency of evacuated tube solar collector using WO3/Water nanofluid,” Renew. Energy, vol. 134, pp. 453–460, 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.010.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Y. Gan, et al., “Thermal conductivity optimization and entropy generation analysis of titanium dioxide nanofluid in evacuated tube solar collector,” Appl. Therm. Eng, vol. 145, no. September, pp. 155–164, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• G. J. O’Keeffe, S. L. Mitchell, T. G. Myers, and V. Cregan, “Modelling the efficiency of a nanofluid-based direct absorption parabolic trough solar collector,” Sol. Energy, vol. 159, no. September, pp. 44–54, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.066.
   Google Scholar
• G. J. O’Keeffe, S. L. Mitchell, T. G. Myers, and V. Cregan, “Time-dependent modelling of nanofluid-based direct absorption parabolic trough solar collectors,” Sol. Energy, vol. 174, no. September, pp. 73–82, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.073.
   Google Scholar
• G. Vijayan and K. Rajasekaran, “Performance evaluation of nanofluid on parabolic trough solar collector,” Therm. Sci, vol. 24, no. 2 Part A, pp. 853–864, 2020. DOI: 10.2298/TSCI180509059G.
   Google Scholar
• W. Kang, Y. Shin, and H. Cho, “Economic analysis of flat-plate and U-tube solar collectors using an Al2O3 nanofluid,” Energies, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1911, Nov. 2017. DOI: 10.3390/en10111911.
   Google Scholar
• G. Paul, T. Pal, and I. Manna, “Thermo-physical property measurement of nano-gold dispersed water based nanofluids prepared by chemical precipitation technique,” J. Colloid Interface Sci, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 434–437, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.086.
   Google Scholar
• P. Mélinon, et al., “Engineered inorganic core/shell nanoparticles,” Phys. Rep, vol. 543, no. 3, pp. 163–197, Oct. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• V. K. Pustovalov, “Modeling and analysis of optical properties of nanoparticles and nanofluids for effective absorption of solar radiation and their heating,” SN Appl. Sci, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–25, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0370-2.
   Google Scholar
• H. Li, Y. He, Z. Liu, Y. Huang, and B. Jiang, “Synchronous steam generation and heat collection in a broadband Ag@TiO2 core–shell nanoparticle-based receiver,” Appl. Therm. Eng, vol. 121, pp. 617–627, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.102.
   Google Scholar
• M. Chen, Y. He, X. Wang, and Y. Hu, “Complementary enhanced solar thermal conversion performance of core-shell nanoparticles,” Appl. Energy, vol. 211, no. November, pp. 735–742, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.087.
   Google Scholar
• S. Cingarapu, D. Singh, E. V. Timofeeva, and M. R. Moravek, “Nanofluids with encapsulated tin nanoparticles for advanced heat transfer and thermal energy storage,” Int. J. Energy Res, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 51–59, Jan. 2014. DOI: 10.1002/er.3041.
   Google Scholar
• S. Khashan, et al., “Photo-thermal characteristics of water-based Fe 3O 4@SiO 2 nanofluid for solar-thermal applications,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 055701, 2017. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aa6c15.
   Google Scholar
• N. Ozmen, et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye using core@shell nano-TiO2 particles to reduce toxicity,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, vol. 25, no. 29, pp. 29493–29504, Oct. 2018. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2942-x.
   Google Scholar
• I. Martínez-Mera, M. E. Espinosa-Pesqueira, R. Pérez-Hernández, and J. Arenas-Alatorre, “Synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles without surfactants at room temperature,” Mater. Lett, vol. 61, no. 23–24, pp. 4447–4451, Sep. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.02.018.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Y. Acar and M. Asiltürk, “An investigation on the influence of hydrolysis ratio and base type on the characterization of synthesised nano-TiO2 by using sol–gel method,” J. Nanoparticle Res, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 162, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-022-05543-y.
   Google Scholar
• W. Muhammad, N. Ullah, M. Haroon, and B. H. Abbasi, “Optical, morphological and biological analysis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) using Papaver somniferum L,” RSC Adv, vol. 9, no. 51, pp. 29541–29548, 2019. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA04424H.
   Google Scholar
• N. Majoul, S. Aouida, and B. Bessaïs, “Progress of porous silicon APTES-functionalization by FTIR investigations,” Appl. Surf. Sci, vol. 331, pp. 388–391, Mar. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.107.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Li, et al., “Preparation and characterization of APTES modified magnetic MMT capable of using as anisotropic nanoparticles,” Appl. Surf. Sci, vol. 447, pp. 393–400, Jul. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.230.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International, ASTM E2490-09: Standard Guide For Measurement Of Particle Size Distribution Of Nanomaterials In Suspension By Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (PCS), vol. 14.02, no. E56.02, pp. 1–15, 2015. doi:10.1520/E2490-09R21.
   Google Scholar
• V. A. Hackley and J. D. Clogston, “Measuring the hydrodynamic size of nanoparticles in aqueous media using batch-mode dynamic light scattering.” In: McNeil, S. (ed.), Characterization of Nanoparticles Intended for Drug Delivery. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), Vol. 697. Humana Press. pp. 35–52, 2011. doi10.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_4.
   Google Scholar
• L. Jitkang, Y. S. Pin, C. H. Xin, and L. S. Chun, “Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle by dynamic light scattering,” Nanoscale Res. Lett, vol. 8, 1 pp.308–381, 2013. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-8-308.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Xuan and W. Roetzel, “Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf, vol. 43, no. 19, pp. 3701–3707, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0017-9310(99)00369-5.
   Google Scholar
• J. A. Duffie, W. A. Beckman, and J. McGowan, “Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes,” Am. J. Phys, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 382, 1985. DOI: 10.1119/1.14178.
   Google Scholar
• J. P. Holman, Experimental Methods for Engineers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill’s. pp. 616, 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0894-1777(94)90118-X.
   Google Scholar
• S. P. Jang and S. U. S. Choi, “Cooling performance of a microchannel heat sink with nanofluids,” Appl. Therm. Eng, vol. 26, no. 17–18, pp. 2457–2463, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.02.036.
   Google Scholar
• V. Iranidokht, S. Hamian, N. Mohammadi, and M. B. Shafii, “Thermal conductivity of mixed nanofluids under controlled pH conditions,” Int. J. Therm. Sci, vol. 74, pp. 63–71, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.07.008.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kole and T. K. Dey, “Thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al 2 O 3 nanofluid based on car engine coolant,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys, vol. 43, no. 31, pp. 315501, 2010. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/31/315501.
   Google Scholar
• G. Huminic and A. Huminic, “Numerical analysis of laminar flow heat transfer of nanofluids in a flattened tube,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf, vol. 44, pp. 52–57, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• A. Khan, et al., “Chemically reactive nanofluid flow past a thin moving needle with viscous dissipation, magnetic effects and hall current,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 4 April, pp. 1–18, 2021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249264.
   Google Scholar
• F. P. Incropera, et al., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th ed, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2007. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703993104.
   Google Scholar
• T. Yousefi, F. Veysi, E. Shojaeizadeh, and S. Zinadini, “An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3–H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors,” Renew. Energy, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 293–298, Mar. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.056.
   Google Scholar
• A. Zamzamian, M. KeyanpourRad, M. KianiNeyestani, and M. T. Jamal-Abad, “An experimental study on the effect of Cu-synthesized/EG nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors,” Renew. Energy, vol. 71, pp. 658–664, Nov. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• S. K. Verma, A. K. Tiwari, and D. S. Chauhan, “Performance augmentation in flat plate solar collector using MgO/water nanofluid,” Energy Convers. Manag, vol. 124, pp. 607–617, Sep. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• T. Yousefi, F. Veisy, E. Shojaeizadeh, and S. Zinadini, “An experimental investigation on the effect of MWCNT-H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci, vol. 39, pp. 207–212, May. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.01.025.
   Google Scholar
• S. Salavati Meibodi, A. Kianifar, H. Niazmand, O. Mahian, and S. Wongwises, “Experimental investigation on the thermal efficiency and performance characteristics of a flat plate solar collector using SiO2/EG-water nanofluids,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf, vol. 65, pp. 71–75, Jul. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.02.011.
   Google Scholar
• F. Kiliç, T. Menlik, and A. Sözen, “Effect of titanium dioxide/water nanofluid use on thermal performance of the flat plate solar collector,” Sol. Energy, vol. 164, pp. 101–108, Apr. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Q. He, S. Zeng, and S. Wang, “Experimental investigation on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors with nanofluids,” Appl. Therm. Eng, vol. 88, pp. 165–171, Sep. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.09.053.
   Google Scholar
• J. J. Michael and S. Iniyan, “Performance of copper oxide/water nanofluid in a flat plate solar water heater under natural and forced circulations,” Energy Convers. Manag, vol. 95, pp. 160–169, May. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.017.
   Google Scholar
• D. Anin Vincely and E. Natarajan, “Experimental investigation of the solar FPC performance using graphene oxide nanofluid under forced circulation,” Energy Convers. Manag, vol. 117, pp. 1–11, Jun. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.015.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Said, R. Saidur, M. A. Sabiha, A. Hepbasli, and N. A. Rahim, “Energy and exergy efficiency of a flat plate solar collector using pH treated Al2O3 nanofluid,” J. Clean. Prod, vol. 112, pp. 3915–3926, Jan. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.115.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Said, R. Saidur, M. A. Sabiha, N. A. Rahim, and M. R. Anisur, “Thermophysical properties of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes and its effect on exergy efficiency of a flat plate solar collector,” Sol. Energy, vol. 115, pp. 757–769, May. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.037.
   Google Scholar
• O. A. Alawi, H. M. Kamar, H. A. Mohammed, A. R. Mallah, and O. A. Hussein, “Energy efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector using thermally treated graphene-based nanofluids: experimental study,” Nanomater. Nanotechnol, vol. 10, pp. 184798042096461, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1847980420964618.
   Google Scholar
• M. Faizal, R. Saidur, S. Mekhilef, and M. A. Alim, “Energy, economic and environmental analysis of metal oxides nanofluid for flat-plate solar collector,” Energy Convers. Manag, vol. 76, pp. 162–168, Dec. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.038.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Said, et al., “Performance enhancement of a flat plate solar collector using titanium dioxide nanofluid and polyethylene glycol dispersant,” J. Clean. Prod, vol. 92, pp. 343–353, Apr. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• N. S. Rajput, D. D. B. Shukla, S. K. Sharma, and D. Rajput, “Thermal analysis of mwcnt/distilled water nanofluid on the efficiency of flat plate solar collector,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol, vol. 8, pp. 233–240, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• O. A. Alawi, H. Mohamed Kamar, A. R. Mallah, S. N. Kazi, and N. A. C. Sidik, “Thermal efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector filled with pentaethylene glycol-treated graphene nanoplatelets: an experimental analysis,” Sol. Energy, vol. 191, pp. 360–370, Oct. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.011.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ahmadi, D. D. Ganji, and F. Jafarkazemi, “Analysis of utilizing Graphene nanoplatelets to enhance thermal performance of flat plate solar collectors,” Energy Convers. Manag, vol. 126, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.061.
   Google Scholar
• L. S. Sundar, M. K. Singh, V. Punnaiah, and A. C. M. Sousa, “Experimental investigation of Al2O3/water nanofluids on the effectiveness of solar flat-plate collectors with and without twisted tape inserts,” Renew. Energy, vol. 119, pp. 820–833, Apr. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.056.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Sharafeldin, G. Gróf, and O. Mahian, “Experimental study on the performance of a flat-plate collector using WO3/Water nanofluids,” Energy, vol. 141, pp. 2436–2444, Dec. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.068.
   Google Scholar
• M. Faizal, R. Saidur, S. Mekhilef, A. Hepbasli, and I. M. Mahbubul, “Energy, economic, and environmental analysis of a flat-plate solar collector operated with SiO2nanofluid,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1457–1473, Aug. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-014-0870-0.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. Owolabi, H. H. Al-Kayiem, and A. T. Baheta, “Performance investigation on a thermal energy storage integrated solar collector system using nanofluid,” Int. J. Energy Res, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 650–657, Apr. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/er.3657.
   Google Scholar