Insights into carsharing demand dynamics: Outputs of an agent-based model application to Lisbon, Portugal

References

• Ayed, H., Khadraoui, D., & Aggoune, R. (2015). Using MATSim to simulate carpooling and car-sharing trips. World Congress on Information Technology and Computer Applications Congress (WCITCA), IEEE, pp. 1–5. Hammamet, Tunisia.
   Google Scholar
• Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2015). Carsharing demand estimation Zurich, Switzerland, area case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2536, 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). Evaluating the influence of parking space on the quality of service and the demand for one-way carsharing: A Zurich area case study, Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Barrios, J. A., & Doig, J. C. (2014). Fleet sizing for flexible carsharing systems: A simulation-based approach. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M., & Shaheen, S. A. (2002). Shared-use vehicle systems—Framework for classifying carsharing, station cars, and combined approaches. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1791, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M., & Todd, M. (1999). Simulation model performance analysis of a multiple station shared vehicle system. Transport Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 7(4), 237–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M., Todd, M., & Xue, L. (2004). User-based vehicle relocation techniques for multiple-station shared-use vehicle systems. Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 7280–7287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2003). City CarShare—First-year travel demand impacts. Transportation Finance, Economics and Economic Development, 1839, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., Balac, M., & Balmer, M. (2015). Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: A test case for Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation, 42(3), 413–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., Bock, B., & Balmer, M. (2014). Modeling station-based and free-floating carsharing 2 demand: A test case study for Berlin, Germany. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., Schuessler, N., & Axhausen, K. W. (2013). Estimation of carsharing demand using an activity-based microsimulation approach: model discussion and some results. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, G., & Antunes, A. P. (2012). Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, G. H. D. A., Jorge, D. R., & Antunes, D. M. (2013). The added value of accounting for users' flexibility and information on the potential of a station-based one-way car-sharing system: An application in Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(3), 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lorimier, A., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). Understanding the factors affecting vehicle usage and availability in carsharing networks: A case study of communauto carsharing system from Montreal, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiró, T., & Martínez, L. (2014). Development of a discrete choice model to evaluate the impact of new transport alternatives. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Eiro, T., Martinez, L. M., & Viegas, J. M. (2011). Configuration of innovative minibus service in the Lisbon, Portugal, municipality spatial-temporal assessment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2217, 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, W., Machemehl, R. B., & Lownes, N. E. (2008). Carsharing dynamic decision-making problem for vehicle allocation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2063, 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampshire, R. C., & Sinha, S. (2011). A simulation study of peer-to-peer carsharing. IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation System (FISTS), pp. 159–163.
   Google Scholar
• Heilig, M., Mallig, N., Schröder, O., Kagerbauer, M., & Vortisch, P. (2015). Multiple-day agent-based modeling approach of station-based and free-floating carsharing. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Ine, I. (2011). Censos 2011—Resultados Definitivos. Lisboa: IP Instituto Nacional de Estatística.
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum Corporate Partnership Board. (2015). Urban mobility system upgrade: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic. International Transport Forum, Corporate Partnership Board. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge, D., & Correia, G. (2013). Carsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: A literature review. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 13(3), 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge, D., Correia, G., & Barnhart, C. (2014). Comparing optimal relocation operations with simulated relocation policies in one-way carsharing systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(4), 1667–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge, D., Molnar, G., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2015). Trip pricing of one-way station-based carsharing networks with zone and time of day price variations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 81, Part 2, 461–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kek, A. G. H., Cheu, R. L., & Chor, M. L. (2006). Relocation simulation model for multiple-station shared-use vehicle systems. Transit: Management, Maintenance, Technology and Planning, 1986, 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kek, A. G. H., Cheu, R. L., Meng, Q., & Fung, C. H. (2009). A decision support system for vehicle relocation operations in carsharing systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1), 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., Shaheen, S. A., & Lidicker, J. (2010). Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings results from North American shared-use vehicle survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143, 150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. M., Correia, G. H. A., & Viegas, J. M. (2015). An agent-based simulation model to assess the impacts of introducing a shared-taxi system: An application to Lisbon (Portugal). Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49(3), 475–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L. M., & Viegas, J. M. (2013). A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L., Viegas, J., & Silva, E. (2009). A traffic analysis zone definition: A new methodology and algorithm. Transportation, 36(5), 581–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes Lopes, M., Martinez, L. M., & Correia, G. H. d. A. (2014). Simulating carsharing operations through agent-based modelling: An application to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 828–837.
   Google Scholar
• Morency, C., Habib, K. M. N., Grasset, V., & Islam, M. T. (2012). Understanding members' carsharing (activity) persistency by using econometric model. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 46(1), 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morency, C., Trepanier, M., & Agard, B. (2011). Typology of carsharing members, Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, F., Duarte, A., & Viegas, J. (2007). CAReFUL—Car fleet renewal as a key role for atmospheric emission reduction. Lisbon: CESUR, Instituto Superior Técnico.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, G. D., Martínez, L. M., Viegas, J. M., & Alves, D. (2011). Design and deployment of an innovative mobility survey for the lisbon metropolitan area oriented to assess the market potential and obtain the best configuration of new alternative transport modes. European Transport Conference, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D., & Micheaux, H. (2015). One-way carsharing's evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas. Transportation, 42(3), 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2007). Growth in worldwide carsharing—An international comparison. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1992, 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., & Rodier, C. J. (2005). Travel effects of a suburban commuter carsharing service—CarLink case study. Transit: Planning, Management and Maintenance, Technology, Marketing and Fare Policy, and Capacity and Quality of Service, 1927, 182–188.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., & Wright, J. (2001). Carlink II: research approach and early findings, California PATH research record (UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-39). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Sioui, L., Morency, C., & Trepanier, M. (2013). How carsharing affects the travel behavior of households: A case study of Montreal, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 52–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Schure, J., Napolitan, F., & Hutchinson, R. (2012). Cumulative impacts of carsharing and unbundled parking on vehicle ownership and mode choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2319, 96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viegas, J. M., & Martinez, L. M. (2010). Generating the universe of urban trips from a mobility survey sample with minimum recourse to behavioural assumptions. 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Weikl, S., & Bogenberger, K. (2013). Relocation strategies and algorithms for free-floating car sharing systems. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 5(4), 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariah, J., Gao, J., Kornhauser, A., & Mufti, T. (2013). Uncongested mobility for all: A proposal for an area wide Autonomous taxi system in New Jersey. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Scott, M., Rodriguez, M., Sierzchula, W., Platz, D., Guo, J. Y., & Adams, T. M. (2009). Carsharing in a university community assessing potential demand and distinct market characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2110, 18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar