Proximity changes to what and for whom? Investigating sustainable accessibility change in the Gothenburg city region 1990–2014

References

• Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808–836. doi: 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amcoff, J., Möller, P., & Westholm, E. (2011). The (un)importance of the closure of village shops to rural migration patterns. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21(2), 129–143. doi: 10.1080/09593969.2011.562678
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., Malmberg, B., & Östh, J. (2012). Travel-to-school distances in Sweden 2000–2006: Changing school geography with equality implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apparicio, P., Abdelmajid, M., Riva, M., & Shearmur, R. (2008). Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(7). doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, H., Horswell, M., & Millar, P. (2012). Neighbourhood accessibility and active travel. Planning Practice & Research, 27(2), 177–201. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661636
   Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Levin, L., Abramsson, M., & Hagberg, J. E. (2014). Mobility in the transition to retirement: The intertwining of transportation and everyday projects. Journal of Transport Geography, 38, 48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussauw, K., Neutens, T., & Witlox, F. (2012). Relationship between spatial proximity and travel-to-work distance: The effect of the compact city. Regional Studies, 46(6), 687–706. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.522986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmueller, T. C., Jacobson, M., & Wold, C. (2006). How far to the hospital? The effect of hospital closures on access to care. Journal of Health Economics, 25(4), 740–761. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, T., & Stone, J. (2014). Transport disadvantage and low-income rental housing ( AHURI Positioning Paper No. 157.). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Büttner, B., Wulfhorst, G., & Evans, J. (2016). Ensuring accessibility to daily activities for different population groups with respect to sharp increases in mobility costs. In K. Geurs, R. Patuelli, & T. Ponce Dentinho (Eds.), Accessibility, equity and efficiency: Challenges for transport and public services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brotchie, J. F. (1984). Technological change and urban form. Environment and Planning A, 16(5), 583–596. doi: 10.1068/a160583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerin, E., Andrea, N., van Cauwenberg, J., & Barnett, D. (2017). The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(15). doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., Bertolini, L., & le Clercq, F. (2007). Measuring sustainable accessibility. Transportation research record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017, 16–25. doi: 10.3141/2017-03
   Google Scholar
• Church, A., Frost, M., & Sullivan, K. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy, 7(3), 195–205. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00024-X
   Google Scholar
• Curl, A., Nelson, J., & Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., Babb, C., & Olaru, D. (2015). Built environment and children's travel to school. Transport Policy, 42, 21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., & Scheurer, J. (2016). Planning for public transport accessibility: An international sourcebook. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, J., & Sipe, N. (2007). Oil vulnerability in the Australian city: Assessing socioeconomic risks from higher urban fuel prices. Urban Studies, 44(1), 37–62. doi: 10.1080/00420980601023810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84. doi: 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Google Scholar
• Falavigna, C., & Hernandez, D. (2016). Assessing inequalities on public transport affordability in two Latin American cities: Montevideo (Uruguay) and Córdoba (Argentina). Transport Policy, 45, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesel, F., & Rahn, C. (2015). Everyday life in the suburbs of Berlin: Consequences for the social participation of aged men and women. Journal of Women & Aging, 27(4), 330–351. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2014.951248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil Solá, A. (2016). Constructing work travel inequalities: The role of household gender contracts. Journal of Transport Geography, 53, 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Göteborgs stad. (2014). Strategi för utbyggnadsplanering, Göteborg 2035. Göteborg: Stadsbyggnadskontoret Göteborgs stad.
   Google Scholar
• Grasser, G., van Dyck, D., Titze, S., & Stronegger, W. (2013). Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 615–625. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0435-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grengs, J. (2012). Equity and the social distribution of job accessibility in Detroit. Environment and Planning B, 39(5), 785–800. doi: 10.1068/b36097
   Google Scholar
• Grengs, J. (2015). Nonwork accessibility as a social equity indicator. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2012.719582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers in Regional Science, 24(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x
   Google Scholar
• Hajna, S., Ross, N., Brzeau, A., Bélisle, P., Joseph, L., & Dasgupta, K. (2015). Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 15(768). doi: 10.1186/s12889-12015-12082-x
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., & Clifton, K. (2001). Evaluating neighbourhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 4(2/3), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., & Niemeier, D. (1997). Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194. doi: 10.1068/a291175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2002). Accessibility- vs. mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the U.S. Prepared for the European Conference of Ministers of Transport. May 2002. http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/handy/ECMT_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen, K. (2011). The advantage of ‘near’: Which accessibilities matter to whom? European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4), 368–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen, K., & Vilhelmson, B. (2013). The divergent role of spatial access: The changing supply and location of service amenities and service travel distance in Sweden. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsdottir, B., Wennberg, H., Svensson, H., & Ståhl, A. (2016). Implementation of accessibility policy in municipal transport planning: Progression and regression in Sweden between 2004 and 2014. Transport Policy, 49, 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helling, A. (1998). Changing intra-metropolitan accessibility in the U.S.: Evidence from Atlanta. Progress in Planning, 49(2), 55–108. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(97)00032-910.1016/S0305-9006(97)00032-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, J., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2012). Journeys to health services in Great Britain: An analysis of changing travel patterns 1985–2006. Health & Place, 18(2), 274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. R. (1971). The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an Operational Form. Regional Studies, 5, 101–107. doi: 10.1080/09595237100185131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, M. I., & Heggie, I. G. (1983). Understanding travel behaviour. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Kain, J. F. (1968). Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(2), 175–197. doi: 10.2307/1885893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollektivtrafikkommittén. (2003). Kollektivtrafik med människan i centrum: Slutbetänkande. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
   Google Scholar
• Korsu, E., & Wenglenski, S. (2010). Job accessibility, residential segregation and risk of long-term unemployment in the Paris region. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2279–2234. doi: 10.1177/0042098009357962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., & Johnson, P. (2006). Proximity to trails and retail: Effects on urban cycling and walking. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 33–42. doi: 10.1080/01944360608976722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, N. I., Story, M. T., & Nelson, M. C. (2009). Neighborhood environments: Disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(1), 74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2008). Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Building Research & Information, 36(5), 395–411. doi: 10.1080/09613210802045547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindelöw, D. (2016). Walking as a transport mode. Examining the role of preconditions, planning aspects and personal traits for the urban pedestrian (PhD thesis). Lund University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., Grosvenor, T., & Simpson, R. (2001). Transport, the environment and social exclusion. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/ York Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre, S., Macdonald, L., & Ellaway, A. (2008). Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland. Social Science & Medicine, 67(6), 900–914. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2014). Walking short distances. The socioeconomic drivers for the use of proximity in everyday mobility in Barcelona. Transportation Research Part A, 70, 210–222. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2015a). Neighbourhood vitality and physical activity among the elderly: The role of walkable environments on active ageing in Barcelona, Spain. Social Science & Medicine, 135, 24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2015b). The Walkable city and the importance of the proximity environments for Barcelona's everyday mobility. Cities, 28, 258–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquet, O., Rýos Bedoya, V., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2016). Local accessibility inequalities and willingness to walk in Latin American cities: Findings from Medellýn, Colombia. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(3), 186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, H., & Knox, P. L. (2006). Slow cities: Sustainable places in a fast world. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(4), 321–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, D. (2013). Mobility, access and choice. A new source of evidence. Journal for Transport and Land Use, 6(2), 1–4. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. (2008). The promotion of London as a ‘walkable city’ and overlapping walks of life. In R. Imrie, L. Lees, & M. Raco (Eds.), Regenerating London: Governance, sustainability and community in a global city (pp. 192–211). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milkakis, D., Cervero, R., & van Wee, B. (2015). Stay local or go regional? Urban form effects on vehicle use at different spatial scales: A theoretical concept and its application to the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(2), 59–86. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P., Salomon, I., & Singer, M. (2015). What moves us? An interdisciplinary exploration of reasons for traveling. Transport Reviews, 35(3), 250–274. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1013076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motte-Baumwol, B., Massot, M. H., & Byrd, A. (2010). Escaping car dependence in the outer suburbs of Paris. Urban Studies, 47(3), 604–619. doi: 10.1177/0042098009349773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2011). ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(1), 25–44. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v4i1.170
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2013). Residential location, transport rationales and daily-life travel behaviour: The case of Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China. Progress in Planning, 79, 1–50. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2015). The end of automobile dependence. How cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J., & Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3), 151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneland, M. (1998). Befolkningens avstånd till service: GIS-projektet tillgänglighet i svenska städer 1980 och 1995. Göteborg: Rapport – Stads- och trafikplanering, Arkitektur, Chalmers tekniska högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisionen. (2014). Primärvårdens styrning: Efter behov eller förfrågan?. Stockholm: Riksrevisionen.
   Google Scholar
• Rogalsky, J. (2010). The working poor and what GIS reveals about the possibilities of public transit. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(2), 226–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryley, T. J. (2008). The propensity for motorists to walk for short trips: Evidence from West Edinburgh. Transportation Research part A, 42(4), 620–628. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Saelens, B., Sallis, J., & Frank, L. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCB. (2013). Longitudinell integrationsdatabas för sjukförsäkrings- och arbetsmarknadsstudier (LISA) 1990–2012. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, C., Friberg, T., & Sandén, A. (2012). Re-reading time-geography from a gender perspective: Examples from gendered mobility. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 103(5), 584–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T. (2016). Geographies of transport I: Reinventing a field? Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 126–137. doi: 10.1177/0309132514565725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEU. (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. Social Exclusion Unit. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, A., Bania, N., & Leete, L. (2011). Comparative approaches to measuring food access in urban areas: The case of Portland, Oregon. Urban Studies, 48(8), 1715–1737. doi: 10.1177/0042098010375994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Stanley, J. (2014). Social exclusion and travel. In T. Gärling, D. Ettema, & M. Friman (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable travel (pp. 165–184). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stelder, D. (2014). Regional accessibility trends in Europe: Road infrastructure, 1957–2012. Regional Studies, 50(6), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.952721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockholms stad. (2015). Park- och naturtillgång i stockholms stad. Stockholm: Stockholms stad.
   Google Scholar
• Straatemeier, T. (2008). How to plan for regional accessibility? Transport Policy, 15(2), 127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M., Silva, C., & Bertolini, L. (2014). Assessing usability of accessibility instruments. COST Office: Brussels. ISBN 978-90-9028212-1.
   Google Scholar
• van Wee, B. (2016). Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wee, B., & Geurs, K. (2011). Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4), 350–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wärnhjelm, M. (2012). Hållbara inköpsresor kräver nytt tankesätt. Plan, 2012(5–6), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Westin, K., & Vilhelmson, B. (2011). Old, yet young: Travel-activity patterns among new pensioners in Sweden. Social Space, 1(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar