Preventive maintenance of road pavement with microsurfacing—an economic and sustainable strategy

References

• Abo-Hashema, M. A., & Sharaf, E. A. (2009). Development of maintenance decision model for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3(10), 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AppaRoa, G., Kumar, R., Amar, D. D., & Ryntathiang, T. L. (2013). Green road approach for the sustainable development in India. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, J., Oliveira, J., & Silva, H. (2014). The importance of the use phase on the LCA of environmentally friendly solutions for asphalt road pavements. Transport Research Part D, 32, 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, A., & Stoffels, S. M. (2007). Economic effects of microsurfacing on thermally cracked pavements. Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(3), 177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benta, A., Duarte, C., Almeida-Costa, A., Cordeiro, T., & Pereira, R. (2015). Design and performance of a warm high-modulus asphalt concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, B., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2012). 30 Years of microsurfacing: A review. ISRN Civil Engineering, 2012, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cerea, P. (2010). Preventive maintenance treatments on road pavements: Multi-approach life-cycle assessment (master's thesis). Milano, Italy: Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Polytechnic Institute of Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., Lane, B., & Kazmierowski, T. (2010). Pavement preservation: A solution for sustainability. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of TRB, Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chappat, M., & Bilal, J. (2003). The environmental road of the future: Life cycle analysis. Paris, France: Colas.
   Google Scholar
• Cuelho, E., Mokwa, R., & Akin, M. (2006). Preventive maintenance treatments of flexible pavements: A synthesis of highway practice (Report No. FHWA/MT-06-009/8117-26). Bozeman, USA: The State of Montana Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, T., Sunb, L., & Chenc, Z. (2013). Optimal strategy of pavement preventive maintenance considering life-cycle cost analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 1679–1685.
   Google Scholar
• Ducasse, K., Distin, T., & Osborne, L. (2004). The use of microsurfacing as a cost effective remedial action for surface rutting. Proceedings of 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA), Sun City, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• EN 13108-1. (2006). Bituminous mixtures – Material specifications – Part 1: Asphalt concrete. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobitume. (2011). Life cycle inventory: Bitumen. Brussels, Belgium: Eurobitume.
   Google Scholar
• Galehouse, L., Moulthrop, J. S., & Hicks, G. (2003). Principles of pavement preservation: Definitions, benefits, issues, and barriers. TR News, 228, 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, D. R. (2005). Pavement preservation definitions (reference no. HIAM-20). Washington DC, USA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Giustozzi, F., Flintsch, G. W., & Crispino, M. (2011). Environmental analysis of preventive maintenance treatments on road pavements. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Hawzheen, K. (2011). Road design for future maintenance-life-cycle cost analyses for road barriers (PhD thesis). Stockholm, Sweden: KTC Architecture and the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, R. G., Seeds, S. B., & Peshkin, D. G. (2000). Selecting a preventive maintenance treatment for flexible pavements. Washington, USA: Foundation for Pavement Preservation.
   Google Scholar
• ISSA (International Slurry Surfacing Association). (2010). Recommended performance guideline for microsurfacing (report No. A143). Annapolis, USA: International Slurry Surfacing Association.
   Google Scholar
• IVL (Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd). (2001). Life cycle assessment of road: A pilot study for inventory analysis (Report No. B 1210 E). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. J. (2001). Pavement preventive maintenance guidelines. Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control, No. 01-128, Auburm, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jawad, D., & Ozbay, K. (2006). The discount rate in life cycle analysis of transportation projects. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of TRB, Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y., Nantung, T., Tompkins, B., & Harris, D. (2013). Evaluation for microsurfacing as pavement preservation treatment. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(4), 540–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. (2000). Best practices handbook on asphalt pavement maintenance (report No. 2000-04). Minneapolis a, USA: Minnesota Technology Transfer (T2) Center/LTAP Program Center for Transportation Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kazmierowski, T. J., Bradbury, A., Hajek, J., & Jones, G. (1993). Effectiveness of high performance thin surfacings in a wet-freeze environment. Proceedings of 72nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kucharek, A. S., Davidson, J. K., Moore, T., Linton, P. (2010). Performance review of micro surfacing and slurry seal application in Canada. Victoria, Canada: Canadian Technical Asphalt Association.
   Google Scholar
• Labi, S., Hwee, K. S., Lamptey, G., & Nunoo, C. (2006). Long-term benefits of microsurfacing applications in Indiana – methodology and case study. Proceedings of 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Labi, S., Lapmtey, G., & Kong, S. (2007). Effectiveness of microsurfacing treatments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133(5), 298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamptey, G., Labi, S., & Li, Z. (2008). Decision support for optimal scheduling of highway pavement preventive maintenance within resurfacing cycle. Decision Support Systems, 46, 376–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamlouk, M. S., & Zaniewski, J. P. (1997). Pavement preventive maintenance: Description, effectiveness, and treatments. Proceedings of the Symposium on Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation and Maintenance. São Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Morian, D. A. (2011). Cost benefit analysis of including microsurfacing in pavement treatment strategies & cycle maintenance (Report No. FHWA-PA-2011-001-080503). Pennsylvania, USA: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Raza, H. (1994). Surface rehabilitation techniques: Design, construction and performance of micro-surfacing, instructor's guide. (Report No. FHWA-SA-94-072). Washington DC, USA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J., Flintsch, G., & Ferreira, A. (2017). Environmental and economic assessment of pavement construction and management practices for enhancing pavement sustainability. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 116, 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J., Ferreira, A., & Flintsch, G. (2015). A life cycle assessment model for pavement management: Road pavement construction and management in Portugal. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4(16), 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, H., Oliveira, J., Ferreira, C., & Pereira, P. (2010). Assessment of the performance of warm mix asphalts in road pavements. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3, 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Takamura, K., Lok, K. P., & Wittlinger, R. (2001). Microsurfacing for preventive maintenance: Eco-efficient strategy. Proceedings of ISSA Annual Meeting, Maui, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2000). A synthesis of highway practice (Report No. 284). National Cooperative Highway Research NCHRP Program. Washington DC, USA: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2004). Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications (Report No. 523). National Cooperative Highway Research NCHRP Program. Washington DC, USA: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• TMR (Transport and Main Roads). (2011). Cost-benefit Analysis manual – theoretical guide. Queensland, Australia: State of Queensland – Department of Transport and Main Roads.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, M., DeSombre, R. I., & Peshkin, D. G. (2001). High volume/high speed asphalt roadway preventive maintenance surface treatments (Report No. SD99-09). South Dakota, USA: South Dakota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J. III., & Smith, M. R. (1998). Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design – Interim Technical Bulletin (Report No. FHWA-SA-98-079). Washington DC, USA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Jared, D. (1998). Georgia department of transportation's experience with microsurfacing. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 1616(1), 42–46.
   Google Scholar