An environmental impact comparison of disposable wood pallets and reusable steel cradles: A case study on rolled steel coils in container shipping in South Korea

References

• Basson, E. (2017). World steel in figures 2017. Brussels, Belgium: World Steel Association.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo, F., Amani, P., Cavallo, C., Cembalo, L., D'Amico, M., Del Giudice, T., … Cicia, G. (2018). The environmental benefits of changing logistics structures for fresh vegetables. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(4), 233–240. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1337834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B.-L., Chung, K.-Y., & Lee, K.-D. (2014). The impact of policy measures on promoting the modal shift from road to rail. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1423–1429. doi: 10.1007/s00779-013-0734-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B.-L., & Lee, K.-D. (2015). Comparison of disposable dunnage and reusable cradles in container shipping of steel rolled coils: A case study in South Korea. Packaging Technology and Science, 28(9), 801–809. doi: 10.1002/pts.2142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, K., Saxe, S., Roorda, M. J., & Shalaby, A. (2017). Moving freight on public transit: Best practices, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(2), 120–132. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2016.1197349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekvall, T. (1999). Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7(4), 281–294. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00149-3
   Google Scholar
• Fantozzi, F., & Buratti, C. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biomass chains: Wood pellet from short rotation coppice using data measured on a real plant. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(12), 1796–1804. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasol, C. M., Farreny, R., Gabarrell, X., & Rieradevall, J. (2008). Life cycle assessment comparison among different reuse intensities for industrial wooden containers. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(5), 421–431. doi: 10.1007/s11367-008-0005-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedkoop, M., & Spriensma, R. (2000). The eco-indicator 99—A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment—Methodology report. Amersfoort, Netherlands: Product Ecology Consultants (PRé).
   Google Scholar
• Guinée, J. B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., D., Koning, A., … de Haes, H. A. U. (2001). Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, Ministry of Housing. The Netherlands: Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) and Centre of Environmental Science-Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, A., & Schäfer, S. (2017). Comparative LCA study of different timber and mineral buildings and calculation method for substitution factors on building level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 630–642. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hapag-Lloyd Container Line (2010). Container packing. Hamburg, Germany: Hapag-Lloyd Container Line.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R., & Sadler, D. (2017). The international steel industry: restructuring, state policies, and localities. Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.kr/books?hl=ko&lr=&id=QeJBDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=steel+industry+history&ots=dnPRqY9Gpo&sig=PjXr-T-la2thPbWYyy9A0XyFM-E#v=onepage&q=steelindustryhistory&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarsson, A. F., Pestiaux, J., & Vanek, F. M. (2011). A global assessment of hydrogen for future automotive transportation: Projected energy requirements and co2emissions. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(2), 71–90. doi: 10.1080/15568310903511884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO (2006a). Environmental management –life cycle assessment- principles and framework (Vol. 14040). Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (2006b). Environmental management –life cycle assessment- requirements and guidelines (Vol. 14044). Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., & Rosenbaum, R. (2003). IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(6), 324–330. doi: 10.1007/BF02978505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaps, H. (2014). Container handbook. Berlin, Germany: GDV.
   Google Scholar
• KAS global (2011). Coil container loading manual. Retrieved from http://www.kasglobal.co.kr
   Google Scholar
• Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Tabatabaei, M., Ghanavati, H., Mohtasebi, S. S., Rahimi, V., … Karimi, K. (2017). Life cycle assessment of castor-based biorefinery: A well to wheel LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1383-y
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. W., Han, J. H., & Kwac, L. K. (2005). The development of dunnage for transportation of a steel roll coil. Key Engineering Materials, 297, 339–344. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.339
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Rahimi, M., & Newell, J. (2012). Life-cycle emissions from port electrification: A case study of cargo handling tractors at the port of Los Angeles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6(6), 321–337. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2011.606353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N. S., & Van Wee, B. (2014). Toward a better methodology for assessing CO2 emissions for intermodal and truck-only freight systems: A European case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(3), 177–201. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2011.633689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwac, L.-K., Kim, J.-Y., Kim, H.-W., Han, J.-H., & Lee, Y.-S. (2006). Stability analysis of dunnage for transportation of a steel roll coil. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 20(25n27), 3769–3774. doi: 10.1142/S0217979206040349
   Google Scholar
• Kwac, L. K., Kim, H. G., & Kim, H. W. (2007). The production and performance estimation of dunnage for transportation of a steel roll coil. Key Engineering Materials, 340, 1363–1368. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.340-341.1363
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, E., & Spencer, C. (2009). Guide to the Carriage of Steel Cargo. London, England: Standard Cargo.
   Google Scholar
• Niero, M., Di Felice, F., Ren, J., Manzardo, A., & Scipioni, A. (2014). How can a life cycle inventory parametric model streamline life cycle assessment in the wooden pallet sector? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(4), 901–918. doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0705-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, D. W., Margni, M., Amman, C., & Jolliet, O. (2005). Spatial versus non-spatial multimedia fate and exposure modeling: Insights for Western Europe. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(4), 1119–1128. doi: 10.1021/es034598x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi, M. B., & Hanaoka, S. (2015). Assessment of modal shift and emissions along a freight transport corridor between Laos and Thailand. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(3), 192–202. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2012.754972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproesser, G., Chang, Y.-J., Pittner, A., Finkbeiner, M., & Rethmeier, M. (2015). Life cycle assessment of welding technologies for thick metal plate welds. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel Recycling Institute (2013). 2013 Steel recycling rates. Pittsburg: Steel Recycling Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tupper, L. L., Chowdhury, M. A., Klotz, L., & Fries, R. N. (2012). Measuring sustainability: How traffic incident management through intelligent transportation systems has greater energy and environmental benefits than common construction-phase strategies for “green” roadways. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6(5), 282–297. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2011.597910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK P&I Club (2014). Carefully to Carry. Carriage of Steel. Thomas Miller P&I Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Weidema, B. P., & Wesnaes, M. S. (1996). Data quality management for life cycle inventories-an example of using data quality indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 4(3–4), 167–174. (96)00043-1 doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1
   Google Scholar