Exploring the expectations of transport professionals concerning the future automobility system: Visions, challenges, and transitions

References

• Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century: The transport crisis. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2009). Transport policies and climate change. In S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, & A. Mehmood (Eds.), Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Oxford, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, A., Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2016). Explaining “peak car” with economic variables. Transportation Research Part A, 88, 236–250.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J. (2001). Automobility – A social problem and theoretical concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(5), 593–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, S., Jones, C., Land, C., & Paterson, M. (2006). Conceptualizing automobility introduction: Impossibilities of automobility. The Sociological Review, 54, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, S. (2011). Accessing cars: Different ownership and use choices. Retrieved from http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/accessing_cars-cairns-main_report.pdf. Accessed: 7th September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Caniëls, M. C. J., & Romijn, H. A. (2008). Strategic niche management: Towards a policy tool for sustainable development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(2), 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caperello, N. D., & Kurani, K. S. (2012). Households' stories of their encounters with a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Environment and Behavior, 44(4), 493–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dant, T. (2004). The Driver-car. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2014). Transport statistics Great Britain: Table TSGB0101. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/transport-statistics-great-britain-2014. Accessed: 7th September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2015). National Transport statistics: Table NTS0405. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/nts04-purpose-of-trips. Accessed: 7th September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. J., Watkins, S. J., Gorman, D. R., & Higgins, M. (2011). Are cars the new tobacco? Journal of Public Health, 33(2), 160–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., & Kent, J. (2013). The Challenges of planning for autonomous mobility in Australia. State of Australian cities conference. Retrieved from http://www.soacconference.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Dowling-movement.pdf. Accessed: 9th August 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, G., & Chatterjee, K. (2012). The governance of transport policy. In F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, G. (1999). From the “magic circle” to “automobile dependence”: Measurements and political implications. Transport Policy, 6, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Eddington, R. (2006). The Eddington transport study: Volume 1 – Transport's role in sustaining the UK's productivity and competitiveness. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090104005813/http://www.dft.gov.uk/162259/187604/206711/volume1.pdf. Accessed: 7th September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, M. P. (2015). How a rapid modal convergence into a universal automated taxi service could be the future for local passenger transport. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 910–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Notice of violation. Retrieved from http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/cert/documents/vw-nov-2015-11-02.pdf. Accessed: 3rd November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. (2004). Automobilities: An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. (2007). Mobility, Motility and Freedom: The Structural Story as Analytical Tool for Understanding the Interconnection. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 33(1), 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaras, G., Franco, V., Dilara, P., Martini, G., & Manfredi, U. (2014). Development and review of Euro 5 passenger car emission factors based on experimental results over various driving cycles. Science of the Total Environment, 468–469, 1034–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D., & Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Governing societal transitions to sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B. (2011). The car as a material possession: Exploring the link between materialism and car ownership and use. In K. Lucas, E. Blumenber, & R. Weinberger (Eds.), Auto motives: Understanding car use behaviours. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerlings, H., Shiftan, Y., & Stead, D. (2012). Transition towards sustainable mobility: The role of instruments, individuals and institutions. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, T., & Gorham, R. (2006). Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions. Technology in Society, 28(1–2), 261–273.
   Google Scholar
• Graham-Rowe, E., Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Skippon, S., Dittmar, H., Hutchins, R., & Stannard, J. (2012). Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 140–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G. S., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2012). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., Gärling, A., & Loukopoulos, P. (2002). forecasting psychological consequences of car use reduction: A challenge to an environmental psychology of transportation. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., & Cohen, S. (2014). Why sustainable transport policies will fail: EU climate policy in the light of transport taboos. Journal of Transport Geography, 39, 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. (2006). Secessionist automobility: Racism, anti‐urbanism, and the politics of automobility in Atlanta, Georgia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(2), 293–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., & Banister, D. (2007). Looking over the horizon: Transport and reduced CO2 emissions in the UK by 2030. Transport Policy, 14(5), 377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2016a). Can environmental awareness explain declining preference for car-based mobility amongst generation Y? A qualitative examination of learn to drive behaviours. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 149–163. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.028
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2016b). Destabilising automobility? The emergent mobilities of generation Y. Ambio, 1–13. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0841-2
   Google Scholar
• Hubers, C., & Lyons, G. (2013). Assessing future travel demand: A need to account for non‐transport technologies? Foresight, 15(3), 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, J. L., & Dowling, R. (2013). Puncturing automobility? Carsharing practices. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 86–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. L. (2015). Still feeling the car – The role of comfort in sustaining private car use. Mobilities, 10(5), 726–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Geels, F., & Dudley, G. (2012). Sustainability transitions in the automobility regime and the need for a new perspective. In F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in Transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ker, I., & Tranter, P. (1997). A wish called wander: Reclaiming automobility from the motor car. World Transport Policy and Practice, 3, 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kley, F., Lerch, C., & Dallinger, D. (2011). New business models for electric cars—A holistic approach. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3392–3403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnimhof, T., Armoogum, J., Buelher, R., Dargay, J., Denstadli, J. M., & Yamamoto, T. (2012). Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults – Evidence from six industrialised countries. Transport Reviews, 32(6), 761–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurani, K. S., Turrentine, T., & Sperling, D. (1996). Testing electric vehicle demand in ‘hybrid households' using a reflexive survey. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1(2), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. (2012). Visions for the future and the need for a social science perspective in transport studies. In F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in Transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., & Goodwin, P. (2014). Grow, peak or plateau – The outlook for car travel. Discussion paper. New Zealand Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., & Jones, P. (2009). The car in British society. Royal Automobile Club Foundation Publication. Retrieved from http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/car_in_british_society-lucas_et_al-170409.pdf. Accessed: 7th September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mattioli, G. (2014). Moving through the city with strangers? Public transport as a significant kind of urban public space. In T. Shortell & E. Brown (Eds.), Walking in the European city: Quotidian mobility and urban ethnography. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mattioli, G., Anable, J., & Vrotsou, K. (2016). Car dependent practices: Findings from a sequence pattern mining study of UK time use data. Transportation Research Part A, 89, 56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer's “Spheres of Justice” to the transport sector. Transportation, 39(6), 1035–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, P., & Honnery, D. (2008). The prospects for global green car mobility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1717–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, C., & Marsden, G. (2016). Mobility justice in low carbon energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykvist, B., & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(9), 1373–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, D. (2004). Complexity science and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooley, C. (2016). Mobility, transport and social inclusion: Lessons from history. Social Inclusion, 4(3), 100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAC Foundation. (2006). Shopping and transport policy. London, UK: Royal Automobile Club Foundation Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering. (2011). Engineering ethics in practise: A guide for engineers. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, C. (2007). Automobility, liberalism, and the ethics of driving. Environmental Ethics, 29, 77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdie, M. (1998). The city after the automobile: An architect's vision. Boulder, USA: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., Hoogma, R., & Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system. Futures, 26(10), 1060–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2013). Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2004). Automotive emotions feeling the car. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 221–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sileghem, L., Bosteels, D., May, J., Favre, C., & Verhelst, S. (2014). Analysis of vehicle emission measurements on the new WLTC, the NEDC and the CADC. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 32, 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Exclusion Unit. (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhilber, S., Wells, P., & Thankappan, S. (2013). Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 60, 531–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, M., Banister, D., Bishop, J. D. K., & McCulloch, M. D. (2013). Simulating early adoption of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(5), 865–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). The “System” of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vergragt, P. J., & Brown, H. S. (2007). Sustainable mobility: From technological innovation to societal learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1104–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermaas, P., Kroes, P., van de Poel, I., Franssen, M., & Houkes, W. (2011). A Philosophy of technology – From technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Morgan and Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Waygood, E. O. D., & Avineri, E. (2011). Does “500 g of CO₂ for a five mile trip” mean anything? Towards more effective presentation of CO₂ information. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wesseling, J. H., Farla, J. C. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). Exploring car manufacturers' responses to technology-forcing regulation: The case of California's ZEV mandate. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., Swartling, Å. G., & Jäger, J. (2009). Participation of experts and non-experts in a sustainability assessment of mobility. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(4), 232–250.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, N. Y., & Ahuvia, A. C. (1998). Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology and Marketing, 15(5), 423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., & Egan, J. (2000). De-marketing the car. Transport Policy, 7(4), 287–294.
   Google Scholar