Modeling the households’ satisfaction level with the first electric vehicle and the time until the purchase of the second electric vehicle

References

• Anastasopoulos, P. C., & Mannering, F. L. (2011). An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 1140–1147. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P. C., Haddock, J. E., Karlaftis, M. G., & F. L. Mannering, F. L. (2012). Analysis of urban travel times: Hazard-based approach to random parameters. Transportation Research Record, 2302(1), 121–129. ‏ https://doi.org/10.3141/2302-13
   Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., & Mannering, F. L. (2017). The effect of passengers on driver-injury severities in single-vehicle crashes: A random parameters heterogeneity-in-means approach. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 14, 41–53. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, N., Jarvis, D., & Jones, A. (2018). Analyzing the take up of battery electric vehicles: An investigation of barriers amongst drivers in the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggs, A. M., Arvin, R., & Khattak, A. J. (2020). Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 136, 105406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‏Chu, W., Im, M., Song, M. R., & Park, J. (2019). Psychological and behavioral factors affecting electric vehicle adoption and satisfaction: A comparative study of early adopters in China and Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 1–18. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., & Melia, S. (2016). Changes in level of household car ownership: The role of life events and spatial context. Transportation, 43(4), 565–599. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9589-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., Melia, S., Knies, G., & Laurie, H. (2014). Life events and travel behaviour: Exploring the inter-relationship using the UK household longitudinal study. Transportation Research Record, 2413(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2413-06
   Google Scholar
• Dimitropoulos, A., Rietveld, P., & Van Ommeren, J. N. (2013). Consumer valuation of changes in driving range: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 55, 27–45. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, C. S., Khattak, A. J., & Council, F. M. (1998). Applying the ordered probit model to injury severity in truck-passenger car rear-end collisions. Transportation Research Record, 1635(1), 63–71. ‏ https://doi.org/10.3141/1635-09
   Google Scholar
• Eker, U., Fountas, G., & Anastasopoulos, P. C. (2020). An exploratory empirical analysis of willingness to pay for and use flying cars. Aerospace Science and Technology, 104, 105993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas, G., Anastasopoulos, P. C., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2018). Analysis of accident injury-severities using a correlated random parameters ordered probit approach with time variant covariates. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 18, 57–68. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, T., Günther, M., Trantow, M., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Does this range suit me? Range satisfaction of battery electric vehicle users. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 191–199. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2016). NLOGIT version 6.0. Econometric. Software Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, G., Feng, T., Yang, D., & Timmermans, H. (2021). Modeling dynamics in household car ownership over life courses: A latent class competing risks model. Transportation, 48(2), 809–821. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10078-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, M. M., & Abdelwahab, W. (1996). Effect of government policies and vehicle marketing strategies on household vehicle demand and fuel consumption. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(3), 587–587. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, M. M., & Al-Eideh, B. (2018). Modelling the demand for electric vehicles. European Journal of Social Sciences, 56(4), 364–382.
   Google Scholar
• Hamed, M. M., & Al-Eideh, B. (2020). An exploratory analysis of traffic accidents and vehicle ownership decisions using a random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 25, 100116. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2020.100116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, M. M., & Easa, S. (1998a). Integrated modeling of urban shopping activities. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 124(3), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1998)124:3(115)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, M. M., & Easa, S. (1998b). Ordered probability modeling of seat belt usage. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 124(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:3(271)
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. N., & Zhao, X. (2007). A zero-inflated ordered probit model, with an application to modelling tobacco consumption. Journal of Econometrics, 141(2), 1073–1099. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haustein, S., & Jensen, A. F. (2018). Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1398790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higueras-Castillo, E., Guillén, A., Herrera, L.-J., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2021). Adoption of electric vehicles: Which factors are really important? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(10), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1818330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, N., Gnann, T., Plötz, P., Sprei, F., & Karlsson, S. (2016). Are multi-car households better suited for battery electric vehicles? – Driving patterns and economics in Sweden and Germany. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 65, 1–15. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F., & Mabit, S. L. (2017). The use of electric vehicles: A case study on adding an electric car to a household. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 89–99. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, S. (2017). What are the value and implications of two-car households for the electric car? Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 81, 1–17. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., & Kockelman, K. M. (2012). Predicting the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles using multiday GPS data. Energy Policy, 46, 225–233. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, A. J., & Wali, B. (2017). Analysis of volatility in driving regimes extracted from basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 84, 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, Y., Son, S., & Jang, K. (2020). User satisfaction with battery electric vehicles in South Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 82, 102306. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbroek, J. H., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2017). Electric vehicle users and their travel patterns in Greater Stockholm. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 98–111. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévay, P. Z., Drossinos, Y., & Thiel, C. (2017). The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy, 105, 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering, F. (2018). Temporal instability and the analysis of highway accident data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 17, 1–13. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering, F. L., Shankar, V., & Bhat, C. R. (2016). Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 11, 1–16. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering, F., & Winston, C. (1985). A dynamic empirical analysis of household vehicle ownership and utilization. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(2), 215–236. ‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/2555411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4(1), 103–120. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1975.9989847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, N., Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Pinjari, A. R., & Mannering, F. (2019). Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13 (2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1443178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A. S. (2020). A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the master's degree of Science at the German Jordanian University in the field of Environmental and Renewable Energy Engineering. Modeling Electric Vehicle Ownership and Utilization.
   Google Scholar
• Nazari, F., Mohammadian, A., & Stephens, T. (2018). Dynamic household vehicle decision modeling considering plug-In electric vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2672(49), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118796925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, K., Tate, J., Wadud, Z., & Nellthorp, J. (2018). Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan. Applied Energy, 209, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, J. L. (2016). Paving the way for future transportation infrastructure. In J. L. Schofer & H. S. Mahmassani (Eds.), MOBILITY 2050 A vision for transportation infrastructure. Prepared for the Association of Equipment Manufacturers by the Transportation Center, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• ‏Sovacool, B. K., Abrahams, W., Zhang, L., & Ren, J. (2019). Pleasure or profit? Surveying the purchasing intentions of potential electric vehicle adopters in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X. H., Yamamoto, T., & Morikawa, T. (2016). Fast-charging station choice behavior among battery electric vehicle users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamor, M. A., & Milačić, M. (2015). Electric vehicles in multi-vehicle households. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 56, 52–60. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassileva, I., & Campillo, J. (2017). Adoption barriers for electric vehicles: Experiences from early adopters in Sweden. Energy, 120, 632–641. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrkljan, B. H., & Anaby, D. (2011). What vehicle features are considered important when buying an automobile? An examination of driver preferences by age and gender. Journal of Safety Research, 42(1), 61–65. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali, B., Khattak, A. J., & Khattak, A. J. (2018a). A heterogeneity based case-control analysis of motorcyclist's injury crashes: Evidence from motorcycle crash causation study. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 119, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali, B., Khattak, A., Waters, J., Chimba, D., & Li, X. (2018b). Development of safety performance functions for Tennessee: Unobserved heterogeneity & functional form analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2672(30), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118767409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, S., Karlaftis, M. G., Mannering, F., & Anastasopoulos, P. (2020). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. CRC Press. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Wu, G., Inderbitzin, A., & Bening, C. (2015). Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: A probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments. Energy Policy, 80, 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar