Multimodal travel-based multitasking during the commute: Who does what?

References

• Anable, J., & Gatersleben, B. (2005). All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 163–181. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B., & Ferrell, C. E. (2017). The influence of crime on active and sustainable travel: New geo-statistical methods and theories for understanding crime and mode choice. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 516–529. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, R. M., Malokin, A., Circella, G., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2015). Travel-based multitasking: Modeling the propensity to conduct activities while commuting. Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC. Available from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1338990
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M., Bergman, A., Lee, M., Greene, E., & Childress, S. (2015). Predicting and applying differential response rates in address-based sampling for a household travel survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2526(1), 119–125. doi:10.3141/2526-13
   Google Scholar
• Childress, S., Nichols, B., Charlton, B., & Coe, S. (2015). Using an activity-based model to explore the potential impacts of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2493(1), 99–106. doi:10.3141/2493-11
   Google Scholar
• Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Poff, L. K. (2012). A conceptual typology of multitasking behavior and polychronicity preferences. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 9(1), 59–107. doi:10.13085/eijtur.9.1.59-107
   Google Scholar
• Circella, G., Salgado, J. R., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Diana, M. (2015). The impact of activities while traveling on the subjective valuation of travel time. Presented at Northwestern University. Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://www.transportation.northwestern.edu/docs/2015/04.23.Mokhtarian.presentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2013). Travel and subjective well-being: A focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transport Reviews, 33(4), 421–442. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.815665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinno, A. (2012). paran: Horn’s test of principal components/factors (Version 1.5.1) [Software]. Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=paran
   Google Scholar
• Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2012). How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettema, D., & Verschuren, L. (2007). Multitasking and value of travel time savings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010(1), 19–25. doi:10.3141/2010-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, C., Mahmassani, H. S., & Frei, A. (2015). Making time count: Traveler activity engagement on urban transit. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 76, 58–70. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Z., Derian, A., & Zhao, J. (2015). Smart devices and travel time use by bus passengers in Vancouver, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(5), 335–347. doi:10.1080/15568318.2013.784933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, J., & Lyons, G. (2008). The gift of travel time. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(2), 81–89. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S. (2006). The ‘accessibility diary’: Discussing a new methodological approach to understand the impact of Internet use upon personal travel and activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(2), 123–134. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S. (2010). What do we mean by multitasking? Exploring the need for methodological clarification in time use research. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 7(1), 42–60. doi:10.13085/eIJTUR.7.1.42-60
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S., & Lyons, G. (2007). Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(2), 161–175. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keseru, I., Bulckaen, J., Macharis, C., Minnen, J., Gloreiux, I., & van Tienoven, T. P. (2015). Is travel time wasted? Evidence from a time use survey in Flanders, Belgium. Presented at the 14th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Old Windsor, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Keseru, I., & Macharis, C. (2018). Travel-based multitasking: Review of the empirical evidence. Transport Reviews, 38(2), 162–183. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1317048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, C. J., & Waller, M. J. (2010). Time for reflection: A critical examination of polychronicity. Human Performance, 23(2), 173–190. doi:10.1080/08959281003621703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., Jain, J., & Holley, D. (2007). The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(1), 107–120. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., Jain, J., Susilo, Y., & Atkins, S. (2013). Comparing rail passengers’ travel time use in Great Britain between 2004 and 2010. Mobilities, 8(4), 560–579. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.743221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., Jain, J., & Weir, I. (2016). Changing times – A decade of empirical insight into the experience of rail passengers in Great Britain. Journal of Transport Geography, 57, 94–104. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., & Urry, J. (2005). Travel time use in the information age. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 257–276. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malokin, A., Circella, G., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2015). How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Testing public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios. Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Available from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1336974
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Van Arem, B., & Van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 324–348. doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, G. S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Widaman, K. F. (2015). An empirical investigation of attitudes toward waiting on the part of Northern California commuters. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2(2), 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1994). Modeling the choice of telecommuting: Setting the context. Environment and Planning A, 26(5), 749–766. doi:10.1068/a260749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(8), 695–719. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00013-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, J. (1994). Scobit: An alternative estimator to logit and probit. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 230–255. doi:10.2307/2111343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmori, N., & Harata, N. (2008). How different are activities while commuting by train? A case in Tokyo. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(5), 547–561. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Judgments of travel experiences, activity envelopes, trip features and multi-tasking: A panel effects regression model specification. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 63, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.7.5) [Software]. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, A., & Zhao, J. (2016). Making the commute count: Quality of productive travel time use. Presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Mokhtarian, P. (2015). How real is a reported desire to travel for its own sake? Exploring the ‘teleportation’ concept in travel behaviour research. Transportation, 42(2), 333–345. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9546-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Price, R., Signal, L., Stanley, J., Gerring, Z., & Cumming, J. (2011). What do passengers do during travel time? Structured observations on buses and trains. Journal of Public Transportation, 14(3), 123–146. doi:10.5038/2375-0901.14.3.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, I., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1998). What happens when mobility-inclined market segments face accessibility-enhancing policies? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(3), 129–140. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00038-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A. (2017). Exploring the positive utility of travel and mode choice (doctoral dissertation). Portland State University, Portland, OR. doi:10.15760/etd.3447
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A. (in press a). How useful is travel-based multitasking? Evidence from Portland, Oregon, commuters. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. doi:10.1177/0361198118776151
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A. (in press b). Walking (and cycling) to well-being: Modal and other determinants of subjective well-being during the commute. Travel Behaviour and Society, doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A. (in press c). Discussing the “positive utilities” of autonomous vehicles: Will travellers really use their time productively? Transport Reviews, doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1470584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. A., & Goddard, T. (2016). Cycling by choice or necessity? Exploring. The gender gap in bicycling in Oregon. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2598, 110–118. doi:10.3141/2598-13
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H., & van der Waerden, P. (2008). Synchronicity of activity engagement and travel in time and space: Descriptors and correlates of field observations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2054(1), 1–9. doi:10.3141/2054-01
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS). (2015). Step it up! The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote walking and walkable communities. Office of the Surgeon General, US DHHS, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• van der Waerden, P., Timmermans, H., & van Neerven, R. (2009). Extent, nature, and covariates of multitasking of rail passengers in an urban corridor: A Dutch case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2110(1), 106–111. doi:10.3141/2110-13
   Google Scholar
• Yosritzal. (2014). An investigation into the role of technology in influencing the perception and value of travel time by rail (doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10443/2493
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Timmermans, H. (2010). Scobit-based panel analysis of multitasking behavior of public transport users. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2157(1), 46–53. doi:10.3141/2157-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar