Securing the Sustainability of Global Medical Nuclear Supply Chains Through Economic Cost Recovery, Risk Management, and Optimization

References

• Abkowitz M, Cheng P. 1988. Developing a risk/cost framework for routing truck movements of hazardous materials. Accident Analysis and Preview, 20(1), 39–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abkowitz M, Eiger A, Srinivasan S. 1984. Estimating the release rates and costs of transporting hazardous waste. Transportation Research Record 977:22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Alp E. 1995. Risk-based transportation planning practices overall methodology and a case example. Information Systems and Operational Research 33(1):4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson S. E. 1994. Safe transport of dangerous goods: Road, rail or sea? A screening of technical and administrative factors. European Journal of Operational Research 75(3):499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batta R, Chiu S. S. 1988. Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: Transportation of hazardous materials. Operations Research, 36(1):84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger SA, Goldsmith W, Lewis ER. eds. 2004. Introduction to Bioengineering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramia M, Giordani S, Iovanella A. 2010. On the selection of k routes in multiobjective hazmat route planning. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 21(3):239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carotenuto P, Giordani S, Ricciardeli S. 2005. Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments. Computers and Operations Research 34(5):1304–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz J. 2009. The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Decision Support Systems 48(1):224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz J. M, Liu Z. 2011. Modeling and analysis of multiperiod effects of social relationship on supply chain networks. European Journal of Operational Research 214(1):39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz J, Matsypura D. 2009. Supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. International Journal of Production Research 47(3):621–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafermos S. C, Sparrow F. T. 1969. The traffic assignment problem for a general network. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 73B:91–118.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange F. 2010. Covidien's role in the supply chain of molybdenum-99 and technetium-99 m generators. Tijdschrift voor Nucleaire Geneeskunde, 32:593–596.
   Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Alp O. 2006. Integrated routing and scheduling of hazmat trucks with stops en-route. Transportation Science 41(1):107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Gzara F. 2008. Solving the hazmat transport network design problem. Computers and Operations Research 35(7):2234–2247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Ingolfsson A. 2005. Transport risk models for hazardous materials: Revisited. Operations Research Letters 33(1):81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Tjandra SA, Verter V. 2007. Hazardous materials transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 14, (Transportation). New York, NY: Elsiver, pp. 539–621.
   Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Verter V. 1998. Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Operations Research, 46(5):625–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett J. 1993. Ensuring suppliers’ environmental performance. Purchasing and Supply Management October: 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gray DE ed. 1972. American Institute of Physics Handbook, 3rd ed., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill pp. 8-6–8-91.
   Google Scholar
• Huang B, Cheu RL. 2004. GIS and genetic algorithms for hazmat route planning with security considerations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18(8):769–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iakovou E, Douligeris C, Lii H, Ip C, Yudhbir L. 1999. A maritime global route planning model for hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Science 33(1):34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkmana SN, van Gelder PHAJM, Vrijling JK. 2003. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials A99:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kara BY, Verter V. 2004. Design a road network for hazardous material transportation. Transportation Science 38(2):188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn LH. 2008. The potential dangers in medical isotope production. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 16 March. http://thebulletin.org/potential-dangers-medical-isotpoe-production
   Google Scholar
• Kloeber G, Cornell M, McNamara T, Moscati A. 1979. Risk Assessment of Air versus other Transportation Modes for Explosives and Flammable Cryogenic Liquids. Volume I: Risk assessment method and results. (Report DOT/RSPA/MTB-79/13). Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek KD, Xu J, Murphy SL, Minino AM, Kung H-C. 2011. Deaths: Preliminary data for 2009, National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 59, No. 4, March 16, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Korpelevich G M. 1977. The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems. Matekon 13:35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer D. 2011. Drive to end civilian use of HEU collides with medical isotope production. Physics Today, February, 17–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantheur Medical Imaging, Inc. 2009. Lantheur Medical Imaging takes proactive steps to mitigate impact of global molybdenun-99 supply chain operations on operations. Press Release, May 20, http://www.lantheur.com/News-Press-2009-0520.html
   Google Scholar
• List G, Mirchandani P. 1991. An integrated network planar multiobjective model for routing and siting for hazardous materials and wastes. Transportation Science 25(2):146–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Nagurney A. 2011. Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition. Omega 39(5):539–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marianov V, ReVelle C. 1998. Linear, non-approximated models for optimal routing in hazardous environments. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(2):157–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoumi AH, Yu M, and Nagurney A. 2012. A supply chain generalized network oligopoly model for pharmaceuticals under brand differentiation and perishability. Transportation Research E 48:762–780.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A. 1999. Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach, 2nd and rev. ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A. 2006. Supply Chain Network Economics: Dynamics of Prices, Flows, and Profits. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A. 2010. Optimal supply chain network design and redesign at minimal total cost and with demand satisfaction. International Journal of Production Economics 128(1):200–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Aronson J. 1989. A general dynamic spatial price network equilibrium model with gains and losses. Networks19(7):751–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Dong J, Zhang D. 2002. A supply chain network equilibrium model. Transportation Research E 38:281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Liu Z, Woolley T. 2007. Sustainable supply chain networks and transportation. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 1(1):29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Masoumi A, Yu M. 2012. Supply chain network operations management of a blood banking system with cost and risk minimization. Computational Management Science 9(2):205–231.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Nagurney LS. 2010. Sustainable supply chain network design: A multicriteria perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 3(3):189–197.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Nagurney LS. 2012. Medical nuclear supply chain design: A tractable network model and computational approach. International Journal of Production Economics 140(2):865–874.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Qiang Q. 2009. Fragile Networks: Identifying Vulnerabilities and Synergies in an Uncertain World. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Woolley T. 2010. Environmental and cost synergy in supply chain network integration in mergers and acquisitions in sustainable energy and transportation systems. In: Ehrgott M, Naujoks B, Stewart T, Wallenius J (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2009. Medical isotope production without highly enriched uranium. The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. 2010a. The supply of medical radioisotopes: An economic study of the molybdenum-99 supply chain.Paris, France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. 2010b. The supply of medical radioisotopes: Interim report of the OECD/NEA high-level group on security of supply of medical radioisotopes. Paris, France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. 2011. The supply of medical radioisotopes: The path to reliability NEA No. 6985. Paris, France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2011. Top Consequence Hazardous Materials by Commodities and Failure Modes, 2005–2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ponsard B. 2010. Mo-99 supply issues: Report and lessons learned, presented at the 14th International Topical Meeting on the Research Reactor Fuel Management (RRFM 2010), Marrakech, Morrocco, 21–25 March, published by the European Nuclear Society, ENS RRFM 2010 Transactions.
   Google Scholar
• Qiang Q, Nagurney A, Dong J. 2009. Modeling of supply chain risk under disruptions with performance measurement and robustness analysis. In: Wu T, Blackhurst J, (eds.), Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability: Tools and Methods for Supply Chain Decision Makers. Berlin, Germany: Springer pp. 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Raith A. 2009. Multiobjective Routing and Transportation Problems. PhD diss., School of Engineering, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Resnikoff M. 1992. Study of transportation accident severity. Radioactive Waste Management Associates for the Nevada Nuclear Waste Project Office, February.
   Google Scholar
• ReVelle C J, Cohon J, Shobrys D. 1991. Simultaneous siting and routing in the disposal of hazardous wastes. Transportation Science 25(2):138–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeverens HJJ. 2010. The economics of the molybdenum-99/Technetium-99 m supply chain. Tijdschrift voor Nucleaire Geneeskunde 32:604–608.
   Google Scholar
• Sherali HD, Brizendine LD, Glickman TS, Subramianian S. 1997. Low probability-high consequence considerations in routing hazardous material shipments. Transportation Science 31(3):237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vorst JGAJ, Beulens AJM, and van Beek P. 2000. Modelling and simulating multi-echelon food systems. European Journal of Operational Research 122(2):354–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2011. Radioisotopes in medicine. January 26. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Non-Power-Nuclear-Applications/Radioisptopes-in-Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D. 2006. A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition. Omega 34(3):283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar